Free access

Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes

Edited by Stephen Polasky, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, and approved November 2, 2015 (received for review May 26, 2015)
November 23, 2015
112 (49) 15060-15065
Letter
Reply to Bistline and Blanford: Letter reaffirms conclusions and highlights flaws in previous research
Mark Z. Jacobson, Mark A. Delucchi [...] Bethany A. Frew

Significance

The large-scale conversion to 100% wind, water, and solar (WWS) power for all purposes (electricity, transportation, heating/cooling, and industry) is currently inhibited by a fear of grid instability and high cost due to the variability and uncertainty of wind and solar. This paper couples numerical simulation of time- and space-dependent weather with simulation of time-dependent power demand, storage, and demand response to provide low-cost solutions to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of WWS across all energy sectors in the continental United States between 2050 and 2055. Solutions are obtained without higher-cost stationary battery storage by prioritizing storage of heat in soil and water; cold in water and ice; and electricity in phase-change materials, pumped hydro, hydropower, and hydrogen.

Abstract

This study addresses the greatest concern facing the large-scale integration of wind, water, and solar (WWS) into a power grid: the high cost of avoiding load loss caused by WWS variability and uncertainty. It uses a new grid integration model and finds low-cost, no-load-loss, nonunique solutions to this problem on electrification of all US energy sectors (electricity, transportation, heating/cooling, and industry) while accounting for wind and solar time series data from a 3D global weather model that simulates extreme events and competition among wind turbines for available kinetic energy. Solutions are obtained by prioritizing storage for heat (in soil and water); cold (in ice and water); and electricity (in phase-change materials, pumped hydro, hydropower, and hydrogen), and using demand response. No natural gas, biofuels, nuclear power, or stationary batteries are needed. The resulting 2050–2055 US electricity social cost for a full system is much less than for fossil fuels. These results hold for many conditions, suggesting that low-cost, reliable 100% WWS systems should work many places worldwide.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

The authors received no external support for this work.

