Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment

Edited by Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany, and accepted by the Editorial Board September 23, 2013 (received for review January 31, 2013)
December 16, 2013
111 (9) 3262-3267

Significance

Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are widely expected to influence global climate over the coming century. The impact on drought is uncertain because of the complexity of the processes but can be estimated using outputs from an ensemble of global models (hydrological and climate models). Using an ensemble of 35 simulations, we show a likely increase in the global severity of drought by the end of 21st century, with regional hotspots including South America and Central and Western Europe in which the frequency of drought increases by more than 20%. The main source of uncertainty in the results comes from the hydrological models, with climate models contributing to a substantial but smaller amount of uncertainty.

Abstract

Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are expected to modify the global water cycle with significant consequences for terrestrial hydrology. We assess the impact of climate change on hydrological droughts in a multimodel experiment including seven global impact models (GIMs) driven by bias-corrected climate from five global climate models under four representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Drought severity is defined as the fraction of land under drought conditions. Results show a likely increase in the global severity of hydrological drought at the end of the 21st century, with systematically greater increases for RCPs describing stronger radiative forcings. Under RCP8.5, droughts exceeding 40% of analyzed land area are projected by nearly half of the simulations. This increase in drought severity has a strong signal-to-noise ratio at the global scale, and Southern Europe, the Middle East, the Southeast United States, Chile, and South West Australia are identified as possible hotspots for future water security issues. The uncertainty due to GIMs is greater than that from global climate models, particularly if including a GIM that accounts for the dynamic response of plants to CO2 and climate, as this model simulates little or no increase in drought frequency. Our study demonstrates that different representations of terrestrial water-cycle processes in GIMs are responsible for a much larger uncertainty in the response of hydrological drought to climate change than previously thought. When assessing the impact of climate change on hydrology, it is therefore critical to consider a diverse range of GIMs to better capture the uncertainty.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), and we thank the Hadley Centre Global Environment Model version 2, the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, and the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate climate-modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. Original codes were written by Dr. George Goodsell, who is gratefully acknowledged. The manuscript could be improved thanks to constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers, who are gratefully acknowledged. For CMIP, the US Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. This work has been conducted under the framework of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP). The ISI-MIP Fast Track project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, with project funding reference number 01LS1201A. The work has been in part funded by the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology-Natural Environment Research Council water program. I.G. was funded by a PhD scholarship from the United Kingdom Natural Environment Research Council (NE/YXS1270382). R.D. was supported by the Joint Department of Energy and Climate Change/Department for Environment and Rural Affairs Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Y.M. was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-10) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information

