Early emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food

Edited by Elizabeth S. Spelke, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved June 29, 2016 (received for review April 4, 2016)
August 8, 2016
113 (34) 9480-9485

Significance

Food choice can serve as a social shibboleth, whereby information about what an individual eats affords insight into her cultural background and social relationships. We provide evidence for an early-emerging system linking food preferences to social identity. Infants expect people to share food preferences, unless those people belong to different groups, suggesting human reasoning about food preferences is fundamentally social. However, infants generalize disgust toward a food even across people who belong to different groups, suggesting that infants are particularly vigilant to social information that might signal danger. This research opens new lines of investigation regarding infant social cognition and food selection across the lifespan, and has implications for social policy surrounding nutrition, heath, and obesity.

Abstract

Selecting appropriate foods is a complex and evolutionarily ancient problem, yet past studies have revealed little evidence of adaptations present in infancy that support sophisticated reasoning about perceptual properties of food. We propose that humans have an early-emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food selection. Specifically, infants’ reasoning about food choice is tied to their thinking about agents’ intentions and social relationships. Whereas infants do not expect people to like the same objects, infants view food preferences as meaningfully shared across individuals. Infants’ reasoning about food preferences is fundamentally social: They generalize food preferences across individuals who affiliate, or who speak a common language, but not across individuals who socially disengage or who speak different languages. Importantly, infants’ reasoning about food preferences is flexibly calibrated to their own experiences: Tests of bilingual babies reveal that an infant’s sociolinguistic background influences whether she will constrain her generalization of food preferences to people who speak the same language. Additionally, infants’ systems for reasoning about food is differentially responsive to positive and negative information. Infants generalize information about food disgust across all people, regardless of those people’s social identities. Thus, whereas food preferences are seen as embedded within social groups, disgust is interpreted as socially universal, which could help infants avoid potentially dangerous foods. These studies reveal an early-emerging system for thinking about food that incorporates social reasoning about agents and their relationships, and allows infants to make abstract, flexible, adaptive inferences to interpret others’ food choices.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristin Shutts for extremely helpful conversations about the intellectual direction of this project, and Alex Shaw and Susan Goldin-Meadow for comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This research was supported by NIH Grant R01 HD070890 (to K.D.K.) and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (to Z.L.).

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information
pnas.1605456113.sd01.xlsx
pnas.1605456113.sm01.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm02.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm03.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm04.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm05.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm06.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm07.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm08.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm09.mov
pnas.1605456113.sm10.mov

