Bacteria push the limits of chemotactic precision to navigate dynamic chemical gradients

Edited by Howard C. Berg, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved April 15, 2019 (received for review September 26, 2018)
May 16, 2019
116 (22) 10792-10797

Significance

The limited precision of sensory organs places fundamental constraints on organismal performance. An open question, however, is whether organisms are routinely pushed to these limits and how limits might influence interactions between populations of organisms and their environment. By combining a method to generate dynamic, replicable resource landscapes, high-speed tracking of freely moving bacteria, a mathematical theory, and agent-based simulations, we show that sensory noise ultimately limits when and where bacteria can detect and climb chemical gradients. Our results suggest that the typical chemical landscapes bacteria inhabit are dominated by noise that masks shallow gradients and that the spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial aggregations can be predicted by mapping the region where gradient signal rises above noise.

Abstract

Ephemeral aggregations of bacteria are ubiquitous in the environment, where they serve as hotbeds of metabolic activity, nutrient cycling, and horizontal gene transfer. In many cases, these regions of high bacterial concentration are thought to form when motile cells use chemotaxis to navigate to chemical hotspots. However, what governs the dynamics of bacterial aggregations is unclear. Here, we use an experimental platform to create realistic submillimeter-scale nutrient pulses with controlled nutrient concentrations. By combining experiments, mathematical theory, and agent-based simulations, we show that individual Vibrio ordalii bacteria begin chemotaxis toward hotspots of dissolved organic matter (DOM) when the magnitude of the chemical gradient rises sufficiently far above the sensory noise that is generated by stochastic encounters with chemoattractant molecules. Each DOM hotspot is surrounded by a dynamic ring of chemotaxing cells, which congregate in regions of high DOM concentration before dispersing as DOM diffuses and gradients become too noisy for cells to respond to. We demonstrate that V. ordalii operates close to the theoretical limits on chemotactic precision. Numerical simulations of chemotactic bacteria, in which molecule counting noise is explicitly taken into account, point at a tradeoff between nutrient acquisition and the cost of chemotactic precision. More generally, our results illustrate how limits on sensory precision can be used to understand the location, spatial extent, and lifespan of bacterial behavioral responses in ecologically relevant environments.

Continue Reading

Acknowledgments

We thank V. Sourjik, N. Wingreen, T. Emonet, F. Menolascina, K. Son, V. Fernandez, and J. Keegstra for useful discussions. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award DE180100911 (to D.R.B.); The University of Melbourne Computational Biology Research Initiative and high-performance computing system (D.R.B.); a Swiss National Science Foundation Early Mobility Postdoctoral Fellowship (F.C.); a James S. McDonnell Foundation Fellowship (A.M.H.); Army Research Office Grants W911NG-11-1-0385 and W911NF-14-1-0431 (to S.A.L.); Simons Foundation Grant 395890 (to S.A.L.); Gordon and Betty Moore Marine Microbial Initiative Investigator Award GBMF3783 (to R.S.); and Simons Foundation Grant 542395 (to R.S.) as part of the Principles of Microbial Ecosystems Collaborative (PriME).

Supporting Information

Appendix (PDF)
Movie S1.
Numerical simulation of bacteria with the chemotactic precision factor Π = 1 (corresponding to trajectories in main text Fig. 4A).
Movie S2.
Numerical simulation of bacteria with the chemotactic precision factor Π = 6.6 (corresponding to trajectories in main text Fig. 4B).
Movie S3.
Numerical simulation of bacteria with the chemotactic precision factor Π = 100 (corresponding to trajectories in main text Fig. 4C).

