A hyperpolarizing neuron recruits undocked innexin hemichannels to transmit neural information in Caenorhabditis elegans
Edited by Aravinthan D. Samuel, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; received April 4, 2024; accepted April 19, 2024 by Editorial Board Member Jeremy Nathans
Significance
Neurotransmitter release is known to be triggered by depolarization of the neuronal membrane, while hyperpolarization is regarded as a resting state of chemical neurotransmission. In this study, we show that hyperpolarizing neurons employ innexin hemichannels to actively signal neural information. We find that UNC-7, a member of the innexin family in Caenorhabditis elegans, functions as a hemichannel in thermosensory neurons and transmits temperature information in response to signals that hyperpolarize the thermosensory neurons. UNC-7 is essential for the control of thermotaxis behavior and functions independently of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Our findings suggest that innexin hemichannels mediate neurotransmission from hyperpolarizing neurons in a manner that is distinct from the synaptic transmission, expanding the way of neural circuitry operations.
Abstract
While depolarization of the neuronal membrane is known to evoke the neurotransmitter release from synaptic vesicles, hyperpolarization is regarded as a resting state of chemical neurotransmission. Here, we report that hyperpolarizing neurons can actively signal neural information by employing undocked hemichannels. We show that UNC-7, a member of the innexin family in Caenorhabditis elegans, functions as a hemichannel in thermosensory neurons and transmits temperature information from the thermosensory neurons to their postsynaptic interneurons. By monitoring neural activities in freely behaving animals, we find that hyperpolarizing thermosensory neurons inhibit the activity of the interneurons and that UNC-7 hemichannels regulate this process. UNC-7 is required to control thermotaxis behavior and functions independently of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Our findings suggest that innexin hemichannels mediate neurotransmission from hyperpolarizing neurons in a manner that is distinct from the synaptic transmission, expanding the way of neural circuitry operations.
Sign up for PNAS alerts.
Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited.
Neurotransmission is a primary means of neural communication and plays an essential role in the generation of animal behaviors. A common form of neural communication is chemical synaptic transmission (1, 2), in which the neurotransmitters are released upon membrane depolarization through synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Neural communication is also mediated by electrical synapses, also known as gap junctions (3, 4). The core proteins of gap junctions, connexins in vertebrates and innexins in invertebrates (5, 6), form undocked membrane channels, hemichannels, which on their own can promote the passage of small molecules between the cytosol and extracellular space (7, 8). Gap junction channels are assembled by docking of two opposing hemichannels from adjacent cells, thereby connecting the cytoplasms of adjacent neurons and enabling electrical coupling that can mediate neuronal synchrony (3, 4). For instance, gap junctions synchronize neuronal activities in the inferior olivary nucleus through propagating depolarizing spikes (9, 10).
In addition to depolarization, electrical synapses are also reported to spread hyperpolarizing potentials. In the Golgi neurons of the mammalian cerebellum, gap junctions composed of connexins were shown to facilitate the propagation of hyperpolarization after a brief depolarizing current (11, 12). In the Caenorhabditis elegans motor circuit, hyperpolarizing current flow delivered by gap junctions composed of innexins is shown to be important for the coordination of animal movements (13) and the duration (14) of forward locomotion. These observations imply that hyperpolarizing neurons might also be engaged in controlling the dynamics of neural circuitry. However, the mechanisms underlying neurotransmission from hyperpolarizing neurons and their roles in animal behaviors have remained largely unexplored.
The C. elegans thermotaxis (TTX) behavior provides an effective model in which to address the mechanisms of neurotransmission from hyperpolarizing neurons. The temperature preference of C. elegans is plastic and is determined by the past experience: The animals prefer the temperature at which they have been previously cultivated in the presence of food (15). When placed on a temperature gradient, the animals migrate toward the cultivation temperature (16–18). In light of the complete knowledge of the C. elegans connectome composed of only 302 neurons (19, 20), the neural circuitry regulating TTX has been extensively studied (16, 21, 22). Central to this circuit is the AFD (Amphid Finger-like Endings D) thermosensory neuron essential for temperature sensing (16). In response to warming stimuli, the AFD thermosensory neuron depolarizes and increases its intracellular calcium concentration (17, 23–27). The depolarized AFD neurons control the activity of their postsynaptic partner, the AIY (Anterior Interneuron Y) interneuron (21, 28, 29). Regulation of the AIY activity by AFD is bidirectional, and the AIY response represents stimulus valence (30, 31): AIY is excited in response to warming stimulus with the positive valence where the temperature is increased toward the cultivation temperature, while the AIY activity is inhibited upon warming above the cultivation temperature (31).
By contrast, very little is known about how the AFD neurons transmit neuronal outputs in response to cooling stimuli. Previous studies demonstrated that cooling stimuli hyperpolarized the AFD membrane potentials (25) and that the AFD neuron is indispensable for the behavioral control upon temperature cooling (17, 18). However, how the hyperpolarized AFD neurons transmit neural information and control the neural circuitry to generate appropriate behaviors remains elusive.
In this study, we identify unc-7, which encodes an innexin protein, as a regulator for TTX and show that UNC-7 can act as both a hemichannel and a gap junction in AFD to transmit temperature information to the AIY interneurons. The UNC-7 hemichannels regulate AIY neuronal activity upon membrane hyperpolarization of the AFD neuron. Intriguingly, UNC-7 controls TTX in parallel to the chemical transmission from AFD. Our findings suggest that hyperpolarized neurons can actively transmit neural information by employing innexin hemichannels that function independently of synaptic vesicle exocytosis.
Results
UNC-7 Acts in the AFD Thermosensory Neurons to Regulate the C. elegans TTX.
We have previously shown that inx-4, a member of innexins, functions in the AFD thermosensory neurons to regulate TTX (32). In this study, we conducted a genome-wide survey of innexins, aiming to reveal the roles of the innexin family genes in the control of TTX (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2). Of the 24 remaining innexin genes present in the C. elegans genome, we focused on the genes that are dispensable for viability and locomotion and are expressed in the nervous system (33–36). We examined the TTX behaviors of mutants for such innexin genes and found that all innexin mutants examined displayed the wild-type TTX phenotype (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). We also assessed the effect of AFD-specific overexpression of the innexin genes. Seven innexin genes—inx-1, inx-2, inx-4, inx-7, inx-10, inx-19, and unc-7—were reported to be expressed in AFD of the wild-type animals (37). We overexpressed each of these genes in AFD and observed that overexpression of unc-7 caused a thermophilic phenotype (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2). While the wild-type animals cultivated at 20 °C stayed around the cultivation temperature, animals overexpressing unc-7 in AFD migrated toward a temperature region higher than the cultivation temperature (Fig. 1B). By contrast, animals overexpressing other innexin genes in AFD did not show abnormality in TTX (SI Appendix, Fig. S2).
Fig. 1.

