Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left
Abstract
The question of whether language affects perception has been debated largely on the basis of cross-language data, without considering the functional organization of the brain. The nature of this neural organization predicts that, if language affects perception, it should do so more in the right visual field than in the left visual field, an idea unexamined in the debate. Here, we find support for this proposal in lateralized color discrimination tasks. Reaction times to targets in the right visual field were faster when the target and distractor colors had different names; in contrast, reaction times to targets in the left visual field were not affected by the names of the target and distractor colors. Moreover, this pattern was disrupted when participants performed a secondary task that engaged verbal working memory but not a task making comparable demands on spatial working memory. It appears that people view the right (but not the left) half of their visual world through the lens of their native language, providing an unexpected resolution to the language-and-thought debate.
Acknowledgments
We thank Lera Boroditsky for providing counsel; Paul Aparicio for aid with programming pilot studies; Michael Posner, Christian Fiebach, David Presti, and Michael Webster for their comments on the manuscript; and Steven Shevell for suggesting the title. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants 0418404 and 0418283 (to P.K. and T.R.) and National Institutes of Health Grant NS40813 (to R.B.I.).
References
1
Carroll, J. B., ed. (1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
2
Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. C. (1996) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.).
3
Gordon, P. (2004) Science 306, 496-499.
4
Casasanto, D. (2005) Science 307, 1721-1722.
5
Gordon, P. (2005) Science 307, 1722.
6
Kay, P. & Kempton, W. (1984) Am. Anthropol. 86, 65-79.
7
Roberson, D. & Davidoff, J. (2000) Mem. Cognit. 28, 977-986.
8
Witthoft, N., Winawer, J., Wu, L., Frank, M., Wade, A. & Boroditsky, L. (2003) in Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. Alterman, R. & Kirsh, D. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 1247-1252.
9
Heider, E. R. (1972) J. Exp. Psychol. 93, 10-20.
10
Heider, E. R. & Olivier, D. C. (1972) Cognit. Psychol. 3, 337-354.
11
Lindsey, D. T. & Brown, A. M. (2002) Psychol. Sci. 13, 506-512.
12
Franklin, A., Clifford, A., Williamson, E. & Davies, I. (2005) J. Exp. Child Psychol. 90, 114-141.
13
Corballis, M. C. (1991) The Lopsided Ape: Evolution of the Generative Mind (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
14
Hellige, J. B. (1993) Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA).
15
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D. & Damasio, A. R. (1996) Nature 380, 499-505.
16
Davidoff, J. (1976) Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 28, 387-394.
17
Hannay, H. J. (1979) Brain Lang. 8, 191-201.
18
Malone, D. R. & Hannay, H. J. (1978) Neuropsychologia 16, 51-59.
19
Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C. B., Tang, J. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1989) J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 723-735.
20
Sidtis, J. J., Volpe, B. T., Wilson, D. H., Rayport, M. & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1981) J. Neurosci. 1, 323-331.
21
Baynes, K., Wessinger, C. M., Fendrich, R. & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1995) Neuropsychologia 33, 1225-1242.
22
MacLeod, C. M. (1991) Psychol. Bull. 109, 163-203.
23
Pilling, M., Wiggett, A., Özgen, E. & Davies, I. R. L. (2003) Mem. Cognit. 31, 538-551.
24
Raz, A., Fan, J. & Posner, M. I. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9978-9983.
25
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Costantini-Ferrando, M. F., Alpert, N. M. & Spiegel, D. (2000) Am. J. Psychiatry 157, 1279-1284.
26
Pashler, H. (1994) Psychol. Bull. 116, 220-244.
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Copyright © 2006, The National Academy of Sciences.
Submission history
Published online: December 30, 2005
Published in issue: January 10, 2006
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank Lera Boroditsky for providing counsel; Paul Aparicio for aid with programming pilot studies; Michael Posner, Christian Fiebach, David Presti, and Michael Webster for their comments on the manuscript; and Steven Shevell for suggesting the title. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants 0418404 and 0418283 (to P.K. and T.R.) and National Institutes of Health Grant NS40813 (to R.B.I.).
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
103 (2) 489-494,
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.