An intrinsically disordered pathological prion variant Y145Stop converts into self-seeding amyloids via liquid–liquid phase separation

Edited by Michael K. Rosen, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, and approved October 5, 2021 (received for review January 20, 2021)
November 5, 2021
118 (45) e2100968118

Significance

Biology has evolved to achieve precise spatiotemporal control of crucial cellular functions through liquid–liquid phase separation of highly flexible proteins and nucleic acids into membraneless organelles. However, these liquid-like intracellular condensates can undergo irreversible phase transitions into solid-like aggregates associated with deadly human diseases. Here, we show that a pathological truncation variant of the prion protein comprising the N-terminal unstructured domain spontaneously phase-separates into liquid droplets under physiological conditions. These liquid-like condensates gradually mature into solid-like self-replicable amyloids reminiscent of toxic misfolded proteinaceous aggregates involved in transmissible prion diseases. This aberrant phase-transition propensity is suppressed in the full-length protein, which may indicate an evolutionarily conserved role of an intriguing relationship between different domains in modulating the protein phase behavior.

Abstract

Biomolecular condensation via liquid–liquid phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins/regions (IDPs/IDRs) along with other biomolecules is proposed to control critical cellular functions, whereas aberrant phase transitions are associated with a range of neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we show that a disease-associated stop codon mutation of the prion protein (PrP) at tyrosine 145 (Y145Stop), resulting in a truncated, highly disordered, N-terminal IDR, spontaneously phase-separates into dynamic liquid-like droplets. Phase separation of this highly positively charged N-terminal segment is promoted by the electrostatic screening and a multitude of weak, transient, multivalent, intermolecular interactions. Single-droplet Raman measurements, in conjunction with an array of bioinformatic, spectroscopic, microscopic, and mutagenesis studies, revealed a highly mobile internal organization within the liquid-like condensates. The phase behavior of Y145Stop is modulated by RNA. Lower RNA:protein ratios promote condensation at a low micromolar protein concentration under physiological conditions. At higher concentrations of RNA, phase separation is abolished. Upon aging, these highly dynamic liquid-like droplets gradually transform into ordered, β-rich, amyloid-like aggregates. These aggregates formed via phase transitions display an autocatalytic self-templating characteristic involving the recruitment and binding-induced conformational conversion of monomeric Y145Stop into amyloid fibrils. In contrast to this intrinsically disordered truncated variant, the wild-type full-length PrP exhibits a much lower propensity for both condensation and maturation into amyloids, hinting at a possible protective role of the C-terminal domain. Such an interplay of molecular factors in modulating the protein phase behavior might have much broader implications in cell physiology and disease.

Continue Reading

Data Availability

All study data are included in the article and supporting information.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Witold Surewicz (Case Western Reserve University) for the kind gift of the DNA plasmid of full-length prion protein; Dr. Mahak Sharma (Indian Institute of Science Education and Research [IISER] Mohali) for confocal microscopy; Ms. Pallavi Joshi for preliminary studies; Dr. Shravan Mishra (IISER Mohali) for providing us yeast total RNA; Dr. Mily Bhattacharya (Thapar Institute), Dr. Priyanka Dogra (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital), Dr. Anupa Majumdar (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics), and the members of the S.M. laboratory for critically reading this manuscript; and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and valuable suggestions. This study was funded in part by the IISER Mohali, Department of Science and Technology (Nano-Mission grant to S.M. and FIST grant); Department of Biotechnology (fellowship to A. Agarwal); Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (fellowship to S.K.R.); and the Ministry of Education, Government of India (Centre of Excellence grant to S.M.).

Supporting Information

Appendix 01 (PDF)
Movie S1.
A video of fluorescently-labeled Y145Stop droplets showing fusion events.

