Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation linear due to H2O greenhouse effect
Edited by Dennis L. Hartmann, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved August 23, 2018 (received for review June 8, 2018)
Significance
Earth’s climate is set by a balance between incoming solar and outgoing infrared radiation. The physical processes that influence this balance are complex and nonlinear, yet models and satellite measurements counterintuitively show that Earth’s infrared radiation is simply a linear function of surface temperature. Here we explain why: Linearity is due to the cancellation of two nonlinear processes and always arises in an atmosphere dominated by a condensable greenhouse gas. Our work explains a fundamental property of Earth’s climate and has implications for climate change as well as the climates of extrasolar planets with exotic greenhouse gases.
Abstract
Satellite measurements and radiative calculations show that Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) is an essentially linear function of surface temperature over a wide range of temperatures (60 K). Linearity implies that radiative forcing has the same impact in warmer as in colder climates and is thus of fundamental importance for understanding past and future climate change. Although the evidence for a nearly linear relation was first pointed out more than 50 y ago, it is still unclear why this relation is valid and when it breaks down. Here we present a simple semianalytical model that explains Earth’s linear OLR as an emergent property of an atmosphere whose greenhouse effect is dominated by a condensable gas. Linearity arises from a competition between the surface’s increasing thermal emission and the narrowing of spectral window regions with warming and breaks down at high temperatures once continuum absorption cuts off spectral windows. Our model provides a way of understanding the longwave contribution to Earth’s climate sensitivity and suggests that extrasolar planets with other condensable greenhouse gases could have climate dynamics similar to Earth’s.
Data Availability
Data deposition: The PyRads radiation code used in this study has been deposited on GitHub and is available at https://github.com/ddbkoll/PyRADS.
Acknowledgments
We thank Nick Lutsko for discussions and comments and two anonymous reviewers for insightful feedback. D.D.B.K. was supported by a James McDonnell Foundation Postdoctoral fellowship. T.W.C. was supported by NSF Grant AGS-1623218, “Using a hierarchy of models to constrain the temperature-dependence of climate sensitivity.”
Supporting Information
Appendix (PDF)
- Download
- 569.77 KB
References
1
I Budyko, The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the Earth. Tellus 21, 611–619 (1969).
2
RN Gerald, Theory of energy-balance climate models. J Atmos Sci 32, 2033–2043 (1975).
3
A Otto, et al., Energy budget constraints on climate response. Nat Geosci 6, 415–416 (2013).
4
; PALAEOSENS Project Members, Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity. Natureet al. 491, 683–691 (2012).
5
MI Budyko The Heat Balance of the Earth’s Surface (US Department of Commerce Weather Bureau, Washington, DC, 1958).
6
IM Held, MJ Suarez, Simple albedo feedback models of the icecaps. Tellus 26, 613–629 (1974).
7
MI Budyko, On present-day climatic changes. Tellus 29, 193–204 (1977).
8
S Manabe, RT Wetherald, Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J Atmos Sci 24, 241–259 (1967).
9
A Raval, V Ramanathan, Observational determination of the greenhouse effect. Nature 342, 758–761 (1989).
10
RT Pierrehumbert Principles of Planetary Climate (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
11
Yi Huang, MB Shahabadi, Why logarithmic? A note on the dependence of radiative forcing on gas concentration. J Geophys Res Atmos 119, 13,683–13,689 (2014).
12
GC Simpson, Some studies in terrestrial radiation. Mem R Meteorol Soc 2, 69–95 (1928).
13
M Komabayasi, Discrete equilibrium temperatures of a hypothetical planet with the atmosphere and the hydrosphere of one component-two phase system under constant solar radiation. J Meteorol Soc Jpn Ser 45, 137–139 (1967).
14
AP Ingersoll, The runaway greenhouse: A history of water on Venus. J Atmos Sci 26, 1191–1198 (1969).
15
S Nakajima, Y-Y Hayashi, Y Abe, A study on the “runaway greenhouse effect” with a one-dimensional radiative–convective equilibrium model. J Atmos Sci 49, 2256–2266 (1992).
16
C Goldblatt, TD Robinson, KJ Zahnle, D Crisp, Low simulated radiation limit for runaway greenhouse climates. Nat Geosci 6, 661–667 (2013).
17
JT Kiehl, KE Trenberth, Earth’s annual global mean energy budget. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78, 197–208 (1997).
18
IE Gordon, et al., The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database. J Quant Spectrosc Radiative Transfer 203, 3–69 (2017).
19
R Alexander, HH Aumann, EM Manning, Relative humidity in the troposphere with AIRS. J Atmos Sci 71, 2516–2533 (2014).
20
W Ingram, A very simple model for the water vapour feedback on climate change. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136, 30–40 (2010).
21
BJ Soden, IM Held, An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J Clim 19, 3354–3360 (2006).
22
BJ Soden, et al., Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J Clim 21, 3504–3520 (2008).
23
IM Held, BJ Soden, Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25, 441–475 (2000).
24
VO John, BJ Soden, Temperature and humidity biases in global climate models and their impact on climate feedbacks. Geophys Res Lett, 2007).
25
KC Armour, CM Bitz, GH Roe, Time-varying climate sensitivity from regional feedbacks. J Clim 26, 4518–4534 (2013).
26
N Feldl, GH Roe, Four perspectives on climate feedbacks. Geophys Res Lett 40, 4007–4011 (2013).
27
BEJ Rose, KC Armour, DS Battisti, N Feldl, DDB Koll, The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake. Geophys Res Lett 41, 1071–1078 (2014).
28
J Bloch-Johnson, RT Pierrehumbert, DS Abbot, Feedback temperature dependence determines the risk of high warming. Geophys Res Lett 42, 4973–4980 (2015).
29
Knutti R, Maria A. Rugenstein A (2015) Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models. Philos Trans R Soc A 373:20150146.
30
CP McKay, JB Pollack, R Courtin, The greenhouse and antigreenhouse effects on Titan. Science 253, 1118–1121 (1991).
31
L Schaefer, F Bruce, Chemistry of silicate atmospheres of evaporating super-Earths. Astrophys J Lett 703, L113–L117 (2009).
32
Y Miguel, L Kaltenegger, B Fegley, L Schaefer, Compositions of hot super-Earth atmospheres: Exploring Kepler candidates. Astrophys J Lett 742, L19 (2011).
33
BA Wielicki, et al., Clouds and the Earth’s radiant energy system (CERES): An earth observing system experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77, 853–868 (1996).
34
E Kalnay, et al., The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77, 437–471 (1996).
35
F Ding, RT Pierrehumbert, Convection in condensible-rich atmospheres. Astrophys J 822, 24 (2016).
36
EJ Mlawer, et al., Development and recent evaluation of the MT_CKD model of continuum absorption. Philos Trans R Soc A 370, 2520–2556 (2012).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
© 2018. Published under the PNAS license.
Data Availability
Data deposition: The PyRads radiation code used in this study has been deposited on GitHub and is available at https://github.com/ddbkoll/PyRADS.
Submission history
Published online: September 25, 2018
Published in issue: October 9, 2018
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank Nick Lutsko for discussions and comments and two anonymous reviewers for insightful feedback. D.D.B.K. was supported by a James McDonnell Foundation Postdoctoral fellowship. T.W.C. was supported by NSF Grant AGS-1623218, “Using a hierarchy of models to constrain the temperature-dependence of climate sensitivity.”
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation linear due to H2O greenhouse effect, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
115 (41) 10293-10298,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809868115
(2018).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.