References

1
P Rozin, The selection of foods by rats, humans and other animals. Advances in the Study of Behavior, ed JS Rosenblatt (Elsevier, London), pp. 21–76 (1976).
2
SJ Gripshover, EM Markman, Teaching young children a theory of nutrition: Conceptual change and the potential for increased vegetable consumption. Psychol Sci 24, 1541–1553 (2013).
3
JO Hill, JC Peters, Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science 280, 1371–1374 (1998).
4
P Rozin, L Hammer, H Oster, T Horowitz, V Marmora, The child’s conception of food: Differentiation of categories of rejected substances in the 16 months to 5 year age range. Appetite 7, 141–151 (1986).
5
K Shutts, KF Condry, LR Santos, ES Spelke, Core knowledge and its limits: The domain of food. Cognition 112, 120–140 (2009).
6
C Fischler, Food, self, and identity. Soc Sci Info 27, 275–292 (1988).
7
R Fox The Challenges of Anthropology: Old Encounters and New Excursions (Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, 1994).
8
BN Frazier, SA Gelman, N Kaciroti, JW Russell, JC Lumeng, I’ll have what she’s having: The impact of model characteristics on children’s food choices. Dev Sci 15, 87–98 (2012).
9
J Germov, L Williams A Sociology of Food and Nutrition: The Social Appetite (Oxford Univ Press, Melbourne, 2008).
10
LR Kass The Hungry Soul: Eating and Perfecting out Nature (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994).
11
K Shutts, KD Kinzler, JM DeJesus, Understanding infants’ and children’s social learning about foods: Previous research and new prospects. Dev Psychol 49, 419–425 (2013).
12
I Grunfeld Dietary Laws Regarding Plants and Vegetables, with Particular Reference to the Produce of the Holy Land (Soncino Press, London, 1975).
13
M Harris, The cultural ecology of India’s sacred cattle. Curr Antro 7, 51–66 (1966).
14
C Korsmeyer The Taste Culture Reader: Experiencing Food and Drink (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, 2005).
15
K Lewin, Forces behind food habits and methods of change. The Problem of Changing Food Habits 1941–1943. Bulletin No. 108 (National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1943).
16
E Millstone, T Lang The Atlas of Food: Who Eats What, Where and Why (Univ of California Press, Oakland, CA, 2002).
17
C Nemeroff, P Rozin, You are what you eat: Applying the demand-free impressions technique to an unacknowledged belief. Ethos 17, 50–69 (1989).
18
E Rozin, P Rozin, Culinary themes and variations. Nat Hist 90, 6–14 (1981).
19
V Aldridge, TM Dovey, JCG Halford, The role of familiarity in dietary development. Dev Rev 29, 32–44 (2009).
20
LL Birch, Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr 19, 41–62 (1999).
21
H Hausner, S Nicklaus, S Issanchou, C Mølgaard, P Møller, Breastfeeding facilitates acceptance of a novel dietary flavour compound. Clin Nutr 29, 141–148 (2010).
22
JC Lumeng, N Patil, EM Blass, Social influences on formula intake via suckling in 7 to 14-week-old-infants. Dev Psychobiol 49, 351–361 (2007).
23
JA Mennella, CP Jagnow, GK Beauchamp, Prenatal and postnatal flavor learning by human infants. Pediatrics 107, E88 (2001).
24
E Cashdan, A sensitive period for learning about food. Hum Nat 5, 279–291 (1994).
25
AE Fallon, P Rozin, P Pliner, The child’s conception of food: The development of food rejections with special reference to disgust and contamination sensitivity. Child Dev 55, 566–575 (1984).
26
P Rozin, AE Fallon, M Augustoni-Ziskind, The child’s conception of food: The development of contamination sensitivity to disgusting substances. Dev Psychol 21, 1075–1079 (1985).
27
SA Graham, CS Kilbreath, AN Welder, Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Dev 75, 409–427 (2004).
28
AN Welder, SA Graham, The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants’ inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Dev 72, 1653–1673 (2001).
29
TA Lavin, DG Hall, Domain effects in lexical development: Learning words for foods and toys. Cogn Dev 16, 929–950 (2002).
30
JF Macario, Young children’s use of color in classification: Foods and canonically colored objects. Cogn Dev 6, 17–46 (1991).
31
LR Santos, MD Hauser, ES Spelke, Recognition and categorization of biologically significant objects by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): The domain of food. Cognition 82, 127–155 (2001).
32
LR Santos, MD Hauser, ES Spelke, Domain-specific knowledge in human children and non-human primates: Artifact and food kinds. The Cognitive Animal, eds M Bekoff, C Allen, G Burghardt (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 205–215 (2002).
33
LR Santos, CT Miller, MD Hauser, Representing tools: How two non-human primate species distinguish between the functionally relevant and irrelevant features of a tool. Anim Cogn 6, 269–281 (2003).
