Ocean-wide tracking of pelagic sharks reveals extent of overlap with longline fishing hotspots
Edited by Steven D. Gaines, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board December 18, 2015 (received for review May 26, 2015)
Significance
Shark populations are declining worldwide because of overexploitation by fisheries with unknown consequences for ecosystems. Although the harvest of oceanic sharks remains largely unregulated, knowing precisely where they interact with fishing vessels will better aid their conservation. We satellite track six species of shark and two entire longline fishing vessel fleets across the North Atlantic over multiple years. Sharks actively select and aggregate in space-use “hotspots” characterized by thermal fronts and high productivity. However, longline fishing vessels also target these habitats and efficiently track shark movements seasonally, leading to an 80% spatial overlap. Areas of highest overlap between sharks and fishing vessels show persistence between years, suggesting current hotspots are at risk, and arguing for introduction of international catch limits.
Abstract
Overfishing is arguably the greatest ecological threat facing the oceans, yet catches of many highly migratory fishes including oceanic sharks remain largely unregulated with poor monitoring and data reporting. Oceanic shark conservation is hampered by basic knowledge gaps about where sharks aggregate across population ranges and precisely where they overlap with fishers. Using satellite tracking data from six shark species across the North Atlantic, we show that pelagic sharks occupy predictable habitat hotspots of high space use. Movement modeling showed sharks preferred habitats characterized by strong sea surface-temperature gradients (fronts) over other available habitats. However, simultaneous Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking of the entire Spanish and Portuguese longline-vessel fishing fleets show an 80% overlap of fished areas with hotspots, potentially increasing shark susceptibility to fishing exploitation. Regions of high overlap between oceanic tagged sharks and longliners included the North Atlantic Current/Labrador Current convergence zone and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge southwest of the Azores. In these main regions, and subareas within them, shark/vessel co-occurrence was spatially and temporally persistent between years, highlighting how broadly the fishing exploitation efficiently “tracks” oceanic sharks within their space-use hotspots year-round. Given this intense focus of longliners on shark hotspots, our study argues the need for international catch limits for pelagic sharks and identifies a future role of combining fine-scale fish and vessel telemetry to inform the ocean-scale management of fisheries.
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the UK Natural Environment Research Council Oceans 2025 Strategic Research Programme (D.W.S.), the Save Our Seas Foundation (D.W.S.), a Marine Biological Association Senior Research Fellowship (D.W.S.), European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) via the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (COMPETE), National Funds via Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under PTDC/MAR/100345/2008 and COMPETE FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-010580 (to N.Q. and D.W.S.), Project Biodiversity, Ecology and Global Change cofinanced by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme 2007/2013 (ON.2—O Novo Norte), under the National Strategic Reference Framework via the European Regional Development Fund (N.Q.), FCT Investigator Fellowships IF/01611/2013 (to N.Q.) and IF/00043/2012 (to F.P.L.), FCT Doctoral Fellowships SFRH/BD/68717/2010 (to L.L.S.) and SFRH/BD/68521/2010 (to R.S.) and by the Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, Batchelor Foundation, and West Coast Inland Navigation District in Florida (N.H.). This research was part of the European Tracking of Predators in the Atlantic initiative. This paper is dedicated to the memory of our colleague P. Alexandrino, who supported the initial work.
Supporting Information
Appendix (PDF)
Supporting Information
- Download
- 2.38 MB
References
1
DJ McCauley, et al., Marine defaunation: Animal loss in the global ocean. Science 347, 1255641 (2015).
2
B Worm, et al., Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar Policy 40, 194–204 (2013).
3
JA Hutchings, RA Myers, VB García, LO Lucifora, A Kuparinen, Life-history correlates of extinction risk and recovery potential. Ecol Appl 22, 1061–1067 (2012).
4
JK Baum, et al., Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic. Science 299, 389–392 (2003).
5
RA Myers, JK Baum, TD Shepherd, SP Powers, CH Peterson, Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315, 1846–1850 (2007).
6
JK Baum, W Blanchard, Inferring shark population trends from generalized linear mixed models of pelagic longline catch and effort data. Fish Res 102, 229–239 (2010).
7
MD Camhi, E Lauck, EK Pikitch, EA Babcock, A global overview of commercial fisheries for open ocean sharks. Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation, eds MD Camhi, EK Pikitch, EA Babcock (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 166–192 (2008).
8
; International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (ICCAT), Report of the 2004 Inter-sessional Meeting of the ICCAT sub-committee on by-catches: Shark stock assessment. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 58, 799–890 (2005).
9
; International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (ICCAT), Report of the 2008 shark stock assessment meeting. Collect Vol Sci Pap ICCAT 64, 1343–1491 (2009).
10
; International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (ICCAT), Report of the 2012 shortfin mako stock assessment and ecological risk assessment meeting. Olhão, Portugal. www.iccat.int/Documents/Meetings/Docs/2012_SHK_ASS_ENG.pdf. (2012).
11
DW Sims, Tracking and analysis techniques for understanding free-ranging shark movements and behaviour. Biology of Sharks and their Relatives, eds J Carrier, M Heithaus, J Musick (CRC, Boca Raton, FL) Vol II, 351–392 (2010).
