Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica

Edited by Lynn Margulis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, and approved September 17, 2008
November 18, 2008
105 (46) 17867-17871

Abstract

The sea slug Elysia chlorotica acquires plastids by ingestion of its algal food source Vaucheria litorea. Organelles are sequestered in the mollusc's digestive epithelium, where they photosynthesize for months in the absence of algal nucleocytoplasm. This is perplexing because plastid metabolism depends on the nuclear genome for >90% of the needed proteins. Two possible explanations for the persistence of photosynthesis in the sea slug are (i) the ability of V. litorea plastids to retain genetic autonomy and/or (ii) more likely, the mollusc provides the essential plastid proteins. Under the latter scenario, genes supporting photosynthesis have been acquired by the animal via horizontal gene transfer and the encoded proteins are retargeted to the plastid. We sequenced the plastid genome and confirmed that it lacks the full complement of genes required for photosynthesis. In support of the second scenario, we demonstrated that a nuclear gene of oxygenic photosynthesis, psbO, is expressed in the sea slug and has integrated into the germline. The source of psbO in the sea slug is V. litorea because this sequence is identical from the predator and prey genomes. Evidence that the transferred gene has integrated into sea slug nuclear DNA comes from the finding of a highly diverged psbO 3′ flanking sequence in the algal and mollusc nuclear homologues and gene absence from the mitochondrial genome of E. chlorotica. We demonstrate that foreign organelle retention generates metabolic novelty (“green animals”) and is explained by anastomosis of distinct branches of the tree of life driven by predation and horizontal gene transfer.
Symbiotic associations and their related gene transfer events are postulated to contribute significantly to evolutionary innovation and biodiversity. This comes from extensive analysis of organelles such as plastids (e.g., chloroplasts) that originated via primary endosymbiosis of a free-living cyanobacterium (1, 2). The cyanobacterial genome was greatly reduced by endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT) to the host nucleus and wholesale gene loss, giving rise to the primary lineages of plants and green algae (streptophytes and chlorophytes), red algae (rhodophytes), and glaucophytes (36) [see the scheme in supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. The diverse group of secondary or “complex” algae (e.g., chromalveolates, euglenids), in turn, arose by secondary endosymbiosis—the uptake of a eukaryotic alga (green or red lineage) by a heterotrophic eukaryotic host. In this case, in addition to EGT, transfer of genes between the unrelated organisms by lateral or horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and loss of genes occurred as a result of the “merger” of the two nuclei (host and endosymbiont) (7). As a result of primary and secondary endosymbiosis, plastid genomes (ptDNAs) encode less than 10% of the predicted 1,000 to 5,000 proteins required to sustain the metabolic capacity of the plastid (8, 9).
Examples of HGT between unrelated or nonmating species are abundant among prokaryotes (10, 11) but less so between prokaryotes and unicellular (1214) or multicellular eukaryotes (1520). Most of these latter examples are associated with parasitism or phagotrophy, including the elegant studies of HGT from the α-proteobacteria Wolbachia to insects and nematodes (1618), and the finding of rhizobial-like genes in plant parasitic nematodes (19, 20). The exchange of genetic material between two eukaryotes is extremely rare, or at least not well documented to date. The best-studied cases include the transfer of mitochondrial DNA from achlorophyllous or epiphytic plants to the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) of their closely related photosynthetic hosts (21), the exchange of transposons between two animal (22) or two plant (23) species, and the presence of plant genes in plant parasitic nematodes (in addition to the rhizobial genes discussed previously), which are hypothesized to be “defense” genes whose products protect the parasite from host detection (20).
The sacoglossan mollusc (sea slug) Elysia chlorotica represents a unique model system to study the potential for interdomain HGT between two multicellular eukaryotes—in this case, from a filamentous secondary (heterokont) alga (Vaucheria litorea) to a mollusc. This emerald green sea slug owes its coloring and photosynthetic ability to plastids acquired during herbivorous feeding (2429). The plastids do not undergo division in the sea slug and are sequestered intracellularly in cells lining the finely divided digestive diverticula. The plastids continue to carry out photosynthesis, providing the sea slug with energy and carbon during its approximately 10-month life span (27, 28). Long-term plastid activity continues despite the absence of algal nuclei (27, 29), and hence a source of nuclear-encoded plastid-targeted proteins. We hypothesize that the algal nuclear genes encoding essential plastid proteins are present in the sea slug, presumably as a result of HGT. Here, we present evidence for such interdomain HGT of psbO, a nuclear gene encoding the plastid manganese-stabilizing protein (MSP = PsbO). MSP is a subunit of the photosystem II complex associated with photosynthetic oxygen evolution (30, 31), which is, unquestionably, the most important enzyme complex of oxygenic life.

