Multiple types of motives don't multiply the motivation of West Point cadets

Edited by Linda M. Bartoshuk, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, and approved June 4, 2014 (received for review March 29, 2014)
June 30, 2014
111 (30) 10990-10995

Significance

Virtually any sustained, effortful activity can be motivated by factors internal to the activity (e.g., scientists pursuing discoveries) or instrumental to it (e.g., scientists pursuing promotions or status). Research in economics and psychology suggests that instrumental motives (often called “extrinsic motives”) undermine the positive impact of internal motives (often called “intrinsic motives”). However, despite 40 y of research, mostly using laboratory-based manipulations, the effect of instrumental motives on the impact of internal motives remains controversial, and naturalistic, long-term tests of its existence are lacking. We show that holding both internal and instrumental motives for attending West Point harms outcomes associated with persistence and performance quality in a sample of over 10,000 cadets over periods spanning up to 14 y.

Abstract

Although people often assume that multiple motives for doing something will be more powerful and effective than a single motive, research suggests that different types of motives for the same action sometimes compete. More specifically, research suggests that instrumental motives, which are extrinsic to the activities at hand, can weaken internal motives, which are intrinsic to the activities at hand. We tested whether holding both instrumental and internal motives yields negative outcomes in a field context in which various motives occur naturally and long-term educational and career outcomes are at stake. We assessed the impact of the motives of over 10,000 West Point cadets over the period of a decade on whether they would become commissioned officers, extend their officer service beyond the minimum required period, and be selected for early career promotions. For each outcome, motivation internal to military service itself predicted positive outcomes; a relationship that was negatively affected when instrumental motives were also in evidence. These results suggest that holding multiple motives damages persistence and performance in educational and occupational contexts over long periods of time.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

We thank Linda Bartoshuk, James Baron, and Clark McCauley, and our reviewers for helpful comments. This work was generously supported by the Yale School of Management.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information

References

1
EL Deci, RM Ryan Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, New York, 1985).
2
EL Deci, RM Ryan, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11, 227–268 (2000).
3
RM Ryan, EL Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55, 68–78 (2000).
4
EL Deci, R Koestner, RM Ryan, A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull 125, 627–668, discussion 692–700 (1999).
5
BS Frey, F Oberholzer-Gee, The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am Econ Rev 87, 746–755 (1997).
6
MR Lepper, D Greene, RE Nisbett, Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 28, 129–137 (1973).
7
BS Frey, How intrinsic motivation is crowded out and in. Rationality Soc 6, 334–352 (1994).
8
R Eisenberger, J Cameron, Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth? Am Psychol 51, 1153–1166 (1996).
9
N Lacetera, M Macis, R Slonim, Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Am Econ J Econ Policy 4, 186–223 (2012).
10
K Murayama, M Matsumoto, K Izuma, K Matsumoto, Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 20911–20916 (2010).
11
D Ariely, A Bracha, S Meier, Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am Econ Rev 99, 544–555 (2009).
12
MT Kiviniemi, M Snyder, AM Omoto, Too many of a good thing? The effects of multiple motivations on task fulfillment, satisfaction, and cost. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28, 732–743 (2002).
13
M Miserandino, Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. J Educ Psychol 88, 203–214 (1996).
14
RJ Vallerand, MS Fortier, F Guay, Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. J Pers Soc Psychol 72, 1161–1176 (1997).
15
C Senecal, E Julien, F Guay, Role conflict and academic procrastination: A self-determination perspective. Eur J Soc Psychol 33, 135–145 (2003).
16
B Soenens, M Vansteenkiste, Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. J Youth Adolesc 34, 589–604 (2005).
17
M Vansteenkiste, E Sierens, B Soenens, K Luyckx, W Lens, Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. J Educ Psychol 101, 671–688 (2009).
18
AM Grant, S Nurmohamed, SJ Ashford, KD Dekas, The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 116, 241–251 (2011).
19
AL Duckworth, C Peterson, MD Matthews, DR Kelly, Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 92, 1087–1101 (2007).
20
DJ Bartholomew Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis (Oxford Univ Press, New York, 1987).
21
AM Grant, Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J Appl Psychol 93, 48–58 (2008).
22
A Wrzesniewski, JE Dutton, Crafting a job: Employees as active crafters of their work. Acad Manage Rev 26, 179–201 (2001).
23
C Sansone, C Weir, L Harpster, C Morgan, Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. J Pers Soc Psychol 63, 379–390 (1992).
24
TS Bateman, B Barry, Masters of the long haul: Pursuing long-term work goals. J Organ Behav 33, 984–1006 (2012).
25
JP Wanous, Effects of a realistic job preview on job acceptance, job attitudes, and job survival. J Appl Psychol 58, 327–332 (1973).
26
A Wrzesniewski, CR McCauley, P Rozin, B Schwartz, Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. J Res Pers 31, 21–33 (1997).
27
JM Berg, AM Grant, V Johnson, When callings are calling: Crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings. Organ Sci 21, 973–994 (2010).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.111; No.30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 111 | No. 30
July 29, 2014
PubMed: 24982165

Classifications

Submission history

Published online: June 30, 2014
Published in issue: July 29, 2014

Keywords

  1. crowding out
  2. overjustification effect

Acknowledgments

We thank Linda Bartoshuk, James Baron, and Clark McCauley, and our reviewers for helpful comments. This work was generously supported by the Yale School of Management.

Notes

*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

Authors

Affiliations

Amy Wrzesniewski1 [email protected]
Organizational Behavior, Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
Barry Schwartz
Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081; and
Xiangyu Cong
Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Michael Kane
Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Audrey Omar
Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Thomas Kolditz
Organizational Behavior, Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].
Author contributions: A.W. and B.S. designed research; A.W., B.S., and T.K. performed research; A.W., X.C., M.K., and A.O. analyzed data; and A.W. and B.S. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Multiple types of motives don't multiply the motivation of West Point cadets
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 111
    • No. 30
    • pp. 10897-11223

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media