A wireless, battery-free device enables oxygen generation and immune protection of therapeutic xenotransplants in vivo

Contributed by Robert Langer; received July 13, 2023; accepted August 10, 2023; reviewed by Sharon Gerecht and David Putnam
September 22, 2023
120 (40) e2311707120

Significance

Cell therapies for protein replacement result in functional cures for patients with chronic, life-threatening conditions such as Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), but their development has been limited by challenges in maintaining transplanted cell viability in vivo. Attack from host immune tissue and low oxygen levels represent two major causes of failure. This work addresses both challenges through an immune-isolating device that houses and oxygenates transplanted cells in vivo. The device oxygenates cells via electrolytic water vapor splitting inside the body, obviating the need for pumps and fluid handling mechanisms. The device is battery-free and relies on wireless energy harvesting, addressing challenges associated with battery recharging, size, and toxicity, potentially allowing for long-lived cell therapies in subcutaneous sites.

Abstract

The immune isolation of cells within devices has the potential to enable long-term protein replacement and functional cures for a range of diseases, without requiring immune suppressive therapy. However, a lack of vasculature and the formation of fibrotic capsules around cell immune-isolating devices limits oxygen availability, leading to hypoxia and cell death in vivo. This is particularly problematic for pancreatic islet cells that have high O2 requirements. Here, we combine bioelectronics with encapsulated cell therapies to develop the first wireless, battery-free oxygen-generating immune-isolating device (O2-Macrodevice) for the oxygenation and immune isolation of cells in vivo. The system relies on electrochemical water splitting based on a water-vapor reactant feed, sustained by wireless power harvesting based on a flexible resonant inductive coupling circuit. As such, the device does not require pumping, refilling, or ports for recharging and does not generate potentially toxic side products. Through systematic in vitro studies with primary cell lines and cell lines engineered to secrete protein, we demonstrate device performance in preventing hypoxia in ambient oxygen concentrations as low as 0.5%. Importantly, this device has shown the potential to enable subcutaneous (SC) survival of encapsulated islet cells, in vivo in awake, freely moving, immune-competent animals. Islet transplantation in Type I Diabetes represents an important application space, and 1-mo studies in immune-competent animals with SC implants show that the O2-Macrodevice allows for survival and function of islets at high densities (~1,000 islets/cm2) in vivo without immune suppression and induces normoglycemia in diabetic animals.

Continue Reading

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF), (grant 3-SRA-2022-1098-S-B), the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable trust (2102-04997) and the NIH (NIH R01EB031992). S.R.K gratefully acknowledges funding from the JDRF (postdoctoral fellowship 3-PDF-2022-1138-A-N) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB-NIH) (K99EB032427). S.B. acknowledges funding from the NIBIB-NIH (K99EB025254). We thank Dr. Philipp Gutruf for insightful discussions. Device fabrication and assembly was partly performed at MIT.Nano, and we acknowledge the contributions of MIT.Nano staff members Dennis Ward, Donal Jamieson, and Kurt Broderick in helping refine our fabrication processes and in maintaining essential equipment. Finally, we thank the Joslin Diabetes Center for providing us isolated rat islets that we used in the studies described here.

Author contributions

S.R.K., M.A.B., S.B., R.L., and D.G.A. designed research; S.R.K., C.L., M.A.B., N.K., B.W., L.O., A.F., R.L., and D.G.A. performed research; S.R.K., C.L., M.A.B., N.K., R.L., and D.G.A. analyzed data; and S.R.K., R.L., and D.G.A. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

S.R.K, M.A.B, S.B, N.K, R.L., and D.G.A are inventors on a patent application relevant to the technology described in the above work. D.G.A is on the Scientific advisory board of Sigilon Therapeutics, a biotechnology company based in Cambridge, MA, that develops antifibrotic materials for microencapsulated cell-based therapies. R.L. receives licensing fees (to patents in which he was an inventor on) from, invested in, consults (or was on Scientific Advisory Boards or Boards of Directors) for, lectured (and received a fee), or conducts sponsored research at MIT for which he was not paid for a large number of entities. A full list can be found in SI Appendix.

Supporting Information

Appendix 01 (PDF)
Movie S1.
180x speed video of continuous wireless, battery‒free oxygen and hydrogen generation from O2‒Macrodevice in deionized water.
Movie S2.
180x speed video of pulsed mode wireless battery‒free oxygen and hydrogen generation from O2‒Macrodevice in deionized water, operated at a duty cycle of 50%.