Results and Discussion

Plastid Genetic Autonomy.

The plastids in E. chlorotica are not transmitted vertically; rather, they must be acquired with each generation early in development to ensure maturation to the adult sea slug (32). Laboratory coculturing studies were carried out to establish that the alga V. litorea, a derived heterokont alga that contains secondary plastids of red algal origin (33) (Fig. S1), was the sole source of plastids in the sea slugs (Fig. 1, Movie S1, Movie S2, and SI Methods). Subsequent sequencing and mapping of the V. litorea ptDNA (only the fifth heterokont ptDNA to be published to date) revealed a very compact 115,341-bp double-stranded circular genome encoding 169 genes, including 139 protein-encoding genes (14 are conserved ORFs [ORF-designated ycfs] and 2 are unknown ORFs), 27 tRNA genes, and 3 rRNA genes (Fig. 2). The genes are densely arranged with an average intergenic region of 74bp and 11.1% noncoding DNA. The overall G + C content is 28%, which is low compared with most plastids, including other related heterokonts (34, 35). The genome is separated into two large single-copy regions (62,002bp and 43,469bp) by two smaller inverted repeats (both 4935bp). All the plastid rRNA genes are found on both copies of the inverted repeat in the highly conserved operon rrs-trnI-trnA-rrl-rrf. Unlike the four published heterokont ptDNAs that lack introns (34, 35), V. litorea contains one intron in the trnL UAA gene—an ancient intron that is also present in cyanobacteria (36). In addition, V. litorea has retained the genes for the light-independent chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway: chlB, chlL, and chlN. However, as expected, the V. litorea ptDNA shares more similarity with heterokonts and red algae than it does with green plastids (34, 35, 37) (see complete inventory of plastid genes by category in Table S1).
Fig. 1.
Laboratory culturing of E. chlorotica. (A) Free-swimming E. chlorotica veliger larvae. (Scale bar, 100 μm.) Under laboratory conditions, the veliger larvae develop and emerge from plastid-free sea slug–fertilized eggs within approximately 7 days. The green coloring in the digestive gut is attributable to planktonic feeding and not to the acquisition of plastids at this stage. Metamorphosis of the larvae to juvenile sea slugs requires the presence of filaments of V. litorea. (B) Metamorphosed juvenile sea slug feeding for the first time on V. litorea. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) The grayish-brown juveniles lose their shell, and there is an obligate requirement for plastid acquisition for continued development. This is fulfilled by the voracious feeding of the juveniles on filaments of V. litorea. (Also see Movie S1). (C) Young adult sea slug 5 days after first feeding. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) By a mechanism not yet understood, the sea slugs selectively retain only the plastids in cells that line their highly branched digestive tract. (D) Adult sea slug. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) As the sea slugs further develop and grow in size, the expanding digestive diverticuli spread the plastids throughout the entire body of the mollusc, yielding a uniform green coloring. (Also see Movie S2.) From these controlled rearing studies, we were able to conclude that the only source of plastids in our experimental sea slugs was V. litorea.
Fig. 2.
Map of the ptDNA of V. litorea. Genes on the outside are transcribed in the clockwise direction, whereas genes on the inside are transcribed in the counterclockwise direction. Genes are color coded according to their function as shown. tRNAs are listed by the one-letter amino acid code followed by the anticodon. The only gene with an intron (L-uaa) is indicated by an asterisk.
Examining the genetic autonomy of V. litorea ptDNA revealed the absence of the major core protein of the oxygen evolving complex of photosystem II, MSP (encoded by psbO). MSP has been reported to be critical to the stability of the water-splitting reaction of photosynthesis that generates atmospheric oxygen (30, 31). The evolutionary conservation of this reaction is demonstrated by the presence of MSP in all oxygenic photosynthetic organisms (30). Likewise, animal genomes have never been shown to contain psbO; hence, MSP cannot be made by the sea slug in the absence of HGT. We have previously demonstrated that oxygen evolution is linked to photosynthetic electron transport in the sea slug for at least 5 months after being removed from its algal prey (27), and photosystem II is generally highly susceptible to photo-oxidative damage requiring de novo synthesis and reassembly of its subunits (38, 39). For these reasons, we targeted psbO for HGT from V. litorea to E. chlorotica.

