Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke

Edited by Danielle S. Bassett, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Michael S. Gazzaniga May 31, 2016 (received for review October 29, 2015)
July 11, 2016
113 (30) E4367-E4376

Significance

Since the early days of neuroscience, the relative merit of structural vs. functional network accounts in explaining neurological deficits has been intensely debated. Using a large stroke cohort and a machine-learning approach, we show that visual memory and verbal memory deficits are better predicted by functional connectivity than by lesion location, and visual and motor deficits are better predicted by lesion location than functional connectivity. In addition, we show that disruption to a subset of cortical areas predicts general cognitive deficit (spanning multiple behavior domains). These results shed light on the complementary value of structural vs. functional accounts of stroke, and provide a physiological mechanism for general multidomain deficits seen after stroke.

Abstract

Deficits following stroke are classically attributed to focal damage, but recent evidence suggests a key role of distributed brain network disruption. We measured resting functional connectivity (FC), lesion topography, and behavior in multiple domains (attention, visual memory, verbal memory, language, motor, and visual) in a cohort of 132 stroke patients, and used machine-learning models to predict neurological impairment in individual subjects. We found that visual memory and verbal memory were better predicted by FC, whereas visual and motor impairments were better predicted by lesion topography. Attention and language deficits were well predicted by both. Next, we identified a general pattern of physiological network dysfunction consisting of decrease of interhemispheric integration and intrahemispheric segregation, which strongly related to behavioral impairment in multiple domains. Network-specific patterns of dysfunction predicted specific behavioral deficits, and loss of interhemispheric communication across a set of regions was associated with impairment across multiple behavioral domains. These results link key organizational features of brain networks to brain–behavior relationships in stroke.

Continue Reading

Data Availability

Data deposition: Neuroimaging and neuropsychological data are publicly available at https://cnda.wustl.edu/app/template/Login.vm. Matlab scripts were written to perform all analyses described. Scripts used for the main analyses (Figs. 1–3 and 6) can be found at www.nil.wustl.edu/labs/corbetta/resources/.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nico Dosenbach and Brad Schlaggar for assistance with visualization software; Carl Hacker, Timothy Laumann, and Evan Gordon for data processing assistance; and Alexandre Carter for conceptual development. This study was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Health Award 5R01HD061117 (to M.C.), National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (P30 NS048056 to A.Z.S.), National Institute of Health Medical Scientist Training Award 5T32GM007200-39 and American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship Award 14PRE19610010 (to J.S.S.).

