A dilution effect in the emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
Edited by David B. Wake, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved August 23, 2011 (received for review May 26, 2011)
Abstract
Global declines in biodiversity are altering disease dynamics in complex and multifaceted ways. Changes in biodiversity can have several outcomes on disease risk, including dilution and amplification effects, both of which can have a profound influence on the effects of disease in a community. The dilution effect occurs when biodiversity and disease risk are inversely related, whereas the amplification effect is a positive relationship between biodiversity and disease risk. We tested these effects with an emerging fungal pathogen of amphibians, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which is responsible for catastrophic amphibian population declines and extinctions worldwide. Despite the rapid and continued spread of Bd, the influence of host diversity on Bd dynamics remains unknown. We experimentally manipulated host diversity and density in the presence of Bd and found a dilution effect where increased species richness reduced disease risk, even when accounting for changes in density. These results demonstrate the general importance of incorporating community structure into studies of disease dynamics and have implications for the effects of Bd in ecosystems that differ in biodiversity.
Sign up for PNAS alerts.
Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited.
The relationship between biodiversity and infectious disease is dynamic and often complex, especially in multihost pathogen systems. When multiple species are affected by the same pathogen, host species can vary in their ability to acquire the pathogen, defend themselves against the pathogen, and transmit the pathogen to others. Thus, changes in biodiversity that affect host species composition can dramatically alter disease dynamics within a community (1, 2).
Changes in biodiversity can have several outcomes on disease risk, including dilution and amplification effects (3). The dilution effect occurs when biodiversity and disease risk are inversely related. This pattern can occur through several pathways, including reduced encounter rates between susceptible and infectious individuals, reduced transmission rates, reduced host density, increased mortality of infected individuals, or accelerated recovery of infected individuals (3). The dilution effect has primarily been studied in vector-transmitted pathogens with frequency-dependent transmission (refs. 4–7 but see refs. 8 and 9).
The amplification effect, in contrast, occurs when there is a positive relationship between biodiversity and disease risk (3). This scenario occurs when low-diversity systems contain poorly competent hosts, and adding species to the community increases the number of highly competent hosts that easily acquire and transmit the pathogen. The amplification effect may occur, for example, when epidemics are driven by transmission from a reservoir species that is not present in low-diversity systems (10, 11).
Whether a dilution or amplification effect occurs can be context-dependent. For example, a comparative study in a grassland ecosystem showed the dilution effect to be more common than the amplification effect (12). Additionally, ecological models predict that dilution effects are more common than amplification effects in the intensely studied Lyme disease system, if species diversity is nonrandomly manipulated (13). However, other models have indicated that the dilution effect will primarily occur in pathogens with frequency-dependent transmission (14), which is common in vector-transmitted pathogens and not in pathogens that experience density-dependent transmission.
A dilution effect can occur if communities with higher biodiversity have a lower density of susceptible individuals. Fewer susceptible hosts lead to reduced pathogen transmission and a lower disease risk. In field studies, it is difficult to determine whether dilution effects occur from biodiversity changes or simply from changes in host density. Diversity per se does not always affect disease risk, but changes in host density as a result of altered diversity can create a dilution effect (12). Thus, it is essential to account for host density and biodiversity to understand the effects that each factor has on disease risk. Studies accounting for both are rare.
Neither the dilution nor the amplification effect has been well-studied with regard to amphibian disease ecology or amphibian population declines. However, such studies may elucidate some of the differences in amphibian disease dynamics in regions that differ in species diversity. For example, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is an emerging amphibian pathogen responsible for numerous population declines around the world (15–17). Although there has been an extensive rise in the number of studies, publications, and citations regarding Bd since it was first described (18–21), very little is known about its biology in a community context (but see refs. 22 and 23). Bd is directly transmitted, and there is some evidence that Bd exhibits density-dependent transmission (24, 25), although transmission could potentially exhibit frequency dependence if a reservoir is present (26). Therefore, it may be possible for a dilution effect to occur in the Bd system. Understanding the relationships among Bd, host diversity, and host density is essential for a better understanding of Bd dynamics and transmission.
