Atomic-resolution chemical characterization of (2x)72-kDa tryptophan synthase via four- and five-dimensional 1H-detected solid-state NMR

Edited by Robert Tycko, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD; received August 12, 2021; accepted December 13, 2021
January 20, 2022
119 (4) e2114690119

Significance

The atomic-level understanding of protein function and enzyme catalysis requires site-specific information on chemical properties such as protonation and hybridization states and chemical exchange equilibria. This information is encoded in NMR chemical shifts, which serve as important complementary information to structural data from other experimental techniques or structure prediction algorithms. This study demonstrates that comprehensive chemical-shift assignments are achievable for large and highly complex proteins, offering insights into chemical structure and dynamics. The access to the active-site chemistry in the 144-kDa (72-kDa asymmetric unit) enzyme tryptophan synthase demonstrated here extends the elucidation of chemical properties to a member of an important class of enzymes of interest in pharmacology and biotechnology.

Abstract

NMR chemical shifts provide detailed information on the chemical properties of molecules, thereby complementing structural data from techniques like X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy. Detailed analysis of protein NMR data, however, often hinges on comprehensive, site-specific assignment of backbone resonances, which becomes a bottleneck for molecular weights beyond 40 to 45 kDa. Here, we show that assignments for the (2x)72-kDa protein tryptophan synthase (665 amino acids per asymmetric unit) can be achieved via higher-dimensional, proton-detected, solid-state NMR using a single, 1-mg, uniformly labeled, microcrystalline sample. This framework grants access to atom-specific characterization of chemical properties and relaxation for the backbone and side chains, including those residues important for the catalytic turnover. Combined with first-principles calculations, the chemical shifts in the β-subunit active site suggest a connection between active-site chemistry, the electrostatic environment, and catalytically important dynamics of the portal to the β-subunit from solution.

Continue Reading

Data Availability

Chemical-shift data have been deposited in the BMRB under entry 51166 (75). All other study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.

Acknowledgments

We thank the group of W. Koźmiński and Jan Stanek for helpful discussions about Signal Separation Algorithm (SSA) and related processing scripts. R.L. was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 27112786, 325871075, and the Emmy Noether program. This study was funded by the DFG under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2033 – 390677874 – RESOLV and EXC-114 – 24286268 – CiPS-M (Ruhr Explores SOLVation and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich, respectively). Financial support is also acknowledged from US NSF Grant CHE1710671 and NIH Grants GM097569 and GM137008 given to L.J.M. We acknowledge the computing time provided on the Linux High-Performance Computing cluster at Technical University Dortmund (LiDO3), partially funded via the Large-Scale Equipment Initiative by the DFG as Project 271512359. Additional computations were performed using the computer clusters and data storage resources of the University of California, Riverside High-Performance Computer Cluster, funded by grants from NSF (MRI-1429826) and NIH (S10OD016290).

Supporting Information

Materials/Methods, Supplementary Text, Tables, Figures, and/or References

Appendix 01 (PDF)