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information

References

1
E Carrera, G Tononi, Diaschisis: Past, present, future. Brain 137, 2408–2422 (2014).
2
C von Monakow, Die Lokalisation im Grosshirn: und der Abbau der Funktion durch kortikale Herde [Localization in the Cerebrum and the Degeneration of Functions Through Conical Sources] (Bergmann, Wiesbaden, Germany). German. (1914).
3
J Alstott, M Breakspear, P Hagmann, L Cammoun, O Sporns, Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLOS Comput Biol 5, e1000408 (2009).
4
M Corbetta, Functional connectivity and neurological recovery. Dev Psychobiol 54, 239–253 (2012).
5
A Fornito, A Zalesky, M Breakspear, The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 16, 159–172 (2015).
6
RL Buckner, M Corbetta, J Schatz, ME Raichle, SE Petersen, Preserved speech abilities and compensation following prefrontal damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 1249–1253 (1996).
7
F Chollet, et al., The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 29, 63–71 (1991).
8
M Corbetta, MJ Kincade, C Lewis, AZ Snyder, A Sapir, Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci 8, 1603–1610 (2005).
9
DM Feeney, JC Baron, Diaschisis. Stroke 17, 817–830 (1986).
10
AE Hillis, et al., Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: The role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain 125, 1094–1104 (2002).
11
D Perani, G Vallar, S Cappa, C Messa, F Fazio, Aphasia and neglect after subcortical stroke. A clinical/cerebral perfusion correlation study. Brain 110, 1211–1229 (1987).
12
AR Carter, et al., Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann Neurol 67, 365–375 (2010).
13
BJ He, et al., Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 53, 905–918 (2007).
14
EM Nomura, et al., Double dissociation of two cognitive control networks in patients with focal brain lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 12017–12022 (2010).
15
L Wang, et al., Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 133, 1224–1238 (2010).
16
AD Boes, et al., Network localization of neurological symptoms from focal brain lesions. Brain 138, 3061–3075 (2015).
17
H Damasio, TJ Grabowski, D Tranel, RD Hichwa, AR Damasio, A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380, 499–505 (1996).
18
H-O Karnath, S Ferber, M Himmelbach, Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 411, 950–953 (2001).
19
M Corbetta, et al., Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron 85, 927–941 (2015).
20
TG Phan, et al., Development of a new tool to correlate stroke outcome with infarct topography: A proof-of-concept study. Neuroimage 49, 127–133 (2010).
21
DV Smith, JA Clithero, C Rorden, H-O Karnath, Decoding the anatomical network of spatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 1518–1523 (2013).
22
Y Lv, et al., Identifying the perfusion deficit in acute stroke with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 73, 136–140 (2013).
23
JS Siegel, AZ Snyder, L Ramsey, GL Shulman, M Corbetta, The effects of hemodynamic lag on functional connectivity and behavior after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2015).
24
JD Power, et al., Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 84, 320–341 (2014).
25
EM Gordon, et al., Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb Cortex 26, 288–303 (2016).
26
Y Behzadi, K Restom, J Liau, TT Liu, A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 37, 90–101 (2007).
27
J Muschelli, et al., Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor. Neuroimage 96, 22–35 (2014).
28
A Baldassarre, et al., Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect. Brain 137, 3267–3283 (2014).
29
MP van Meer, K van der Marel, WM Otte, JW Berkelbach van der Sprenkel, RM Dijkhuizen, Correspondence between altered functional and structural connectivity in the contralesional sensorimotor cortex after unilateral stroke in rats: A combined resting-state functional MRI and manganese-enhanced MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30, 1707–1711 (2010).
30
AK Rehme, et al., Identifying neuroimaging markers of motor disability in acute stroke by machine learning techniques. Cereb Cortex 25, 3046–3056 (2015).
31
S Dubovik, et al., The behavioral significance of coherent resting-state oscillations after stroke. Neuroimage 61, 249–257 (2012).
32
J Wu, et al., Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke. Brain 138, 2359–2369 (2015).
33
A Baldassarre, et al., Dissociated functional connectivity profiles for motor and attention deficits in acute right-hemisphere stroke. Brain, 2016).
34
JX O’Reilly, et al., Causal effect of disconnection lesions on interhemispheric functional connectivity in rhesus monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 13982–13987 (2013).
35
C Gratton, EM Nomura, F Pérez, M D’Esposito, Focal brain lesions to critical locations cause widespread disruption of the modular organization of the brain. J Cogn Neurosci 24, 1275–1285 (2012).
36
G Deco, G Tononi, M Boly, ML Kringelbach, Rethinking segregation and integration: Contributions of whole-brain modelling. Nat Rev Neurosci 16, 430–439 (2015).
37
C Wernicke, Some new studies on aphasia. Fortschr Med, pp. 824–830 (1885).
38
P Broca, Remarks on the seat of the faculty of articulated language, following an observation of aphemia (loss of speech). Bull Soc Anat 6, 330–357 (1861).
39
K Brodmann, Comparative Localization Studies in the Brain Cortex, its Fundamentals Represented on the Basis of its Cellular Architecture (JA Barth, Leipzig, Germany). (1909).
40
JD Power, et al., Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678 (2011).
41
M Corbetta, GL Shulman, Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3, 201–215 (2002).
42
M-M Mesulam, Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol 28, 597–613 (1990).
43
S Ullman, Visual routines. Cognition 18, 97–159 (1984).
44
M Corbetta, GL Shulman, Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci 34, 569–599 (2011).
45
PS Goldman-Rakic, Topography of cognition: Parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 11, 137–156 (1988).
46
MI Posner, SE Petersen, PT Fox, ME Raichle, Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science 240, 1627–1631 (1988).
47
AM Owen, KM McMillan, AR Laird, E Bullmore, N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 25, 46–59 (2005).
48
EE Smith, J Jonides, Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 12061–12068 (1998).
49
LT Connor, ML Albert, N Helm-Estabrooks, LK Obler, Attentional modulation of language performance. Brain Lang 71, 52–55 (2000).
50
VL Gracco, JH Abbs, Central patterning of speech movements. Exp Brain Res 71, 515–526 (1988).
51
P Tallal, et al., Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 271, 81–84 (1996).
52
E Fedorenko, SL Thompson-Schill, Reworking the language network. Trends Cogn Sci 18, 120–126 (2014).
53
RC Craddock, GA James, 3rd PE Holtzheimer, XP Hu, HS Mayberg, A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum Brain Mapp 33, 1914–1928 (2012).
54
K Shen, et al., Stable long-range interhemispheric coordination is supported by direct anatomical projections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 6473–6478 (2015).
55
Jr WT Longstreth, et al., Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke 27, 1274–1282 (1996).
56
JL Andersson, M Jenkinson, S Smith, Non-linear optimisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA1. Univ Oxf FMRIB Cent Oxf UK. Available at fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/techrep/tr07ja1/tr07ja1.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2015. (2007).
57
RA Robb, DP Hanson, A software system for interactive and quantitative visualization of multidimensional biomedical images. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 14, 9–30 (1991).
58
DJ Rowland, JR Garbow, R Laforest, AZ Snyder, Registration of [18F]FDG microPET and small-animal MRI. Nucl Med Biol 32, 567–572 (2005).
59
MF Glasser, et al., The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage; WU-Minn HCP Consortium 80, 105–124 (2013).
60
B Fischl, MI Sereno, RBH Tootell, AM Dale, High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8, 272–284 (1999).
61
DC Van Essen, et al., An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8, 443–459 (2001).
62
MY Chan, DC Park, NK Savalia, SE Petersen, GS Wig, Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, E4997–E5006 (2014).
63
Y Zhu, Y Wu, X Liu, W Mio, Transductive optimal component analysis. 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2008 (IEEE, Tampa, FL), pp. 1–4 (2008).
64
SM Smith, A Hyvärinen, G Varoquaux, KL Miller, CF Beckmann, Group-PCA for very large fMRI datasets. Neuroimage 101, 738–749 (2014).
65
P Golland, B Fischl, Permutation tests for classification: Towards statistical significance in image-based studies. Information Processing in Medical Imaging, eds Taylor C, Noble JA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin ), pp 330–341. (2003).
66
CD Hacker, et al., Resting state network estimation in individual subjects. NeuroImage 82, 616–633 (2013).
67
III H Daumé, Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv09071815. (2009).
68
M Bastian, S Heymann, M Jacomy, Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media 8:361–362. (2009).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.113; No.30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 113 | No. 30
July 26, 2016
PubMed: 27402738