References

1
Fuhrman J (1987) Close coupling between release and uptake of dissolved free amino-acids in seawater studied by and isotope-dilution approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:45–52.
2
Blackburn N, Fenchel T, Mitchell J (1998) Microscale nutrient patches in planktonic habitats shown by chemotactic bacteria. Science 282:2254–2256.
3
Stocker R, Seymour JR (2012) Ecology and physics of bacterial chemotaxis in the ocean. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:792–812.
4
Jackson GA (2012) Seascapes: The world of aquatic organisms as determined by their particulate natures. J Exp Biol 215:1017–1030.
5
Segall JE, Block SM, Berg HC (1986) Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8987–8991.
6
Brown DA, Berg HC (1974) Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:1388–1392.
7
Waite A, et al. (2016) Non-genetic diversity modulates population performance. Mol Syst Biol 12:895.
8
Stocker R (2012) Marine microbes see a sea of gradients. Science 338:628–633.
9
Smriga S, Fernandez VI, Mitchell JG, Stocker R (2016) Chemotaxis toward phytoplankton drives organic matter partitioning among marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:1576–1581.
10
Hein AM, Carrara F, Brumley DR, Stocker R, Levin SA (2016) Natural search algorithms as a bridge between organisms, evolution, and ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:9413–9420.
11
Wadhams GH, Armitage JP (2004) Making sense of it all: Bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:1024–1037.
12
Berg HC, Purcell EM (1977) Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J 20:193–219.
13
Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2008) Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:15749–15754.
14
Mora T, Wingreen NS (2010) Limits of sensing temporal concentration changes by single cells. Phys Rev Lett 104:248101.
15
Frankel NW, et al. (2014) Adaptability of non-genetic diversity in bacterial chemotaxis. eLife 3:e03526.
16
Hein AM, Brumley DR, Carrara F, Stocker R, Levin SA (2016) Physical limits on bacterial navigation in dynamic environments. J R Soc Interf 13:20150844.
17
Taylor JR, Stocker R (2012) Trade-offs of chemotactic foraging in turbulent water. Science 338:675–679.
18
Son K, Brumley DR, Stocker R (2015) Live from under the lens: Exploring microbial motility with dynamic imaging and microfluidics. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:761–775.
19
Duursma E, Dawson R (2011) Marine Organic Chemistry, Elsevier Oceanography Series (Elsevier, Amsterdam), Vol 31.
20
Jikeli JF, et al. (2015) Sperm navigation along helical paths in 3D chemoattractant landscapes. Nat Commun 6:7985.
21
McCray JA, Trentham DR (1989) Properties and uses of photoreactive caged compounds. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 18:239–270.
22
Kromer JA, Märcker S, Lange S, Baier C, Friedrich BM (2018) Decision making improves sperm chemotaxis in the presence of noise. PLOS Comput Biol 14:e1006109.
23
Cluzel P, Surette M, Leibler S (2000) An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. Science 287:1652–1655.
24
Sourjik V, Berg HC (2002) Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12669–12674.
25
Berg HC (2008) E. coli in Motion (Springer, Berlin).
26
Long J, Zucker SW, Emonet T (2017) Feedback between motion and sensation provides nonlinear boost in run-and-tumble navigation. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005429.
27
Xie L, Lu C, Wu XL (2015) Marine bacterial chemoresponse to a stepwise chemoattractant stimulus. Biophys J 108:766–774.
28
Morton-Firth CJ, Shimizu TS, Bray D (1999) A free-energy-based stochastic simulation of the Tar receptor complex1. J Mol Biol 286:1059–1074.
29
Son K, Guasto JS, Stocker R (2013) Bacteria can exploit a flagellar buckling instability to change direction. Nat Phys 9:494–498.
30
Bray D, Levin MD, Lipkow K (2007) The chemotactic behavior of computer-based surrogate bacteria. Curr Biol 17:12–19.
31
Bialek W, Setayeshgar S (2005) Physical limits to biochemical signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10040–10045.
32
Korobkova E, Emonet T, Vilar JMG, Shimizu TS, Cluzel P (2004) From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium. Nature 428:574–578.
33
Keegstra JM, et al. (2017) Phenotypic diversity and temporal variability in a bacterial signaling network revealed by single-cell FRET. eLife 6:e27455.
34
Govern CC, ten Wolde PR (2014) Optimal resource allocation in cellular sensing systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17486–17491.
35
Keller EF, Segel LA (1970) Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theor Biol 26:399–415.
36
Seymour JR, Amin SA, Raina JB, Stocker R (2017) Zooming in on the phycosphere: The ecological interface for phytoplankton–bacteria relationships. Nat Microbiol 2:17065.
37
Azam F, Malfatti F (2007) Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nat Rev Micro 5:782–791.
38
Barlow M (2009) What antimicrobial resistance has taught us about horizontal gene transfer. Horizontal Gene Transfer Genomes Flux 532:397–411.
39
Moor K, et al. (2017) High-avidity IgA protects the intestine by enchaining growing bacteria. Nature 544:498–502.
40
Stocker R, Seymour JR, Samadani A, Hunt DE, Polz MF (2008) Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4209–4214.
41
Barbara GM, Mitchell JG (2003) Marine bacterial organisation around point-like sources of amino acids. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:99–109.
42
Jackson GA (1987) Simulating chemosensory responses of marine microorganisms. Limnol Oceanogr 32:1253–1266.
43
Lan G, Sartori P, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Tu Y (2012) The energy-speed-accuracy trade-off in sensory adaptation. Nat Phys 8:422–428.
44
Lestas I, Vinnicombe G, Paulsson J (2010) Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467:174–178.
45
Magariyama Y, et al. (1995) Simultaneous measurement of bacterial flagellar rotation rate and swimming speed. Biophys J 69:2154–2162.
46
Flores M, Shimizu TS, ten Wolde PR, Tostevin F (2012) Signaling noise enhances chemotactic drift of E. coli. Phys Rev Lett 109:148101.
47
Sneddon M, Pontius W, Emonet T (2012) Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:805–810.
48
He R, Zhang R, Yuan J (2016) Noise-induced increase of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys J 111:430–437.
49
Hu B, Tu Y (2013) Coordinated switching of bacterial flagellar motors: Evidence for direct motor-motor coupling? Phys Rev Lett 110:158703.