Supporting Information

Appendix (PDF)
Supporting Information

References

1
BK Sovacool, The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: Technical barrier or rhetorical excuse? Util Policy 17, 288–296 (2009).
2
MZ Jacobson, MA Delucchi, A path to sustainable energy by 2030. Sci Am 301, 58–65 (2009).
3
IG Mason, SC Page, AG Williamson, A 100% renewable electricity generation system for New Zealand utilising hydro, wind, geothermal and biomass resources. Energy Policy 38, 3973–3984 (2010).
4
EK Hart, MZ Jacobson, A Monte Carlo approach to generator portfolio planning and carbon emissions assessments of systems with large penetrations of variable renewables. Renew Energy 36, 2278–2286 (2011).
5
EK Hart, MZ Jacobson, The carbon abatement potential of high penetration intermittent renewables. Energy Environ Sci 5, 6592–6601 (2012).
6
D Connolly, H Lund, BV Mathiesen, M Leahy, The first step towards a 100% renewable energy-system for Ireland. Appl Energy 88, 502–507 (2011).
7
BV Mathiesen, H Lund, K Karlsson, 100% Renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth. Appl Energy 88, 488–501 (2011).
8
P Denholm, M Hand, Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 39, 1817–1830 (2011).
9
B Elliston, M Diesendorf, I MacGill, Simulations of scenarios with 100% renewable electricity in the Australian national electricity market. Energy Policy 45, 606–613 (2012).
10
; National Renewable Energy Laboratory Renewable Electricity Futures Study , eds MM Hand, et al. (NREL, Golden, CO, 2012).
11
MG Rasmussen, GB Andresen, M Greiner, Storage and balancing synergies in a fully or highly renewable pan-European power system. Energy Policy 51, 642–651 (2012).
12
J Nelson, et al., High-resolution modeling of the western North American power system demonstrates low-cost and low-carbon futures. Energy Policy 43, 436–447 (2012).
13
C Budischak, et al., Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time. J Power Sources 225, 60–74 (2013).
14
B Elliston, I MacGill, M Diesendorf, Least cost 100% renewable electricity scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market. Energy Policy 59, 270–282 (2013).
15
T Mai, D Mulcahy, MM Hand, SF Baldwin, Envisioning a renewable electricity future for the United States. Energy 65, 374–386 (2014).
16
T Mai, et al., Renewable electricity futures for the United States. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 5, 372–378 (2014).
17
A Mileva, JH Nelson, J Johnston, DM Kammen, SunShot solar power reduces costs and uncertainty in future low-carbon electricity systems. Environ Sci Technol 47, 9053–9060 (2013).
18
J Cochran, T Mai, M Bazilian, Meta-analysis of high penetration renewable energy scenarios. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29, 246–253 (2014).
19
S Becker, et al., Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: Optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions. Energy 72, 443–458 (2014).
20
B Elliston, I MacGill, M Diesendorf, Comparing least cost scenarios for 100% renewable electricity with low emission fossil fuel scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market. Renew Energy 66, 196–204 (2014).
21
B Sørensen Energy Intermittency (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015).
22
MZ Jacobson, et al., 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy Environ Sci 8, 2093–2117 (2015).
23
B Sibbitt, et al., The performance of a high solar fraction seasonal storage district heating system: Five years of operation. Energy Procedia 30, 856–865 (2012).
24
D King, Li-ion battery prices still headed way, way down, to $180/kWh by 2020. Available at green.autoblog.com/2013/11/08/li-ion-battery-prices-headed-down-180-kwh/. Accessed January 1, 2015. (2013).
25
K Nithyanandam, R Pitchumani, Cost and performance analysis of concentrating solar power systems with integrated latent thermal energy storage. Energy 64, 793–810 (2014).
26
; International Renewable Energy Agency Concentrating Solar Power. IEA-ETSAP and IRENA Technology Brief E10 (IRENA, Abu Dhabi, 2012).
27
; US Energy Information Administration Tables 1.7 and 1.8. Annual Energy Review (EIA, Washington, DC, 2012).
28
BA Corcoran (Frew), N Jenkins, MZ Jacobson, Effects of aggregating electric load in the United States. Energy Policy 46, 399–416 (2012).
29
MZ Jacobson, CL Archer, Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 15679–15684 (2012).
30
MZ Jacobson, CL Archer, W Kempton, Taming hurricanes with arrays of offshore wind turbines. Nat Clim Chang 4, 195–200 (2014).
31
; National Renewable Energy Laboratory Western Wind Dataset (NREL, Golden, CO, 2014).
32
; National Renewable Energy Laboratory Eastern Wind Dataset (NREL, Golden, CO, 2014).
33
; US Energy Information Administration Consumption and Expenditures Tables. 2009 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (EIA, Washington, DC, 2009).
34
; US Energy Information Administration Table E1A. Major Fuel Consumption (Btu) by End Use for All Buildings, 2003. 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (EIA, Washington, DC, 2008).
35
; US Energy Information Administration Table 5.2 End uses of fuel consumption, 2010. 2010 Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (EIA, Washington, DC, 2013).
36
; Wikipedia, Ivanpah solar power facility., Available at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility. Accessed December 30, 2014. (2014).
37
MA Delucchi, MZ Jacobson, Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 39, 1170–1190 (2011).
38
MZ Jacobson, WG Colella, DM Golden, Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Science 308, 1901–1905 (2005).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.112; No.49
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 112 | No. 49
December 8, 2015
PubMed: 26598655

Submission history

Published online: November 23, 2015
Published in issue: December 8, 2015

Keywords

  1. energy security
  2. climate change
  3. grid stability
  4. renewable energy
  5. energy cost

Acknowledgments

The authors received no external support for this work.

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data available upon request (from M.Z.J.).

Authors

Affiliations

Mark Z. Jacobson1 [email protected]
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Mark A. Delucchi
Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Mary A. Cameron
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
Bethany A. Frew
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected].
Author contributions: M.Z.J. designed research; M.Z.J. and M.A.D. performed research; M.Z.J., M.A.D., M.A.C., and B.A.F. contributed analytic tools; M.Z.J., M.A.D., and M.A.C. analyzed data; and M.Z.J., M.A.D., M.A.C., and B.A.F. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 112
    • No. 49
    • pp. 14997-E6827

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media