References

1
A. C. Eliot, J. F. Kirsch, Pyridoxal phosphate enzymes: Mechanistic, structural, and evolutionary considerations. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 383–415 (2004).
2
A. Mozzarelli, S. Bettati, Exploring the pyridoxal 5′-phosphate-dependent enzymes. Chem. Rec. 6, 275–287 (2006).
3
A. Sarup, O. M. Larsson, A. Schousboe, GABA transporters and GABA-transaminase as drug targets. Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord. 2, 269–277 (2003).
4
K. A. Abrahams et al., Inhibiting mycobacterial tryptophan synthase by targeting the inter-subunit interface. Sci. Rep. 7, 9430 (2017).
5
D. Niks et al., Allostery and substrate channeling in the tryptophan synthase bienzyme complex: Evidence for two subunit conformations and four quaternary states. Biochemistry 52, 6396–6411 (2013).
6
K. Michalska et al., Allosteric inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis tryptophan synthase. Protein Sci. 29, 779–788 (2020).
7
J. F. Rocha, A. F. Pina, S. F. Sousa, N. M. F. S. A. Cerqueira, PLP-dependent enzymes as important biocatalysts for the pharmaceutical, chemical and food industries: A structural and mechanistic perspective. Catal. Sci. Technol. 9, 4864–4876 (2019).
8
D. K. Romney, J. Murciano-Calles, J. E. Wehrmüller, F. H. Arnold, Unlocking reactivity of TrpB: A general biocatalytic platform for synthesis of tryptophan analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 10769–10776 (2017).
9
M. Dick, N. S. Sarai, M. W. Martynowycz, T. Gonen, F. H. Arnold, Tailoring tryptophan synthase TrpB for selective quaternary carbon bond formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19817–19822 (2019).
10
B. G. Caulkins et al., Catalytic roles of βLys87 in tryptophan synthase: (15)N solid state NMR studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1854, 1194–1199 (2015).
11
B. G. Caulkins et al., NMR crystallography of a carbanionic intermediate in tryptophan synthase: Chemical structure, tautomerization, and reaction specificity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15214–15226 (2016).
12
E. H. Cordes, W. P. Jencks, Semicarbazone formation from pyridoxal, pyridoxal phosphate, and their Schiff bases. Biochemistry 1, 773–778 (1962).
13
B. G. Caulkins et al., Protonation states of the tryptophan synthase internal aldimine active site from solid-state NMR spectroscopy: Direct observation of the protonated Schiff base linkage to pyridoxal-5′-phosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12824–12827 (2014).
14
J. Kraus, S. Sarkar, C. M. Quinn, T. Polenova, “Solid-state NMR spectroscopy of microcrystalline proteins” in Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, G. A. Webb, Ed. (Academic Press, 2021), vol. 102, pp. 81–151.
15
A. K. Schütz, Solid-state NMR approaches to investigate large enzymes in complex with substrates and inhibitors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 49, 131–144 (2021).
16
M. Kovermann, P. Rogne, M. Wolf-Watz, Protein dynamics and function from solution state NMR spectroscopy. Q. Rev. Biophys. 49, e6 (2016).
17
D. P. Frueh, Practical aspects of NMR signal assignment in larger and challenging proteins. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 78, 47–75 (2014).
18
G. R. Marshall et al., Determination of a precise interatomic distance in a helical peptide by REDOR NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 963–966 (2002).
19
M. L. Gilchrist Jr. et al., Measurement of interfluorine distances in solids. J. Magn. Reson. 152, 1–6 (2001).
20
J. E. Ollerenshaw, V. Tugarinov, L. E. Kay, Methyl TROSY: Explanation and experimental verification. Magn. Reson. Chem. 41, 843–852 (2003).
21
W. P. Aue, E. Bartholdi, R. R. Ernst, Two‐dimensional spectroscopy. Application to nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2229 (1976).
22
S. Żerko, W. Koźmiński, Six- and seven-dimensional experiments by combination of sparse random sampling and projection spectroscopy dedicated for backbone resonance assignment of intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 63, 283–290 (2015).
23
T. Wiegand et al., Monitoring ssDNA binding to the DnaB helicase from Helicobacter pylori by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 14164–14168 (2016).
24
H. Fraga et al., Solid-state NMR H-N-(C)-H and H-N-C-C 3D/4D correlation experiments for resonance assignment of large proteins. ChemPhysChem 18, 2697–2703 (2017).
25
D. F. Gauto et al., Aromatic ring dynamics, thermal activation, and transient conformations of a 468 kDa enzyme by specific 1H-13C labeling and fast magic-angle spinning NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11183–11195 (2019).
26
H. Singh et al., Fast-microsecond dynamics of the protein-water network in the active site of human carbonic anhydrase II by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19276–19288 (2019).
27
P. I. Aguion, J. Kirkpatrick, T. Carlomagno, A. Marchanka, Identification of RNA base pairs and complete assignment of nucleobase resonances by proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy at 100 kHz MAS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 23903–23910 (2021).
28
M. Lu et al., Atomic-resolution structure of HIV-1 capsid tubes by magic-angle spinning NMR. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 863–869 (2020).
29
M. T. Colvin et al., Atomic resolution structure of monomorphic Aβ42 amyloid fibrils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9663–9674 (2016).
30
M. D. Tuttle et al., Solid-state NMR structure of a pathogenic fibril of full-length human α-synuclein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 409–415 (2016).
31
V. S. Mandala et al., Structure and drug binding of the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein transmembrane domain in lipid bilayers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1202–1208 (2020).
