Identification of select glucocorticoids as Smoothened agonists: Potential utility for regenerative medicine
Edited* by Robert J. Lefkowitz, Duke University Medical Center/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Durham, NC, and approved April 6, 2010 (received for review September 18, 2009)
Abstract
Regenerative medicine holds the promise of replacing damaged tissues largely by stem cell activation. Hedgehog signaling through the plasma membrane receptor Smoothened (Smo) is an important process for regulating stem cell proliferation. The development of Hedgehog-related therapies has been impeded by a lack of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Smo agonists. Using a high-content screen with cells expressing Smo receptors and a β-arrestin2-GFP reporter, we identified four FDA-approved drugs, halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide, as Smo agonists that activate Hedgehog signaling. These drugs demonstrated an ability to bind Smo, promote Smo internalization, activate Gli, and stimulate the proliferation of primary neuronal precursor cells alone and synergistically in the presence of Sonic Hedgehog protein. Halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide provide an unprecedented opportunity to develop unique clinical strategies to treat Hedgehog-dependent illnesses.
Sign up for PNAS alerts.
Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited.
The Hedgehog signaling pathway, mediated by the Smoothened (Smo) receptor, has been shown to regulate stem cells and is a fundamental regulator of organogenesis in developing embryos and tissue integrity in mature organisms (1–9). Smo agonists have been proposed as desired therapeutics for restoring tissue function in diseases associated with heart failure, neuronal injury/degeneration, wound repair, and retinal damage, where they could reactivate or stimulate repair mechanisms in situations in which normal regenerative capacity is compromised (10–14). However, for therapeutic modalities to be acceptable for a previously undescribed use in humans, clinical safety and efficacy must be demonstrated to gain U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Some tool compounds of Smo, agonists such as purmorphamine, have demonstrated an ability to promote human embryonic stem cell differentiation (15), but the preclinical development of such small-molecule Smo agonists has lagged.
The interaction of Hedgehog ligand with the membrane protein Patched (Ptc) enables the seven-transmembrane receptor Smo to activate downstream Gli transcription factors (1). Activated Smo shares important behaviors with canonical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including an ability to undergo GPCR kinase phosphorylation and to recruit β-arrestin2 (βarr2) proteins for endocytosis, as shown in our previous study (16). Cyclopamine, a naturally occurring steroid alkaloid, inhibits the constitutive activity of Smo via direct antagonism, preventing its phosphorylation and interaction with βarr2. We exploited this observation to construct high-throughput high-content screens for Smo ligands, with a goal of accelerating the development of Hedgehog agonist drugs that could potentially have a role in tissue regeneration or be employed as tool compounds to study stem cell proliferation. We have identified four fluorinated glucocorticoids, halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide (Fig. 1A), all FDA-approved compounds, as Smo agonists that activate Hedgehog signaling and promote the proliferation of primary neuronal stem/precursor cells alone and synergistically in the presence of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh).
Fig. 1.
Results
Fluorinated Glucocorticoid Smo Agonist (FGSA) Drugs Promote Smo Intracellular Aggregation with βarr2-GFP and Promote Smo Internalization.
Included among the chemical libraries we screened using a 384-multiwell format was the Prestwick Chemicals Library containing FDA-approved drugs. It contains 68 glucocorticoids or structurally related steroid compounds, including cortisone and dexamethasone. The primary screening assay employed U2OS cells, chosen for adherence, flatness, and stable expression of βarr2-GFP, and a tail substitution mutant of Smo, Smo-633, which provided better sensitivity than WT Smo (16, 17). Images of Smo-633/βarr2-GFP complexes were obtained at the rate of 5,000 per day using an automated confocal-based plate reader (ImageXpress Ultra; Molecular Devices). A read-out of compound activity for each well was provided by analyzing the corresponding image for changes in βarr2-GFP distribution that occurred as a result of compound addition.