34
K Shutts, L Markson, ES Spelke, The developmental origins of animal and artifact concepts. The Origins of Object Knowledge, eds B Hood, L Santos (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp. 189–210 (2009).
35
ES Spelke, K Breinlinger, K Jacobson, A Phillips, Gestalt relations and object perception: A developmental study. Perception 22, 1483–1501 (1993).
36
E Addessi, AT Galloway, E Visalberghi, LL Birch, Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2-5-year-old children. Appetite 45, 264–271 (2005).
37
BR Carruth, PJ Ziegler, A Gordon, SI Barr, Prevalence of picking eating among infants and toddlers and their caregivers’ decisions about offering a new food. J Am Diet Assoc 104, s57–s64 (2004).
38
AE Wertz, K Wynn, Selective social learning of plant edibility in 6- and 18-month-old infants. Psychol Sci 25, 874–882 (2014).
39
D Buttelmann, J Call, M Tomasello, Behavioral cues that great apes use to forage for hidden food. Anim Cogn 11, 117–128 (2008).
40
BG Galef, Functions of social learning about food: A casual analysis of effects of diet novelty on preference transmission. Anim Behav 46, 257–265 (1993).
41
Jr BG Galef, EE Whiskin, Learning socially to eat more of one food than of another. J Comp Psychol 109, 99–101 (1995).
42
AV Jaeggi, MA van Noordwijk, JM Burkhart, CP van Schaik, The evolution of voluntary food transfers among primates. Folia Primatol (Basel) 80, 121–122 (2009).
43
N Schiel, L Huber, Social influences on the development of foraging behavior in free-living common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am J Primatol 68, 1150–1160 (2006).
44
A Ueno, T Matsuzawa, Response to novel food in infant chimpanzees. Do infants refer to mothers before ingesting food on their own? Behav Processes 68, 85–90 (2005).
45
A Appadurai, Gastropolitics in Hindu South Asia. Amer Ethno 8, 494–511 (1981).
46
ME Barker, M Tandy, JD Stookey, How are consumers of low-fat and high-fat diets perceived by those with lower and higher fat intake? Appetite 33, 309–317 (1999).
47
E Cashdan, Adaptiveness of food learning and food aversions in children. Soc Sci Info 37, 613–632 (1998).
48
CM Counihan, Food rules in the United States: Individualism, control, and hierarchy. Anthro Quar 65, 55–66 (1992).
49
KA Johnson, AE White, BM Boyd, AB Cohen, Matzah, meat, milk, and mana: Psychological influences on religio-cultural food practices. J Cross Cult Psychol 42, 1421–1436 (2011).
50
Z Liberman, KD Kinzler, AL Woodward, Friends or foes: Infants use shared evaluations to infer others’ social relationships. J Exp Psychol Gen 143, 966–971 (2014).
51
L Miller, P Rozin, AP Fiske, Food sharing and feeding another person suggest intimacy; two studies of American college students. Eur J Soc Psychol 28, 423–436 (1998).
52
DR Peryam, The acceptance of novel foods. Food Technol 17, 33–39 (1963).
53
P Rozin, M Siegal, Vegemite as a marker of national identity. Gastro 3, 63–67 (2003).
54
LR Vartanian, CP Herman, J Polivy, Consumption stereotypes and impression management: How you are what you eat. Appetite 48, 265–277 (2007).
55
JK Hamlin, K Wynn, Who knows what’s good to eat? Infants fail to match food preferences of antisocial others. Cogn Dev 27, 227–239 (2012).
56
K Shutts, KD Kinzler, CB McKee, ES Spelke, Social information guides infants’ selection of foods. J Cogn Dev 10, 1–17 (2009).
57
CA Fawcett, L Markson, Similarity predicts liking in 3-year-old children. J Exp Child Psychol 105, 345–358 (2010).
58
KD Kinzler, E Dupoux, ES Spelke, The native language of social cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 12577–12580 (2007).
59
N Mahajan, K Wynn, Origins of “us” versus “them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others. Cognition 124, 227–233 (2012).
60
S Sloane, R Baillargeon, D Premack, Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychol Sci 23, 196–204 (2012).
61
JS Buresh, AL Woodward, Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition 104, 287–314 (2007).
62
AM Henderson, AL Woodward, Nine-month-old infants generalize object labels, but not object preferences across individuals. Dev Sci 15, 641–652 (2012).
63
MA Novack, AM Henderson, AL Woodward, Twelve-month-old infants generalize novel signed labels, but not preferences across individuals. J Cogn Dev 15, 539–550 (2014).
64
LL Birch, Acquisition of food preferences and eating patterns in children. Eating Disorders and Obesity: A Comprehensive Handbook, eds CG Fairburn, KD Brownell (The Guildford Press, New York, NY), pp. 75–79 (2002).
65
LV Harper, KM Sanders, The effect of adults’ eating on young children’s acceptance of unfamiliar foods. J Exp Child Psychol 20, 206–214 (1975).
66
