Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor
Edited by Robert T. Paine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved May 22, 2012 (received for review February 24, 2012)
Science Sessions podcast
June 10, 2019
Abstract
Endangered species recovery programs seek to restore populations to self-sustaining levels. Nonetheless, many recovering species require continuing management to compensate for persistent threats in their environment. Judging true recovery in the face of this management is often difficult, impeding thorough analysis of the success of conservation programs. We illustrate these challenges with a multidisciplinary study of one of the world’s rarest birds—the California condor (Gymnogyps californianus). California condors were brought to the brink of extinction, in part, because of lead poisoning, and lead poisoning remains a significant threat today. We evaluated individual lead-related health effects, the efficacy of current efforts to prevent lead-caused deaths, and the consequences of any reduction in currently intensive management actions. Our results show that condors in California remain chronically exposed to harmful levels of lead; 30% of the annual blood samples collected from condors indicate lead exposure (blood lead ≥ 200 ng/mL) that causes significant subclinical health effects, measured as >60% inhibition of the heme biosynthetic enzyme δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase. Furthermore, each year, ∼20% of free-flying birds have blood lead levels (≥450 ng/mL) that indicate the need for clinical intervention to avert morbidity and mortality. Lead isotopic analysis shows that lead-based ammunition is the principle source of lead poisoning in condors. Finally, population models based on condor demographic data show that the condor’s apparent recovery is solely because of intensive ongoing management, with the only hope of achieving true recovery dependent on the elimination or substantial reduction of lead poisoning rates.
Acknowledgments
We thank V. Bakker, M. Clark, C. Eng, D. Finkelstein, S. Flannagan, R. Franks, G. Grisdale, C. Johnson, T. Kelly, D. Lang, B. Massey, D. Moen, M. Nydes, J. Petterson, P. Raimondi, B. Rideout, R. Risebrough, S. Scherbinski, B. Sullivan, J. Theyerl, M. Tyner, A. Welch, and J. Wynne for their important contributions to this study. We also thank the staff of the Wildlife Disease Laboratories at the San Diego Zoo, the veterinary facility at the Los Angeles Zoo, the field crews from the Hopper Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Pinnacles National Monument, and the Ventana Wildlife Society. This work was supported by the National Park Service, the Western National Park Association, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information
- Download
- 762.58 KB
st01.docx
- Download
- 21.17 KB
st02.docx
- Download
- 32.22 KB
st03.docx
- Download
- 19.39 KB
st04.docx
- Download
- 30.85 KB
References
1
JM Scott, DD Goble, AM Haines, JA Wiens, MC Neel, Conservation-reliant species and the future of conservation. Conserv Lett 3, 91–97 (2010).
2
; US Fish and Wildlife Service Report to Congress, Endangered and Threatened Species Recovery Program (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1996).
3
; Department of Justice Canada Species at Risk Act (Minister of Justice, Ottawa, Canada, Available at http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/S-15.3.pdf. (2002).
4
JM Scott, et al., Recovery of imperiled species under the Endangered Species Act: The need for a new approach. Front Ecol Environ 3, 383–389 (2005).
5
NFR Snyder, HA Snyder The California Condor: A Saga of Natural History and Conservation (Academic, London, 2000).
6
DS Wilcove, RM May, Endangered species—the fate of the California condor. Nature 319, 16 (1986).
7
JR Walters, et al., Status of the California condor (Gymnogyps Californianus) and efforts to achieve its recovery. Auk 127, 969–1001 (2010).
8
J Grantham Reintroduction of California Condors into Their Historic Range: The Recovery Program in California. California Condors in the 21st Century Series in Ornithology, eds A Mee, LS Hall (American Ornithologists Union, Nuttall Ornithological Club, Washington, DC) Vol 2, 123–138 (2007).
9
LF Kiff, RI Mesta, MP Wallace Recovery Plan for the California Condor (US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, 1996).
10
BA Rideout, et al., Patterns of mortality in free-ranging California Condors (Gymnogyps californianus). J Wildl Dis 48, 95–112 (2012).