HGT and Expression of psbO.

Heterologous degenerate primers (Table S2) were designed based on alignments of published psbO sequences to amplify an internal fragment using reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. A 452-bp fragment was amplified from both algal and sea slug cDNA (5 months after algal feeding) (Fig. 3A). The translated product was used to blast the GenBank database, which revealed a relatively high identity (48%–68%) to several secondary red algal–derived MSP amino acid sequences. The entire V. litorea psbO cDNA sequence was then obtained using 5′- and 3′-RACE, and this sequence was used to design homologous primers to amplify a 963-bp internal fragment of the V. litorea psbO cDNA (Fig. 3C). These same primers yielded a similar sized PCR product from sea slug cDNA and DNA templates (Fig. 3C), the sequences of which were identical to the V. litorea psbO cDNA sequence beginning with the start codon (there are no introns in the algal gene; Fig. S2).
Fig. 3.
Expression of psbO in V. litorea and E. chlorotica. (A) RT-PCR using heterologous primers to psbO amplified a 452-bp fragment from both algal and adult sea slug cDNA. Water served as the negative control. Standards were a 1-kb Plus DNA ladder (Invitrogen). Vli, Vaucheria litorea, Ecl, Elysia chlorotica. (B) Northern blot analysis employing the cloned V. litorea 452 bp psbO product as probe hybridized with a 1.2-kb transcript for V. litorea and E. chlorotica as well as a 1.6-kb transcript in the sea slug. RNA Millennium Size Markers (Ambion) were run to estimate transcript size. (C) Homologous primers were designed from the RACE-amplified sequence of the V. litorea psbO fragment in A. By PCR, these primers amplified a 963-bp product from genomic DNA of V. litorea and E. chlorotica eggs and adult tissue as well as E. chlorotica adult cDNA by RT-PCR. (D) Translation of the psbO sequences obtained from the 963-bp products in B, for both V. litorea and E. chlorotica, yielded an identical amino acid sequence with a putative tripartite targeting signal for MSP. The signal sequence is in red, the transit peptide is in blue, and the thylakoid targeting domain is in green. Note the highly conserved phenylalanine residue at the cleavage site of the signal sequence.
Although it had been several months since the sea slugs had been in contact with any algal prey, the possibility of algal nuclei remaining in the gut of the sea slug and contaminating the total genomic DNA preparation was eliminated by carrying out the same PCR on sea slug egg DNA. Because plastids are not inherited in E. chlorotica, eggs provide a source of animal DNA and RNA that is free of algal contamination (27). Amplification of the sea slug egg DNA with the same primers resulted in a 963-bp fragment (Fig. 3C) with a sequence identical to the algal and sea slug psbO fragments (Fig. S2). As further PCR controls, primers complementary to the V. litorea internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1; GenBank EF441743) were used as a positive algal nuclear control (27); no product was observed from sea slug or sea slug egg DNA templates. Likewise, attempts to amplify psbO from negative controls (pufferfish and Dictyostelium DNA) using the same primers and reagents did not yield a positive PCR product. Finally, identical PCR results have been obtained from sea slugs collected from the same site on multiple occasions over a 3-year period (results not shown). Expression of the foreign gene in the sea slug was further supported by Northern blot analysis. The V. litorea psbO probe cross-reacted with a 1.2-kb transcript for both V. litorea and E. chlorotica RNA, along with a slightly larger transcript (1.6 kb) in the sea slug (Fig. 3B).
The identical translated MSP amino acid sequences for both V. litorea and E. chlorotica (Fig. 3D) were analyzed by phylogenetic methods (40, 41) incorporating 23 published MSP sequences. This revealed nesting of the sequences in the red algal lineage in a clade containing other heterokonts (Fig. S3). As expected for this secondary lineage, the V. litorea MSP preprotein contains a tripartite targeting sequence (Fig. 3D; as predicted by refs. 42, 43). This reflects the presence of chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum around the complex plastids, which must be traversed by proteins targeted to the plastid (44). What is interesting is that the MSP preprotein in the sea slug has retained the entire tripartite targeting sequence (Fig. 3D), especially in light of the observation that the chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum does not appear to be retained around the engulfed chloroplasts (28).
Recently, it was reported that nuclear genes encoding plastid-localized light harvesting complex proteins (fcp, lhcv1, and lhcv2) have also been transferred from V. litorea to E. chlorotica (45). Using a similar PCR approach, identical nucleotide sequences were reported for sea slug and algal fcp and lhcv1, and only a single base substitution was found between larval lhcv2 and adult sea slug or alga lhcv2. Although evidence from Southern blotting has not been achieved in the study reported here or for the light harvesting complex protein genes (45), we were able to obtain sequence information using genome walking for the 3′ untranslated flanking region of the psbO gene from both algal DNA and sea slug egg DNA. A nested gene-specific primer coupled with an adapter-specific primer (Table S2) yielded a 3′ flanking sequence from both organisms that was identical for the first 81bp corresponding to the 3′ end of the psbO gene and ending with the stop codon (Fig. S4). This sequence was followed by a highly diverged sequence corresponding to the 3′ untranslated region in each genome. These results support the interdomain transfer of an algal gene to a mollusc, its expression in the foreign host, and also that the gene has been inserted into the germline, even though the plastids are not yet transmitted vertically in the sea slug.