12
BA Block, et al., Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475, 86–90 (2011).
13
JK Baum, DG Kehler, RA Myers, Robust estimates of decline for pelagic shark populations in the northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries (Bethesda, Md) 30, 27–29 (2005).
14
N Queiroz, NE Humphries, LR Noble, AM Santos, DW Sims, Spatial dynamics and expanded vertical niche of blue sharks in oceanographic fronts reveal habitat targets for conservation. PLoS One 7, e32374 (2012).
15
B Worm, HK Lotze, RA Myers, Predator diversity hotspots in the blue ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 9884–9888 (2003).
16
P Miller, Composite front maps for improved visibility of dynamic sea-surface features on cloudy SeaWiFS and AVHRR data. J Mar Syst 78, 327–336 (2009).
17
N Bez, E Walker, D Gaertner, J Rivoirard, P Gaspar, Fishing activity of tuna purse seiners estimated from vessel monitoring system (VMS) data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68, 1998–2010 (2011).
18
SC Votier, et al., Individual responses of seabirds to commercial fisheries revealed using GPS tracking, stable isotopes and vessel monitoring systems. J Appl Ecol 47, 487–497 (2010).
19
JSE Lea, et al., Repeated, long-distance migrations by a philopatric predator targeting highly contrasting ecosystems. Sci Rep 5, 11202 (2015).
20
N Hammerschlag, AJ Gallagher, DM Lazarre, C Slonim, Range extension of the endangered great hammerhead shark Sphyrna mokarran in the Northwest Atlantic: Preliminary data and significance for conservation. Endanger Species Res 13, 111–116 (2011b).
21
A Getis, JK Ord, The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24, 189–206 (1992).
22
A Walli, et al., Seasonal movements, aggregations and diving behavior of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) revealed with archival tags. PLoS One 4, e6151 (2009).
23
DP Tittensor, et al., Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010).
24
F Vandeperre, et al., Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) across their life history. PLoS One 9, e103538 (2014).
25
SE Campana, et al., Migration pathways, behavioural thermoregulation and overwintering grounds of blue sharks in the Northwest Atlantic. PLoS One 6, e16854 (2011).
26
P Ward, RA Myers, Shifts in open-ocean fish communities coinciding with the commencement of commercial fishing. Ecology 86, 835–847 (2005).
27
MD Camhi, Conservation status of pelagic elasmobranchs. Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation, eds MD Camhi, EK Pikitch, EA Babcock (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 397–417 (2008).
28
S Fossette, et al., Pan-atlantic analysis of the overlap of a highly migratory species, the leatherback turtle, with pelagic longline fisheries. Proc Biol Sci 281, 20133065 (2014).
29
JH Roe, et al., Predicting bycatch hotspots for endangered leatherback turtles on longlines in the Pacific Ocean. Proc Biol Sci 281, 20132559 (2014).
30
SJ Jorgensen, et al., Philopatry and migration of Pacific white sharks. Proc Biol Sci 277, 679–688 (2010).
31
UR Sumaila, D Zeller, R Watson, J Alder, D Pauly, Potential costs and benefits of marine reserves in the high seas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 345, 305–310 (2007).
32
AC Godin, T Wimmer, JH Wang, B Worm, No effect from rare-earth metal deterrent on shark bycatch in a commercial pelagic longline trial. Fish Res 143, 131–135 (2013).
33
SE Campana, W Joyce, MJ Manning, Bycatch and discard mortality in commercially caught blue sharks Prionace glauca assessed using archival satellite pop-up tags. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 387, 241–253 (2009).
34
JM Marzluff, JJ Millspaugh, P Hurvitz, MS Handcock, Relating resources to a probabilistic measure of space use: Forest fragments and Steller’s jays. Ecology 85, 1411–1427 (2004).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
Submission history
Published online: January 25, 2016
Published in issue: February 9, 2016
Keywords
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the UK Natural Environment Research Council Oceans 2025 Strategic Research Programme (D.W.S.), the Save Our Seas Foundation (D.W.S.), a Marine Biological Association Senior Research Fellowship (D.W.S.), European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) via the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (COMPETE), National Funds via Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under PTDC/MAR/100345/2008 and COMPETE FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-010580 (to N.Q. and D.W.S.), Project Biodiversity, Ecology and Global Change cofinanced by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme 2007/2013 (ON.2—O Novo Norte), under the National Strategic Reference Framework via the European Regional Development Fund (N.Q.), FCT Investigator Fellowships IF/01611/2013 (to N.Q.) and IF/00043/2012 (to F.P.L.), FCT Doctoral Fellowships SFRH/BD/68717/2010 (to L.L.S.) and SFRH/BD/68521/2010 (to R.S.) and by the Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, Batchelor Foundation, and West Coast Inland Navigation District in Florida (N.H.). This research was part of the European Tracking of Predators in the Atlantic initiative. This paper is dedicated to the memory of our colleague P. Alexandrino, who supported the initial work.
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. S.D.G. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
Ocean-wide tracking of pelagic sharks reveals extent of overlap with longline fishing hotspots, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
113 (6) 1582-1587,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510090113
(2016).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.