Mutants harboring a presumptive null allele of unc-7, unc-7(e5), were uncoordinated (33), and hence, we could not test their TTX behavior. To address whether a loss of unc-7 function affects TTX, we attempted to generate strains lacking unc-7 only in AFD using the Cre/loxP system. We inserted two loxP sequences into the unc-7 locus and crossed with this unc-7(nj300) animal a strain carrying a single-copy insertion of the Cre gene fused with the AFD-specific gcy-8L promoter (Fig. 1C). This strain, hereafter referred to as unc-7(AFD KO) animals, displayed a cryophilic defect and migrated toward a lower temperature region than the wild-type animals did (Fig. 1D). Strains carrying unc-7(nj300) or the gcy-8Lp::Cre insertion alone did not show abnormality in TTX. The TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) animals was rescued by expressing unc-7 specifically in AFD (Fig. 1E). These results indicate that UNC-7 functions in AFD to regulate TTX.
UNC-7 Is Required Later than the Larval Stage to Regulate TTX.
A previous study showed that UNC-7 is required for presynaptic differentiation during synaptogenesis (38). This observation suggests that the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) animals could be attributable to abnormalities of synaptogenesis of AFD. To assess whether UNC-7 is required for the development of the AFD thermosensory neurons, we examined the critical period of UNC-7 for the regulation of TTX by the Auxin Induced Degradation (AID) system (39). We expressed TIR1 in AFD of animals in which unc-7 was tagged with a degron sequence. While the animals cultivated with auxin throughout the development showed cryophilic defects, the animals cultivated without auxin did not show abnormality in TTX (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A and B), indicating that the AID system successfully knocked down the UNC-7 activity. When the animals that had been cultivated in the absence of auxin for 2 d, at which most animals had grown to the second or third larval stage, were transferred onto plates with auxin, they displayed a cryophilic defect (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 C and D). Conversely, the animals treated with auxin only for the first 2 d of their development did not exhibit TTX defects. These results indicated that the activity of UNC-7 in AFD is required at or later than the third larval stage, the period at which AFD has connected to the majority of its postsynaptic neurons (40), suggesting that UNC-7 is required to function in the mature AFD neuron.
Cysteine Mutants of UNC-7 Failed to Localize to the AFD Axonal Region.
Innexins form two types of channels, gap junction channels and undocked hemichannels (41–43). To address whether UNC-7 acts as a gap junction channel or a hemichannel for the regulation of TTX, we utilized the cysteine mutants of UNC-7, UNC-7(Cysless; C173A, C191A, C377A, and C394A), and UNC-7(C191A). These cysteine residues were previously reported to be essential for the formation of gap junctions but were dispensable for hemichannel activity (44). We therefore asked whether the expression of unc-7(Cysless) or unc-7(C191A) in AFD could rescue the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO). However, we observed that these mutants of UNC-7 failed to localize to the axonal region of AFD unlike the wild-type UNC-7, and that the expression of these mutant unc-7 genes did not rescue the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). These observations suggested that the cysteine residues are required for the transport of UNC-7 in the AFD sensory neurons. Since the cysteine mutants of UNC-7 were reported to localize in the neuronal processes of the ventral nerve cord (44), UNC-7 might be transported by distinct mechanisms depending on the neuronal subtypes.
We also attempted to utilize another mutant form of unc-7, UNC-7(M121L) (45). A previous study showed that the gap junction activity of UNC-7 was required for the regulation of locomotion and that certain genomic constructs of UNC-7(M121L) did not rescue the locomotory defect of unc-7(e5), while others did, depending on the promoters used to drive unc-7(M121L) (45). We found that when an unc-7(M121L) cDNA fused with an AFD-specific promoter was introduced into unc-7(AFD KO) animals via an extrachromosomal array or a single-copy insertion, the animals no longer showed abnormality in TTX (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). However, our subsequent analysis indicated that the cDNA form of UNC-7(M121L) we used might retain some activity to form gap junctions (see below). These observations suggested that neither the cysteine mutant of UNC-7 nor UNC-7(M121L) could be utilized to address whether UNC-7 functions as a gap junction or a hemichannel to regulate TTX.
UNC-7 Acts as a Hemichannel to Regulate TTX.
To address the type of channel that UNC-7 functions during TTX, we attempted to design a form of UNC-7 that would lose the ability to form gap junctions but retain the hemichannel activity. Since previous structural studies suggested that the formation of a gap junction is mediated through the interaction between the second extracellular loops (EL2) of the opposing hemichannels (46), we generated a chimeric form of UNC-7 whose coding sequence for the EL2 was replaced by that of mouse pannexin 1 (mPANX1), which belongs to the family of pannexin, the functional homolog of innexins (47–49) (Fig. 2A). The AFD-specific expression of this chimeric UNC-7 rescued the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) animals, indicating that the activity of the chimeric UNC-7 is sufficient for regulating the TTX (Fig. 2B). By contrast, expression of a full-length mPANX1 specifically in AFD did not rescue the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) (SI Appendix, Fig. S6).
Fig. 2.

To assess whether the chimeric UNC-7 retains hemichannel activity, we expressed the chimeric UNC-7 in Xenopus oocyte and confirmed that the chimeric UNC-7 exhibited voltage-dependent hemichannel currents comparable to that observed by the wild-type UNC-7 (Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Fig. S7). To test whether the chimeric UNC-7 displays the gap junction activity, we asked whether the chimeric UNC-7 rescues the locomotion defect of unc-7(e5) mutants. The locomotory defect of unc-7(e5) animals is manifested in the uncoordinated propagation of the body-bending waves (13). To characterize the locomotion defect, we conducted curvature analyses of the animal posture during the locomotion (Fig. 2 D and E and SI Appendix, Fig. S8) and quantified the propagation of the body bends (Fig. 2F and SI Appendix, Fig. S9). These analyses captured the propagation of the body bends from the head to the tail in the wild-type animals but not in unc-7(e5) mutants (Fig. 2 E and F, SI Appendix, Figs. S8 A and B and S9 A and C, and Movies S1 and S2). We observed that the panneuronal expression of the wild-type UNC-7 restored to unc-7(e5) animals the continuous body-bending waves during forward movement (Fig. 2 E and F, SI Appendix, Figs. S8C and S9 A and C, and Movie S3), whereas the panneuronal expression of the chimeric UNC-7 could not (Fig. 2 E and F, SI Appendix, Figs. S8 D and E and S9 A and C, and Movies S4 and S5). To exclude the possibility that the lack of the rescuing activity of the chimeric UNC-7 is due to the absence of a functional copy of the chimeric UNC-7 in the extrachromosomal arrays, we transferred these arrays to an unc-7(AFD KO) background and confirmed that these transgenes rescued the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) animals (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). These results indicate that the chimeric UNC-7 can not rescue the locomotion defects of unc-7(e5) and suggest that the chimeric UNC-7 can not form a gap junction in the locomotory circuit. We also observed that the chimeric UNC-7 loses the gap junction activity in AFD (see below). Together, these results indicated that the chimeric UNC-7 loses the ability to form gap junctions but retains the hemichannel activity and suggested that the hemichannel activity of UNC-7 in AFD is sufficient to regulate TTX.