V Kuhlmeier, K Wynn, P Bloom, Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychol Sci 14, 402–408 (2003).
67
E Cohen, The evolution of tag-based cooperations in humans: The case for accent. Curr Anthropol 53, 588–616 (2012).
68
W Labov The Social Stratification of English in New York City (Cambridge Univ Press, 2nd Ed, New York, 2006).
69
Z Liberman, AL Woodward, KD Kinzler, Preverbal infants infer third-party social relationships based on language. Cogn Sci, 2016).
70
JK Hamlin, K Wynn, P Bloom, Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Dev Sci 13, 923–929 (2010).
71
A Vaish, T Grossmann, A Woodward, Person-centred positive emotions, object-centred negative emotions: 2-year-olds generalize negative but not positive emotions across individuals. Br J Dev Psychol 33, 391–397 (2015).
72
R Baillergeon, P Setoh, S Sloane, K Jin, L Bian, Infant social cognition: Psychologival and sociomoral reasoning. The Cognitive Neurosciences, eds MS Gazzainiga, GR Mangun (MIT Press, 5th Ed, Cambridge, MA), pp. 7–14 (2014).
73
SC Johnson, CS Dweck, FS Chen, Evidence for infants’ internal working models of attachment. Psychol Sci 18, 501–502 (2007).
74
LJ Powell, ES Spelke, Preverbal infants expect members of social groups to act alike. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E3965–E3972 (2013).
75
LH Howard, C Carrazza, AL Woodward, Neighborhood linguistic diversity predicts infants’ social learning. Cognition 133, 474–479 (2014).
76
CH Legare, M Nielsen, Imitation and innovation: The dual engines of cultural learning. Trends Cogn Sci 19, 688–699 (2015).
77
O Mascaro, G Csibra, Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 6862–6867 (2012).
78
D Medin, A Ortony, Psychological essentialism. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, eds S Vosniadou, A Ortony (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 179–195 (1989).
79
L Thomsen, WE Frankenhuis, M Ingold-Smith, S Carey, Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science 331, 477–480 (2011).
80
NA Christakis, JH Fowler, The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 357, 370–379 (2007).
81
J Greenhalgh, et al., Positive- and negative peer modelling effects on young children’s consumption of novel blue foods. Appetite 52, 646–653 (2009).
82
HM Hendy, B Raudenbush, Effectiveness of teacher modeling to encourage food acceptance in preschool children. Appetite 34, 61–76 (2000).
83
J Blom-Hoffman, C Kelleher, TJ Power, SS Leff, Promoting healthy food consumption among young children: Evaluation of a multi-component nutrition education program. J Sch Psychol 41, 45–60 (2004).
84
AS Murphy, JP Youatt, SL Hoerr, CA Sawyer, SL Andrews, Kindergarten students’ food preferences are not consistent with their knowledge of the Dietary Guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 219–223 (1995).
85
J Wardle, G Huon, An experimental investigation of the influence of health information on children’s taste preferences. Health Educ Res 15, 39–44 (2000).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 113 | No. 34
August 23, 2016
PubMed: 27503878

Classifications

Submission history

Published online: August 8, 2016
Published in issue: August 23, 2016

Keywords

  1. food
  2. social cognition
  3. infancy
  4. cognitive development
  5. disgust

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristin Shutts for extremely helpful conversations about the intellectual direction of this project, and Alex Shaw and Susan Goldin-Meadow for comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This research was supported by NIH Grant R01 HD070890 (to K.D.K.) and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (to Z.L.).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Authors

Affiliations

Zoe Liberman1 [email protected]
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60642;
Amanda L. Woodward
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60642;
Kathleen R. Sullivan
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60642;
Office of Research on Women’s Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Katherine D. Kinzler
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60642;
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected].
Author contributions: Z.L., A.L.W., K.R.S., and K.D.K. designed research; Z.L. and K.R.S. performed research; Z.L. analyzed data; and Z.L., A.L.W., and K.D.K. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Get Access

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to get full access to it.

    Single Article Purchase

    Early emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 113
    • No. 34
    • pp. 9381-E5091

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media