Mechanism and Site of Integration of Transferred Genes.

Similar to many other phagocytic or parasitic relations that lead to presumptive HGT events, the E. chlorotica/V. litorea plastid endosymbiosis involves intimate physical contact between predator and prey. During the sea slug's phagocytic feeding, the algal nuclei come into direct physical contact with the sea slug digestive epithelium. Upon nuclear rupture in the gut, pieces of algal chromosomal DNA (and possibly transcripts) may have been randomly transferred by “bulk transfer” or viral transmission (46) to the sea slug. Two potential sites for insertion of foreign genes in the sea slug are the nuclear genome and the mtDNA. Mitochondrion-to-mitochondrion gene transfer is now recognized as a dominant mode of HGT in plants because of the larger and more plastic mtDNAs in these taxa (21). The smaller compact animal or metazoan mitochondrion genome is generally believed to be a poorer target for foreign gene insertion. However, some basal metazoans do exhibit greater variation in mtDNA size and gene content (47). This includes multiple examples of HGT of group I intron sequences (normally not found in animals) into the mtDNA of a sponge (48), a sea anemone (49), and a coral (50).
To determine if the mtDNA of E. chlorotica serves as a target for any foreign genes, including psbO, we used PCR and primer walking to obtain the complete sequence and map the 14,132-bp mtDNA from sea slug eggs (Fig. 4). The genome was found to encode the standard 37 genes found in other typical animal mitochondria (see ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/ORGANELLES/33208). No introns were identified, and only 0.0125% of the DNA was noncoding. By measuring the G + C content over adjacent windows of 500 nt with 200-nt overlaps, the values were found to be uniformly distributed across the windows, suggesting homogeneity in GC content of the mtDNA and not supporting the existence of a chimeric region (Fig. S5). To assess further the possibility of HGT in E. chlorotica mitochondria, we did phylogenetic analyses with nucleotide data generated using a sliding window approach with the genome data (i.e., DNA sequences that are independent of gene structure) and using the complete translated ORFs. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees inferred with these alignments showed that the E. chlorotica sequences are monophyletic with molluscs, consistent with a vertical evolutionary history for E. chlorotica mtDNA (e.g., see the phylogenetic tree of cytochrome b in Fig. S6). These analyses point to an intact and “typical” animal mtDNA in E. chlorotica. We, however, do not argue absolutely against the possibility of a partial DNA insertion from an algal or other source in this genome; rather, that if such an insertion exists, it is not detectable using the approaches described here. In any case, it is undoubtedly more likely that large-scale gene insertion would be more readily accommodated in sea slug nuclear DNA than in mtDNA, and high-throughput genome sequencing will be necessary to prove this idea.
Fig. 4.
Map of the mtDNA of the sacoglossan mollusc E. chlorotica. Genes transcribed clockwise are shown on the outside of the circle, whereas those transcribed counterclockwise are shown to the inside of the circle. Names of tRNA genes are indicated by the three-letter amino acid code with the two leucine and two serine tRNAs differentiated by + and − signs, recognizing codons UAG and UAA for leucine and AGN and UCN for serine, respectively.