Movie S1.
Movement of a wild-type animal.
Movie S2.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal.
Movie S3.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses the wild-type UNC-7.
Movie S4.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses the chimeric UNC-7 (line#1).
Movie S5.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses the chimeric UNC-7 (line#2).
In addition, we assessed whether the panneuronal expression of UNC-7(M121L) could rescue the locomotion defect of unc-7(e5). We found that introduction of UNC-7(M121L) restored the propagation of body bending waves to unc-7(e5) animals (SI Appendix, Figs. S8F and S9A and Movie S6), suggesting that UNC-7(M121L) retains the ability to form gap junctions in the locomotory circuit.
Movie S6.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses UNC-7(M121L).
UNC-7 Functions Downstream of Calcium Influx in AFD.
A previous report indicated that the UNC-7 hemichannel is required for the sensory transduction of mechanosensation in C. elegans (50). Given this report, we assessed whether UNC-7 regulates temperature sensing in the AFD thermosensory neurons. The AFD neurons were previously shown to increase their calcium concentration in response to temperature warming, and this calcium response occurs around the cultivation temperature (23–27). We therefore monitored calcium dynamics of AFD in wild-type, unc-7(e5) and unc-7(AFD KO) animals and found that the calcium response of AFD was normal in unc-7 mutants (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). We did not detect significant differences in the maximum value of ratio change or response temperature of AFD between wild-type animals and unc-7 mutants (SI Appendix, Fig. S11 C and D). These results indicated that unc-7 is not required for the temperature-evoked calcium response in AFD and suggested that UNC-7 regulates a process downstream of calcium influx in AFD.
UNC-7 Transmits Temperature Information to the AIY Interneuron.
To identify neurons to which UNC-7 transmits temperature information from AFD, we conducted single-cell ablation experiments by using reconstituted caspases (18, 51). We individually ablated a subset of the neurons reported to be chemical or electrical synapse partners of AFD (20) and asked which neurons, when ablated, could suppress the effect of the AFD-specific overexpression of UNC-7. We observed that while overexpression of unc-7 affected TTX behaviors of animals lacking AIB (Anterior Interneuron B), AIZ (Anterior Interneuron Z), AVE (Anterior Ventral Process E), or AWC (Amphid Wing Neuron C), the ablation of the AIY interneuron or the RMD (Ring Motor Neuron D) motor neuron suppressed the defect caused by the unc-7 overexpression (Fig. 3). These results suggested that UNC-7 transmits temperature information to the AIY and RMD neurons. Since the AIY interneurons have been shown to play pivotal roles in TTX (16, 18, 52), we focused on the neural pathway between AFD and AIY and further investigated the mechanisms of the behavioral regulation by UNC-7 hemichannels. We note that the RMD head motor neurons (19) were previously implicated in TTX (18), implying the possibility that the temperature information transmitted to RMD via UNC-7 might also be important for the navigation toward cultivated temperature.
Fig. 3.

UNC-7 Regulates Curving Bias by Transmitting Temperature Information to AIY.
Previous studies showed that multiple behavioral components such as turns, reversals, and curves are important for the regulations of TTX behavior. Many of these behavioral components are regulated by the AFD-AIY neural pathway, and each of the behavioral components contributes to TTX to a different degree (17, 18). To address which behavioral components are regulated by UNC-7, we performed high-resolution behavioral analysis using the Multi Worm Tracking (MWT) system (18, 31, 53) (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Figs. S12 and S13). We cultivated animals at 20 °C and monitored their behaviors within the temperature range from 18.5 °C to 21.5 °C (Fig. 4A). Consistent with previous reports (18, 31), we observed that wild-type animals displayed curving bias toward warmer temperature when moving down the thermal gradient and curved toward colder temperature when moving up the thermal gradient. This bidirectional curving bias presumably drives the animals toward the cultivation temperature. unc-7(AFD KO) animals showed defects in the regulation of curve and, in particular, displayed lower curving bias than that of the wild-type animals when moving down the thermal gradient (Fig. 4 B–D). This curving defect of unc-7(AFD KO) was rescued by expressing the wild-type or the chimeric UNC-7 in AFD. These results suggested that UNC-7 hemichannels promote the curving bias toward warmer temperature when animals are moving down the temperature gradient away from the cultivation temperature, thereby promoting migration toward the cultivation temperature. We did not observe significant defects attributable to the loss of unc-7 in other behavioral components examined, including omega turn, reversal, shallow turn, or speed (SI Appendix, Fig. S12).
Fig. 4.

To ask whether the regulation of the curving bias by UNC-7 involves the AIY interneuron, we analyzed behavioral components of the AIY-ablated animals (Fig. 4 E–G and SI Appendix, Fig. S13). We found that the AIY-ablated animals showed the opposite curving bias to that observed in the wild type: They curved toward colder temperature when moving down the thermal gradient and toward warmer temperature when moving up the thermal gradient (Fig. 4E). Importantly, the curving bias of the AIY-ablated animals when moving down the thermal gradient was not affected by unc-7(AFD KO) (Fig. 4G). Together, these results indicate that UNC-7 regulates curving bias through the AIY interneuron while animals are moving toward colder temperature and suggest that UNC-7 mediates transmission of temperature information from AFD to AIY.
We also note that unc-7(AFD KO) appeared to slightly affect the curving bias of the AIY-ablated background when animals moved up the thermal gradient, especially in the entry direction around 45° (Fig. 4E), This result implied that UNC-7 might transmit temperature information to neurons besides AIY.
UNC-7 Hemichannels Inhibit the Activity of the AIY Neuron upon Cooling Stimuli.