32
A. E. McDermott, F. J. Creuzet, A. C. Kolbert, R. G. Griffin, High-resolution magic-angle-spinning NMR spectra of protons in deuterated solids. J. Magn. Reson. 98, 408–413 (1992).
33
E. K. Paulson et al., Sensitive high resolution inverse detection NMR spectroscopy of proteins in the solid state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 15831–15836 (2003).
34
V. Chevelkov, K. Rehbein, A. Diehl, B. Reif, Ultrahigh resolution in proton solid-state NMR spectroscopy at high levels of deuteration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 3878–3881 (2006).
35
S. Asami, B. Reif, Proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy at aliphatic sites: Application to crystalline systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2089–2097 (2013).
36
R. Linser, V. Chevelkov, A. Diehl, B. Reif, Sensitivity enhancement using paramagnetic relaxation in MAS solid-state NMR of perdeuterated proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 189, 209–216 (2007).
37
N. P. Wickramasinghe et al., Nanomole-scale protein solid-state NMR by breaking intrinsic 1HT1 boundaries. Nat. Methods 6, 215–218 (2009).
38
C. Öster, S. Kosol, J. R. Lewandowski, Quantifying microsecond exchange in large protein complexes with accelerated relaxation dispersion experiments in the solid state. Sci. Rep. 9, 11082 (2019).
39
S. Penzel et al., Protein resonance assignment at MAS frequencies approaching 100 kHz: A quantitative comparison of J-coupling and dipolar-coupling-based transfer methods. J. Biomol. NMR 63, 165–186 (2015).
40
J. Stanek et al., NMR spectroscopic assignment of backbone and side-chain protons in fully protonated proteins: Microcrystals, sedimented assemblies, and amyloid fibrils. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 15504–15509 (2016).
41
S. K. Vasa, H. Singh, K. Grohe, R. Linser, Assessment of a large enzyme-drug complex by proton-detected solid-state NMR without deuteration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 58, 5758–5762 (2019).
42
R. Linser, Side-chain to backbone correlations from solid-state NMR of perdeuterated proteins through combined excitation and long-range magnetization transfers. J. Biomol. NMR 51, 221–226 (2011).
43
R. Linser, B. Bardiaux, V. Higman, U. Fink, B. Reif, Structure calculation from unambiguous long-range amide and methyl 1H-1H distance restraints for a microcrystalline protein with MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5905–5912 (2011).
44
A. Bertarello et al., Picometer resolution structure of the coordination sphere in the metal-binding site in a metalloprotein by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 16757–16765 (2020).
45
H. W. Orton et al., Protein NMR resonance assignment without spectral analysis: 5D SOlid-state automated projection spectroscopY (SO-APSY). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 2380–2384 (2020).
46
J. Stanek et al., Automated backbone NMR resonance assignment of large proteins using redundant linking from a single simultaneous acquisition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5793–5799 (2020).
47
M. Zinke et al., Architecture of the flexible tail tube of bacteriophage SPP1. Nat. Commun. 11, 5759 (2020).
48
T. Schubeis, J. Stanek, G. Pintacuda, Backbone assignment of crystalline E. coli maltose binding protein. Biomol. NMR Assign. 15, 317–322 (2021).
49
W. T. Franks, K. D. Kloepper, B. J. Wylie, C. M. Rienstra, Four-dimensional heteronuclear correlation experiments for chemical shift assignment of solid proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 39, 107–131 (2007).
50
S. Xiang, V. Chevelkov, S. Becker, A. Lange, Towards automatic protein backbone assignment using proton-detected 4D solid-state NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 60, 85–90 (2014).
51
S. Xiang, J. Biernat, E. Mandelkow, S. Becker, R. Linser, Backbone assignment for minimal protein amounts of low structural homogeneity in the absence of deuteration. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 52, 4002–4005 (2016).
52
M. Zinke et al., Bacteriophage tail-tube assembly studied by proton-detected 4D solid-state NMR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56, 9497–9501 (2017).
53
S. K. Vasa, H. Singh, P. Rovó, R. Linser, Dynamics and interactions of a 29 kDa human enzyme studied by solid-state NMR. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1307–1311 (2018).
54
M. Huber, A. Böckmann, S. Hiller, B. H. Meier, 4D solid-state NMR for protein structure determination. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 5239–5246 (2012).
55
R. Linser et al., Solid-state NMR structure determination from diagonal-compensated, sparsely nonuniform-sampled 4D proton-proton restraints. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11002–11010 (2014).
56
C. Shi et al., Atomic-resolution structure of cytoskeletal bactofilin by solid-state NMR. Sci. Adv. 1, e1501087 (2015).
57
L. J. Mueller, M. F. Dunn, NMR crystallography of enzyme active sites: Probing chemically detailed, three-dimensional structure in tryptophan synthase. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2008–2017 (2013).
58
J. D. Hartman, T. J. Neubauer, B. G. Caulkins, L. J. Mueller, G. J. O. Beran, Converging nuclear magnetic shielding calculations with respect to basis and system size in protein systems. J. Biomol. NMR 62, 327–340 (2015).
59
J. B. Holmes et al., Imaging active site chemistry and protonation states in tryptophan synthase: NMR-assisted crystallography of the α-aminoacrylate intermediate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 10.1073/pnas.2109235119 (2022).
60
R. Linser, U. Fink, B. Reif, Narrow carbonyl resonances in proton-diluted proteins facilitate NMR assignments in the solid-state. J. Biomol. NMR 47, 1–6 (2010).