References

1
F. Lim, A. M. Sun, Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science 210, 908–910 (1980).
2
M. A. Bochenek et al., Alginate encapsulation as long-term immune protection of allogeneic pancreatic islet cells transplanted into the omental bursa of macaques. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 810–821 (2018).
3
S. Bose et al., A retrievable implant for the long-term encapsulation and survival of therapeutic xenogeneic cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 814–826 (2020).
4
P. O. Carlsson et al., Transplantation of macroencapsulated human islets within the bioartificial pancreas βAir to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Trans. 18, 1735–1744 (2018).
5
A. J. Vegas et al., Long-term glycemic control using polymer-encapsulated human stem cell–derived beta cells in immune-competent mice. Nat. Med. 22, 306 (2016).
6
J. Wikström et al., Alginate-based microencapsulation of retinal pigment epithelial cell line for cell therapy. Biomaterials 29, 869–876 (2008).
7
K. E. La Flamme et al., Biocompatibility of nanoporous alumina membranes for immunoisolation. Biomaterials 28, 2638–2645 (2007).
8
T. A. Desai, D. Hansford, M. Ferrari, Characterization of micromachined silicon membranes for immunoisolation and bioseparation applications. J. Membrane Sci. 159, 221–231 (1999).
9
L. Leoni, A. Boiarski, T. A. Desai, Characterization of nanoporous membranes for immunoisolation: Diffusion properties and tissue effects. Biomed. Microdevices 4, 131–139 (2002).
10
S. L. Tao, T. A. Desai, Microfabricated drug delivery systems: From particles to pores. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 55, 315–328 (2003).
11
C. E. Nyitray et al., Polycaprolactone thin-film micro-and nanoporous cell-encapsulation devices. ACS Nano 9, 5675–5682 (2015).
12
H. Hentze et al., Teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells: Evaluation of essential parameters for future safety studies. Stem Cell Res. 2, 198–210 (2009).
13
D. An et al., Designing a retrievable and scalable cell encapsulation device for potential treatment of type 1 diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E263–E272 (2018).
14
A. Dove, Cell-based therapies go live. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 339–343 (2002).
15
T. Desai, L. D. Shea, Advances in islet encapsulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 16, 338–350 (2017).
16
G. Weir, Islet encapsulation: Advances and obstacles. Diabetologia 56, 1458–1461 (2013).
17
J. Beck et al., Islet encapsulation: Strategies to enhance islet cell functions. Tissue Eng. 13, 589–599 (2007).
18
U. Barkai et al., Enhanced oxygen supply improves islet viability in a new bioartificial pancreas. Cell Transplant. 22, 1463–1476 (2013).
19
C. Olgasi et al., Patient-specific iPSC-derived endothelial cells provide long-term phenotypic correction of hemophilia A. Stem Cell Rep. 11, 1391–1406 (2018).
20
G. Hortelano et al., Persistent delivery of factor IX in mice: Gene therapy for hemophilia using implantable microcapsules. Hum. Gene Therapy 10, 1281–1288 (1999).
21
W. Xu, L. Liu, I. G. Charles, Microencapsulated iNOS-expressing cells cause tumor suppression in mice. FASEB J. 16, 1–18 (2002).
22
A. Bjorklund, J. H. Kordower, Cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease: What next? Mov. Disord. 28, 110–115 (2013).
23
O. Lindvall, A. Björklund, Cell therapy in Parkinson’s disease. NeuroRx 1, 382–393 (2004).
24
S. B. Dunnett, A. Björklund, O. Lindvall, Cell therapy in Parkinson’s disease–Stop or go? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 365–369 (2001).
25
C. K. Colton, Oxygen supply to encapsulated therapeutic cells. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 67, 93–110 (2014).
26
J.-H. Juang, S. Bonner-Weir, Y. Ogawa, J. P. Vacanti, G. C. Weir, Outcome of subcutaneous islet transplantation improved by polymer device1. Transplantation 61, 1557–1561 (1996).
27
C. Kemp, M. Knight, D. Scharp, W. Ballinger, P. Lacy, Effect of transplantation site on the results of pancreatic islet isografts in diabetic rats. Diabetologia 9, 486–491 (1973).
28
A. Mellgren, A. Schnell Landström, B. Petersson, A. Andersson, The renal subcapsular site offers better growth conditions for transplanted mouse pancreatic islet cells than the liver or spleen. Diabetologia 29, 670–672 (1986).
29
A. R. Pepper et al., A prevascularized subcutaneous device-less site for islet and cellular transplantation. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 518–523 (2015).
30
E. Pedraza, M. M. Coronel, C. A. Fraker, C. Ricordi, C. L. Stabler, Preventing hypoxia-induced cell death in beta cells and islets via hydrolytically activated, oxygen-generating biomaterials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 4245–4250 (2012).
31
L.-H. Wang et al., A bioinspired scaffold for rapid oxygenation of cell encapsulation systems. Nat. Commun. 12, 5846 (2021).
32
K. Yang et al., A therapeutic convection–enhanced macroencapsulation device for enhancing β cell viability and insulin secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2101258118 (2021).
33
M. Yu et al., Islet transplantation in the subcutaneous space achieves long-term euglycaemia in preclinical models of type 1 diabetes. Nat. Metabolism 2, 1013–1020 (2020).
34
B. Ludwig et al., A novel device for islet transplantation providing immune protection and oxygen supply. Horm. Metab. Res. 42, 918–922 (2010).
35
B. Ludwig et al., Favorable outcome of experimental islet xenotransplantation without immunosuppression in a nonhuman primate model of diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 11745–11750 (2017).