To assess whether UNC-7 regulates the neuronal activity of the AIY interneuron, we analyzed calcium dynamics of AFD and AIY in freely behaving animals using the microscope with an automated tracking system (Fig. 5). Since our behavioral component analysis suggested that UNC-7 transmits temperature information from AFD to AIY when animals were migrating down the temperature gradient, we subjected the animals to a cooling stimulus, where the temperature was decreasing away from the cultivation temperature: 20 °C (Fig. 5B). We observed that in response to this cooling stimulus, the wild-type AFD neurons showed decreases in the calcium concentration (Fig. 5C). This observation is consistent with the previous report that cooling hyperpolarizes the AFD neurons (25). We also found that the majority of the AIY neurons of the wild-type animals responded to the cooling stimulus by decreasing the calcium concentration. This result corresponds to our previous report that the AIY responses correlate with the valence of thermal stimuli, with stimuli associated with positive valence evoking excitatory responses and stimuli with negative valence inhibitory responses (31). When unc-7(AFD KO) animals were subjected to cooling stimuli, the activity of AFD was decreased similarly to those observed in the wild-type animals (Fig. 5C). By contrast, decreases in the AIY calcium concentration were attenuated in unc-7(AFD KO) animals when compared to those in the wild-type animals (Fig. 5 C and D). We found that the proportion of the fluorescent changes below the median value of the wild-type responses was significantly lower in unc-7(AFD KO) animals (Fig. 5D). This defect was rescued by AFD-specific expression of the wild-type UNC-7 (Fig. 5 C and D) or of the chimeric UNC-7 (Fig. 5 E and F). We also monitored the neuronal activities in animals subjected to warming stimuli and found that unc-7(AFD KO) did not affect the AIY activity upon warming (SI Appendix, Fig. S14). These results indicated that the hyperpolarizing AFD neuron inhibits the activity of the AIY neuron in response to cooling stimuli and that UNC-7 hemichannels regulate this process.
Fig. 5.

Chimeric UNC-7 Loses the Ability to Form Gap Junctions in AFD.
In the above rescue experiments for the TTX defect of unc-7(AFD KO) animals, expression of the chimeric UNC-7 in AFD rescued the defect properly (Fig. 2B), whereas that of the wild-type UNC-7 resulted in a weak thermophilic phenotype (Fig. 1E). We also tested the effects of these UNC-7 transgenes in a wild-type genetic background and found that the wild-type UNC-7 caused a thermophilic defect while the chimeric UNC-7 did not (Fig. 6A). These results led us to hypothesize that the thermophilic defect caused by the AFD-specific overexpression of the wild-type UNC-7 was brought by excessive activity of the gap junction. Because our cell-ablation analysis also indicated that the effect of the wild-type UNC-7 overexpression is mediated by the AIY interneuron (Fig. 3C), we examined whether innexins expressed in AIY are required for the effect of the UNC-7 overexpression in AFD. We tested mutants for a subset of the innexin genes expressed in AIY, inx-1, inx-2, inx-19, and unc-9, and injected into these mutants a plasmid that expresses the wild-type UNC-7 in AFD. Animals mutant for unc-9 display an uncoordinated phenotype (33), which precludes us from analyzing their TTX behaviors. We therefore constructed animals lacking unc-9 specifically in AIY by the Cre/loxP system. These animals, hereafter referred to as unc-9(AIY KO), displayed a normal TTX behavior (SI Appendix, Fig. S15A). We observed that an AFD overexpression of the wild-type UNC-7 in inx-1, inx-2, and inx-19 mutants caused thermophilic phenotypes (SI Appendix, Fig. S15 B–D). By contrast, introduction of the UNC-7 construct into unc-9(AIY KO) animals did not cause a thermophilic behavior. Instead, unc-9(AIY KO) animals overexpressing the wild-type UNC-7 displayed a weak cryophilic phenotype (Fig. 6B). To exclude the possibility that unc-9(AIY KO) animals generated an unusual UNC-7 transgene, we transferred into unc-9(AIY KO) animals another unc-7 transgene that had rendered the wild-type animals a thermophilic defect (Fig. 3) and found that unc-9(AIY KO) animals carrying this transgene displayed cryophilc behaviors (SI Appendix, Fig. S15 E and F). These observations suggest that the wild-type UNC-7, when overexpressed in AFD, can form excessive gap junctions with UNC-9 in AIY and alter the TTX behavior. That the overexpression of the chimeric UNC-7 did not alter TTX indicates that the chimeric UNC-7 loses the ability to form gap junctions in AFD.
Fig. 6.

To further corroborate this finding, we evaluated the effect of UNC-7 overexpression on the neural activity of AIY (Fig. 6 C and D). We observed that the wild-type animals overexpressing the wild-type UNC-7 in AFD showed a stronger inhibition of the AIY activity upon cooling stimulus compared to their control animals without the UNC-7 overexpression. This inhibitory effect on the AIY activity was abolished in the chimeric UNC-7. Furthermore, unc-9(AIY KO) mutation completely suppressed the inhibition of the AIY activity mediated by the wild-type UNC-7 overexpression (Fig. 6 E and F). These results indicated that the wild-type UNC-7, when overexpressed in AFD, can form gap junctions with UNC-9 in AIY and that the chimeric UNC-7 loses the ability to form gap junctions in AFD. Together, these results strongly support that the hemichannel activity of UNC-7 in AFD is sufficient for the regulation of TTX.
Since the AIY responses in unc-9(AIY KO) animals expressing the wild-type UNC-7 were indistinguishable from those of the wild-type animals without UNC-7 overexpression, the cryophilic phenotype caused by the overexpression of UNC-7 in unc-9(AIY KO) animals might be due to excessive or ectopic gap junctions between AFD and neurons other than AIY.
Additionally, we observed that the AFD-specific overexpression of UNC-7(M121L) in a wild-type genetic background did not cause a thermophilic defect (Fig. 6A). We also evaluated the effect of UNC-7(M121L) overexpression on the neuronal activity of AIY (SI Appendix, Fig. S16 and Fig. 6 C and D). The AFD-specific expression of UNC-7(M121L) rescued the defects of the AIY response in unc-7(AFD KO) animals (SI Appendix, Fig. S16). We also observed that this transgene, when introduced into a wild-type background, caused a stronger inhibition of the AIY neuronal activity compared to the animals without the transgene, but the extent of the inhibitory effect by UNC-7(M121L) was smaller than that caused by the wild-type UNC-7 (Fig. 6 C and D). Together, these results suggest that the gap-junction activity of UNC-7(M121L) in AFD might be partially compromised.
UNC-7 Regulates TTX Independently of Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis.
We next address whether inhibition of the AIY activity by UNC-7 is mediated by controlling the synaptic transmission from AFD. The AFD-AIY synaptic transmission was shown to be brought about by two kinds of neurotransmitters, neuropeptides for excitatory signaling and glutamates for inhibitory signaling (28, 29). The glutamatergic transmission from AFD requires eat-4, which encodes a vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT) that transports glutamates into synaptic vesicles (29, 54). To assess whether UNC-7 functions through controlling synaptic release of glutamates, we conducted the epistasis analysis between unc-7 and eat-4. We generated animals lacking eat-4 specifically in AFD by the Cre/loxP system and found that eat-4(AFD KO) animals displayed thermophilic defects (SI Appendix, Fig. S17A), indicating that EAT-4 acts in AFD to regulate TTX behavior. Importantly, the unc-7(AFD KO) mutation affected TTX in animals lacking eat-4 in AFD (Fig. 7A). These results indicated that UNC-7 acts in parallel to EAT-4 to regulate TTX.
Fig. 7.

