Plant coexistence depends on ecosystem nutrient cycles: Extension of the resource-ratio theory

June 17, 2005
102 (26) 9212-9217

Abstract

We present a model of plant-nutrient interactions that extends classical resource competition theory to environments in which essential nutrients (resources) are recycled between plant and soil pools and dissolved nutrients are lost through plant-available (i.e., inorganic forms) or plant-unavailable (i.e., complex organic forms) pathways. Losses by dissolved organic pathways can alter ratios of nutrients that are recycled and supplied within the plant-soil system, thereby influencing competition and coexistence among plant species. In special cases, our extended model does not differ from classical models, but in more realistic cases our model introduces new dynamical behavior that influences competitive outcomes. At equilibrium, coexistence still depends on nutrient supply and consumption, but nutrient supply includes recycling and is highly sensitive to whether a species promotes more organic losses of the nutrient that limits its own growth than of nutrients that limit its competitors. Because recycling operates with a time delay compared with consumption, recycling-mediated effects on competition can, under certain conditions, lead to sustained population oscillations. Our findings have implications for how we understand nutrient competition, nutrient cycles, and plant evolutionary strategies.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

We thank David Tilman, Simon Levin, Steve Pacala, Christopher Klausmeier, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Biocomplexity Grant NSF DEB00-83566 and by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

Supporting Information

Adobe PDF - 06427SuppAppendix.pdf
Adobe PDF - 06427SuppAppendix.pdf

References

1
Ingestad, T. & Ågren, G. I. (1995) Plant Soil 168-169, 15-20.
2
Vitousek, P. M. & Farrington, H. (1997) Biogeochemistry 37, 63-75.
3
Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton).
4
Tilman, D. & Wedin, D. (1991) Ecology 72, 1038-1049.
5
Braakhekke, W. G. & Hooftman, D. A. P. (1999) J. Veg. Sci. 10, 187-200.
6
Sommer, U. & Worm, B. (2002) Competition and Coexistence, Ecological Studies 161 (Springer, Berlin).
7
Phillips, O. M. (1973) Am. Nat. 107, 73-93.
8
Leon, J. & Tumpson, D. (1975) J. Theor. Biol. 50, 185-201.
9
Tilman, D. (1980) Am. Nat. 116, 362-393.
10
Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. (2003) Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Aproaches (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago).
11
Grover, J. P. (1997) Resource competition: Population and Community, Biology Series 19 (Chapman & Hall, London).
12
Vitousek, P. M., Hedin, L. O., Matson, P. A., Fownes, J. H. & Neff, J. (1998) in Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science, eds. Pace, M. L. & Groffmann, P. M. (Springer, New York), pp. 432-451.
13
Loreau, M. (1998) Proc. R. Soc. London B 265, 33-38.
14
Hedin, L. O., Vitousek, P. M. & Matson, P. A. (2003) Ecology 84, 2231-2255.
15
Odum, E. P. (1969) Science 164, 262-270.
16
Pomeroy, L. R. (1970) Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 171-190.
17
Daufresne T. & Loreau, M. (2001) Ecol. Lett. 4, 196-206.
18
Grover, J. P. (2002) J. Theor. Biol. 214, 599-618.
19
Hedin, L. O., Armesto, J. J. & Johnson, A. H. (1995) Ecology 76, 493-509.
20
Perakis, S. S. & Hedin, L. O. (2002) Nature 415, 416-419.
21
Hessen, D. O. & Andersen, T. (1992) Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih.: Ergeb Limnol. 35, 111-120.
22
Urabe, J. (1995) Ecoscience 2(3), 286-296.
23
Sterner, R. W. (1997) Freshwater Biol. 38, 473-481.
24
Rothhaupt, K. O. (1997) J. Plankton Res. 19, 125-139.
25
Neff, J. C., Chapin, F. S. & Vitousek, P. M. (2003) Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 205-211.
26
De Mazancourt, C., Loreau, M. & Abbadie, L. (1998) Ecology 79, 2242-2252.
27
Tilman, D. (1990) in Perspectives on Plant Competition, eds. Grace, J. B. & Tilman, D. (Academic, San Diego), pp. 117-141.
28
Steinberg, D. K., Goldthwait, S. A. & Hansell, D. A. (2002) Deep-Sea Res. 49, 1445-1461.
29
Darchambeau, F., Thys, I., Leporcq, B., Hoffmann, L. & Descy, J.-P. (2005) Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 905-913.
30
Augustine, D. J., McNaughton, S. J. & Frank, D. A. (2003) Ecol. Appl. 13, 1325-1337.
31
McNaughton, S. J., Stronach, N. R. H. & Georgiadis, N. J. (1998) Ecol. Appl. 8, 464-468.
32
Northrup, R. R., Yu, Z. S., Dahlgren, R. A. & Vogt, K. A. (1995) Nature 377, 227-229.
33
Kraus, T. E. C., Dahlgren, R. A. & Zasoski, R. J. (2003) Plant Soil 256, 41-66.
34
Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. (1991) Biogeochemistry 13, 87-115.
35
Tilman, D. & Wedin, D. (1991) Nature 353, 653-655.
36
Stone, L. & Ezrati, S. (1996) J. Ecol. 84, 279-291.
37
Loiseau, P., Soussana, J. F., Louault, F. & Delpy, R. (2001) Grass Forage Sci. 56, 205-217.
38
Huisman, J. & Weissing, F. J. (1999) Nature 402, 407-410.
39
Ohlund, J. & Nasholm, V. (2001) Tree Physiol. 21, 1319-1326.
40
Klausmeier, C. A. & Tilman, D. (2002) in Competition and Coexistence, Ecological Studies 161, eds. Sommer, U. & Worm, B. (Springer, Berlin), pp. 43-78.
41
Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. (2002) Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton).
42
Gantmacher, F. R. (1959) The Theory of Matrices (Chelsea, New York), Vol. 2.
43
Levin, S. A. (1974) Am. Nat. 108, 207-228.

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.102; No.26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 102 | No. 26
June 28, 2005
PubMed: 15964989

Classifications

Submission history

Received: August 31, 2004
Published online: June 17, 2005
Published in issue: June 28, 2005

Keywords

  1. plant competition
  2. recycling
  3. biogeochemistry
  4. nutrient losses
  5. evolution

Acknowledgments

We thank David Tilman, Simon Levin, Steve Pacala, Christopher Klausmeier, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Biocomplexity Grant NSF DEB00-83566 and by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

Authors

Affiliations

Tanguy Daufresne
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Lars O. Hedin
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

Notes

To whom correspondence should be sent at the present address: Chemin de Borde-Rouge, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage, Auzeville, BP 52627, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected].
Edited by G. David Tilman, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, and approved May 17, 2005

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Plant coexistence depends on ecosystem nutrient cycles: Extension of the resource-ratio theory
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 102
    • No. 26
    • pp. 9087-9430

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media