We tested the effects of host density and species richness (taxonomic diversity) on disease risk from Bd. Bd infects keratinized cells of amphibians (larval mouthparts and postmetamorphic skin) and appears to cause higher mortality at the postmetamorphic stage (23, 27, 28). However, larval amphibians can suffer both lethal and sublethal effects of infection and may act as important reservoirs for Bd, maintaining persistence of Bd even in the absence of postmetamorphic hosts (24, 29).
We focused our study on Western toads (Anaxyrus boreas) because they are particularly susceptible to Bd (28, 30, 31) and have suffered population declines associated with Bd in portions of their range (32). In the Cascade Mountain Range of Oregon, A. boreas is sympatric with several other amphibian species that host Bd, including Cascades frogs (Rana cascadae) and Pacific tree frogs (Pseudacris regilla) (32–35). However, they can also be found in habitats where other amphibians are rare or absent (33). A. boreas larvae aggregate at high densities either in single-species or mixed-species schools (33, 36, 37). Thus, this is an ideal system to study the interrelationships among biodiversity and density as well as to test for dilution and amplification effects.
Results
We first analyzed disease risk for our focal species (A. boreas), then expanded our analyses to include all individuals, with five measures of disease risk: toad infection severity (concentration of infection in A. boreas), toad infection prevalence (percentage of A. boreas infected), all-species infection severity (concentration of infection in all species), all-species infection prevalence (percentage of all species infected), and total infection [sum of Bd per replicate (in gross amount, not concentration)] (Table 1). We also analyzed gross infection [raw quantitative PCR (qPCR) output], which is closely related to infection severity (SI Results). Toad infection severity was reduced as species richness increased (F1, 50 = 18.31, P < 0.01; Fig. 1A and Table 1). Neither the number of A. boreas individuals nor the total number of individuals was a significant predictor of infection. The same results were found with gross infection of toads (SI Results and Fig. S1). Additionally, species richness decreased toad infection prevalence (F1, 52 = 22.67, P < 0.01; Fig. 1B and Table 1), but it was not affected by the number of A. boreas individuals or the total number of individuals.
Table 1.
Disease risk | Relationship with | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Measurement | Definition | All-species density | A. boreas density | Species richness |
Toad infection prevalence | Percentage of A. boreas infected in each aquarium | None | None | Negative |
All-species infection prevalence | Percentage of all individuals infected in each aquarium | Negative | None | Negative |
Toad infection severity | Concentration of Bd in the mouthparts of A. boreas | None | None | Negative |
All-species infection severity | Concentration of Bd in the mouthparts of all individuals | None | None | Negative |
Total infection | Sum of Bd infection in each aquarium | None | Positive | None |
Fig. 1.

When incorporating all species, infection severity again demonstrated a negative relationship with species richness (F1, 50 = 9.86, P < 0.01; Fig. 1C and Table 1), whereas neither the total number of individuals nor the number of A. boreas individuals was a significant predictor. The same results were found with gross infection (SI Results and Fig. S1). All-species infection prevalence was predicted by both species richness and the density of hosts (richness: F1, 52 = 22.37, P < 0.01; density: F1, 52 = 4.43, P = 0.04; Fig. 1D and Table 1), where more animals and more species led to a reduction in the percentage of individuals infected. However, species richness and total density were not significant predictors of total infection (richness: F1, 40 = 0.03, P = 0.86; density: F1, 40 = 0.86, P = 0.36). Total infection was best predicted by the number of A. boreas, where fewer toads led to lower total Bd (F1, 40 = 7.81, P = 0.01; Fig. 2 and Table 1).
Fig. 2.

Species did not significantly differ in infection severity (F2, 192 = 1.12, P = 0.33), although A. boreas and P. regilla had higher average Bd loads than R. cascadae did (Table S1). Gross infection differed by species (F2, 187 = 11.58, P < 0.01), where R. cascadae had lower average gross infection than the other two species (Table S1). All tested Bd-control (unexposed) individuals were negative for infection (n = 10). Infection severity, gross infection, and prevalence in P. regilla and R. cascadae did not differ among treatments, although average infection severity and gross infection were lower in the presence of more species (P. regilla infection severity: t(16) = 1.40, P = 0.18; P. regilla gross infection: t(16) = 1.78, P = 0.09; P. regilla infection prevalence: t(16) < 0.01, P = 0.99; R. cascadae infection severity: t(16) = 1.28, P = 0.22; R. cascadae gross infection: t(16) = 1.38, P = 0.19; R. cascadae infection prevalence: t(16) = 1.20, P = 0.25; Fig. S2).