We also tested the possibility that UNC-7 is involved in the peptidergic signaling within AFD. Previous studies indicated that unc-31, which encodes the calcium-dependent activator protein essential for secreting neuropeptides, is required for the peptidergic signaling between AFD and AIY (28, 55). We tested the epistasis between unc-7 and unc-31 and found that while unc-31(AFD KO) did not display a TTX defect (SI Appendix, Fig. S17B), animals lacking both unc-7 and unc-31 showed a cryophilic phenotype stronger than that of unc-7(AFD KO) or unc-31(AFD KO) animals (Fig. 7B). These results suggested that UNC-31 plays at least a minor role in AFD to regulate TTX and that UNC-7 acts in parallel to UNC-31. Furthermore, we examined TTX behaviors of single mutants for a panel of the neuropeptide genes that are expressed in AFD (56, 57) and found that none of the mutants tested displayed a TTX defect (SI Appendix, Fig. S18). These results implied that UNC-7 functions to regulate TTX independently of the synaptic vesicle exocytosis.
Discussion
In this study, we report that the AFD sensory neurons inhibit the activity of the AIY interneurons while animals are subjected to cooling stimuli and that UNC-7 can function as both hemichannels and gap junctions in AFD to regulate this process. Since our imaging results and the previous study indicate that cooling stimuli hyperpolarize the AFD neuron (25), these results suggest that the hyperpolarizing AFD neurons recruit UNC-7 to down-regulate the AIY activity.
Our results uncovered the roles of innexin hemichannels in promoting neurotransmission from hyperpolarized cells. Previously, gap junctions have been shown to mediate the propagation of hyperpolarization from one cell to the next. For example, in mammals, hyperpolarizing current spreads directly from the endothelial cells to the smooth muscle cells via myoendothelial gap junctions composed of connexins (58, 59). In the mammalian cerebellum, gap junctions composed of connexins between Golgi neurons were shown to facilitate the propagation of hyperpolarization after a brief depolarizing current (11, 12). In C. elegans, the gap junctions composed of UNC-7 and UNC-9 were also implicated to spread membrane hyperpolarization from motor neurons to premotor interneurons during the regulation of locomotor activity (13, 14). These reports suggest that the propagation of membrane hyperpolarization is under the control of gap junctions. Our findings now indicate that innexins can also function as hemichannels to regulate neurotransmission from hyperpolarizing neurons. We suggest that hemichannel-composing proteins—innexins, connexins, and pannexins—could be general mediators of neural transmission in hyperpolarized cells.
Recent studies in mammals suggested that glial cells employ hemichannels to modulate communications between neurons. For example, the connexin hemichannels expressed in astrocytes sustain excitatory synaptic transmission from CA3 to CA1 pyramidal neurons (8). Another report suggested that astroglial hemichannels modulate excitatory synaptic transmission in spinal cord neurons (60). Thus, these observations led to the notion that hemichannels in glial cells support neurotransmission (61). Our findings further advance this idea and show that neuronal UNC-7 hemichannels directly regulate neural communication. We speculate that neuronal hemichannels composed of innexins and possibly those of connexins and pannexins could similarly contribute to neurotransmission.
Our epistasis analysis suggested that UNC-7 hemichannels expressed in the AFD neurons regulate neurotransmission independently of chemical synaptic transmissions. The most plausible function of UNC-7 would be to release transmitters. In mammals, channel proteins had been reported to release neurotransmitters to signal sensory information: The CALHM1/CALHM3 channels are essential for taste perception and mediate depolarization-dependent release of ATP from taste cells (61). Like CALHM1/CALHM3 channels, UNC-7 hemichannels might allow neurotransmitters to pass through, and such neurotransmitters exert inhibitory effects on the AIY neuronal activity. This releasing mechanism by hemichannels is likely distinct from that by CALHM channels in that it would operate in the absence of calcium influx. Given that innexins form large pore channels (43), innexin hemichannels can facilitate the passage of diverse ligands. Depending on a combination of ligands and their cognate receptors, hemichannel-mediated neurotransmission might allow diverse modes of neural communication from hyperpolarized cells. To identify these ligands, presumptive pore-forming mutants of UNC-7 might be useful. Introduction of such mutation into the chimeric UNC-7 and investigation of mutated chimeric UNC-7 activity would help narrow down the candidate of functional neurotransmitters. Our results thus suggest a mechanism of neurotransmission that expands the way of the neural circuitry operations.
How does this mechanism of the innexin-mediated neurotransmission contribute to TTX behavior? The AIY neurons regulate the curving bias as well as the frequency of reversals and turns (18, 62), and the reduction in the AIY activity generally correlates with reorientation maneuvers (18, 63, 64) Thus, the AIY activity is expected to be inhibited when animals are moving away from the cultivation temperature on a thermal gradient. Consistent with this expectation, previous studies indicated that when animals migrate up a thermal gradient above the cultivation temperature, AFD depolarizes upon warming stimulus, triggers glutamate release via chemical synapse, and inhibits AIY activity (29, 31). The AFD neurons were also reported to play an essential role in behavioral control while animals were moving down a thermal gradient below the cultivation temperature (18). However, since the AFD membrane would be hyperpolarized under such a thermal context, how AFD controls the neural circuitry had remained unknown. Our studies provide an answer to this question and reveal that UNC-7 hemichannels function as calcium-independent regulators of neurotransmission, act in parallel to the gap junction, and inhibit the AIY neurons. We speculate that such neurotransmissions via hemichannels in response to membrane hyperpolarization can play crucial roles in various sensory contexts. The careful investigation of the regulatory mechanism by the innexin hemichannels will lead to a further understanding of neurotransmission in hyperpolarizing neurons.
Methods
C. elegans Strains.
C. elegans animals were cultivated at 20 °C on nematode growth media (NGM) plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50 bacteria (33). N2 (Bristol) was used as the wild-type strain. Germline transformation was performed by microinjection as previously described (65). Genome editing was performed by the CRISPR Cas9 system as previously described (66, 67). We used the unc-7(isoform a) cDNA sequence for expression of the wild-type unc-7(+), chimeric unc-7, and unc-7(M121L). All strains used in this study are shown in SI Appendix, Table S1.
TTX Assay.
TTX assays were performed as previously described (68). A linear thermal gradient from 17 °C to 23 °C was formed on a TTX assay plate with a temperature steepness of approximately 0.5 °C/cm. The center of the plate was set at 20 °C. Animals cultivated at 20 °C were placed on the center of a TTX assay plate and were allowed to freely behave for 1 h. We divided the TTX assay plate into 8 sections along the temperature gradient, and the number of animals in each section was counted. We calculated TTX indexes using the formula shown in Fig. 1A.
Curvature Analysis.