61
A. Klein, S. K. Vasa, R. Linser, Automated projection spectroscopy in solid-state NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 72, 163–170 (2018).
62
R. Linser, U. Fink, B. Reif, Proton-detected scalar coupling based assignment strategies in MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy applied to perdeuterated proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 193, 89–93 (2008).
63
R. Linser et al., Proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy of fibrillar and membrane proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50, 4508–4512 (2011).
64
E. Barbet-Massin et al., Rapid proton-detected NMR assignment for proteins with fast magic angle spinning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12489–12497 (2014).
65
D. H. Zhou et al., Proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy of fully protonated proteins at 40 kHz magic-angle spinning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 11791–11801 (2007).
66
L. B. Andreas et al., Protein residue linking in a single spectrum for magic-angle spinning NMR assignment. J. Biomol. NMR 62, 253–261 (2015).
67
S. Xiang et al., Sequential backbone assignment based on dipolar amide-to-amide correlation experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 62, 303–311 (2015).
68
K. Kazimierczuk, A. Zawadzka, W. Koźmiński, Narrow peaks and high dimensionalities: Exploiting the advantages of random sampling. J. Magn. Reson. 197, 219–228 (2009).
69
M. G. Jain et al., Selective 1H-1H distance restraints in fully protonated proteins by very fast magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 2399–2405 (2017).
70
J. S. Retel et al., Structure of outer membrane protein G in lipid bilayers. Nat. Commun. 8, 2073 (2017).
71
T. Schubeis et al., A β-barrel for oil transport through lipid membranes: Dynamic NMR structures of AlkL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 21014–21021 (2020).
72
N. Kulminskaya et al., Access to side-chain carbon information in deuterated solids under fast MAS through non-rotor-synchronized mixing. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 52, 268–271 (2016).
73
N. Kulminskaya, S. K. Vasa, K. Giller, S. Becker, R. Linser, Asynchronous through-bond homonuclear isotropic mixing: Application to carbon-carbon transfer in perdeuterated proteins under MAS. J. Biomol. NMR 63, 245–253 (2015).
74
E. Schmidt, P. Güntert, A new algorithm for reliable and general NMR resonance assignment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 12817–12829 (2012).
75
A. Klein et al., Solid-state NMR assignments of tryptophan synthase of S. typhimurium. Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank. https://bmrb.io/data_library/summary/index.php?bmrbId=51166. Deposited 4 November 2021.
76
D. L. Bryce, NMR crystallography: Structure and properties of materials from solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance observables. IUCrJ 4, 350–359 (2017).
77
J. C. Facelli, D. M. Grant, Determination of molecular symmetry in crystalline naphthalene using solid-state NMR. Nature 365, 325–327 (1993).
78
P. Hodgkinson, NMR crystallography of molecular organics. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 118–119, 10–53 (2020).
79
H. Zhang et al., HIV-1 capsid function is regulated by dynamics: Quantitative atomic-resolution insights by integrating magic-angle-spinning NMR, QM/MM, and MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14066–14075 (2016).
80
J. A. Gascón, E. M. Sproviero, V. S. Batista, QM/MM study of the NMR spectroscopy of the retinyl chromophore in visual rhodopsin. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 1, 674–685 (2005).
81
C. Bonhomme et al., First-principles calculation of NMR parameters using the gauge including projector augmented wave method: A chemist’s point of view. Chem. Rev. 112, 5733–5779 (2012).
82
J. D. Hartman, R. A. Kudla, G. M. Day, L. J. Mueller, G. J. O. Beran, Benchmark fragment-based (1)H, (13)C, (15)N and (17)O chemical shift predictions in molecular crystals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 21686–21709 (2016).
83
E. A. Engel et al., A Bayesian approach to NMR crystal structure determination. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 23385–23400 (2019).
84
S. Sharif, G. S. Denisov, M. D. Toney, H.-H. Limbach, NMR studies of solvent-assisted proton transfer in a biologically relevant Schiff base: Toward a distinction of geometric and equilibrium H-bond isotope effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3375–3387 (2006).
85
M. Chan-Huot et al., NMR studies of protonation and hydrogen bond states of internal aldimines of pyridoxal 5′-phosphate acid-base in alanine racemase, aspartate aminotransferase, and poly-L-lysine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18160–18175 (2013).
86
U. Sternberg et al., 1H line width dependence on MAS speed in solid state NMR - Comparison of experiment and simulation. J. Magn. Reson. 291, 32–39 (2018).
87
Y. M. Huang et al., Protonation states and catalysis: Molecular dynamics studies of intermediates in tryptophan synthase. Protein Sci. 25, 166–183 (2016).
88
A. Hassan et al., Sensitivity boosts by the CPMAS CryoProbe for challenging biological assemblies. J. Magn. Reson. 311, 106680 (2020).
89
K. Kosiński, J. Stanek, M. J. Górka, S. Żerko, W. Koźmiński, Reconstruction of non-uniformly sampled five-dimensional NMR spectra by signal separation algorithm. J. Biomol. NMR 68, 129–138 (2017).
90
Y. Shen, A. Bax, Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks. J. Biomol. NMR 56, 227–241 (2013).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.119; No.4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 119 | No. 4
January 25, 2022
PubMed: 35058365