Mortality did not differ by species (χ2 = 1.12, df = 2, P = 0.57), Bd treatment (χ2 = 0.16, df = 1, P = 0.69), or density/richness treatment (χ2 = 9.23, df = 5, P = 0.10). Mass and length of A. boreas were not predicted by Bd treatment or species richness. However, A. boreas were heavier and longer when fewer total animals were present (mass: F2, 224 = 16.70, P < 0.01; length: F2, 224 = 7.08, P < 0.01) and when there were fewer A. boreas present (mass: F1, 104 = 19.18, P < 0.01; length: F1, 104 = 15.10, P < 0.01; Fig. S3). For R. cascadae and P. regilla, mass and length did not differ by treatment. Among-species comparisons revealed that both mass and length differed by species (mass: F2, 387 = 136.97, P > 0.01; length: F2, 387 = 151.69, P > 0.01). On average, A. boreas were the smallest of the three species, with R. cascadae being the largest and P. regilla as the intermediate (Table S1).
Discussion
Our results demonstrate a dilution effect in the Bd system. Increased species richness reduced disease risk in larval amphibians, even after controlling for changes in density. None of our measures indicated an amplification effect, and only one had a positive relationship with host density. Thus, this system follows trends predicted with the dilution effect.
Increased species richness caused a decrease in disease risk for four of the five measures tested. Specifically, both Bd prevalence and infection severity were reduced in treatments with greater species richness, whether we focused on A. boreas alone or all species together. Infection prevalence is an important measure of disease risk because it may indicate the likelihood of a susceptible host acquiring the pathogen. If fewer infected individuals are present in a system (as we found in treatments with high species richness), the encounter rate between susceptible and infected individuals is expected to be reduced. Infection severity, on the other hand, may be a good predictor of how strong an infection will become for an individual in a given system. Thus, because both measures of disease risk were negatively correlated with species richness, high-diversity systems may contain fewer infected individuals with reduced pathogen loads compared with systems with lower diversity.
The dilution effect has been found in other systems (4–9), and there are multiple mechanisms that could lead to this phenomenon. However, an inverse relationship between biodiversity and disease risk has not been previously reported regarding amphibians and Bd and has rarely been demonstrated in directly transmitted pathogens with density-dependent transmission. Therefore, this study indicates that the dilution effect may be possible in systems with density-dependent transmission or that Bd can exhibit frequency-dependent transmission (25). Additionally, a dilution effect in Bd may be context-dependent. For example, a correlative study investigating the relationship between habitat loss and Bd infection found that Bd occurrence was higher in human-disturbed areas, where biodiversity was also lower (38). Controlled experimental studies are necessary to understand the mechanisms generating dilution effects.
Differential rates of transmission among species may be one mechanism that drives the dilution effect we found. For example, if low-diversity systems contain individuals that are particularly effective at transmitting pathogens, a dilution effect may occur. In our study, A. boreas may shed more infectious particles (zoospores) than the other species do, driving the pattern where aquaria with only A. boreas had higher infection prevalence and severity than aquaria with more species. However, few studies have attempted to quantify transmission rates of Bd among individuals, and none have done so in a comparative framework with multiple species (25, 29).
The observed dilution effect could also be caused by changes in behavior or physiology in response to density of conspecifics or the presence of other species. Larval amphibians alter their behavior in response to their biotic and abiotic environment (39, 40). Different densities of conspecifics or the presence of other species may alter behaviors such as schooling or foraging, which could change their likelihood of encountering Bd or transmitting it to other individuals. Additionally, density and species richness may affect stress in A. boreas, altering their susceptibility to Bd. Stress hormones such as corticosterone affect amphibian immune function (41–43) and can be elevated in response to high larval density (44) and presumably in the presence of interspecific competition. Thus, our manipulations of larval density and species richness could have altered stress hormones, subsequently altering A. boreas’ susceptibility to Bd.
If our findings had been driven by changes in host density, we would expect to see a positive relationship between density and disease risk. However, there was no clear pattern between these two factors. Infection prevalence was negatively correlated with host density but only when focusing on all species. Thus, treatments with more individuals had lower infection prevalence, which was also negatively correlated with species richness. In contrast, aquaria with more A. boreas had higher levels of total infection, which was not affected by species richness or total number of individuals.