Curvature analysis was performed essentially as described (69). Animals’ movements were tracked and recorded by using the MWT system (53). The MWT system extracted the coordinates along the body segment that equally divides the midline of the body. A one-dimensional median filter was applied to the coordinates of each point to reduce noise effects. Each segment angle was calculated with the MATLAB program and converted into a spatiotemporal color map (x-axis = time and y-axis = head–tail axis). Angles were assigned ascending numbers (1~9) along from head to tail. Dorsal and ventral bending is represented by blue and red color, respectively. Cross-correlation functions between time series of angle 2 and that of posteior angles (angle 2 ~ angle 8) were also calculated with the MATLAB program. Each cross-correlation value was normalized so that the autocorrelation value of angle 2 at lag 0 (s) is 1. We did not analyze angle 1 and angle 9 because of the noises in the coordinate acquisition of the end segment points. To quantify the propagation of the body bends, we defined and compared “cross-correlation ranges”, which were calculated by the following formula: the maximum cross-correlation value (angle 2 vs. angle 3, lag > 0)—the minimum cross-correlation value (angle 2 vs. angle 3, lag > 0). The value of cross-correlation range would become high if the body bending wave propagates along the head-to-tail axis, giving large absolute values in both positive and negative cross-correlations.
Electrophysiological Analysis.
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recording of Xenopus oocytes was performed as previously described (70). The wild-type and chimeric unc-7 genes were cloned into pGEM-HeFx plasmids, and the cRNA was generated from each plasmid by using an RNA preparation kit (mMessage mMachine T7 Transcription Kit; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The oocytes were collected from Xenopus laevis and then treated with collagenase solution, which contains 2 mg/mL collagenase type I (Gibco) dissolved in OR2 buffer (82.5 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES [adjusted to pH 7.5 with NaOH]) at 18 °C for 1.5 h. Forty nanograms of unc-7 cRNA was coinjected with 10 ng of antisense oligonucleotide DNA for Xenopus Cx38 into oocytes. The oocytes for negative controls were injected with the antisense DNA only. The oocytes were incubated at 18 °C for 2 to 3 d in ND96 buffer (93.5 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES [adjusted to pH 7.5 with NaOH]). Hemichannel currents were recorded by using the iTEV 90 Multi-Electrode Clamp Amplifier (HEKA Elektronik). The oocytes placed in ND96 buffer without CaCl2 were clamped at −30 mV initially and then subjected to 10 s voltage steps from −50 mV to +50 mV in 20 mV increments.
Critical Period Analysis by the AID System.
We generated unc-7(nj291) strain, in which a degron sequence was inserted at the unc-7 locus, and introduced into this strain a transgene that drives an AFD-specific expression of TIR1, an auxin-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase. We added 1mM auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) into NGM and TTX plates to allow TIR1 to bind degron-tagged UNC-7 and promote their ubiquitylation, leading to the degradation of degron-tagged UNC-7 by the proteasome specifically in AFD (39).
Calcium Imaging of the AFD Neurons in Immobilized Animals.
Calcium imaging recordings of the AFD neurons in immobilized animals were performed as previously described (26). Animals expressing calcium probe GCaMP6m together with TagRFP in AFD (67) were cultivated at 20 °C and were immobilized on 10% agarose pads by polystyrene beads. We subjected animals to stepwise temperature warming and recorded fluorescence images of the AFD cell body by EM-CCD camera with 400 ms pulsed illumination every 1 s. The fluorescence intensities were acquired from these images using MetaMorph software, and the ratio of fluorescence intensity (GCaMP3/TagRFP) was calculated. The ratio change was calculated by the following formula: (ratio—baseline ratio)/baseline ratio, where the baseline ratio value was the mean of the ratio values during the first 10 s before the beginning of the temperature change.
Calcium Imaging of the AFD Neurons and the AIY Neurons in Freely Behaving Animals.
Calcium imaging of the AFD neurons and the AIY neurons in freely behaving animals was performed as previously described (31, 71). Animals expressing calcium probe YCX simultaneously in the AFD nuclei and the AIY neurons were cultivated at 20 °C and allowed to freely behave on 2% agarose pads. We subjected animals to warming or cooling stimuli and tracked their movement. We recorded fluorescence images of AFD and AIY under the epifluorescent microscope with SOLA LED light engine as a light source with 30 msec pulsed illumination every 1 s for 30 s.
The fluorescence intensities from these images were analyzed using the MATLAB program (71), and the ratio of fluorescence intensity (GCaMP3/TagRFP) was calculated. The intensities of AFD were acquired from its nuclei and those of AIY were acquired from a part of the axonal region shown in Fig. 5A. The ratio of fluorescence intensity (YFP/CFP) was standardized to 0 to 1 range, and the standardized ratio change was calculated by the following formula: (ratio—baseline ratio)/baseline ratio, where the baseline ratio value was the mean of the ratio values during first 10 s before the beginning of the temperature change.
Behavioral Analysis.
MWT assays were performed as previously described (18, 31). Animals cultivated at 20 °C were placed on the TTX assay plate, and their behaviors were recorded using a CMOS camera (8 bits, 4,096 × 3,072 pixels; CSC12M25BMP19-01B, Toshiba-Teli) for 1 h. The MWT system extracted the coordinates of individual animal’s centroids and spines from the recording video. Using these data, the behavioral components of the worms on the temperature gradient within the range of 18.5 °C to 21.5 °C were analyzed by the MATLAB program previously described (18).
Statistics.
The Brunner–Munzel test, which does not require the assumption of normality and homogeneity of variance, was utilized to analyze differences in TTX indexes, voltage-clamp currents (Fig. 2C), cross-correlation ranges (SI Appendix, Fig. S9C), and AFD calcium response (SI Appendix, Fig. S11 C and D). To avoid type I errors, P-values in multiple comparisons were adjusted based on Bonferroni correction. Chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction were performed for multiple comparisons of the percentage of a categorical AIY response (Fig. 5 D and F and SI Appendix, Figs. S14C and S16B). The significance level in all statistics tests is 0.05.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Custom codes for the analysis of the calcium imaging experiments were previously published (31) and are available at https://github.com/ShunjiNakano/AIY_tracking. The Multi Worm Tracking data were analyzed by the custom codes previously published (18) and are available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/mwt/files/ and https://github.com/ikedamuneki/ThermotaxisAnalysis. All other data are included in the manuscript and/or supporting information.
Acknowledgments
We thank K. Ikegami, Y. Murakami, and M. Murase for technical and administrative assistance; K. Noma for knjIs16 strains; R. Ahluwalia for nlp-50(nj340) strains; A. Kano for help to rewrite the source code of behavioral analysis; the members of the Mori laboratory and Noma group at Nagoya University for discussions. Some strains were provided by Caenorhabditis Genetic Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440) or by NBRP, which is funded by the Japanese government. This work was supported by JST SPRING Grant Number JPMJSP2125 (to A.N.) and by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 23H02418 (to A.O.), 19H05644 (to I.M.), 18H05123 (to S.N.), and 21H052525 (to S.N.).
