Insight into the growth pattern and bone fusion of basal birds from an Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird
Contributed by Zhonghe Zhou, August 28, 2017 (sent for review May 9, 2017; reviewed by Stephen Brusatte and Gareth Dyke)
Significance
We report an Early Cretaceous bird from 120 My ago that has a completely fused carpometacarpus and pelvis, pushing back the date for these avian traits by over 40 My. We suggest that this taxon grew more rapidly than other basal birds, but the degree of bone fusion is not causally linked with growth pattern in primitive birds. We hypothesize that the surprisingly high degree of bone fusion in basal birds may have been environmentally induced pertinent to flight or alternatively resultant from genetic modifications. Future developmental studies focusing on the development of bone fusion are needed to test these hypotheses and illustrate how the skeletal system of living birds achieves its modern shape.
Abstract
Bird skeletons exhibit remarkable modifications that allow for flight. The most distinguishable features are the fusion of the bones in the hand, feet, and pelvis into composite rigid and bony structures. However, the historical origins of these avian bone fusions remain elusive because of the rarity of transitional fossils and developmental studies on modern birds. Here, we describe an Early Cretaceous bird (120 Mya) that has fully fused alular-major metacarpals and pelvis. We discuss the manus and pelvis fusions across Paravian phylogeny and demonstrate that these features evolved independently across nonavian theropods, Enantiornithes, and Ornithuromorpha. The fusions of these bones are rare in known nonavian theropods and Early Cretaceous birds but are well established among Late Cretaceous and modern birds, revealing a complicated evolution pattern unrecognized previously. We posit that the developments of bone fusion were polymorphic close to the origin of birds, resulting in the varying degrees of fusion in Paraves. However, that development polymorphism appears to be fundamentally restricted along the line to modern birds by the Late Cretaceous, where all birds have a completely fused manus and pelvis. Such changes likely correspond to a refinement of flight capability. Alternatively, the degree of bone fusion in this primitive bird may have been related to modifications in genes or developmental paths. Future studies and fossil discoveries are required to clarify these hypotheses and pinpoint the developmental pathways involving the bone fusions in early avian evolution through to their modern pattern.
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Zhang for helping in preparing the bone thin sections; W. Gao for photography; A. O. Vargas, G. Zhang, and C. M. Chung for discussion about the possible genes involved in skeletal fusion in living birds; and T. Stidham for editing and commenting on the manuscript. This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 41502002 and 41688103.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information (PDF)
- Download
- 2.41 MB
Appendix (PDF)
- Download
- 196.19 KB
References
1
JK O’Connor, A systematic review of Enantiornithes (Aves: Ornithothoraces). PhD thesis (University of Southern California, Los Angeles). (2009).
2
LM Chiappe, CA Walker, Skeletal morphology and systematics of the Cretaceous Euenantiornithes (Ornithothoraces: Enantiornithes). Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs, eds LM Chiappe, LM Witmer (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), pp. 240–267 (2002).
3
Z Zhou, The Jehol Biota, an Early Cretaceous terrestrial Lagerstätte: New discoveries and implications. Natl Sci Rev 1, 543–559 (2014).
4
M Wang, Taxonomical revision, ontogenetic, ecological and phylogenetic analyses of Enantiornithes (Aves: Ornithothoraces) of China. PhD thesis (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing). (2014).
5
M Wang, Z Zhou, C Sullivan, A fish-eating enantiornithine bird from the Early Cretaceous of China provides evidence of modern avian digestive features. Curr Biol 26, 1170–1176 (2016).
6
X Zheng, et al., Preservation of ovarian follicles reveals early evolution of avian reproductive behaviour. Nature 495, 507–511 (2013).
7
M Wang, H Hu, Z Li, A new small enantiornithine bird from the Jehol Biota, with implications for early evolution of avian skull morphology. J Syst Palaeontol 14, 481–497 (2015).
8
GM Erickson, et al., Was dinosaurian physiology inherited by birds? Reconciling slow growth in archaeopteryx. PLoS One 4, e7390 (2009).
9
A Chinsamy The Microstructure of Dinosaur Bone: Deciphering Biology with Fine-Scale Techniques (Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore, 2005).
10
JJ Baumel, LM Witmer, Osteologia. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium, eds JJ Baumel, AS King, JE Breazile, HE Evans, JCV Berge (Nuttall Ornithological Club, 2nd Ed, Cambridge, MA), pp. 45–132 (1993).
11
M Wang, Z Zhou, JK O’Connor, NV Zelenkov, A new diverse enantiornithine family (Bohaiornithidae fam. nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information from two new species. Vertebr Palasiat 52, 31–76 (2014).
12
X Xu, X Wu, Cranial morphology of Sinornithosaurus millenii Xu et al. 1999 (Dinosauria: Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China. Can J Earth Sci 38, 1739–1752 (2001).
13
Y Wang, et al., A new Jehol enantiornithine bird with three-dimensional preservation and ovarian follicles. J Vertebr Paleontol 36, e1054496 (2016).
14
JF Ashley, A study of the structure of the humerus in the Corvidae. Condor 43, 184–195 (1941).
15
Z Zhou, F Zhang, Anatomy of the primitive bird Sapeornis chaoyangensis from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. Can J Earth Sci 40, 731–747 (2003).
16
S Zhou, Z Zhou, JK O’Connor, Anatomy of the basal ornithuromorph bird Archaeorhynchus spathula from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. J Vertebr Paleontol 33, 141–152 (2013).
17
J Baumel, R Raikow, Arthrologia. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium, eds JJ Baumel, AS King, JE Breazile, HE Evans, JCV Berge (Nuttall Ornithological Club, 2nd Ed, Cambridge, MA), pp. 133–187 (1993).