Conclusions

Molecular evidence is presented supporting eukaryotic multicellular interdomain HGT (including into the germline) using a mollusc model and expression of an essential algal nuclear gene required for photosynthesis. Many questions remain to be answered, however; for example, the chromosomal location and additional flanking sequences of the psbO gene in the sea slug. Key will be to establish how this gene was activated in the mollusc and to identify the mechanism of plastid protein targeting. It is also very likely that HGT contributes to the long-term survival and functioning of V. litorea plastids in E. chlorotica and that many more algal nuclear genes have been transferred in the sea slug. In light of these findings, the prospect of natural HGT taking place between distantly related organisms, especially with any physical contact, must be considered formally possible. This is especially true in the context of genetically modified organisms. The implications for evolution and speciation through acquisition of foreign parts and selected genes to produce new lineages, as proposed by Margulis (2), are heightened by this unusual photosynthetic mollusc.

Methods

Experimental Materials.

E. chlorotica was collected from Martha's Vineyard Island in Massachusetts and maintained without algae in aquaria containing aerated artificial seawater (925 mosmol; Instant Ocean, Aquarium Systems) at 12 °C during a 14-h photoperiod (27). After 3 months, eggs produced by E. chlorotica were used to initiate culturing experiments as described in SI Methods. V. litorea CCMP2940 filaments were maintained in a modified f/2 medium (27).

Nucleic Acid Preparation.

DNA and RNA were isolated from sea slugs (5 months after feeding or collection), sea slug eggs, and algal filaments using DNAzol or DNAzol extra strength (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) and the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen), respectively, unless noted differently. RNase and DNase were added during the extraction process for DNA and RNA, respectively, and negative controls were run on each. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II ribonuclease H RT (Invitrogen) and oligo d(T) priming on DNase-treated RNA.

PCR Amplification and Northern Blotting.

Degenerate primers (psbO R and psbO L2; see Table S2) were designed to amplify an internal fragment of V. litorea psbO based on the conserved regions of several heterokont and red alga psbO sequences (for list, see SI Methods). This 452-bp psbO fragment was then used as a probe for Northern blot analysis with the Northern Max kit (Ambion) and RediprimeII random prime labeling system (Amersham Biosciences).

RACE and Phylogenetic Analysis of psbO.

The complete V. litorea psbO gene was obtained by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) using the Gene-Racer Kit (Invitrogen) and primers listed in Table S2. Homologous primers (psbO L5 and psbO R8) were then designed to amplify a larger (963-bp) internal fragment of the V. litorea psbO cDNA. Phylogenetic analysis of psbO (MSP) was based on amino acid sequences of 25 mature proteins (for list, see SI Methods) and carried out using maximum parsimony in PAUP 4.0b10 (41).

ptDNA Sequencing.

ptDNA was purified from V. litorea filaments as described (51). ptDNA was digested with the restriction endonucleases PstI, HindIII, and EcoRI. The PstI and HindIII fragments were cloned, and a restriction site map using all three enzymes was produced as described by Lehman and Manhart (52). A total of 104 kb was obtained from cloned restriction fragments. The remainder of the genome (11 kb) was obtained by PCR amplification (53). Thirty-eight oligonucleotide primers were used to fill gaps between cloned restriction fragments and to check fragment connections, using all possible combinations of these primers. Fragments were sequenced by primer walking (53).

Genome Walking.

Clontech's Genome Walking Kit was used with gene-specific and adapter primers (sequences presented in Table S2) to amplify the 3′ end of the psbO gene and the flanking untranslated region using algal DNA and sea slug egg DNA (see SI Methods for additional details).

mtDNA Sequencing.