36
B. Ludwig et al., Transplantation of human islets without immunosuppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 19054–19058 (2013).
37
H. Wu et al., In situ electrochemical oxygen generation with an immunoisolation device. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 875, 105–125 (1999).
38
S. Dresp et al., Direct electrolytic splitting of seawater: Activity, selectivity, degradation, and recovery studied from the molecular catalyst structure to the electrolyzer cell level. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800338 (2018).
39
C. Xiang, Y. Chen, N. S. Lewis, Modeling an integrated photoelectrolysis system sustained by water vapor. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 3713–3721 (2013).
40
J. M. Spurgeon, N. S. Lewis, Proton exchange membrane electrolysis sustained by water vapor. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2993–2998 (2011).
41
H. Tang, S. Peikang, F. Wang, M. Pan, A degradation study of Nafion proton exchange membrane of PEM fuel cells. J. Power Sources 170, 85–92 (2007).
42
S. Samms, S. Wasmus, R. Savinell, Thermal stability of Nafion® in simulated fuel cell environments. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 1498 (1996).
43
W. Robb, Thin silicone membranes-their permeation properties and some applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 146, 119–137 (1968).
44
A. Kusoglu, A. Z. Weber, New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers. Chem. Rev. 117, 987–1104 (2017).
45
P. Gutruf et al., Fully implantable optoelectronic systems for battery-free, multimodal operation in neuroscience research. Nat. Electronics 1, 652 (2018).
46
G. Shin et al., Flexible near-field wireless optoelectronics as subdermal implants for broad applications in optogenetics. Neuron 93, 509–521.e3 (2017).
47
S. Han et al., Battery-free, wireless sensors for full-body pressure and temperature mapping. Sci. Trans. Med. 10, eaan4950 (2018).
48
H. Komatsu et al., Oxygen environment and islet size are the primary limiting factors of isolated pancreatic islet survival. PloS One 12, e0183780 (2017).
49
A. S. Johnson, R. J. Fisher, G. C. Weir, C. K. Colton, Oxygen consumption and diffusion in assemblages of respiring spheres: Performance enhancement of a bioartificial pancreas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 64, 4470–4487 (2009).
50
Y. Evron et al., Long-term viability and function of transplanted islets macroencapsulated at high density are achieved by enhanced oxygen supply. Sci. Rep. 8, 6508 (2018).
51
C. Colton, E. Avgoustiniatos, Bioengineering in development of the hybrid artificial pancreas. J. Biomech. Eng. 113, 152–170 (1991).
52
H. Komatsu, F. Kandeel, Y. Mullen, Impact of oxygen on pancreatic islet survival. Pancreas 47, 533 (2018).
53
N. Sakata, S. Egawa, S. Sumi, M. Unno, Optimization of glucose level to determine the stimulation index of isolated rat islets. Pancreas 36, 417–423 (2008).
54
K. J. Welsh, M. S. Kirkman, D. B. Sacks, Role of glycated proteins in the diagnosis and management of diabetes: Research gaps and future directions. Diabetes care 39, 1299 (2016).
55
A. P. Vollmer, R. F. Probstein, R. Gilbert, T. Thorsen, Development of an integrated microfluidic platform for dynamic oxygen sensing and delivery in a flowing medium. Lab on a Chip 5, 1059–1066 (2005).
56
I. Ohsawa et al., Hydrogen acts as a therapeutic antioxidant by selectively reducing cytotoxic oxygen radicals. Nat. Med. 13, 688–694 (2007).
57
R. Tian et al., Hydrogen-rich water attenuates brain damage and inflammation after traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res. 1637, 1–13 (2016).
58
B. Gharib et al., Anti-inflammatory properties of molecular hydrogen: Investigation on parasite-induced liver inflammation. C. R. Acad. Sci. III 324, 719–724 (2001).
59
S. Ohta, Molecular hydrogen is a novel antioxidant to efficiently reduce oxidative stress with potential for the improvement of mitochondrial diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820, 586–594 (2012).
60
H. Ye, M. Daoud-El Baba, R.-W. Peng, M. Fussenegger, A synthetic optogenetic transcription device enhances blood-glucose homeostasis in mice. Science 332, 1565–1568 (2011).
61
K. Krawczyk et al., Electrogenetic cellular insulin release for real-time glycemic control in type 1 diabetic mice. Science 368, 993–1001 (2020).
62
J. Malda, T. J. Klein, Z. Upton, The roles of hypoxia in the in vitro engineering of tissues. Tissue Eng. 13, 2153–2162 (2007).
63
E. Bland, D. Dréau, K. J. Burg, Overcoming hypoxia to improve tissue-engineering approaches to regenerative medicine. J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 7, 505–514 (2013).
64
H. Luan et al., Complex 3D microfluidic architectures formed by mechanically guided compressive buckling. Sci. Adv. 7, eabj3686 (2021).
65
J. T. Reeder et al., Soft, bioresorbable coolers for reversible conduction block of peripheral nerves. Science 377, 109–115 (2022).
66
A. Khademhosseini, R. Langer, A decade of progress in tissue engineering. Nat. Protocols 11, 1775–1781 (2016).
67
P. Gutruf, J. A. Rogers, Implantable, wireless device platforms for neuroscience research. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 42–49 (2018).
68
M. Qi et al., Five-year follow-up of patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted with allogeneic islets: The UIC experience. Acta Diabetol. 51, 833–843 (2014).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.120; No.40
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 120 | No. 40
October 3, 2023
PubMed: 37738292

