Free access

Reply to Gewald: Isolated Himba settlements still exist in Kaokoland

April 23, 2010
107 (18) E76
We agree with Gewald (1) that historical and anthropological accounts are essential tools for understanding the Himba culture, and these accounts are valuable to both us and him. However, we contest his claim that the Himba individuals in our study were not culturally isolated. Gewald (1) claims that it would be “unlikely” that the Himba people with whom we worked had “not been exposed to the affective signals of individuals from cultural groups other than their own” as stated in our paper (2). Gewald (1) seems to argue that, because outside groups have had contact with some Himba, this means that these events affected all Himba. Yet, the Himba constitute a group of 20,000–50,000 people (3) living in small settlements scattered across the vast Kaokoland region, an area of 49,000 km2 (4).
Gewald (1) further asserts that our ignorance of the history and anthropology of the Himba undermines the validity of our research. In fact, because we were aware of the historical events that he describes in his letter, we employed rigorous procedures to ensure that the Himba individuals that we included in our study had not been in contact with individuals from other cultural groups. Our descriptions of the Himba sample in our study reflected our honest evaluation of their living situation, to which we had paid considerable attention. However, we would like to use this opportunity to outline in more detail the ways in which we ensured that the Himba individuals included in our study had not had contact with other cultural groups.
First, we sought out only the most remote settlements, which were many hours drive away from Opuwo and other bigger settlements in Kaokoland. Gewald (1) is correct in stating that the South African Defense Force (SADF) laid down a network of roads and tracks in some parts of this region. However, the settlements that we visited were not reachable by roads or tracks; we literally drove through rivers and across vast regions of empty land to reach the extremely isolated communities that were included in our sample. Second, we conducted extensive interviews with individuals in each settlement that we visited to establish if they had been visited by mobile schools, traders, researchers, missionaries, or tourists, and if they had visited larger regional towns. Only where this was not the case did we proceed to conduct our study with individuals from the settlement.
Finally, Gewald (1) questions our claim that the “Himba do not have a system for measuring age” (2). He points out that the Himba use a system of ascribing names to years. We are happy to qualify our claim. The Himba participants in our study were generally not able to report the name of the year that they were born, and there was no reliable way to find out this information from an alternative source.

References

1
J-B Gewald, Remote but in contact with history and the world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, E75 (2010).
2
DA Sauter, F Eisner, P Ekman, SK Scott, Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 2408–2412 (2010).
3
M Bollig, Kinship, ritual, and landscape amongst the Himba of Northwest Namibia. African Landscapes, eds M Bollig, O Bubenzer (Springer, New York), pp. 327–351 (2009).
4
T Becker, S Getzin, The fairy circles of Kaokoland (North-West Namibia)—origin, distribution, and characteristics. Basic Appl Ecol 1, 149–159 (2000).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

The cover image for PNAS Vol.107; No.18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 107 | No. 18
May 4, 2010

Submission history

Published online: April 23, 2010
Published in issue: May 4, 2010

Authors

Affiliations

D. A. Sauter1 [email protected]
Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
F. Eisner
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom; and
P. Ekman
The Paul Ekman Group, San Francisco, CA 94104
S. K. Scott
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom; and

Notes

1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].
Author contributions: D.A.S., F.E., P.E., and S.K.S. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements




Altmetrics

Citations

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to access the full text.

    Single Article Purchase

    Reply to Gewald: Isolated Himba settlements still exist in Kaokoland
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 107
    • No. 18
    • pp. 8043-8498

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media