Political ideology and generosity around the globe
Edited by Margaret Levi, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; received December 7, 2022; accepted February 21, 2023
Abstract
In a world severely put under stress by COVID-19, generosity becomes increasingly essential both when able to transcend local boundaries, building upon universalistic values, and when directed toward more local contexts, such as the native country. This study aims to investigate an underresearched determinant of generosity at these two levels, a factor that captures one’s beliefs, values, and opinions about society: political ideology. We study the donation decisions of more than 46,000 participants from 68 countries in a task with the possibility of donating to a national charity and an international one. We test whether more left-leaning individuals display higher generosity in general (H1) and toward international charities (H2). We also examine the association between political ideology and national generosity without hypothesizing any direction. We find that more left-leaning individuals are more likely to donate in general and more likely to be generous internationally. We also observe that more right-leaning individuals are more likely to donate nationally. These results are robust to the inclusion of several controls. In addition, we address a relevant source of cross-country variation, the quality of governance, which is found to have significant informative power in explaining the relationship between political ideology and the different types of generosity. Potential mechanisms underlying the resulting behaviors are discussed.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
The dataset and the STATA source code for all the analyses are available on the Open Science Framework repository: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/xtmwz (16). Previously published data were used for this work (13) OSF Repository: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/tfsza (17).
Acknowledgments
Author contributions
V.P., X.D., R.D.P., and V.C. designed research; V.P., X.D., R.D.P., and V.C. performed research; V.P., X.D., and R.D.P. analyzed data; and V.P., X.D., and V.C. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Supporting Information
Appendix 01 (PDF)
- Download
- 75.23 KB
References
1
R. S. Erikson, K. L. Tedin, American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content and Impact (Routledge, 2015).
2
P. Norris, R. Inglehart, Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
3
J. T. Jost, The end of the end of ideology. Am. Psychol. 61, 651 (2006).
4
J. T. Jost, C. M. Federico, J. L. Napier, Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 60, 307–337 (2009).
5
T. L. L. Milfont, C. L. Davies, M. S. Wilson, The moral foundations of environmentalism. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 14, 1–25 (2019).
6
G. Pennycook, D. G. Rand, Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188, 39–50 (2019).
7
H. H. Tung, T.-J. Chang, M.-J. Lin, Political ideology predicts preventative behaviors and infections amid COVID-19 in democracies. Soc. Sci. Med. 308, 115199 (2022).
8
D. Balliet, J. M. Tybur, J. Wu, C. Antonellis, P. A. M. Van Lange, Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: In-group favoritism among republicans and democrats during a us national election. J. Confl. Resolut. 62, 797–818 (2018).
9
A. Romano, M. Sutter, J. H. Liu, D. Balliet, Political ideology, cooperation and national parochialism across 42 nations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200146 (2021).
10
B. Enke, R. Rodríguez-Padilla, F. Zimmermann, “Moral universalism and the structure of ideology” (Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
11
M. B. Brewer, N. R. Buchan, O. D. Ozturk, G. Grimalda, Parochial altruism and political ideology. Polit. Psychol. 44, 383–396 (2022).
12
F. Azevedo et al., Social and moral psychology of COVID-19 across 69 countries. Nat. Sci. Data (forthcoming).
13
J. J. Van Bavel et al., National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–14 (2022).
14
A. P. Kyriacou, Individualism-collectivism, governance and economic development. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 42, 91–104 (2016).
15
A. Chirumbolo, L. Leone, M. Desimoni, The interpersonal roots of politics: Social value orientation, socio-political attitudes and prejudice. Pers. Individ. Differ. 91, 144–153 (2016).
16
V. Pizziol, Z. Demaj, R. Di Paolo, V. Capraro, Political ideology and generosity around the globe. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/xtmwz. Deposited 13 October 2022.
17
F. Azevedo et al., Social and moral psychology of COVID-19. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/tfsza. Deposited 1 February 2021.
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
The dataset and the STATA source code for all the analyses are available on the Open Science Framework repository: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/xtmwz (16). Previously published data were used for this work (13) OSF Repository: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/tfsza (17).
Submission history
Received: December 7, 2022
Accepted: February 21, 2023
Published online: April 5, 2023
Published in issue: April 11, 2023
Change history
April 11, 2023: The affiliations for V. Pizziol, X. Demaj, and R. Di Paolo, as well as reference 16 have been updated. Previous version (Published April 5, 2023)
Keywords
Acknowledgments
Author contributions
V.P., X.D., R.D.P., and V.C. designed research; V.P., X.D., R.D.P., and V.C. performed research; V.P., X.D., and R.D.P. analyzed data; and V.P., X.D., and V.C. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
Political ideology and generosity around the globe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
120 (15) e2219676120,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219676120
(2023).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.