Classifications

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.

Submission history

Received: July 13, 2023
Accepted: August 10, 2023
Published online: September 22, 2023
Published in issue: October 3, 2023

Keywords

  1. cell therapies
  2. bioelectronics
  3. encapsulation
  4. islet transplantation
  5. diabetes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF), (grant 3-SRA-2022-1098-S-B), the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable trust (2102-04997) and the NIH (NIH R01EB031992). S.R.K gratefully acknowledges funding from the JDRF (postdoctoral fellowship 3-PDF-2022-1138-A-N) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB-NIH) (K99EB032427). S.B. acknowledges funding from the NIBIB-NIH (K99EB025254). We thank Dr. Philipp Gutruf for insightful discussions. Device fabrication and assembly was partly performed at MIT.Nano, and we acknowledge the contributions of MIT.Nano staff members Dennis Ward, Donal Jamieson, and Kurt Broderick in helping refine our fabrication processes and in maintaining essential equipment. Finally, we thank the Joslin Diabetes Center for providing us isolated rat islets that we used in the studies described here.
Author contributions
S.R.K., M.A.B., S.B., R.L., and D.G.A. designed research; S.R.K., C.L., M.A.B., N.K., B.W., L.O., A.F., R.L., and D.G.A. performed research; S.R.K., C.L., M.A.B., N.K., R.L., and D.G.A. analyzed data; and S.R.K., R.L., and D.G.A. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
S.R.K, M.A.B, S.B, N.K, R.L., and D.G.A are inventors on a patent application relevant to the technology described in the above work. D.G.A is on the Scientific advisory board of Sigilon Therapeutics, a biotechnology company based in Cambridge, MA, that develops antifibrotic materials for microencapsulated cell-based therapies. R.L. receives licensing fees (to patents in which he was an inventor on) from, invested in, consults (or was on Scientific Advisory Boards or Boards of Directors) for, lectured (and received a fee), or conducts sponsored research at MIT for which he was not paid for a large number of entities. A full list can be found in SI Appendix.

Notes

Reviewers: S.G., Duke University; and D.P., Cornell University.

Authors

Affiliations

Siddharth R. Krishnan
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Claudia Liu
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Matthew A. Bochenek
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Suman Bose
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Nima Khatib
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Ben Walters
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Laura O’Keeffe
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Amanda Facklam
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Bioengineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Department of Bioengineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Daniel G. Anderson1 [email protected]
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Notes

1
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    A wireless, battery-free device enables oxygen generation and immune protection of therapeutic xenotransplants in vivo
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 120
    • No. 40

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media