When expressed in cells without the addition of exogenous Smo, βarr2-GFP is distributed homogenously throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 1B). The overexpression of Smo (16) or Smo-633 caused a redistribution of βarr2-GFP to intracellular vesicles/aggregates (Fig. 1C). At a concentration of 100 nM or greater, the Smo antagonist cyclopamine (18) reverses this effect and forces βarr2-GFP back into a homogeneous distribution (Fig. 1D). Intravesicular aggregation of βarr2-GFP can be restored in the presence of 100 nM cyclopamine with 5 μM Smo agonist (SAG) (19) or purmorphamine (20, 21), both of which are known small-molecule Smo agonists (Fig. 1 E and F). In our primary assay, a Smo agonist is identified by its ability to aggregate βarr2-GFP in the presence of 100 nM cyclopamine in the steady-state model.
Similar to the positive control, each hit compound at 5 μM overcame the inhibition by 100 nM cyclopamine to produce intracellular βarr2-GFP aggregates (Fig. 1 G–J). Hit compound agonist activities in U2OS cells were also confirmed using a βarr2-GFP assay with WT Smo (16) (Fig. S1). As assessed using the primary assay, the EC50s for halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide are 1.1 ± 0.1 μM, 99 ± 1.4 nM, 1.5 ± 0.1 μM, and >5 μM, respectively, whereas the EC50s for the positive control agonists SAG and purmorphamine are 0.9 ± 0.1 nM and >5 μM, respectively (Fig. 1K and Table 1). In comparison to SAG, which has an efficacy of 1.00 ± 0.08 in the primary assay, the efficacies for halcinonide, fluticasone, and clobetasol are 0.99 ± 0.05, 0.89 ± 0.05, and 0.87 ± 0.05, respectively, whereas the efficacies for purmorphamine and fluocinonide, although greater than 0.5, could not be determined at 10 μM because of the absence of plateaus for the fitted curves (Fig. 1K and Table 1). On the basis of our findings that some steroids are Smo activators, we screened a biased steroid library from Sigma containing 1,658 compounds; however, no additional hits were identified. Additionally, in a test of specificity, neither SAG nor the four hits induced βarr2-GFP aggregation with three control seven-transmembrane receptors, including the human vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R).
Table 1.
Compound | Primary assay | Bodipy-cyclopamine binding | Gli-luciferase assay | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC50, nM | Efficacy | EC50, nM | Efficacy | EC50, nM | Efficacy | |
SAG | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 11 ± 0.5 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 27 ± 2.5 | 1.00 ± 0.14 |
Purmorphamine | >5,000 | NA | >5,000 | NA | >5,000 | NA |
Halcinonide | 1,100 ± 100 | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 78 ± 2.1 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 1.8 ± 0.13 | 0.74 ± 0.08 |
Fluticasone | 99 ± 1.4 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 58 ± 1.2 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.05 |
Clobetasol | 1,500 ± 100 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 57 ± 2.6 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.06 |
Fluocinonide | >5,000 | NA | 1,000 ± 300 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.07 |
Results are presented as the mean ± SEM of at least three experiments. NA, not able to be determined.
We previously demonstrated that SAG induces Smo internalization (16). Fig. 2 A–D shows that in HEK293 cells, 2 μM SAG and 5 μM purmorphamine each stimulate Smo-YFP to internalize. All four primary assay hit compounds similarly induce Smo internalization, consistent with their roles as Smo agonists. Fig. 2 E–H shows representative results for halcinonide and fluticasone. In contrast, in control endocytosis experiments in HEK293 cells testing specificity for Smo, neither SAG nor fluticasone produced V2R internalization (Fig. S2).
Fig. 2.
Fluorinated Glucocorticoid Smo Agonist Drugs Displace Bodipy-Cyclopamine from Smo-Overexpressing Cells.
