Why kinesin is so processive

Edited by Edwin W. Taylor, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, and approved June 16, 2009
August 4, 2009
106 (31) 12717-12722

Abstract

Kinesin I can walk on a microtubule for distances as long as several micrometers. However, it is still unclear how this molecular motor can remain attached to the microtubule through the hundreds of mechanochemical cycles necessary to achieve this remarkable degree of processivity. We have addressed this issue by applying ensemble and single-molecule fluorescence methods to study the process of kinesin stepping, and our results lead to 4 conclusions. First, under physiologic conditions, ≈75% of processively moving kinesin molecules are attached to the microtubule via both heads, and in this conformation, they are resistant to dissociation. Second, the remaining 25% of kinesin molecules, which are in an “ATP waiting state” and are strongly attached to the microtubule via only one head, are intermittently in a conformation that cannot bind ATP and therefore are resistant to nucleotide-induced dissociation. Third, the forward step in the kinesin ATPase cycle is very fast, accounting for <5% of the total cycle time, which ensures that the lifetime of this ATP waiting state is relatively short. Finally, by combining nanometer-level single-molecule fluorescence localization with higher ATP concentrations than used previously, we have determined that in this ATP waiting state, the ADP-containing head of kinesin is located 8 nm behind the attached head, in a location where it can interact with the microtubule lattice. These 4 features reduce the likelihood that a kinesin I motor will dissociate and contribute to making this motor so highly processive.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments.

We thank Marileen Dogterom for sharing the step finder program; Ben Blehm, Comert Kural, Evan Graves, Hasan Yardimci, Sultan Doganay, Sheyum Syed, and Tyler Lougheed for helpful discussions; and Trine Giaever for producing Fig. 5. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM068625 (to P.R.S.) and AR048565 (to S.S.R.) and National Science Foundation Frontiers Grant 0822613 (to P.R.S).

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information

References

1
Z Okten, LS Churchman, RS Rock, JA Spudich, Myosin VI walks hand-over-hand along actin. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11, 884–887 (2004).
2
A Yildiz, et al., Myosin V walks hand-over-hand: Single fluorophoree imaging with 1.5-nm localization. Science 300, 2061–2065 (2003).
3
A Yildiz, et al., Myosin VI steps via a hand-over-hand mechanism with its lever arm undergoing fluctuations when attached to actin. J Biol Chem 279, 37223–37226 (2004).
4
A Yildiz, M Tomishige, RD Vale, PR Selvin, Kinesin walks hand-over-hand. Science 303, 676–678 (2004b).
5
NR Guydosh, SM Block, Backsteps induced by nucleotide analogs suggest the front head of kinesins gated by strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 8054–8059 (2006).
6
SS Rosenfeld, J Xing, GM Jefferson, HC Cheung, PH King, Measuring kinesin's first step. J Biol Chem 277, 36731–36739 (2002).
7
SS Rosenfeld, PM Fordyce, GM Jefferson, PH King, SM Block, Stepping and stretching: How kinesin uses internal strain to walk processively. J Biol Chem 278, 18550–18556 (2003).
8
S Uemura, S Ishiwata, Loading direction regulates the affinity of ADP for kinesin. Nat Struct Biol 10, 308–311 (2003).
9
YZ Ma, EW Taylor, Interacting head mechanism of microtubule-kinesin ATPase. J Biol Chem 272, 724–730 (1997).
10
SP Gilbert, ML Moyer, KA Johnson, Alternating site mechanism of the kinesin ATPase. Biochemistry 37, 792–799 (1998).
11
S Rice, et al., A structural change in the kinesin motor protein that drives motility. Nature 402, 778–784 (1999).
12
MC Alonso, et al., An ATP gate controls tubulin binding by the tethered head of kinesin-1. Science 316, 120–123 (2007).
13
CL Asbury, AN Fehr, SM Block, Kinesin moves by an asymmetric hand-over-hand mechanism. Science 302, 2130–2134 (2003).
14
DD Hackney, Evidence for alternating head catalysis by kinesin during microtubule-stimulated ATP hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 6865–6869 (1994).
15
T Mori, RD Vale, M Tomishige, How kinesin waits between steps. Nature 450, 750–754 (2007).
16
LM Klumpp, A Hoenger, SP Gilbert, Kinesin's second step. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 3444–3449 (2004).
17
NJ Carter, RA Cross, Mechanics of the kinesin step. Nature 435, 308–312 (2005).
18
A Yildiz, M Tomishige, A Gennerich, RD Vale, Intramolecular strain coordinates kinesin stepping behavior along microtubules. Cell 134, 1030–1041 (2008).
19
DD Hackney, The tethered motor domain of a kinesin–microtubule complex catalyzes reversible synthesis of bound ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 18338–18343 (2005).
20
SL Reck-Peterson, et al., Single-molecule analysis of dynein processivity and stepping behavior. Cell 126, 335–348 (2006).
21
JW Kerssemakers, et al., Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution. Nature 442, 709–712 (2006).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.106; No.31
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 106 | No. 31
August 4, 2009
PubMed: 19617538

Classifications

Submission history

Received: August 27, 2008
Published online: August 4, 2009
Published in issue: August 4, 2009

Keywords

  1. fluorescence
  2. motility
  3. gating
  4. fluorescence imaging with 1-nm accuracy
  5. processivity

Acknowledgments

We thank Marileen Dogterom for sharing the step finder program; Ben Blehm, Comert Kural, Evan Graves, Hasan Yardimci, Sultan Doganay, Sheyum Syed, and Tyler Lougheed for helpful discussions; and Trine Giaever for producing Fig. 5. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM068625 (to P.R.S.) and AR048565 (to S.S.R.) and National Science Foundation Frontiers Grant 0822613 (to P.R.S).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0808396106/DCSupplemental.

Authors

Affiliations

Erdal Toprak
Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, and
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801;
Present address: Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Ahmet Yildiz
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and
Melinda Tonks Hoffman
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801;
Steven S. Rosenfeld2 [email protected]
Departments of Neurology and Cell Biology and Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032
Paul R. Selvin2 [email protected]
Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, and
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801;

Notes

2
To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Author contributions: S.S.R. and P.R.S. designed research; E.T. and M.T.H. performed research; A.Y. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.T., S.S.R., and P.R.S. analyzed data; and E.T., S.S.R., and P.R.S. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Why kinesin is so processive
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 106
    • No. 31
    • pp. 12563-13143

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media