Across species and treatments, there were no differences in mortality. It is possible that higher doses of Bd or a longer exposure period can cause lethal effects. Larval amphibians can suffer mortality from Bd exposure in some cases (30), and they can alter behavior and rates of growth and development in response to infection (22, 45, 46). Because tadpoles can act as important reservoirs for Bd (24, 29), it is essential to understand Bd dynamics in larvae so that we may better predict dynamics in communities.
Our study focused on A. boreas, which has suffered population declines throughout much of its range, in some cases correlated with the presence of Bd (32, 47, 48). The results of our study indicate that A. boreas may experience the lowest risk from Bd in high-diversity systems. Thus, in developing a conservation plan for A. boreas and other species suffering Bd-related declines, it is essential to consider the presence of other amphibian species in predicting the prevalence and severity of Bd infection. Additionally, other susceptible amphibian species may exhibit similar patterns with Bd infection and species richness. Thus, loss of amphibian biodiversity from other factors such as habitat loss and pollution may produce communities that are more at risk of Bd-associated declines.
Materials and Methods
Collection and Rearing.
To ensure that animals were not initially infected with Bd, we collected all species as eggs from sites in the Cascade Mountains, Oregon. A. boreas and P. regilla eggs were collected from Little Three Creeks Lake (Deschutes County, elevation 2093 m), and R. cascadae eggs were collected from Parrish Pond (Linn County, elevation 1130 m). Eggs were collected from at least six egg masses for each species and brought to the laboratory for rearing in 38-L aquaria filled with dechlorinated water. Temperature in the laboratory was maintained at 13.5–15.0 °C. Upon hatching, animals were fed a 3:1 ratio (by volume) of rabbit chow to fish food (TetraMin).
Experimental Procedure.
Our experimental unit was a rectangular plastic aquarium (8.5 × 20 × 30 cm) filled with 2.5 L of dechlorinated water. We manipulated both the density of A. boreas and the number of species present in each aquarium. Our density treatments were aquaria with two, three, or six A. boreas. Species richness was manipulated by keeping density constant at six individuals and combining A. boreas with either P. regilla (three A. boreas and three P. regilla), R. cascadae (three A. boreas and three R. cascadae), or both (two A. boreas, two P. regilla, and two R. cascadae). Additionally, each aquarium was randomly assigned to be exposed to either Bd or control (unexposed). Therefore, we had 12 total treatments (6 density/richness treatments each either exposed to Bd or unexposed) that were each replicated nine times.
Animals were placed into their experimental aquarium and given 1 h to acclimate before application of their Bd treatment. We cultured Bd (JEL strain 274, originally isolated from A. boreas in Colorado, stored at −80 °C, then grown in a tryptone solution for 19 mo) on 1% tryptone agar Petri plates that had been kept at ∼14 °C for 15 d. We harvested Bd by flooding plates with distilled water and waiting for 30 min for zoospores to release into the water. We then pooled inoculum from 20 plates and quantified zoospores with a hemocytometer. This inoculum was then diluted 1:10, and 20 mL was added to each aquarium. After 5 days, before any mortality had occurred, the animals were exposed again in the same manner. Combined, these two inoculations added 2.47 × 104 zoospores to each Bd-exposed aquarium. Control animals were inoculated under an identical regime but using sterile agar plates to create the inoculum.