Bodipy-cyclopamine has been used to assess ligand binding to Smo (19). We measured by saturation binding in HEK293 cells stably expressing WT Smo that the affinity (Kd) of bodipy-cyclopamine for Smo is 3.5 ± 0.8 nM (Fig. S3). In competition binding using the same cell line, we observed that SAG completely displaced 5 nM bodipy-cyclopamine from Smo (defined as an efficacy of 1.00), with an EC50 of 11 ± 0.5 nM (Fig. 3 and Table 1). As opposed to cortisone, which is unable to displace bodipy-cyclopamine from Smo up to 10 μM (0 efficacy), the EC50s and efficacy for displacement for halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide are, respectively, 78 ± 2.1 nM, 0.24 ± 0.02; 58 ± 1.2 nM, 0.34 ± 0.01; 57 ± 2.6 nM, 0.24 ± 0.02; and 1,000 ± 300 nM, 0.30 ± 0.01 (Fig. 3 and Table 1). We also observed that the known Smo agonist purmorphamine displaced bodipy-cyclopamine as a weak inhibitor, as previously described (22), with an EC50 >5 μM, which is less than that observed for the four steroid agonists.
Fig. 3.
Fluorinated Glucocorticoid Smo Agonist Drugs Activate Gli-Luciferase Reporter.
Shh binding to Ptc relieves Ptc inhibition of Smo and results in activation of the Gli transcription factor (18), making Gli-luciferase reporter assays important indicators of activity downstream of Smo. SAG was discovered using such a Gli reporter assay (19). In a Gli assay performed in Shh-LIGHT2 cells and using only the endogenous Hedgehog signaling machinery, the four fluorinated steroids activated the Gli-luciferase reporter in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A and Table 1). As expected, the negative control cortisone had no Gli activity in Shh-LIGHT2 cells. In addition, there does not appear to be a non-Smo-mediated pathway that would produce the same type of response (21) (Fig. S4).
Fig. 4.
We also investigated whether Shh activity from conditioned media could be potentiated by the steroid Smo agonists in Shh-LIGHT2 cells. Gli-luciferase activity from compound treatment was measured relative to a DMSO control (activity defined as 1). Shh alone at 0.5% produced a 3.8-fold increase in Gli response. We found that Gli-luciferase activity attributable to the combination of Shh (0.5%) and 5 μM halcinonide, fluocinonide, clobetasol, or fluticasone was increased compared with Shh or compound treatment alone (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, the combination of 5 μM SAG or purmorphamine plus 0.5% Shh did not result in significant activity change compared with either SAG or purmorphamine treatment alone.
Halcinonide, Fluticasone, and Clobetasol Promote Mouse Cerebellar Granule Cell Precursor Proliferation.
Cerebellar granular cell precursors (GCPs) differentiate into distinct types of mature neurons that comprise the most abundant neurons in the brain (3, 23, 24), and the expansion in vivo of these granule precursor cells requires Hedgehog/Smo pathway signaling (23). We used a mouse GCP proliferation assay to test the growth-promoting effects of Hedgehog agonist compounds. GCPs were treated for 48 h with one of the Smo agonists, purmorphamine or SAG (positive controls); the lead compounds halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide; or the negative control compound cortisone. SAG had approximately a 2-fold greater efficacy than purmorphamine in promoting a GCP proliferative response. Relative to DMSO vehicle, the treatment by halcinonide resulted in a 40–50-fold increase in GCP proliferation that was similar to the maximal response produced by purmorphamine (Fig. 5A). Fluticasone and clobetasol had a 5–6-fold stimulatory effect, while fluocinonide or cortisone had no effect (Fig. 5A, Inset). Experiments repeated in the presence of 5 μM mifepristone (RU-486), a glucocorticoid nuclear receptor antagonist, gave similar results (Fig. S5).
Fig. 5.