Author contributions
A.N., M.W., A.O., I.M., and S.N. designed research; A.N., M.W., R.Y., H.K., and S.N. performed research; A.N., H.J.M., and S.N. analyzed data; and A.N., I.M., and S.N. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Supporting Information
Appendix 01 (PDF)
- Download
- 9.56 MB
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
- Download
- 3.74 MB
Movie S1.
Movement of a wild-type animal.
- Download
- 16.23 MB
Movie S2.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal.
- Download
- 14.41 MB
Movie S3.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses the wild-type UNC-7.
- Download
- 17.09 MB
Movie S4.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses the chimeric UNC-7 (line#1).
- Download
- 20.03 MB
Movie S5.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses the chimeric UNC-7 (line#2).
- Download
- 18.75 MB
Movie S6.
Movement of an unc-7(e5) animal carrying a transgene that panneuronally expresses UNC-7(M121L).
- Download
- 15.93 MB
References
1
B. Katz, R. Miledi, Ionic requirements of synaptic transmitter release. Nature 215, 651 (1967).
2
B. L. Sabatini, W. G. Regehr, Timing of neurotransmission at fast synapses in the mammalian brain. Nature 384, 170–172 (1996).
3
M. V. L. Bennett, R. S. Zukin, Electrical coupling and neuronal synchronization in the Mammalian brain. Neuron 41, 495–511 (2004).
4
B. W. Connors, M. A. Long, Electrical synapses in the mammalian brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 393–418 (2004).
5
P. Phelan, Innexins: Members of an evolutionarily conserved family of gap-junction proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1711, 225–245 (2005).
6
G. Söhl, S. Maxeiner, K. Willecke, Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 191–200 (2005).
7
O. Chever, C.-Y. Lee, N. Rouach, Astroglial connexin43 hemichannels tune basal excitatory synaptic transmission. J. Neurosci. 34, 11228–11232 (2014).
8
G. Cheung et al., Physiological synaptic activity and recognition memory require astroglial glutamine. Nat. Commun. 13, 753 (2022).
9
M. A. Long, M. R. Deans, D. L. Paul, B. W. Connors, Rhythmicity without synchrony in the electrically uncoupled inferior olive. J. Neurosci. 22, 10898–10905 (2002).
10
E. Leznik, R. Llinás, Role of gap junctions in synchronized neuronal oscillations in the inferior olive. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 2447–2456 (2005).
11
G. P. Dugué et al., Electrical coupling mediates tunable low-frequency oscillations and resonance in the cerebellar Golgi cell network. Neuron 61, 126–139 (2009).
12
D. B. Yaeger, L. O. Trussell, Auditory Golgi cells are interconnected predominantly by electrical synapses. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 540–551 (2016).
13
T. Kawano et al., An imbalancing act: Gap junctions reduce the backward motor circuit activity to bias C. elegans for forward locomotion. Neuron 72, 572–586 (2011).
14
A. Sordillo, C. I. Bargmann, Behavioral control by depolarized and hyperpolarized states of an integrating neuron. Elife 10, e67723 (2021).
15
E. M. Hedgecock, R. L. Russell, Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 4061–4065 (1975).
16
I. Mori, Y. Ohshima, Neural regulation of thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 376, 344–348 (1995).
17
L. Luo et al., Bidirectional thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans is mediated by distinct sensorimotor strategies driven by the AFD thermosensory neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 2776–2781 (2014).
18
M. Ikeda et al., Context-dependent operation of neural circuits underlies a navigation behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 6178–6188 (2020).
19
J. G. White, E. Southgate, J. N. Thomson, S. Brenner, The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314, 1–340 (1986).
20
S. J. Cook et al., Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes. Nature 571, 63–71 (2019).
21
A. Kuhara et al., Temperature sensing by an olfactory neuron in a circuit controlling behavior of C. elegans. Science 320, 803–807 (2008).
22
M. Beverly, S. Anbil, P. Sengupta, Degeneracy and neuromodulation among thermosensory neurons contribute to robust thermosensory behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 31, 11718–11727 (2011).
23
K. D. Kimura, A. Miyawaki, K. Matsumoto, I. Mori, The C. elegans thermosensory neuron AFD responds to warming. Curr. Biol. 14, 1291–1295 (2004).
24
D. A. Clark, D. Biron, P. Sengupta, A. D. T. Samuel, The AFD sensory neurons encode multiple functions underlying thermotactic behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 26, 7444–7451 (2006).
25
D. Ramot, B. L. MacInnis, M. B. Goodman, Bidirectional temperature-sensing by a single thermosensory neuron in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 908–915 (2008).
26
K. Kobayashi et al., Single-cell memory regulates a neural circuit for sensory behavior. Cell Rep. 14, 11–21 (2016).
27
A. Takeishi et al., Receptor-type guanylyl cyclases confer thermosensory responses in C. elegans. Neuron 90, 235–244 (2016).
28
A. Narayan, G. Laurent, P. W. Sternberg, Transfer characteristics of a thermosensory synapse in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 9667–9672 (2011).
29
N. Ohnishi, A. Kuhara, F. Nakamura, Y. Okochi, I. Mori, Bidirectional regulation of thermotaxis by glutamate transmissions in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 30, 1376–1388 (2011).
30
J. D. Hawk et al., Integration of plasticity mechanisms within a single sensory neuron of C. elegans actuates a memory. Neuron 97, 356–367.e4 (2018).
31
S. Nakano et al., Presynaptic MAST kinase controls opposing postsynaptic responses to convey stimulus valence in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 1638–1647 (2020).
32
S. Tsukamoto et al., The Caenorhabditis elegans INX-4/Innexin is required for the fine-tuning of temperature orientation in thermotaxis behavior. Genes Cells 25, 154–164 (2020).
33
S. Brenner, The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
34
T. A. Starich, A. Miller, R. L. Nguyen, D. H. Hall, J. E. Shaw, The Caenorhabditis elegans innexin INX-3 is localized to gap junctions and is essential for embryonic development. Dev. Biol. 256, 403–417 (2003).
35
C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium, large-scale screening for targeted knockouts in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. G3 (Bethesda) 2, 1415–1425 (2012).
36
J. S.-C. Chu et al., High-throughput capturing and characterization of mutations in essential genes of Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genomics 15, 361 (2014).
37
A. Bhattacharya, U. Aghayeva, E. G. Berghoff, O. Hobert, Plasticity of the electrical connectome of C. elegans. Cell 176, 1174–1189.e16 (2019).
38
E. Yeh et al., Caenorhabditis elegans innexins regulate active zone differentiation. J. Neurosci. 29, 5207–5217 (2009).
39
L. Zhang, J. D. Ward, Z. Cheng, A. F. Dernburg, The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Development 142, 4374–4384 (2015).