We monitored aquaria daily for mortality, and dead animals were immediately removed and preserved individually in 95% ethanol. Animals were fed ad libitum, and water was changed every 2 wk. At 35 d after initiation of the experiment, which is long enough for multiple life cycles of Bd (20), we killed all animals in MS-222 and preserved them in 95% ethanol. We measured both mass (to the nearest milligram) and length (snout-vent length; to the nearest 0.1 mm) for all individuals. We then extracted whole mouthparts from all Bd-exposed animals and 10 randomly selected control animals for infection analysis with qPCR. Our qPCR methods followed those of Boyle et al. (49) except that we used 60 μL of PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems) instead of 40 mL in DNA extractions. Extractions were diluted 1:10 and processed in an ABI PRISM 7500 (Applied Biosystems). We compared samples to known quantities of Bd (100, 10, 1, and 0.1 genome equivalents). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, and the average number of genome equivalents Bd per animal was calculated. We refer to the raw qPCR output (average genome equivalents per sample) as “gross infection,” which is a relative value of the total amount of Bd in each animal's mouthpart. A sample was considered positive if at least two of the three replicates were positive. Additionally, to account for potential differences in size among species and treatments, each sample was analyzed three times in a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) to determine the concentration of DNA in each sample. This information allowed us to standardize infection severity regardless of host size by calculating infection severity as genome equivalents (determined by qPCR) per nanogram of mouthpart DNA (determined on the NanoDrop spectrophotometer). “Infection severity” is therefore the concentration of Bd in the mouthparts of each animal. Similar methods are used to standardize pathogen loads in ranaviruses (50–52).
Statistical Analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed in R statistical software environment (version 2.9.0). None of our Bd-control animals were infected, so all infection statistics were performed with data from Bd-exposed aquaria only. Our first analyses focused on the effects of density and species richness on our focal species, A. boreas, by using generalized linear models (GLMs). Our model analyzed log-transformed toad infection severity or gross infection (with and without length and weight as cofactors) with the following predictors: number of A. boreas, number of species, and total number of individuals. Individuals were nested by aquarium. Our findings were the same regardless of whether we included Bd-exposed A. boreas that tested negative for infection (i.e., with an infection severity of zero) or if we excluded these individuals from the analyses. We report statistics and figures that include all Bd-exposed animals. We also performed a GLM on the percentage of A. boreas individuals infected in each container (toad infection prevalence) by using the same predictors.
In addition to infection in our focal species, A. boreas, we also determined infection patterns across all species: all-species infection severity, all-species gross infection, all-species infection prevalence, and the total amount of Bd infection in all individuals within an aquarium (referred to as “total infection”; Table 1). We performed GLMs on log-transformed all-species infection severity, including all Bd-exposed individuals and again using only those that tested positive for infection. Our results were the same whether we included Bd-negative individuals in the analyses, so we report statistics and figures including all Bd-exposed animals. Gross infection was analyzed both with and without length and weight as cofactors. To determine total infection, we used the sum of the Bd quantity of all individuals in a replicate (gross amount, not in the form of Bd concentration). If a replicate contained an individual that died and was not recovered (presumably because of cannibalism), this replicate was not included in the analysis of total infection. For these analyses, we performed GLMs with predictors of number of A. boreas individuals, number of species present, and total number of individuals. Individuals were nested by aquarium for analyses of all-species infection severity and gross infection. Additionally, to determine the effects of treatment on R. cascadae and P. regilla infection, we analyzed log-transformed infection severity (averaged by aquarium), log-transformed gross infection (averaged by aquarium), and prevalence for R. cascadae and P. regilla between treatments by using a two-tailed t test for each species.
We tested the effect of Bd treatment, density/richness treatment, and species identity on mortality by using logistic regression nested by aquarium. Mass, length, log-transformed infection severity, and log-transformed gross infection were compared among species by using a GLM with individuals nested by aquarium. To compare mass and length of A. boreas among treatments, we performed a GLM with predictors for number of A. boreas individuals, number of species, number of individuals, and Bd treatment (exposed or unexposed). For R. cascadae and P. regilla, we tested the effects of Bd treatment and number of species present (two or three) on average mass and length by using a two-way ANOVA.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Christie, B. Han, A. Husain, L. Cha, A. Calkins, E. Borer, W. Stubblefield, and J. Bartholomew. Funding for this project was provided by the Society of Wetland Scientists, the Oregon Zoo Foundation Future for Wildlife Grant Program, and a Graduate Women in Sciences Sigma Delta Epsilon Fellowship.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information
- Download
- 591.95 KB
References
1
F Keesing, et al., Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature 468, 647–652 (2010).
2
PTJ Johnson, DW Thieltges, Diversity, decoys and the dilution effect: How ecological communities affect disease risk. J Exp Biol 213, 961–970 (2010).
3
F Keesing, RD Holt, RS Ostfeld, Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecol Lett 9, 485–498 (2006).
4
KA Schmidt, RS Ostfeld, Biodiversity and the dilution effect in disease ecology. Ecology 82, 609–619 (2001).