Using [3H]thymidine incorporation, we further investigated the relationship between Shh and the Smo agonists on GCP proliferation. Shh (2%) induced a 17-fold increase of GCP proliferation as opposed to the marginal GCP proliferation response to 5 μM halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, or fluocinonide; 0.073 μM purmorphamine; or 0.008 μM SAG (Fig. 5B). Treatment of the GCP cells with 2% Shh and an agonist compound resulted in increased GCP proliferation ranging from 30-fold (fluocinonide) to 95-fold (SAG), indicating strong synergism (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist dexamethasone had a tendency to inhibit the activity of 2% Shh (Fig. 5B), as previously described (25). To verify further the opposite effects that the Smo agonists have on proliferation compared to dexamethasone, we treated GCP cells with Shh (2% and 20%) and various concentrations of halcinonide or dexamethasone in the absence or presence of 2% Shh. Synergism between 2% Shh and halcinonide was observed in the proliferation assay; such responses were equal to or greater than the stimulatory effects produced by 20% Shh (Fig. 5C, Left). In comparison, dexamethasone inhibited Shh-activated GCP proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5C, Right).
It has been reported that Hedgehog signaling promotes GCP proliferation through up-regulation of cyclin D2 and inhibition of proteasomal degradation of caspase-3, whereas dexamethasone and several other GR agonists have the opposite effect by inhibiting GCP proliferation and not inhibiting GCP apoptosis (25). Although all the fluorinated glucocorticoid smoothened agonists from our study possess the ability, like dexamethasone, to activate GR as assessed by a GR-GFP nuclear translocation assay (Fig. S6), GCP treatment with Shh; purmorphamine; SAG; or fluorinated halcinonide, clobetasol, and fluticasone (but not the weaker Smo agonist fluocinonide) increased endogenous cyclin D2 protein expression and inhibited caspase-3 degradation (Fig. 6). No such growth-enabling responses were observed in GCPs treated with cortisone, dexamethasone, prednisolone, or corticosterone, observations consistent with recent reports (25–27) (Fig. 6). The opposite response of dexamethasone in the GCP proliferation assay and its similar response in the nuclear receptor assay compared to the FGSAs suggest that the signal for the GCP proliferative response is independent of glucocorticoid nuclear receptor signaling and is most probably attributable directly to activation of Smo.
Fig. 6.
In summary, the drugs halcinonide, fluticasone, clobetasol, and fluocinonide function as Smo agonists, having an ability to bind Smo, promote Smo internalization, activate Gli, and synergistically stimulate the proliferation of primary neuronal precursor cells.
Discussion
Regenerative medicine is an emerging frontier of medical therapy that holds the promise of curing currently untreatable diseases by harnessing the body's ability to replace damaged tissues (28). Such therapies might prompt autonomous tissue repair or facilitate the implantation of engineered tissue derived from progenitors or stem cells (28, 29). Hedgehog activators are prime candidates for therapeutics to initiate or modulate tissue self-repair. In this study, we used neuronal precursor/progenitor cells derived from mouse cerebella and modulated their proliferation using these Hedgehog activators. Even though the Hedgehog pathway was identified over two decades ago, there are still only a few available research compounds that can modulate it, such as SAG and purmorphamine, and, for a variety of reasons, no clinically available agonist drugs targeted to Hedgehog-related diseases exist.
Despite our findings of FGSAs that activate Smo, a search of PubMed indicates they have no apparent association with topical cancers. One of the four hit FGSAs active in the Hedgehog assays was fluticasone. It is reported on the GlaxoSmithKline drug label that fluticasone is well tolerated orally and can be administered i.v. in humans and that its s.c. and oral median lethal doses in mice and rats are greater than 1,000 mg/kg (30).