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.116; No.22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 116 | No. 22
May 28, 2019
PubMed: 31097577

Classifications

Submission history

Published online: May 16, 2019
Published in issue: May 28, 2019

Keywords

  1. chemotaxis
  2. motility
  3. sensing noise
  4. microbial ecology
  5. ocean

Acknowledgments

We thank V. Sourjik, N. Wingreen, T. Emonet, F. Menolascina, K. Son, V. Fernandez, and J. Keegstra for useful discussions. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award DE180100911 (to D.R.B.); The University of Melbourne Computational Biology Research Initiative and high-performance computing system (D.R.B.); a Swiss National Science Foundation Early Mobility Postdoctoral Fellowship (F.C.); a James S. McDonnell Foundation Fellowship (A.M.H.); Army Research Office Grants W911NG-11-1-0385 and W911NF-14-1-0431 (to S.A.L.); Simons Foundation Grant 395890 (to S.A.L.); Gordon and Betty Moore Marine Microbial Initiative Investigator Award GBMF3783 (to R.S.); and Simons Foundation Grant 542395 (to R.S.) as part of the Principles of Microbial Ecosystems Collaborative (PriME).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Authors

Affiliations

Douglas R. Brumley2,1 [email protected]
School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia;
Francesco Carrara2,1 [email protected]
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland;
Andrew M. Hein
Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060;
Yutaka Yawata
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan;
Microbiology Research Center for Sustainability, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan;
Simon A. Levin
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Roman Stocker2 [email protected]
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland;

Notes

2
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected].
Author contributions: D.R.B., F.C., A.M.H., Y.Y., S.A.L., and R.S. designed research; D.R.B., F.C., and A.M.H. analyzed data; D.R.B., F.C., A.M.H., and R.S. wrote the paper; D.R.B. performed numerical simulations; D.R.B., F.C., and A.M.H. developed theory; and F.C. performed experiments.
1
D.R.B. and F.C. contributed equally to this work.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Bacteria push the limits of chemotactic precision to navigate dynamic chemical gradients
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 116
    • No. 22
    • pp. 10599-11077

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media