References

1
S. Alberti, A. A. Hyman, Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 196–213 (2021).
2
M. Fuxreiter, M. Vendruscolo, Generic nature of the condensed states of proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 587–594 (2021).
3
B. Portz, B. L. Lee, J. Shorter, FUS and TDP-43 phases in health and disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 550–563 (2021).
4
M. Hardenberg, A. Horvath, V. Ambrus, M. Fuxreiter, M. Vendruscolo, Widespread occurrence of the droplet state of proteins in the human proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 33254–33262 (2020).
5
B. R. Sabari, A. Dall’Agnese, R. A. Young, Biomolecular condensates in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 961–977 (2020).
6
F. Frottin et al., The nucleolus functions as a phase-separated protein quality control compartment. Science 365, 342–347 (2019).
7
S. Boeynaems et al., Protein phase separation: A new phase in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 420–435 (2018).
8
S. F. Banani, H. O. Lee, A. A. Hyman, M. K. Rosen, Biomolecular condensates: Organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).
9
D. M. Mitrea, R. W. Kriwacki, Phase separation in biology; functional organization of a higher order. Cell Commun. Signal. 14, 1 (2016).
10
A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, F. Jülicher, Liquid–liquid phase separation in biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 39–58 (2014).
11
J. A. Toretsky, P. E. Wright, Assemblages: Functional units formed by cellular phase separation. J. Cell Biol. 206, 579–588 (2014).
12
J. M. Choi, A. S. Holehouse, R. V. Pappu, Physical principles underlying the complex biology of intracellular phase transitions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 49, 107–133 (2020).
13
E. W. Martin et al., Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains. Science 367, 694–699 (2020).
14
G. L. Dignon, R. B. Best, J. Mittal, Biomolecular phase separation: From molecular driving forces to macroscopic properties. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71, 53–75 (2020).
15
S. Mukhopadhyay, The dynamism of intrinsically disordered proteins: Binding-induced folding, amyloid formation, and phase separation. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 11541–11560 (2020).
16
E. W. Martin, T. Mittag, Relationship of sequence and phase separation in protein low-complexity regions. Biochemistry 57, 2478–2487 (2018).
17
K. M. Ruff, S. Roberts, A. Chilkoti, R. V. Pappu, Advances in understanding stimulus-responsive phase behavior of intrinsically disordered protein polymers. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4619–4635 (2018).
18
V. N. Uversky, Intrinsically disordered proteins in overcrowded milieu: Membrane-less organelles, phase separation, and intrinsic disorder. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 44, 18–30 (2017).
19
C. P. Brangwynne, P. Tompa, R. V. Pappu, Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions. Nat. Phys. 11, 899–904 (2015).
20
B. Tsang, I. Pritišanac, S. W. Scherer, A. M. Moses, J. D. Forman-Kay, Phase separation as a missing mechanism for interpretation of disease mutations. Cell 183, 1742–1756 (2020).
21
S. Ray et al., α-Synuclein aggregation nucleates through liquid–liquid phase separation. Nat. Chem. 12, 705–716 (2020).
22
S. Alberti, D. Dormann, Liquid–liquid phase separation in disease. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 171–194 (2019).
23
S. Elbaum-Garfinkle, Matter over mind: Liquid phase separation and neurodegeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 7160–7168 (2019).
24
A. Aguzzi, M. Altmeyer, Phase separation: Linking cellular compartmentalization to disease. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 547–558 (2016).
25
S. B. Prusiner, Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 13363–13383 (1998).
26
S. B. Prusiner, Prion Biology (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2017).
27
C. Scheckel, A. Aguzzi, Prions, prionoids and protein misfolding disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 405–418 (2018).
28
R. Zahn et al., NMR solution structure of the human prion protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 145–150 (2000).
29
J. Castilla, P. Saá, C. Hetz, C. Soto, In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell 121, 195–206 (2005).
30
N. R. Deleault, B. T. Harris, J. R. Rees, S. Supattapone, Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 9741–9746 (2007).
31
F. Wang, X. Wang, C.-G. Yuan, J. Ma, Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science 327, 1132–1135 (2010).
32
B. Kundu et al., Nucleation-dependent conformational conversion of the Y145Stop variant of human prion protein: Structural clues for prion propagation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 12069–12074 (2003).
33
J. J. Helmus, K. Surewicz, P. S. Nadaud, W. K. Surewicz, C. P. Jaroniec, Molecular conformation and dynamics of the Y145Stop variant of human prion protein in amyloid fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 6284–6289 (2008).
34
M. Zweckstetter, Conserved amyloid core structure of stop mutants of the human prion protein. Prion 7, 193–197 (2013).
35
B. Ghetti et al., Vascular variant of prion protein cerebral amyloidosis with tau-positive neurofibrillary tangles: The phenotype of the stop codon 145 mutation in PRNP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 744–748 (1996).
36
G. Zanusso et al., Proteasomal degradation and N-terminal protease resistance of the codon 145 mutant prion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23396–23404 (1999).
37
B. Xue, R. L. Dunbrack, R. W. Williams, A. K. Dunker, V. N. Uversky, PONDR-FIT: A meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 996–1010 (2010).
38