Glucocorticoids, including the fluorinated glucocorticoids, are used clinically for the treatment of asthma, inflammation, and skin disease or injury. Other glucocorticoids, including dexamethasone, prednisone, cortisone, and corticosterone, are used to treat premature infants and have been observed to cause neuronal apoptosis and to inhibit neuronal precursors of the cerebellar granule neuronal lineage in a mouse model (25, 26). On the basis that Shh exposure cannot overcome the effects of dexamethasone but can antagonize the effects of hydrocortisone, Heine and Rowitch (25) recommend that hydrocortisone be used as a replacement for dexamethasone in infants because of the reduced potential for neurotoxicity. We have demonstrated in vitro that fluticasone and the other fluorinated steroids can be used to expand neuronal precursor cell populations and potentiate the ability of 2% Shh stimulation. Our results with FGSAs suggest that some glucocorticoids may even be neuronally protective, but this requires further clinical investigation in this particular case. For regenerative medicine, we propose that FSGAs could be used immediately orally or i.v. on an acute or chronic basis for testing in disease models in which an increase in Gli signaling and consequent Hedgehog-mediated repair are desirable, such as neovascularization after myocardial infarctions (10), wound healing in diabetes (13), or neuronal regeneration after spinal cord injury (12). In summary, the well-known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these FDA-approved steroid Smo agonists provide a significant jumpstart in the process of beginning human studies on their potential therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
Details are described in SI Materials and Methods.
Transfection and Plasmids.
Cells were transfected using either Fugene 6 (Roche) or Nucleofector (Amaxa). Details are provided in SI Materials and Methods.
Primary Assay-Automated High-Throughput Screening.
We made multiple Smo mutants to identify the best location to attach the V2R tail (17), the addition of which, when phosphorylated and precisely located, causes βarr2-GFP to bind to Smo more strongly. Details are provided in SI Materials and Methods.
Bodipy-Cyclopamine Binding Analysis of Smo Agonists in Smo-Overexpressing HEK293 Cells.
HEK293 cells stably expressing WT Smo were split at 166,000 cells per well in the center well (glass bottom, 10-mm diameter) of collagen-coated dishes (MatTek), followed by overnight incubation. Details are provided in SI Materials and Methods.
Gli-Luciferase Reporter Assay.
The reporter assay using Shh-LIGHT2 cells, Smo−/− mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs), or NIH 3T3 cells was performed as described (21).
[3H]Thymidine Proliferation Assay and Western Blots of Primary Neuronal GCPs.
Primary GCPs were isolated from 4- or 8-day postnatal WT C57BL/6 mice, as previously described (23, 25). Details are provided in SI Materials and Methods.
Acknowledgments
We thank Robert Mook for helpful discussion and Richard Premont for critical reading. This project was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant 5R01CA113656-03 (to W.C.), National Institute of Health Grant 1U01-DA022950 (to L.S.B.), and Fred and Alice Stanback (H.K.L.). W.C is a V Foundation Scholar and an American Cancer Society Scholar.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information
- Download
- 912.30 KB
References
1
PW Ingham, AP McMahon, Hedgehog signaling in animal development: Paradigms and principles. Genes Dev 15, 3059–3087 (2001).
2
K Lai, BK Kaspar, FH Gage, DV Schaffer, Sonic hedgehog regulates adult neural progenitor proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Nat Neurosci 6, 21–27 (2003).
3
N Dahmane, A Ruiz i Altaba, Sonic hedgehog regulates the growth and patterning of the cerebellum. Development 126, 3089–3100 (1999).
4
R Machold, et al., Sonic hedgehog is required for progenitor cell maintenance in telencephalic stem cell niches. Neuron 39, 937–950 (2003).
5
V Palma, et al., Sonic hedgehog controls stem cell behavior in the postnatal and adult brain. Development 132, 335–344 (2005).
6
JJ Trowbridge, MP Scott, M Bhatia, Hedgehog modulates cell cycle regulators in stem cells to control hematopoietic regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 14134–14139 (2006).
7
YG Han, et al., Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia are required for the formation of adult neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci 11, 277–284 (2008).
8
S Takashima, M Mkrtchyan, A Younossi-Hartenstein, JR Merriam, V Hartenstein, The behaviour of Drosophila adult hindgut stem cells is controlled by Wnt and Hh signalling. Nature 454, 651–655 (2008).
9
E Angot, et al., Chemoattractive activity of sonic hedgehog in the adult subventricular zone modulates the number of neural precursors reaching the olfactory bulb. Stem Cells 26, 2311–2320 (2008).
10
KJ Lavine, A Kovacs, DM Ornitz, Hedgehog signaling is critical for maintenance of the adult coronary vasculature in mice. J Clin Invest 118, 2404–2414 (2008).