Classifications

Data Availability

Data deposition: Neuroimaging and neuropsychological data are publicly available at https://cnda.wustl.edu/app/template/Login.vm. Matlab scripts were written to perform all analyses described. Scripts used for the main analyses (Figs. 1–3 and 6) can be found at www.nil.wustl.edu/labs/corbetta/resources/.

Submission history

Published online: July 11, 2016
Published in issue: July 26, 2016

Keywords

  1. stroke
  2. functional connectivity
  3. interhemispheric
  4. memory
  5. language

Acknowledgments

We thank Nico Dosenbach and Brad Schlaggar for assistance with visualization software; Carl Hacker, Timothy Laumann, and Evan Gordon for data processing assistance; and Alexandre Carter for conceptual development. This study was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Health Award 5R01HD061117 (to M.C.), National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (P30 NS048056 to A.Z.S.), National Institute of Health Medical Scientist Training Award 5T32GM007200-39 and American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship Award 14PRE19610010 (to J.S.S.).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. D.S.B. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Lenny E. Ramsey
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Nicholas V. Metcalf
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Ravi V. Chacko
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Kilian Weinberger
Department of Computer Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850;
Antonello Baldassarre
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti G. d’Annunzio, 66013 Chieti, Italy;
Carl D. Hacker
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Gordon L. Shulman
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Maurizio Corbetta
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected].
Author contributions: J.S.S., L.E.R., N.V.M., A.B., G.L.S., and M.C. designed research; J.S.S., L.E.R., N.V.M., G.L.S., and M.C. performed research; J.S.S., A.Z.S., N.V.M., R.V.C., K.W., and C.D.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.S.S., L.E.R., and A.Z.S. analyzed data; and J.S.S., A.Z.S., G.L.S., and M.C. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 113
    • No. 30
    • pp. 8339-E4432

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media