5
PTJ Johnson, RB Hartson, DJ Larson, DR Sutherland, Diversity and disease: Community structure drives parasite transmission and host fitness. Ecol Lett 11, 1017–1026 (2008).
6
DW Thieltges, K Reise, K Prinz, KT Jensen, Invaders interfere with native parasite–host interactions. Biol Invasions 11, 1421–1429 (2008).
7
BF Allan, et al., Ecological correlates of risk and incidence of West Nile virus in the United States. Oecologia 158, 699–708 (2009).
8
SR Hall, et al., Friendly competition: Evidence for a dilution effect among competitors in a planktonic host–parasite system. Ecology 90, 791–801 (2009).
9
LJ Dizney, LA Ruedas, Increased host species diversity and decreased prevalence of Sin Nombre virus. Emerg Infect Dis 15, 1012–1018 (2009).
10
AH Purcell, SR Saunders, Fate of Pierce's disease strains of Xylella fastidiosa in common riparian plants in California. Plant Dis 83, 825–830 (1999).
11
AG Power, CE Mitchell, Pathogen spillover in disease epidemics. Am Nat 164, S79–S89 (2004).
12
CE Mitchell, D Tilman, JV Groth, Effects of grassland plant species diversity, abundance, and composition on foliar fungal disease. Ecology 83, 1713–1726 (2002).
13
RS Ostfeld, K LoGiudice, Community disassembly, biodiversity loss, and the erosion of an ecosystem service. Ecology 84, 1421–1427 (2003).
14
RD Holt, AP Dobson, M Begon, RG Bowers, EM Schauber, Parasite establishment in host communities. Ecol Lett 6, 837–842 (2003).
15
KR Lips, et al., Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 3165–3170 (2006).
16
LF Skerratt, et al., Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth 4, 125–134 (2007).
17
VT Vredenburg, RA Knapp, TS Tunstall, CJ Briggs, Dynamics of an emerging disease drive large-scale amphibian population extinctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 9689–9694 (2010).
18
ME Ohmer, PJ Bishop, Citation rate and perceived subject bias in the amphibian-decline literature. Conserv Biol 25, 195–199 (2011).
19
L Berger, et al., Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 9031–9036 (1998).
20
JE Longcore, AJ Pessier, DK Nichols, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis gen. et sp. nov., a chytrid pathogenic to amphibians. Mycologia 91, 219–227 (1999).
21
AR Blaustein, et al., The complexity of amphibian population declines: Understanding the role of cofactors in driving amphibian losses. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1223, 108–119 (2011).
22
MJ Parris, JG Beaudoin, Chytridiomycosis impacts predator-prey interactions in larval amphibian communities. Oecologia 140, 626–632 (2004).
23
MJ Parris, TO Cornelius, Fungal pathogen causes competitive and developmental stress in larval amphibian communities. Ecology 85, 3385–3395 (2004).
24
CJ Briggs, RA Knapp, VT Vredenburg, Enzootic and epizootic dynamics of the chytrid fungal pathogen of amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 9695–9700 (2010).
25
LJ Rachowicz, CJ Briggs, Quantifying the disease transmission function: Effects of density on Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis transmission in the mountain yellow-legged frog Rana muscosa. J Anim Ecol 76, 711–721 (2007).
26
KM Mitchell, TS Churcher, TWJ Garner, MC Fisher, Persistence of the emerging pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis outside the amphibian host greatly increases the probability of host extinction. Proc Biol Sci 275, 329–334 (2008).
27
L Berger, R Speare, LF Skerratt, Distribution of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and pathology in the skin of green tree frogs Litoria caerulea with severe chytridiomycosis. Dis Aquat Organ 68, 65–70 (2005).
28
C Carey, et al., Experimental exposures of boreal toads (Bufo boreas) to a pathogenic chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). EcoHealth 3, 5–21 (2006).
29
LJ Rachowicz, VT Vredenburg, Transmission of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis within and between amphibian life stages. Dis Aquat Organ 61, 75–83 (2004).
30
AR Blaustein, et al., Interspecific variation in susceptibility of frog tadpoles to the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conserv Biol 19, 1460–1468 (2005).