18
LM Chiappe, SA Ji, Q Ji, MA Norell, Anatomy and systematics of the Confuciusornithidae (Theropoda: Aves) from the Late Mesozoic of northeastern China. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 242, 1–89 (1999).
19
M Wang, Z Zhou, A morphological study of the first known piscivorous enantiornithine bird from the Early Cretaceous of China. J Vertebr Paleontol 37, e1278702 (2017).
20
KE Campbell, The manus of archaeopterygians: Implication for avian ancestry. Oryctos 7, 13–26 (2008).
21
S Zhou, JK O’Connor, M Wang, A new species from an ornithuromorph (Aves: Ornithothoraces) dominated locality of the Jehol Biota. Chin Sci Bull 59, 5366–5378 (2014).
22
JA Clarke, MA Norell, The morphology and phylogenetic position of Apsaravis ukhaana from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Am Mus Novit 3387, 1–46 (2002).
23
X Xu, et al., A monodactyl nonavian dinosaur and the complex evolution of the alvarezsauroid hand. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 2338–2342 (2011).
24
W Parker, On the morphology of birds. Proc R Soc London 42, 52–58 (1887).
25
JR Hutchinson, The evolution of pelvic osteology and soft tissues on the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zool J Linn Soc 131, 123–168 (2001).
26
RS Tykoski, Anatomy, ontogeny, and phylogeny of coelophysoid theropods. PhD thesis (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX). (2005).
27
AH Turner, PJ Makovicky, MA Norell, A review of dromaeosaurid systematics and paravian phylogeny. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 371, 1–206 (2012).
28
AF Pourlis, J Antonopoulos, The ossification of the pelvic girdle and leg skeleton of the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Anat Histol Embryol 43, 294–300 (2014).
29
DA Hogg, Fusions occurring in the postcranial skeleton of the domestic fowl. J Anat 135, 501–512 (1982).
30
JK O’Connor, M Wang, X Zheng, X Wang, Z Zhou, The histology of two female Early Cretaceous birds. Vertebr Palasiat 52, 112–128 (2014).
31
AJ De Ricqlès, K Padian, JR Horner, ET Lamm, N Myhrvold, Osteohistology of Confuciusornis sanctus (Theropoda: Aves). J Vertebr Paleontol 23, 373–386 (2003).
32
X Zheng, et al., On the absence of sternal elements in Anchiornis (Paraves) and Sapeornis (Aves) and the complex early evolution of the avian sternum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 13900–13905 (2014).
33
LM Chiappe, JP James, PGP Erickson, New enantiornithine bird from the marine Upper Cretaceous of Alabama. J Vertebr Paleontol 22, 170–174 (2002).
34
M Wang, Z Zhou, A new adult specimen of the basalmost ornithuromorph bird Archaeorhynchus spathula (Aves: Ornithuromorpha) and its implications for early avian ontogeny. J Syst Palaeontology 15, 1–18 (2016).
35
H Francillon-Vieillot, et al., Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues. Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, ed JG Carter (American Geophysical Union, New York), pp. 175–234 (1990).
36
M Köhler, N Marín-Moratalla, X Jordana, R Aanes, Seasonal bone growth and physiology in endotherms shed light on dinosaur physiology. Nature 487, 358–361 (2012).
37
M Wang, JK O’Connor, Y Pan, Z Zhou, A bizarre Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird with unique crural feathers and an ornithuromorph plough-shaped pygostyle. Nat Commun 8, 14141 (2017).
38
GS Bever, JA Gauthier, GP Wagner, Finding the frame shift: Digit loss, developmental variability, and the origin of the avian hand. Evol Dev 13, 269–279 (2011).
39
R Seki, et al., Functional roles of Aves class-specific cis-regulatory elements on macroevolution of bird-specific features. Nat Commun 8, 14229 (2017).
40
BAS Bhullar, et al., A molecular mechanism for the origin of a key evolutionary innovation, the bird beak and palate, revealed by an integrative approach to major transitions in vertebrate history. Evolution 69, 1665–1677 (2015).
41
RO Prum, et al., A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526, 569–573 (2015).
42
SL Brusatte, JK O’Connor, ED Jarvis, The origin and diversification of birds. Curr Biol 25, R888–R898 (2015).
43
EM Standen, TY Du, HCE Larsson, Developmental plasticity and the origin of tetrapods. Nature 513, 54–58 (2014).
44
JM Starck, A Chinsamy, Bone microstructure and developmental plasticity in birds and other dinosaurs. J Morphol 254, 232–246 (2002).
45
CK Ghalambor, JK McKay, SP Carroll, DN Reznick, Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21, 394–407 (2007).
46
ET Lamm, Preparation and sectioning of specimens. Bone Histology of Fossil Tetrapods: Advancing Methods, Analysis, and Interpretation, eds K Padian, ET Lamm (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), pp. 55–160 (2013).
47
WP Maddison, DR Maddison, Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, Version 3.1. Available at mesquiteproject.org. Accessed July 26, 2017. (2011).
48
PA Goloboff, JS Farris, KC Nixon, TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).
49
D Pol, IH Escapa, Unstable taxa in cladistic analysis: Identification and the assessment of relevant characters. Cladistics 25, 515–527 (2009).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Submission history
Published online: October 9, 2017
Published in issue: October 24, 2017
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Zhang for helping in preparing the bone thin sections; W. Gao for photography; A. O. Vargas, G. Zhang, and C. M. Chung for discussion about the possible genes involved in skeletal fusion in living birds; and T. Stidham for editing and commenting on the manuscript. This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 41502002 and 41688103.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
Insight into the growth pattern and bone fusion of basal birds from an Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
114 (43) 11470-11475,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707237114
(2017).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.