Projections of future meteorological drought and wet periods in the Amazon
Edited by Benjamin D. Santer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, and approved September 11, 2015 (received for review November 16, 2014)
Significance
Recent severe droughts in the Amazon basin have increased interest in future climatological and ecological conditions of this region. Future changes in drought and wet periods could have enormous impacts on forest structure, biomass, and composition, but our ability to predict changes in the hydrological regime remains highly uncertain. We evaluate an ensemble of state-of-the-art climate models and demonstrate their accuracy in simulating processes influencing drought in Amazonia. These models provide projections of future properties of drought and wet periods, and indicate that different portions of the Amazon Basin undergo contrasting hydrological futures but will share a tendency toward more hydrological extremes.
Abstract
Future intensification of Amazon drought resulting from climate change may cause increased fire activity, tree mortality, and emissions of carbon to the atmosphere across large areas of Amazonia. To provide a basis for addressing these issues, we examine properties of recent and future meteorological droughts in the Amazon in 35 climate models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). We find that the CMIP5 climate models, as a group, simulate important properties of historical meteorological droughts in the Amazon. In addition, this group of models reproduces observed relationships between Amazon precipitation and regional sea surface temperature anomalies in the tropical Pacific and the North Atlantic oceans. Assuming the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario for future drivers of climate change, the models project increases in the frequency and geographic extent of meteorological drought in the eastern Amazon, and the opposite in the West. For the region as a whole, the CMIP5 models suggest that the area affected by mild and severe meteorological drought will nearly double and triple, respectively, by 2100. Extremes of wetness are also projected to increase after 2040. Specifically, the frequency of periods of unusual wetness and the area affected by unusual wetness are projected to increase after 2040 in the Amazon as a whole, including in locations where annual mean precipitation is projected to decrease. Our analyses suggest that continued emissions of greenhouse gases will increase the likelihood of extreme events that have been shown to alter and degrade Amazonian forests.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 1146206 and the endowment of the Carnegie Institution for Science.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information
- Download
- 1.46 MB
References
1
D Nepstad, P Lefebvre, UL da Silva, Amazon drought and its implications for forest flammability and tree growth: A basin‐wide analysis. Global Change Biol 10, 704–717 (2004).
2
LV Gatti, et al., Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements. Nature 506, 76–80 (2014).
3
DC Nepstad, IM Tohver, D Ray, P Moutinho, G Cardinot, Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. Ecology 88, 2259–2269 (2007).
4
PM Brando, et al., Drought effects on litterfall, wood production and belowground carbon cycling in an Amazon forest: Results of a throughfall reduction experiment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363, 1839–1848 (2008).
5
ACL da Costa, et al., Effect of 7 yr of experimental drought on vegetation dynamics and biomass storage of an eastern Amazonian rainforest. New Phytol 187, 579–591 (2010).
6
SL Lewis, PM Brando, OL Phillips, GMF van der Heijden, D Nepstad, The 2010 Amazon drought. Science 331, 554 (2011).
7
OL Phillips, et al., Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323, 1344–1347 (2009).
8
BJ Meggers, Archeological evidence for the impact of mega-Niño events on Amazonia during the past two millennia. Clim Change 28, 321–338 (1994).
9
MB Bush, MR Silman, C McMichael, S Saatchi, Fire, climate change and biodiversity in Amazonia: A Late-Holocene perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363, 1795–1802 (2008).
10
Y Malhi, et al., Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319, 169–172 (2008).
11
CA Nobre, LDS Borma, “Tipping points” for the Amazon forest. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1, 28–36 (2009).
12
PM Cox, et al., Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century. Theor Appl Climatol 78, 137–156 (2004).
13
FE Mayle, MJ Power, Impact of a drier Early-Mid-Holocene climate upon Amazonian forests. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363, 1829–1838 (2008).
14
PM Cox, RA Betts, CD Jones, SA Spall, IJ Totterdell, Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408, 184–187 (2000).
15
CA Nobre, PJ Sellers, J Shukla, Amazonian deforestation and regional climate change. J Clim 4, 957–988 (1991).
16
C Huntingford, et al., Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO. Nat Geosci 6, 1–6 (2013).
17
A Rammig, et al., Estimating the risk of Amazonian forest dieback. New Phytol 187, 694–706 (2010).
18
P Meir, M Mencuccini, RC Dewar, Drought-related tree mortality: Addressing the gaps in understanding and prediction. New Phytol 207, 28–33 (2015).
19
TL Powell, et al., Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. New Phytol 200, 350–365 (2013).
20
N Zeng, et al., Causes and impacts of the 2005 Amazon drought. Environ Res Lett 3, 014002 (2008).