31
TS Garcia, JM Romansic, AR Blaustein, Survival of three species of anuran metamorphs exposed to UV-B radiation and the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis Aquat Organ 72, 163–169 (2006).
32
E Muths, PS Corn, AP Pessier, DE Green, Evidence for disease-related amphibian decline in Colorado. Biol Conserv 110, 357–365 (2003).
33
RA Nussbaum, ED Brodie, RM Storm Amphibians and Reptiles of the Pacific Northwest (University Press of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 1983).
34
GE Padgett-Flohr, RL Hopkins, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a novel pathogen approaching endemism in central California. Dis Aquat Organ 83, 1–9 (2009).
35
CA Pearl, J Bowerman, MJ Adams, ND Chelgren, Widespread occurrence of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis on Oregon spotted frogs (Rana pretiosa). EcoHealth 6, 209–218 (2009).
36
RK O'Hara, AR Blaustein, Kin preference behavior in Bufo boreas tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11, 43–49 (1982).
37
BA Bancroft, NJ Baker, CL Searle, TS Garcia, AR Blaustein, Larval amphibians seek warm temperatures and do not avoid harmful UVB radiation. Behav Ecol 19, 879–886 (2008).
38
CG Becker, KR Zamudio, Tropical amphibian populations experience higher disease risk in natural habitats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 9893–9898 (2011).
39
CM Bridges, Tadpole swimming performance and activity affected by acute exposure to sublethal levels of carbaryl. Environ Toxicol Chem 16, 1935–1939 (1997).
40
RA Relyea, Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82, 523–540 (2001).
41
LA Rollins-Smith, PJ Blair, The effects of corticosteroid hormones and thyroid hormones on lymphocyte viability and proliferation during development and metamorphosis of Xenopus laevis. Differentiation 54, 155–160 (1993).
42
LA Rollins-Smith, KS Barker, AT Davis, Involvement of glucocorticoids in the reorganization of the amphibian immune system at metamorphosis. Dev Immunol 5, 145–152 (1997).
43
LK Belden, JM Kiesecker, Glucocorticosteroid hormone treatment of larval treefrogs increases infection by Alaria sp. trematode cercariae. J Parasitol 91, 686–688 (2005).
44
KA Glennemeier, RJ Denver, Role for corticoids in mediating the response of Rana pipiens tadpoles to intraspecific competition. J Exp Zool 292, 32–40 (2002).
45
TWJ Garner, et al., Life history tradeoffs influence mortality associated with the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Oikos 118, 783–791 (2009).
46
BA Han, CL Searle, AR Blaustein, Effects of an infectious fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, on amphibian predator-prey interactions. PLoS ONE 6, e16675 (2011).
47
WH Wente, MJ Adams, CA Pearl, Evidence of decline for Bufo boreas and Rana luteiventris in and around the northern Great Basin, western USA. Alytes 22, 95–108 (2005).
48
RN Fisher, HB Shaffer, The decline of amphibians in California's Great Central Valley. Conserv Biol 10, 1387–1397 (1996).
49
DG Boyle, DB Boyle, V Olsen, JAT Morgan, AD Hyatt, Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis Aquat Organ 60, 141–148 (2004).
50
JL Kerby, A Storfer, Combined effects of atrazine and chlorpyrifos on susceptibility of the tiger salamander to Ambystoma tigrinum virus. EcoHealth 6, 91–98 (2009).
51
JL Kerby, AJ Hart, A Storfer, Combined effects of virus, pesticide, and predator cue on the larval tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). EcoHealth, 10.1007/s10393-011-0682-1. (April 27, 2011).
52
NA Haislip, MJ Gray, JT Hoverman, DL Miller, Development and disease: How susceptibility to an emerging pathogen changes through anuran development. PLoS ONE 6, e22307 (2011).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Submission history
Published online: September 19, 2011
Published in issue: September 27, 2011
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Christie, B. Han, A. Husain, L. Cha, A. Calkins, E. Borer, W. Stubblefield, and J. Bartholomew. Funding for this project was provided by the Society of Wetland Scientists, the Oregon Zoo Foundation Future for Wildlife Grant Program, and a Graduate Women in Sciences Sigma Delta Epsilon Fellowship.
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
A dilution effect in the emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
108 (39) 16322-16326,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108490108
(2011).
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.