11
K Tsuboi, CW Shults, Intrastriatal injection of sonic hedgehog reduces behavioral impairment in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 173, 95–104 (2002).
12
NC Bambakidis, et al., Endogenous stem cell proliferation induced by intravenous hedgehog agonist administration after contusion in the adult rat spinal cord. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 10, 171–176 (2009).
13
J Asai, et al., Topical sonic hedgehog gene therapy accelerates wound healing in diabetes by enhancing endothelial progenitor cell-mediated microvascular remodeling. Circulation 113, 2413–2424 (2006).
14
J Wan, H Zheng, HL Xiao, ZJ She, GM Zhou, Sonic hedgehog promotes stem-cell potential of Müller glia in the mammalian retina. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363, 347–354 (2007).
15
XJ Li, et al., Directed differentiation of ventral spinal progenitors and motor neurons from human embryonic stem cells by small molecules. Stem Cells 26, 886–893 (2008).
16
W Chen, et al., Activity-dependent internalization of smoothened mediated by beta-arrestin 2 and GRK2. Science 306, 2257–2260 (2004).
17
RH Oakley, SA Laporte, JA Holt, LS Barak, MG Caron, Association of beta-arrestin with G protein-coupled receptors during clathrin-mediated endocytosis dictates the profile of receptor resensitization. J Biol Chem 274, 32248–32257 (1999).
18
J Taipale, et al., Effects of oncogenic mutations in Smoothened and Patched can be reversed by cyclopamine. Nature 406, 1005–1009 (2000).
19
JK Chen, J Taipale, KE Young, T Maiti, PA Beachy, Small molecule modulation of Smoothened activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 14071–14076 (2002).
20
X Wu, J Walker, J Zhang, S Ding, PG Schultz, Purmorphamine induces osteogenesis by activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Chem Biol 11, 1229–1238 (2004).
21
S Sinha, JK Chen, Purmorphamine activates the Hedgehog pathway by targeting Smoothened. Nature Chemical Biology 2, 29–30 (2006).
22
CM Rominger, et al., Evidence for allosteric interactions of antagonist binding to the smoothened receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 329, 995–1005 (2009).
23
RJ Wechsler-Reya, MP Scott, Control of neuronal precursor proliferation in the cerebellum by Sonic Hedgehog. Neuron 22, 103–114 (1999).
24
T Okano-Uchida, T Himi, Y Komiya, Y Ishizaki, Cerebellar granule cell precursors can differentiate into astroglial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 1211–1216 (2004).
25
VM Heine, DH Rowitch, Hedgehog signaling has a protective effect in glucocorticoid-induced mouse neonatal brain injury through an 11betaHSD2-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest 119, 267–277 (2009).
26
KK Noguchi, et al., Acute neonatal glucocorticoid exposure produces selective and rapid cerebellar neural progenitor cell apoptotic death. Cell Death Differ 15, 1582–1592 (2008).
27
E Gould, P Tanapat, Stress and hippocampal neurogenesis. Biol Psychiatry 46, 1472–1479 (1999).
28
N DeWitt, Regenerative medicine. Nature 453, 301 (2008).
29
Y Xu, Y Shi, S Ding, A chemical approach to stem-cell biology and regenerative medicine. Nature 453, 338–344 (2008).
30
; Physicians Desk Reference Staff Physicians Desk Reference (PDR Network Publishing, 64th Ed, Montvale, NJ), pp. 1459–1463 (2010).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
Submission history
Published online: May 3, 2010
Published in issue: May 18, 2010
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank Robert Mook for helpful discussion and Richard Premont for critical reading. This project was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant 5R01CA113656-03 (to W.C.), National Institute of Health Grant 1U01-DA022950 (to L.S.B.), and Fred and Alice Stanback (H.K.L.). W.C is a V Foundation Scholar and an American Cancer Society Scholar.
Notes
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
107 (20) 9323-9328,
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.