40
D. Witvliet et al., Connectomes across development reveal principles of brain maturation. Nature 596, 257–261 (2021).
41
P. Phelan, T. A. Starich, Innexins get into the gap. Bioessays 23, 388–396 (2001).
42
A. Oshima, K. Tani, Y. Fujiyoshi, Atomic structure of the innexin-6 gap junction channel determined by cryo-EM. Nat. Commun. 7, 13681 (2016).
43
B. Burendei et al., Cryo-EM structures of undocked innexin-6 hemichannels in phospholipids. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax3157 (2020).
44
M. Bouhours et al., A co-operative regulation of neuronal excitability by UNC-7 innexin and NCA/NALCN leak channel. Mol. Brain 4, 16 (2011).
45
T. A. Starich, J. Xu, I. M. Skerrett, B. J. Nicholson, J. E. Shaw, Interactions between innexins UNC-7 and UNC-9 mediate electrical synapse specificity in the Caenorhabditis elegans locomotory nervous system. Neural. Dev. 4, 16 (2009).
46
D. Bai, B. Yue, H. Aoyama, Crucial motifs and residues in the extracellular loops influence the formation and specificity of connexin docking. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1860, 9–21 (2018).
47
Y. Panchin et al., A ubiquitous family of putative gap junction molecules. Curr. Biol. 10, R473–R474 (2000).
48
A. Baranova et al., The mammalian pannexin family is homologous to the invertebrate innexin gap junction proteins. Genomics 83, 706–716 (2004).
49
E. C. Beyer, V. M. Berthoud, Gap junction gene and protein families: Connexins, innexins, and pannexins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1860, 5–8 (2018).
50
D. S. Walker, W. R. Schafer, Distinct roles for innexin gap junctions and hemichannels in mechanosensation. Elife 9, e50597 (2020).
51
D. S. Chelur, M. Chalfie, Targeted cell killing by reconstituted caspases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 2283–2288 (2007).
52
H. J. Matsuyama, I. Mori, Neural coding of thermal preferences in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. eNeuro 7, ENEURO.0414-19.2020 (2020).
53
N. A. Swierczek, A. C. Giles, C. H. Rankin, R. A. Kerr, High-throughput behavioral analysis in C. elegans. Nat. Methods 8, 592–598 (2011).
54
R. Y. Lee, E. R. Sawin, M. Chalfie, H. R. Horvitz, L. Avery, EAT-4, a homolog of a mammalian sodium-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter, is necessary for glutamatergic neurotransmission in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 19, 159–167 (1999).
55
S. Speese et al., UNC-31 (CAPS) is required for dense-core vesicle but not synaptic vesicle exocytosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 27, 6150–6162 (2007).
56
J. Cao et al., Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667 (2017).
57
S. R. Taylor et al., Molecular topography of an entire nervous system. Cell 184, 4329–4347.e23 (2021).
58
S. L. Sandow, C. E. Hill, Incidence of myoendothelial gap junctions in the proximal and distal mesenteric arteries of the rat is suggestive of a role in endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated responses. Circ. Res. 86, 341–346 (2000).
59
K. A. Dora et al., Myoendothelial gap junctions may provide the pathway for EDHF in mouse mesenteric artery. J. Vasc. Res. 40, 480–490 (2003).
60
G. Chen et al., Connexin-43 induces chemokine release from spinal cord astrocytes to maintain late-phase neuropathic pain in mice. Brain 137, 2193–2209 (2014).
61
Z. Ma et al., CALHM3 is essential for rapid ion channel-mediated purinergic neurotransmission of GPCR-mediated tastes. Neuron 98, 547–561.e10 (2018).
62
J. M. Gray, J. J. Hill, C. I. Bargmann, A circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 3184–3191 (2005).
63
A. Kocabas, C.-H. Shen, Z. V. Guo, S. Ramanathan, Controlling interneuron activity in Caenorhabditis elegans to evoke chemotactic behaviour. Nature 490, 273–277 (2012).
64
Z. Li, J. Liu, M. Zheng, X. Z. S. Xu, Encoding of both analog- and digital-like behavioral outputs by one C. elegans interneuron. Cell 159, 751–765 (2014).
65
C. C. Mello, J. M. Kramer, D. Stinchcomb, V. Ambros, Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: Extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 10, 3959–3970 (1991).
66
G. A. Dokshin, K. S. Ghanta, K. M. Piscopo, C. C. Mello, Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 210, 781–787 (2018).
67
S. Higurashi et al., Bacterial diet affects the age-dependent decline of associative learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Elife 12, e81418 (2023).
68
H. Ito, H. Inada, I. Mori, Quantitative analysis of thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. Methods 154, 45–52 (2006).
69
J. T. Pierce-Shimomura et al., Genetic analysis of crawling and swimming locomotory patterns in C. elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20982–20987 (2008).
70
M. Watanabe, R. Sawada, T. Aramaki, I. M. Skerrett, S. Kondo, The physiological characterization of connexin41.8 and connexin39.4, which are involved in the striped pattern formation of zebrafish. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 1053–1063 (2016).
71
S. Nakano et al., Genetic screens identified dual roles of microtubule-associated serine threonine kinase and CREB within a single thermosensory neuron in the regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans thermotaxis behavior. G3 (Bethesda) 12, jkac248 (2022).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Custom codes for the analysis of the calcium imaging experiments were previously published (31) and are available at https://github.com/ShunjiNakano/AIY_tracking. The Multi Worm Tracking data were analyzed by the custom codes previously published (18) and are available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/mwt/files/ and https://github.com/ikedamuneki/ThermotaxisAnalysis. All other data are included in the manuscript and/or supporting information.
Submission history
Received: April 4, 2024
Accepted: April 19, 2024
Published online: May 16, 2024
Published in issue: May 21, 2024
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank K. Ikegami, Y. Murakami, and M. Murase for technical and administrative assistance; K. Noma for knjIs16 strains; R. Ahluwalia for nlp-50(nj340) strains; A. Kano for help to rewrite the source code of behavioral analysis; the members of the Mori laboratory and Noma group at Nagoya University for discussions. Some strains were provided by Caenorhabditis Genetic Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440) or by NBRP, which is funded by the Japanese government. This work was supported by JST SPRING Grant Number JPMJSP2125 (to A.N.) and by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 23H02418 (to A.O.), 19H05644 (to I.M.), 18H05123 (to S.N.), and 21H052525 (to S.N.).
Author contributions
A.N., M.W., A.O., I.M., and S.N. designed research; A.N., M.W., R.Y., H.K., and S.N. performed research; A.N., H.J.M., and S.N. analyzed data; and A.N., I.M., and S.N. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.D.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
A hyperpolarizing neuron recruits undocked innexin hemichannels to transmit neural information in Caenorhabditis elegans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
121 (21) e2406565121,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2406565121
(2024).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.