Universal primers (ref. 54; Table S3) were used to amplify fragments of the mitochondrial rrnL, cob, and cox1 regions from sea slug egg DNA and then in various combinations to amplify the entire mtDNA. The mitochondrial sequence was annotated using Dual Organellar GenoMe Annotator (DOGMA) (55), and the map was drawn using OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) (56). Additional information, including analysis for HGT, is provided in SI Methods.

Data Availability

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database [accession nos. EU912438 (V. litorea complete ptDNA), EU599581 (E. chlorotica complete mtDNA), DQ514337 (V. litorea psbO cDNA), EU621881 (V. litorea psbO DNA), and EU621882 (E. chlorotica psbO DNA).

Acknowledgments.

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants IBN-9808904 (M.R. and J.M.) and IOS-0726178 (M.R. and M.T.); the American Society of Plant Biologists' Education Foundation (M.R. and M.T.); the Maine Technology Institute (M.R.); Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Korean Government, Korea Research Foundation (J.L.); the National Institutes of Health (grant R01ES013679 to D.B.), and the University of Maine (M.R.). This is manuscript no. 3024 of the Maine Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station Hatch Project no. ME08361-08MRF (NC 1168).

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information
SM1.mov
SM2.mov

References

1
W Martin, KV Kowallik, Annotated English translation of Mereschkowsky's 1905 paper Über Natur und Ursprung der Chromatophoren im Pflanzenreiche. Eur J Phycol 34, 287–295 (1999).
2
L Margulis, D Sagan Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species (Basic Books, New York, NY, 2003).
3
W Martin, Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: Frequent and in big chunks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 8612–8614 (2003).
4
A Reyes-Prieto, AP Weber, D Bhattacharya, The origin and establishment of the plastid in algae and plants. Annu Rev Genet 41, 147–168 (2007).
5
L Margulis Origin of Eukaryotic Cells (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT, 1970).
6
AY Mulkidjanian, et al., The cyanobacterial genome core and the origin of photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 13126–13131 (2006).
7
CE Lane, JM Archibald, The eukaryotic tree of life: Endosymbiosis takes its TOL. Trends Ecol Evol 23, 268–275 (2008).
8
W Martin, et al., Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 12246–12251 (2002).
9
E Richly, D Leister, An improved prediction of chloroplast proteins reveals diversities and commonalities in the chloroplast proteomes of Arabidopsis and rice. Gene 329, 11–16 (2004).
10
EV Koonin, KS Makarova, L Aravind, Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification. Annu Rev Microbiol 55, 709–742 (2001).
11
T Dagan, W Martin, Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 870–875 (2007).
12
JO Andersson, Lateral gene transfer in eukaryotes. Cell Mol Life Sci 62, 1182–1197 (2005).
13
B Loftus, et al., The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nature 33, 865–868 (2005).
14
T Nosenko, D Bhattacharya, Horizontal gene transfer in chromalveolates. BMC Evol Biol 7, 173 (2007).
15
A Starcevic, et al., Enzymes of the shikimic acid pathway encoded in the genome of a basal metazoan, Nematostella vectensis, have microbial origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 2533–2537 (2008).
16
N Nikoh, et al., Wolbachia genome integrated in an insect chromosome: evolution and fate of laterally transferred endosymbiont genes. Genome Res 18, 272–280 (2008).
17
K Fenn, et al., Phylogenetic relationships of the Wolbachia of nematodes and arthropods. PLoS Pathog 2, e94 (2006).
18
JC Dunning-Hotopp, et al., Widespread lateral gene transfer from intracellular bacteria to multicellular eukaryotes. Science 317, 1753–1756 (2007).
19
EH Scholl, JL Thorne, JP McCarter, DMcK Bird, Horizontally transferred genes in plant-parasitic nematodes: A high-throughput genomic approach. Genome Biol 4, R39 (2003).
20
J Wasmuth, R Schmid, A Hedley, M Blaxter, On the extent and origins of genic novelty in the Phylum Nematoda. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2, e258 (2008).
21
AO Richardson, JD Palmer, Horizontal gene transfer in plants. J Exp Bot 58, 1–9 (2007).
22
DJ Lampe, DJ Witherspoon, FN Soto-Adames, HM Robertson, Recent horizontal transfer of Mellifera subfamily mariner transposons into insect lineages representing four different orders shows that selection acts only during horizontal transfer. Mol Biol Evol 20, 554–562 (2003).
23
A Roulin, B Piegu, RA Wing, O Panaud, Evidence of multiple horizontal transfers of the long terminal repeat retrotransposon RIRE1 within the genus Oryza. Plant J 53, 950–959 (2008).
24
RK Trench, Of ‘leaves that crawl’: Functional chloroplasts in animal cells. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, ed DH Jennings (Cambridge Univ Press, London), pp. 229–265 (1975).
25
ME Rumpho, EJ Summer, JR Manhart, Solar-powered sea slugs. Mollusc/algal chloroplast symbiosis. Plant Physiol 123, 29–38 (2000).
26
ME Rumpho, FP Dastoor, JR Manhart, J Lee Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration—The Structure and Function of Plastids, eds RR Wise, JK Hoober (Springer, Berlin), pp. 451–473 (2006).