11
SN Wiemeyer, AJ Krynitsky, SR Wilbur, Environmental contaminants in tissues, foods, and feces of California condors. Vulture Biology and Management, eds SR Wilbur, JA Jackson (Univ California Press, Berkeley, CA), pp. 427–439 (1983).
12
TJ Cade, Exposure of California condors to lead from spent ammunition. J Wildl Manage 71, 2125–2133 (2007).
13
; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Managing Elevated Blood Lead Levels Among Young Children: Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Bethesda, 2002).
14
DC Bellinger, The protean toxicities of lead: New chapters in a familiar story. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8, 2593–2628 (2011).
15
PM Dey, J Burger, M Gochfeld, KR Reuhl, Developmental lead exposure disturbs expression of synaptic neural cell adhesion molecules in herring gull brains. Toxicology 146, 137–147 (2000).
16
S Telisman, et al., Semen quality and reproductive endocrine function in relation to biomarkers of lead, cadmium, zinc, and copper in men. Environ Health Perspect 108, 45–53 (2000).
17
TR Kelly, et al., Impact of the California lead ammunition ban on reducing lead exposure in golden eagles and turkey vultures. PLoS One 6, e17656 (2011).
18
PW Collins, NFR Snyder, SD Emslie, Faunal remains in California Condor nest caves. Condor 102, 222–227 (2000).
19
SD Emslie, Age and diet of fossil california condors in grand canyon, Arizona. Science 237, 768–770 (1987).
20
CP Chamberlain, et al., Pleistocene to recent dietary shifts in California condors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 16707–16711 (2005).
21
DM Fry, J Maurer Assessment of Lead Contamination Sources Exposing California Condors (California Deptartment of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 2003).
22
ME Finkelstein, et al., Feather lead concentrations and (207)Pb/(206)Pb ratios reveal lead exposure history of California Condors (Gymnogyps californianus). Environ Sci Technol 44, 2639–2647 (2010).
23
TJ McBride, JP Smith, HP Gross, MJ Hooper, Blood-lead and ALAD activity levels of Cooper's Hawks (Accipiter cooperii) migrating through the southern Rocky Mountains. J Raptor Res 38, 118–124 (2004).
24
TM Work, MR Smith, Lead exposure in Laysan albatross adults and chicks in Hawaii: Prevalence, risk factors, and biochemical effects. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31, 115–119 (1996).
25
N Felitsyn, C McLeod, AL Shroads, PW Stacpoole, L Notterpek, The heme precursor delta-aminolevulinate blocks peripheral myelin formation. J Neurochem 106, 2068–2079 (2008).
26
ME Church, et al., Ammunition is the principal source of lead accumulated by California condors re-introduced to the wild. Environ Sci Technol 40, 6143–6150 (2006).
27
JR Platt, Fight to protect California condors from lead ammunition moves to Arizona. Scientific American (Nature America, Inc., New York, 2009).
28
M Di Paola California Condors Survive Lead-Poisoned Gut Piles: Commentary (Bloomberg News, New York, 2010).
29
RH Gwiazda, DR Smith, Lead isotopes as a supplementary tool in the routine evaluation of household lead hazards. Environ Health Perspect 108, 1091–1097 (2000).
30
WT Sturges, LA Barrie, Lead-206-207 isotope ratios in the atmosphere of North America as tracers of USA and Canadian emissions. Nature 329, 144–146 (1987).
31
DR Smith, JD Osterloh, AR Flegal, Use of endogenous, stable lead isotopes to determine release of lead from the skeleton. Environ Health Perspect 104, 60–66 (1996).
32
ME Finkelstein, RH Gwiazda, DR Smith, Lead poisoning of seabirds: Environmental risks from leaded paint at a decommissioned military base. Environ Sci Technol 37, 3256–3260 (2003).
33
PM Outridge, RD Evans, R Wagemann, REA Stewart, Historical trends of heavy metals and stable lead isotopes in beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) and walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ 203, 209–219 (1997).