21
JA Marengo, J Tomasella, WR Soares, LM Alves, CA Nobre, Extreme climatic events in the Amazon basin. Theor Appl Climatol 107, 73–85 (2011).
22
RR Torres, JA Marengo, Climate change hotspots over South America: From CMIP3 to CMIP5 multi-model datasets. Theor Appl Climatol 117, 579–587 (2014).
23
B Cook, N Zeng, JH Yoon, Will Amazonia dry out? Magnitude and causes of change from IPCC climate model projections. Earth Interact 16, 1–27 (2012).
24
KE Taylor, RJ Stouffer, GA Meehl, An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93, 485–498 (2012).
25
J Sillmann, VV Kharin, X Zhang, FW Zwiers, D Bronaugh, Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J Geophys Res 118, 1716–1733 (2013).
26
L Yin, R Fu, E Shevilakova, RE Dickinson, How well can CMIP5 simulate precipitation and its controlling processes over tropical South America? Clim Dyn 41, 3127–3143 (2013).
27
VE Kousky, MT Kagano, IFA Cavalcanti, A review of the Southern Oscillation - oceanic-atmospheric circulation changes and related rainfall anomalis. Tellus Ser A 36, 490–504 (1984).
28
CF Ropelewski, MS Halpert, Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El-Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 115, 1606–1626 (1987).
29
J-H Yoon, N Zeng, An Atlantic influence on Amazon rainfall. Clim Dyn 34, 249–264 (2010).
30
NB Guttman, Comparing the palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation index1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34, 113–121 (1998).
31
JP Boisier, P Ciais, A Ducharne, M Guimberteau, Projected strengthening of Amazonian dry season by constrained climate model simulations. Nat Clim Chang 5, 656–660 (2015).
32
JE Bagley, J Miller, CJ Bernacchi, Biophysical impacts of climate-smart agriculture in the Midwest United States. Plant Cell Environ 38, 1913–1930 (2015).
33
V Brovkin, et al., Effect of anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on climate and land carbon storage in CMIP5 projections for the twenty-first century. J Clim 26, 6859–6881 (2013).
34
DC Morton, Y Le Page, R DeFries, GJ Collatz, GC Hurtt, Understorey fire frequency and the fate of burned forests in southern Amazonia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368, 20120163–20120163 (2013).
35
AAC Alencar, PM Brando, GP Asner, FE Putz, Landscape fragmentation, severe drought and the new Amazon forest fire regime. Ecol Appl 25, 1493–1505 (2015).
36
CD Allen, AK Macalady, H Chenchouni, A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manage 259, 660–684 (2010).
37
NG McDowell, CD Allen, Darcy’s law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming. Nat Clim Chang 5, 669–672 (2015).
38
CD Allen, DD Breshears, NG McDowell, On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 6, art129 (2015).
39
OL Phillips, et al., Drought-mortality relationships for tropical forests. New Phytol 187, 631–646 (2010).
40
P Zelazowski, Y Malhi, C Huntingford, S Sitch, JB Fisher, Changes in the potential distribution of humid tropical forests on a warmer planet. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 369, 137–160 (2010).
41
G Flato, J Marotzke, Evaluation of climate models. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Stocker TF, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 741−846. (2013).
42
B Orlowsky, SI Seneviratne, Elusive drought: uncertainty in observed trends and short- and long-term CMIP5 projections. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(5), 1765–1781. (2013).
43
RH Reichle, The MERRA-Land Data Product (NASA Goddard Space Flight Cent, Greenbelt, MD) GMAO Off Note 3, Version 1.2. (2012).
44
J Sheffield, G Goteti, EF Wood, Development of a 50-yr high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J Clim 19, 3088–3111 (2006).
45
T Condom, P Rau, JC Espinoza, Correction of TRMM 3B43 monthly precipitation data over the mountainous areas of Peru during the period 1998–2007. Hydrol Processes 25, 1924–1933 (2010).
46
C Tebaldi, R Knutti, The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 365, 2053–2075 (2007).
47
RH Reichle, et al., Assessment and enhancement of MERRA land surface hydrology estimates. J Climate 24, 6322–6338 (2011).
48
GJ Huffman, et al., The TRMM multi-satellite precipitation analysis: QuasiGlobal, multi-year, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scale. J Hydrometeor 8, 38–55 (2007).
49
GJ Huffman, RF Adler, DT Bolvin, EJ Nelkin, The TRMM multi-satellite precipitation analysis (TMPA). Satellite Rainfall Applications for Surface Hydrology, eds F Hossain, M Gebremichael (Springer, Heidelberg), pp. 3–22 (2010).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Submission history
Published online: October 12, 2015
Published in issue: October 27, 2015
Keywords
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 1146206 and the endowment of the Carnegie Institution for Science.
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
112 (43) 13172-13177,
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.