B. Mészáros, G. Erdős, Z. Dosztányi, IUPred2A: Context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W329–W337 (2018).
39
A. K. Lancaster, A. Nutter-Upham, S. Lindquist, O. D. King, PLAAC: A web and command-line application to identify proteins with prion-like amino acid composition. Bioinformatics 30, 2501–2502 (2014).
40
M. Miskei, A. Horvath, M. Vendruscolo, M. Fuxreiter, Sequence-based prediction of fuzzy protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 2289–2303 (2020).
41
B. Bolognesi et al., A concentration-dependent liquid phase separation can cause toxicity upon increased protein expression. Cell Rep. 16, 222–231 (2016).
42
N. M. Milkovic, T. Mittag, “Determination of protein phase diagrams by centrifugation” in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Methods and Protocols, B. B. Kragelund, K. Skriver, Eds. (Springer, 2020), pp. 685–702.
43
J. P. Brady et al., Structural and hydrodynamic properties of an intrinsically disordered region of a germ cell-specific protein on phase separation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E8194–E8203 (2017).
44
A. C. Murthy et al., Molecular interactions underlying liquid–liquid phase separation of the FUS low-complexity domain. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 637–648 (2019).
45
M. A. Kostylev et al., Liquid and hydrogel phases of PrPC linked to conformation shifts and triggered by Alzheimer’s amyloid-β oligomers. Mol. Cell 72, 426–443.e12 (2018).
46
C. O. Matos et al., Liquid–liquid phase separation and fibrillation of the prion protein modulated by a high-affinity DNA aptamer. FASEB J. 34, 365–385 (2020).
47
H. Tange et al., Liquid-liquid phase separation of full-length prion protein initiates conformational conversion in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100367 (2021).
48
M. P. B. Gomes, Y. Cordeiro, J. L. Silva, The peculiar interaction between mammalian prion protein and RNA. Prion 2, 64–66 (2008).
49
R. Lathe, J.-L. Darlix, Prion protein PrP nucleic acid binding and mobilization implicates retroelements as the replicative component of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. Arch. Virol. 165, 535–556 (2020).
50
C. Gabus et al., The prion protein has RNA binding and chaperoning properties characteristic of nucleocapsid protein NCP7 of HIV-1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 19301–19309 (2001).
51
S. Beaudoin et al., A large ribonucleoprotein particle induced by cytoplasmic PrP shares striking similarities with the chromatoid body, an RNA granule predicted to function in posttranscriptional gene regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 335–345 (2009).
52
M. Hofweber et al., Phase separation of FUS is suppressed by its nuclear import receptor and arginine methylation. Cell 173, 706–719.e13 (2018).
53
Y. Lin, D. S. Protter, M. K. Rosen, R. Parker, Formation and maturation of phase-separated liquid droplets by RNA-binding proteins. Mol. Cell 60, 208–219 (2015).
54
S. Elbaum-Garfinkle et al., The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7189–7194 (2015).
55
T. Ukmar-Godec et al., Lysine/RNA-interactions drive and regulate biomolecular condensation. Nat. Commun. 10, 2909 (2019).
56
A. Patel et al., A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162, 1066–1077 (2015).
57
S. Maharana et al., RNA buffers the phase separation behavior of prion-like RNA binding proteins. Science 360, 918–921 (2018).
58
T. Kaur et al., Sequence-encoded and composition-dependent protein-RNA interactions control multiphasic condensate morphologies. Nat. Commun. 12, 872 (2021).
59
R. Tuma, Raman spectroscopy of proteins: From peptides to large assemblies. J. Raman Spectrosc. 36, 307–319 (2005).
60
M. Bhattacharya, N. Jain, P. Dogra, S. Samai, S. Mukhopadhyay, Nanoscopic amyloid pores formed via stepwise protein assembly. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 480–485 (2013).
61
A. M. Smith, A. A. Lee, S. Perkin, The electrostatic screening length in concentrated electrolytes increases with concentration. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 2157–2163 (2016).
62
S. Kroschwald, S. Maharana, A. Simon, Hexanediol: A chemical probe to investigate the material properties of membrane-less compartments. Matters (Zur.) 3, e201702000010 (2017).
63
J. Wang et al., A molecular grammar governing the driving forces for phase separation of prion-like RNA binding proteins. Cell 174, 688–699.e16 (2018).
64
F. Garcia Quiroz et al., Intrinsically disordered proteins access a range of hysteretic phase separation behaviors. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax5177 (2019).
65
S. Qamar et al., FUS phase separation is modulated by a molecular chaperone and methylation of arginine cation-π interactions. Cell 173, 720–734.e15 (2018).
66
P. Dogra, A. Joshi, A. Majumdar, S. Mukhopadhyay, Intermolecular charge-transfer modulates liquid–liquid phase separation and liquid-to-solid maturation of an intrinsically disordered pH-responsive domain. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 20380–20389 (2019).
67
M. Miskei et al., Fuzziness enables context dependence of protein interactions. FEBS Lett. 591, 2682–2695 (2017).
68
H. Lorenz, O. Windl, H. A. Kretzschmar, Cellular phenotyping of secretory and nuclear prion proteins associated with inherited prion diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8508–8516 (2002).
69
M.-A. Wulf, A. Senatore, A. Aguzzi, The biological function of the cellular prion protein: An update. BMC Biol. 15, 34 (2017).
70
B. Wu et al., The N-terminus of the prion protein is a toxic effector regulated by the C-terminus. eLife 6, e23473 (2017).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.118; No.45
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 118 | No. 45
November 9, 2021
PubMed: 34737230