27
BJ Green, et al., Mollusc-algal chloroplast endosymbiosis: Photosynthesis, thylakoid protein maintenance, and chloroplast gene expression continue for many months in the absence of the algal nucleus. Plant Physiol 124, 331–342 (2000).
28
ME Rumpho, EJ Summer, BJ Green, TC Fox, JR Manhart, Mollusc/algal chloroplast symbiosis: How can isolated chloroplasts continue to function for months in the cytosol of a sea slug in the absence of an algal nucleus? Zoology 104, 303–312 (2001).
29
CV Mujer, DL Andrews, JR Manhart, SK Pierce, ME Rumpho, Chloroplast genes are expressed during intracellular symbiotic association of Vaucheria litorea plastids with the sea slug Elysia chlorotica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 12333–12338 (1996).
30
J De Las Rivas, J Barber, Analysis of the structure of the PsbO protein and its implications. Photosynth Res 81, 329–343 (2004).
31
JL Roose, KM Wegener, HB Pakrasi, The extrinsic proteins of photosystem II. Photosynth Res 92, 369–387 (2007).
32
HH West, J Harrigan, SK Pierce, Hybridization of two populations of a marine opistobranch with different development patterns. Veliger 26, 199–206 (1984).
33
RE Lee Phycology, ed RE Lee (Cambridge Univ Press, New York), pp. 507–522 (1989).
34
MP Oudot-Le Secq, et al., Chloroplast genomes of the diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana: Comparison with other plastid genomes of the red lineage. Mol Genet Gen 277, 427–439 (2007).
35
RA Cattolico, et al., Chloroplast genome sequencing analysis of Heterosigma akashiwo CCMP452 (West Atlantic) and NIES293 (West Pacific) strains. BMC Genomics 9, 211 (2008).
36
B Paquin, SD Kathe, SA Nierzwicki-Bauer, DA Shub, Origin and evolution of group I introns in cyanobacterial tRNA genes. J Bacteriol 179, 6798–6806 (1997).
37
M Reith, JA Munholland, High-resolution gene map of the chloroplast genome of the red alga Porphyra purpurea. Plant Cell 5, 464–475 (1993).
38
JL Roose, Y Kashino, HB Pakrasi, The PsbQ protein defines cyanobacterial photosystem II complexes with highest activity and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 2548–2553 (2007).
39
B Andersson, E-M Aro, Photodamage and D1 protein turnover in photosystem II. Regulation of Photosynthesis, eds B Andersson, E-M Aro (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp. 377–393 (2001).
40
J Felsenstein, Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).
41
DL Swofford, et al., Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol 50, 525–539 (2001).
42
I Westerlund, G von Heijne, O Emanuelsson, LumenP—A neural network predictor for protein localization in the thylakoid lumen. Protein Sci 12, 2360–2366 (2003).
43
O Emanuelsson, S Brunak, G von Heijne, H Nielsen, Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP, and related tools. Nat Protoc 2, 953–971 (2007).
44
BK Chaal, BR Green, Protein import pathways in ‘complex’ chloroplasts derived from secondary endosymbiosis involving a red algal ancestor. Plant Mol Biol 57, 333–342 (2005).
45
SK Pierce, NE Curtis, JJ Hanten, SL Boerner, JA Schwartz, Transfer, integration and expression of functional nuclear genes between multicellular species. Symbiosis 43, 57–64 (2007).
46
SK Pierce, TK Maugel, ME Rumpho, JJ Hanten, WL Mondy, Annual viral expression in a sea slug population: Life cycle control and symbiotic chloroplast maintenance. Biol Bull 197, 1–6 (1999).
47
DV Lavrov, Key transitions in animal evolution: A mitochondrial DNA perspective. Integr Comp Biol 47, 734–743 (2007).
48
C Rot, I Goldfarb, M Ilan, D Huchon, Putative cross-kingdom horizontal gene transfer in sponge (Porifera) mitochondria. BMC Evol Biol 6, 71 (2006).
49
CT Beagley, NA Okada, DR Wolstenholme, Two mitochondrial group I introns in a metazoan, the sea anemone Metridium senile: One intron contains genes for subunits 1 and 3 of NADH dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 5619–5623 (1996).
50
MJH van Oppen, et al., The mitochondrial genome of Acropora tenuis (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) contains a large group I intron and a candidate control region. J Mol Evol 55, 1–13 (2002).
51
JD Palmer, Plastid chromosomes: Structure and evolution. The Molecular Biology of Plastids, eds L Bogorad, IK Vasil (Academic, San Diego), pp. 5–53 (1991).
52
RL Lehman, JR Manhart, Preliminary comparison of restriction fragment patterns in the genus Caulerpa (Chlorophyta) and the unique structure of the chloroplast genome of Caulera sertularioides. J Phycol 33, 1055–1062 (1997).
53
J Lee, JR Manhart, Four embryophyte introns and psbB operon indicate Chlorokybus as a basal streptophyte lineage. Algae 17, 53–58 (2002).
54
O Folmer, M Black, R Hoeh, R Lutz, R Vrijenhoek, DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3, 294–299 (1994).
55
SK Wyman, RK Jansen, JL Boore, Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20, 3252–3255 (2004).
56
M Lohse, O Drechsel, R Bock, OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW)—A tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr Genet 52, 267–274 (2007).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 105 | No. 46
November 18, 2008
PubMed: 19004808