34
ME Church, et al., Ammunition is the principal source of lead accumulated by California condors re-introduced to the wild—reply. Environ Sci Technol 42, 1809–1811 (2008).
35
VJ Meretsky, NFR Snyder, Range use and movements of California condors. Condor 94, 313–335 (1992).
36
NFR Snyder, HA Snyder Introduction to the Californnia Condor (Univ California Press, Berkeley, CA, 2005).
37
AR Flegal, C Gallon, S Hibdon, ZE Kuspa, LF Laporte, Declining-but persistent-atmospheric contamination in central California from the resuspension of historic leaded gasoline emissions as recorded in the lace lichen (Ramalina menziesii Taylor) from 1892 to 2006. Environ Sci Technol 44, 5613–5618 (2010).
38
D George, et al. Pinnacles National Monument California Condor Reestablishment, Annual Report 2012 (Pinnacles Natl Monument, Natl Park Serv, Paicines, CA, 2012).
39
; Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act In Assembly Bill No. 821 (California State Assembly, Sacramento, CA, Available at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/bilinfo.html. (2008).
40
; California Department of Fish and Game, Methods Authorized for Taking Big Game, Section 353, Title 14, CCR (Office of Administrative Law, Sacramento, CA). Available at http://www.oal.ca.gov/Publications.htm. (2008).
41
TA Rogers, B Bedrosian, J Graham, KR Foresman, Lead exposure in large carnivores in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. J Wildl Manage 9999, 1–8 (2011).
42
IJ Fisher, DJ Pain, VG Thomas, A review of lead poisoning from ammunition sources in terrestrial birds. Biol Conserv 131, 421–432 (2006).
43
N Kenntner, Y Crettenand, HJ Funfstuck, M Janovsky, F Tataruch, Lead poisoning and heavy metal exposure of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from the European Alps. J Ornithol 148, 173–177 (2007).
44
R Gwiazda, C Campbell, D Smith, A noninvasive isotopic approach to estimate the bone lead contribution to blood in children: Implications for assessing the efficacy of lead abatement. Environ Health Perspect 113, 104–110 (2005).
45
R Gwiazda, D Woolard, D Smith, Improved lead isotope ratio measurements in environmental and biological samples with a double focusing magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). J Anal At Spectrom 13, 1233–1238 (1998).
46
H Fujita, Measurement of δ-aminolevulinate dehydratase activity. Current Protocols in Toxicology, eds M Maines, LG Costa, E Hodgson, DJ Reed, IG Sipes (John, Wiley and Sons, New York), pp. 8.6.1–8.6.11 (1999).
47
AM Scheuhammer, Erythrocyte delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase in birds. I. The effects of lead and other metals in vitro. Toxicology 45, 155–163 (1987).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Submission history
Published online: June 25, 2012
Published in issue: July 10, 2012
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank V. Bakker, M. Clark, C. Eng, D. Finkelstein, S. Flannagan, R. Franks, G. Grisdale, C. Johnson, T. Kelly, D. Lang, B. Massey, D. Moen, M. Nydes, J. Petterson, P. Raimondi, B. Rideout, R. Risebrough, S. Scherbinski, B. Sullivan, J. Theyerl, M. Tyner, A. Welch, and J. Wynne for their important contributions to this study. We also thank the staff of the Wildlife Disease Laboratories at the San Diego Zoo, the veterinary facility at the Los Angeles Zoo, the field crews from the Hopper Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Pinnacles National Monument, and the Ventana Wildlife Society. This work was supported by the National Park Service, the Western National Park Association, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Notes
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
†
The lead isotopic composition of background environmental lead in California reflects multiple sources but is dominated by the persistent, albeit declining, contamination from leaded gas use, which was largely phased out in the late 1970s (37).
‡
As of December 2011, lead-based paint on this inactive fire lookout tower has been remediated; tracking data confirm that condor association with fire lookout towers in central California is a rare occurrence (38).
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
109 (28) 11449-11454,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203141109
(2012).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.