Plant coexistence depends on ecosystem nutrient cycles: Extension of the resource-ratio theory
Abstract
We present a model of plant-nutrient interactions that extends classical resource competition theory to environments in which essential nutrients (resources) are recycled between plant and soil pools and dissolved nutrients are lost through plant-available (i.e., inorganic forms) or plant-unavailable (i.e., complex organic forms) pathways. Losses by dissolved organic pathways can alter ratios of nutrients that are recycled and supplied within the plant-soil system, thereby influencing competition and coexistence among plant species. In special cases, our extended model does not differ from classical models, but in more realistic cases our model introduces new dynamical behavior that influences competitive outcomes. At equilibrium, coexistence still depends on nutrient supply and consumption, but nutrient supply includes recycling and is highly sensitive to whether a species promotes more organic losses of the nutrient that limits its own growth than of nutrients that limit its competitors. Because recycling operates with a time delay compared with consumption, recycling-mediated effects on competition can, under certain conditions, lead to sustained population oscillations. Our findings have implications for how we understand nutrient competition, nutrient cycles, and plant evolutionary strategies.
Acknowledgments
We thank David Tilman, Simon Levin, Steve Pacala, Christopher Klausmeier, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Biocomplexity Grant NSF DEB00-83566 and by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Supporting Information
Adobe PDF - 06427SuppAppendix.pdf
Adobe PDF - 06427SuppAppendix.pdf
- Download
- 41.27 KB
References
1
Ingestad, T. & Ågren, G. I. (1995) Plant Soil 168-169, 15-20.
2
Vitousek, P. M. & Farrington, H. (1997) Biogeochemistry 37, 63-75.
3
Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton).
4
Tilman, D. & Wedin, D. (1991) Ecology 72, 1038-1049.
5
Braakhekke, W. G. & Hooftman, D. A. P. (1999) J. Veg. Sci. 10, 187-200.
6
Sommer, U. & Worm, B. (2002) Competition and Coexistence, Ecological Studies 161 (Springer, Berlin).
7
Phillips, O. M. (1973) Am. Nat. 107, 73-93.
8
Leon, J. & Tumpson, D. (1975) J. Theor. Biol. 50, 185-201.
9
Tilman, D. (1980) Am. Nat. 116, 362-393.
10
Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. (2003) Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Aproaches (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago).
11
Grover, J. P. (1997) Resource competition: Population and Community, Biology Series 19 (Chapman & Hall, London).
12
Vitousek, P. M., Hedin, L. O., Matson, P. A., Fownes, J. H. & Neff, J. (1998) in Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science, eds. Pace, M. L. & Groffmann, P. M. (Springer, New York), pp. 432-451.
13
Loreau, M. (1998) Proc. R. Soc. London B 265, 33-38.
14
Hedin, L. O., Vitousek, P. M. & Matson, P. A. (2003) Ecology 84, 2231-2255.
15
Odum, E. P. (1969) Science 164, 262-270.
16
Pomeroy, L. R. (1970) Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 171-190.
17
Daufresne T. & Loreau, M. (2001) Ecol. Lett. 4, 196-206.
18
Grover, J. P. (2002) J. Theor. Biol. 214, 599-618.
19
Hedin, L. O., Armesto, J. J. & Johnson, A. H. (1995) Ecology 76, 493-509.
20
Perakis, S. S. & Hedin, L. O. (2002) Nature 415, 416-419.
21
Hessen, D. O. & Andersen, T. (1992) Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih.: Ergeb Limnol. 35, 111-120.
22
Urabe, J. (1995) Ecoscience 2(3), 286-296.
23
Sterner, R. W. (1997) Freshwater Biol. 38, 473-481.
24
Rothhaupt, K. O. (1997) J. Plankton Res. 19, 125-139.
25
Neff, J. C., Chapin, F. S. & Vitousek, P. M. (2003) Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 205-211.
26
De Mazancourt, C., Loreau, M. & Abbadie, L. (1998) Ecology 79, 2242-2252.
27
Tilman, D. (1990) in Perspectives on Plant Competition, eds. Grace, J. B. & Tilman, D. (Academic, San Diego), pp. 117-141.
28
Steinberg, D. K., Goldthwait, S. A. & Hansell, D. A. (2002) Deep-Sea Res. 49, 1445-1461.
29
Darchambeau, F., Thys, I., Leporcq, B., Hoffmann, L. & Descy, J.-P. (2005) Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 905-913.
30
Augustine, D. J., McNaughton, S. J. & Frank, D. A. (2003) Ecol. Appl. 13, 1325-1337.
31
McNaughton, S. J., Stronach, N. R. H. & Georgiadis, N. J. (1998) Ecol. Appl. 8, 464-468.
32
Northrup, R. R., Yu, Z. S., Dahlgren, R. A. & Vogt, K. A. (1995) Nature 377, 227-229.
33
Kraus, T. E. C., Dahlgren, R. A. & Zasoski, R. J. (2003) Plant Soil 256, 41-66.
34
Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. (1991) Biogeochemistry 13, 87-115.
35
Tilman, D. & Wedin, D. (1991) Nature 353, 653-655.
36
Stone, L. & Ezrati, S. (1996) J. Ecol. 84, 279-291.
37
Loiseau, P., Soussana, J. F., Louault, F. & Delpy, R. (2001) Grass Forage Sci. 56, 205-217.
38
Huisman, J. & Weissing, F. J. (1999) Nature 402, 407-410.
39
Ohlund, J. & Nasholm, V. (2001) Tree Physiol. 21, 1319-1326.
40
Klausmeier, C. A. & Tilman, D. (2002) in Competition and Coexistence, Ecological Studies 161, eds. Sommer, U. & Worm, B. (Springer, Berlin), pp. 43-78.
41
Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. (2002) Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton).
42
Gantmacher, F. R. (1959) The Theory of Matrices (Chelsea, New York), Vol. 2.
43
Levin, S. A. (1974) Am. Nat. 108, 207-228.
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Copyright © 2005, The National Academy of Sciences.
Submission history
Received: August 31, 2004
Published online: June 17, 2005
Published in issue: June 28, 2005
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank David Tilman, Simon Levin, Steve Pacala, Christopher Klausmeier, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Biocomplexity Grant NSF DEB00-83566 and by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
Plant coexistence depends on ecosystem nutrient cycles: Extension of the resource-ratio theory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
102 (26) 9212-9217,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406427102
(2005).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.