Classifications

Data Availability

All study data are included in the article and supporting information.

Submission history

Accepted: September 23, 2021
Published online: November 5, 2021
Published in issue: November 9, 2021

Keywords

  1. amyloid formation
  2. biological phase transitions
  3. intrinsically disordered proteins
  4. membraneless organelles
  5. stop codon mutation

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Witold Surewicz (Case Western Reserve University) for the kind gift of the DNA plasmid of full-length prion protein; Dr. Mahak Sharma (Indian Institute of Science Education and Research [IISER] Mohali) for confocal microscopy; Ms. Pallavi Joshi for preliminary studies; Dr. Shravan Mishra (IISER Mohali) for providing us yeast total RNA; Dr. Mily Bhattacharya (Thapar Institute), Dr. Priyanka Dogra (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital), Dr. Anupa Majumdar (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics), and the members of the S.M. laboratory for critically reading this manuscript; and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and valuable suggestions. This study was funded in part by the IISER Mohali, Department of Science and Technology (Nano-Mission grant to S.M. and FIST grant); Department of Biotechnology (fellowship to A. Agarwal); Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (fellowship to S.K.R.); and the Ministry of Education, Government of India (Centre of Excellence grant to S.M.).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Authors

Affiliations

Aishwarya Agarwal1
Centre for Protein Science, Design and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Punjab 140306, India;
Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali 140306 Punjab, India;
Sandeep K. Rai1
Centre for Protein Science, Design and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Punjab 140306, India;
Department of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali 140306 Punjab, India
Anamika Avni
Centre for Protein Science, Design and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Punjab 140306, India;
Department of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali 140306 Punjab, India
Centre for Protein Science, Design and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Punjab 140306, India;
Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali 140306 Punjab, India;
Department of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali 140306 Punjab, India

Notes

2
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected].
1
A. Agarwal and S.K.R. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: A. Agarwal and S.M. designed research; A. Agarwal, S.K.R., and A. Avni performed research; A. Agarwal contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A. Agarwal, S.K.R., and A. Avni analyzed data; and A. Agarwal, S.K.R., A. Avni, and S.M. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    An intrinsically disordered pathological prion variant Y145Stop converts into self-seeding amyloids via liquid–liquid phase separation
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 118
    • No. 45

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media