Classifications

Data Availability

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database [accession nos. EU912438 (V. litorea complete ptDNA), EU599581 (E. chlorotica complete mtDNA), DQ514337 (V. litorea psbO cDNA), EU621881 (V. litorea psbO DNA), and EU621882 (E. chlorotica psbO DNA).

Submission history

Received: June 9, 2008
Published online: November 18, 2008
Published in issue: November 18, 2008

Keywords

  1. symbiosis
  2. Vaucheria litorea
  3. evolution
  4. plastid
  5. stramenopile

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants IBN-9808904 (M.R. and J.M.) and IOS-0726178 (M.R. and M.T.); the American Society of Plant Biologists' Education Foundation (M.R. and M.T.); the Maine Technology Institute (M.R.); Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Korean Government, Korea Research Foundation (J.L.); the National Institutes of Health (grant R01ES013679 to D.B.), and the University of Maine (M.R.). This is manuscript no. 3024 of the Maine Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station Hatch Project no. ME08361-08MRF (NC 1168).

Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0804968105/DCSupplemental.

Authors

Affiliations

Mary E. Rumpho1 [email protected]
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
Jared M. Worful
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
Jungho Lee
Green Plant Institute, Seoul National University, Gwonseon, Suwon, Gyeonggi 441-853, Korea;
Krishna Kannan
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
Mary S. Tyler
School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
Debashish Bhattacharya
Department of Biological Sciences and the Roy J. Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324; and
Ahmed Moustafa
Department of Biological Sciences and the Roy J. Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324; and
James R. Manhart
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
Author contributions: M.E.R. and J.R.M. designed research; J.M.W., J.L., and K.K. performed research; J.L., M.S.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; K.K., D.B., A.M., and J.R.M. analyzed data; and M.E.R. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements




Altmetrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Get Access

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to get full access to it.

    Single Article Purchase

    Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 105
    • No. 46
    • pp. 17589-18071

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media