Abstract

What leads humans to divide the social world into groups, preferring their own group and disfavoring others? Experiments with infants and young children suggest these tendencies are based on predispositions that emerge early in life and depend, in part, on natural language. Young infants prefer to look at a person who previously spoke their native language. Older infants preferentially accept toys from native-language speakers, and preschool children preferentially select native-language speakers as friends. Variations in accent are sufficient to evoke these social preferences, which are observed in infants before they produce or comprehend speech and are exhibited by children even when they comprehend the foreign-accented speech. Early-developing preferences for native-language speakers may serve as a foundation for later-developing preferences and conflicts among social groups.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Shutts, a collaborator on the studies looking at friendship choices in childhood, who offered valuable advice for the looking-time method used with 5- to 6-month-old infants. We thank Professor Cabrol for providing access to the Port Royal Maternity Ward, where the Paris infants were tested. We also thank S. Pinker and J. Halberda for advice and I. Berner, J. DeJesus, K. Ellison, R. Lizcano, S. Margules, S. McCarthy, and C. Pemberton for assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD23103 (to E.S.S.).

References

1
M Shell Centen Rev 1, 21–17 (2001).
2
R Phillipson, T Skutnabb-Kangas The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed RE Asher (Pergamon and Aberdeen Univ Press, New York), pp. 2211–2212 (1994).
3
A Sparks Tomorrow is Another Country (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996).
4
T Nazzi, J Bertoncini, J Mehler J Exp Psychol Hum 24, 756–766 (1998).
5
A Vouloumanos, JF Werker Dev Sci 10, 159–164 (2007).
6
AJ DeCasper, WP Fifer Science 208, 1174–1176 (1980).
7
J Mehler, P Jusczyk, G Lambertz, N Halsted, J Bertoncini, C Amiel-Tison Cognition 29, 144–178 (1988).
8
C Moon, RP Cooper, WP Fifer Infant Behav Dev 16, 495–500 (1993).
9
JF Werker, RC Tees Infant Behav Dev 7, 49–63 (1984).
10
PK Kuhl, KA Williams, F Lacerda, KN Stevens, B Lindblom Science 255, 606–608 (1992).
11
WM Weikum, A Vouloumanos, J Navarra, S Soto-Faraco, N Sebastián-Gallés, JF Werker Science 316, 1159 (2007).
12
RL Fantz Science 146, 668–670 (1964).
13
MA Hunter, EW Ames Adv Inf Res 5, 69–95 (1988).
14
BJ Roder, EW Bushnell, AM Sasseville Infancy 1, 491–507 (2000).
15
C Houston-Price, S Nakai Infant Child Dev 13, 341–348 (2004).
16
O Pascalis, S de Schonen, J Morton, C Dereulle, M Fabre-Grenet Infant Behav Dev 18, 79–85 (1995).
17
Y Bar-Haim, T Ziv, D Lamy, RM Hodes Psychol Sci 17, 159–163 (2006).
18
PC Quinn, J Yahr, A Kuhn, AM Slater, O Pascalis Perception 31, 1109–1121 (2002).
19
M Anisfeld, N Bogo, W Lambert J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65, 223–231 (1962).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.104; No.30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 104 | No. 30
July 24, 2007
PubMed: 17640881

Classifications

Submission history

Received: April 4, 2007
Published online: July 24, 2007
Published in issue: July 24, 2007

Keyword

  1. cognitive development

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Shutts, a collaborator on the studies looking at friendship choices in childhood, who offered valuable advice for the looking-time method used with 5- to 6-month-old infants. We thank Professor Cabrol for providing access to the Port Royal Maternity Ward, where the Paris infants were tested. We also thank S. Pinker and J. Halberda for advice and I. Berner, J. DeJesus, K. Ellison, R. Lizcano, S. Margules, S. McCarthy, and C. Pemberton for assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD23103 (to E.S.S.).

Authors

Affiliations

Katherine D. Kinzler [email protected]
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
Emmanuel Dupoux
Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistiques, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 75005 Paris, France; and
Maternité Port Royal-Cochin, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Université René Decartes Paris V, 75005 Paris, France
Elizabeth S. Spelke [email protected]
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;

Notes

To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Contributed by Elizabeth S. Spelke, June 9, 2007
Author contributions: K.D.K., E.D., and E.S.S. designed research; K.D.K. performed research; K.D.K. analyzed data; and K.D.K. and E.S.S. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    The native language of social cognition
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 104
    • No. 30
    • pp. 12229-12581

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media