References

1
KE Trenberth, Conceptual framework for changes of extremes of the hydrological cycle with climate change. Clim Change 42, 327–339 (1999).
2
Field CB, et al. eds (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), p 582.
3
GA Meehl, et al., Global Climate Projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds S Solomon, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 747–845 (2007).
4
DR Cayan, et al., Future dryness in the southwest US and the hydrology of the early 21st century drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 21271–21276 (2010).
5
B Lloyd-Hughes, LC Shaffrey, PL Vidale, NW Arnell, An evaluation of the spatiotemporal structure of large-scale European drought within the HiGEM climate model. Int J Climatol 33, 2024–2035 (2012).
6
J Sheffield, EF Wood, Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Clim Dyn 13, 79–105 (2008).
7
A Dai, Drought under global warming: A review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2, 45–65 (2011).
8
S Hempel, K Frieler, L Warszawski, J Schewe, F Piontek, A trend-preserving bias correction: The ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst Dynam Discuss 4, 49–92 (2013).
9
CM Taylor, RAM de Jeu, F Guichard, PP Harris, WA Dorigo, Afternoon rain more likely over drier soils. Nature 489, 423–426 (2012).
10
J Sheffield, EF Wood Drought: Past Problems and Future Scenarios (Earthscan, London, 2011).
11
SI Seneviratne, et al., Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth Sci Rev 99, 125–161 (2010).
12
SN Gosling, NW Arnell, Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: Model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Hydrol Processes 25, 1129–1145 (2011).
13
DB Clark, et al., The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description–Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics. Geosci. Model Dev 4, 701–722 (2011).
14
I Haddeland, et al., Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: Setup and first results. J Hydrometeorol 12, 869–884 (2011).
15
C Prudhomme, et al., How well do large-scale models reproduce regional hydrological extremes in Europe? J Hydrometeorol 12, 1181–1204 (2011).
16
L Gudmundsson, et al., Comparing large-scale hydrological model simulations to observed runoff percentiles in Europe. J Hydrometeorol 13, 604–620 (2011).
17
S Hagemann, et al., Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models. Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss 3, 1321–1345 (2012).
18
Warszawski L, et al. (2014) The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP): Project framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3228–3232.
19
KE Taylor, RJ Stouffer, GA Meehl, An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93, 485–498 (2011).
20
L Gudmundsson, T Wagener, LM Tallaksen, K Engeland, Evaluation of nine large-scale hydrological models with respect to the seasonal runoff climatology in Europe. Water Resour Res 48, W11504 (2012).
21
S Hagemann, et al., Impact of a statistical bias correction on the projected hydrological changes obtained from three GCMs and two hydrology models. J Hydrometeorol 12, 556–578 (2011).
22
D van Vuuren, et al., The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Clim Change 109, 5–31 (2011).
23
; IPCC, Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds ML Parry, OF Canziani, JP Palutikof, PJ Van der Linden, CE Hanson (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 7–22 (2007).
24
L Cao, G Bala, K Caldeira, R Nemani, G Ban-Weiss, Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 9513–9518 (2010).
25
CA Alo, GL Wang, Potential future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on climate projections by eight general circulation models. J Geophys Res 113, G01004. (2008).
26
Wada Y, et al. (2013) Multimodel projections and uncertainties of irrigation water demand under climate change. Geophys Res Lett, 10.1002/grl.50686.
27
United Nations Environment Programme (2012) GEO 5 Global Environment Oulook 5: Environment for the Future We Want (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya), p 551.
28
A Dai, Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature Clim Change 3, 52–58 (2013).
29
EJ Burke, SJ Brown, Evaluating uncertainties in the projection of future drought. J Hydrometeorol 9, 292–299 (2008).
30
EJ Burke, SJ Brown, N Christidis, Modeling the recent evolution of global drought and projections for the twenty-first century with the Hadley Centre Climate Model. J Hydrometeorol 7, 1113–1125 (2006).
31
DGC Kirono, DM Kent, KJ Hennessy, F Mpelasoka, Characteristics of Australian droughts under enhanced greenhouse conditions: Results from 14 global climate models. J Arid Environ 75, 566–575 (2011).
32
B Orlowsky, SI Seneviratne, Elusive drought: Uncertainty in observed trends and short- and long-term CMIP5 projections. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9, 13773–13803 (2012).
33
Alkama R, Kageyama M, Ramstein G (2010) Relative contributions of climate change, stomatal closure, and leaf area index changes to 20th and 21st century runoff change: A modelling approach using the Organizing Carbon and Hydrology in Dynamic Ecosystems (ORCHIDEE) land surface model. J Geophys Res 115:D17112.
34
RA Betts, et al., Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide. Nature 448, 1037–1041 (2007).
35
ADB Leakey, et al., Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot 60, 2859–2876 (2009).
36
D Gerten, et al., Global water availability and requirements for future food production. J Hydrometeorol 12, 885–899 (2011).
37
K Wang, RE Dickinson, A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Rev Geophys 50, RG2005 (2012).
38
MG De Kauwe, et al., Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2 : A model-data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites. Glob Change Biol 19, 1759–1779 (2013).
39
S Sitch, et al., Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Glob Change Biol 14, 2015–2039 (2008).
40
Y Wada, et al., Global monthly water stress. 2. Water demand and severity of water stress. Water Resour Res 47, W07518 (2011).
41
CJ Vörösmarty, P Green, J Salisbury, RB Lammers, Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289, 284–288 (2000).
42
RH Moss, et al., The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
43
GP Weedon, et al., Creation of the WATCH forcing data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century. J Hydrometeorol 12, 823–848 (2011).
44
Tallaksen LM, Van Lanen HAJ, eds (2004) Hydrological Drought: Processes and Estimation Methods for Streamflow and Groundwater (Elsevier, Amsterdam), p 579.
45
B Orlowsky, S Seneviratne, Global changes in extreme events: Regional and seasonal dimension. Clim Change 110, 669–696 (2012).
46
GA Corzo Perez, MHJ van Huijgevoort, F Voß, HAJ van Lanen, On the spatio-temporal analysis of hydrological droughts from global hydrological models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15, 2963–2978 (2011).
47
KM Andreadis, EA Clark, AW Wood, AF Hamlet, DP Lettenmaier, Twentieth-century drought in the conterminous United States. J Hydrometeorol 6, 985–1001 (2005).
48
DS Wilks Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.111; No.9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 111 | No. 9
March 4, 2014
PubMed: 24344266

Classifications

Submission history

Published online: December 16, 2013
Published in issue: March 4, 2014

Keywords

  1. climate impact
  2. global hydrology
  3. evaporation
  4. global warming

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), and we thank the Hadley Centre Global Environment Model version 2, the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, and the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate climate-modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. Original codes were written by Dr. George Goodsell, who is gratefully acknowledged. The manuscript could be improved thanks to constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers, who are gratefully acknowledged. For CMIP, the US Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. This work has been conducted under the framework of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP). The ISI-MIP Fast Track project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, with project funding reference number 01LS1201A. The work has been in part funded by the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology-Natural Environment Research Council water program. I.G. was funded by a PhD scholarship from the United Kingdom Natural Environment Research Council (NE/YXS1270382). R.D. was supported by the Joint Department of Energy and Climate Change/Department for Environment and Rural Affairs Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Y.M. was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-10) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan.

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Authors

Affiliations

Christel Prudhomme1 [email protected]
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom;
Ignazio Giuntoli
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom;
School of Geography, Earth and Environment Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom;
Emma L. Robinson
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom;
Douglas B. Clark
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom;
Nigel W. Arnell
Walker Institute for Climate System Research, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AR, United Kingdom;
Rutger Dankers
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, United Kingdom;
Balázs M. Fekete
Civil Engineering Department, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031;
Wietse Franssen
Earth System Science, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;
Dieter Gerten
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany;
Simon N. Gosling
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom;
Stefan Hagemann
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;
David M. Hannah
School of Geography, Earth and Environment Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom;
Hyungjun Kim
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan;
Yoshimitsu Masaki
National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba-City, Ibaraki, 305-8506 Japan;
Yusuke Satoh
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656 Japan;
Tobias Stacke
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;
Yoshihide Wada
Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
Dominik Wisser
Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; and
Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].
Author contributions: C.P. and D.B.C. designed research; C.P., I.G., E.L.R., D.B.C., N.W.A., R.D., B.M.F., W.F., D.G., S.N.G., S.H., H.K., Y.M., Y.S., T.S., Y.W., and D.W. performed research; C.P., I.G., E.L.R., and D.B.C. analyzed data; and C.P., I.G., E.L.R., D.B.C., and D.M.H. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 111
    • No. 9
    • pp. 3197-3645

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media

    Further reading in this issue