Classifications

Data Availability

Chemical-shift data have been deposited in the BMRB under entry 51166 (75). All other study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.

Submission history

Received: August 12, 2021
Accepted: December 13, 2021
Published online: January 20, 2022
Published in issue: January 25, 2022

Keywords

  1. solid-state NMR
  2. NMR crystallography
  3. tryptophan synthase
  4. PLP-dependent enzymes
  5. tautomerism

Acknowledgments

We thank the group of W. Koźmiński and Jan Stanek for helpful discussions about Signal Separation Algorithm (SSA) and related processing scripts. R.L. was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 27112786, 325871075, and the Emmy Noether program. This study was funded by the DFG under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2033 – 390677874 – RESOLV and EXC-114 – 24286268 – CiPS-M (Ruhr Explores SOLVation and Center for integrated Protein Science Munich, respectively). Financial support is also acknowledged from US NSF Grant CHE1710671 and NIH Grants GM097569 and GM137008 given to L.J.M. We acknowledge the computing time provided on the Linux High-Performance Computing cluster at Technical University Dortmund (LiDO3), partially funded via the Large-Scale Equipment Initiative by the DFG as Project 271512359. Additional computations were performed using the computer clusters and data storage resources of the University of California, Riverside High-Performance Computer Cluster, funded by grants from NSF (MRI-1429826) and NIH (S10OD016290).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Authors

Affiliations

Alexander Klein
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
Petra Rovó
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany
Varun V. Sakhrani
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Yangyang Wang
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Jacob B. Holmes
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Viktoriia Liu
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Patricia Skowronek
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany
Laura Kukuk
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
Suresh K. Vasa
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
Peter Güntert
Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany

Notes

1
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected].
Author contributions: L.J.M. and R.L. designed research; A.K., P.R., V.V.S., Y.W., J.B.H., V.L., P.S., S.K.V., P.G., and L.J.M. performed research; A.K., P.R., V.V.S., Y.W., J.B.H., V.L., P.S., L.K., S.K.V., L.J.M., and R.L. analyzed data; and A.K., L.J.M., and R.L. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Atomic-resolution chemical characterization of (2x)72-kDa tryptophan synthase via four- and five-dimensional 1H-detected solid-state NMR
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 119
    • No. 4

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media