N6-methyladenosine (m6A) depletion regulates pluripotency exit by activating signaling pathways in embryonic stem cells
Edited by Frank McCormick, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; received March 31, 2021; accepted November 02, 2021
Significance
Dynamic deposition of the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification on messenger RNA (mRNA) regulates pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. Reports show that depletion of m6A abundances increases the mRNA stability of pluripotency and lineage transcription factors (TFs) alike. If the mRNAs of these two TF groups become stabilized, it remains unclear how the pluripotency or lineage commitment decision is implemented. Quantification of pluripotency TFs live at single-cell resolution over generations shows long-term preservation of both pluripotency and priming. m6A depletion activates key signaling pathways involved in pluripotency versus commitment decisions. This occurs independently of m6A control over TF mRNA transcript stability. m6A deposition regulates TF protein expression levels by activating pErk and pAkt signaling to enact cell-fate determination in pluripotent stem cells.
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) deposition on messenger RNA (mRNA) controls embryonic stem cell (ESC) fate by regulating the mRNA stabilities of pluripotency and lineage transcription factors (TFs) [P. J. Batista et al., Cell Stem Cell 15, 707–719 (2014); Y. Wang et al., Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 191–198 (2014); and S. Geula et al., Science 347, 1002–1006 (2015)]. If the mRNAs of these two TF groups become stabilized, it remains unclear how the pluripotency or lineage commitment decision is implemented. We performed noninvasive quantification of Nanog and Oct4 TF protein levels in reporter ESCs to define cell-state dynamics at single-cell resolution. Long-term single-cell tracking shows that immediate m6A depletion by Mettl3 knock-down in serum/leukemia inhibitory factor supports both pluripotency maintenance and its departure. This is mediated by differential and opposing signaling pathways. Increased FGF5 mRNA stability activates pErk, leading to Nanog down-regulation. FGF5-mediated coactivation of pAkt reenforces Nanog expression. In formative stem cells poised toward differentiation, m6A depletion activates both pErk and pAkt, increasing the propensity for mesendodermal lineage induction. Stable m6A depletion by Mettl3 knock-out also promotes pErk activation. Higher pErk counteracts the pluripotency exit delay exhibited by stably m6A-depleted cells upon differentiation. At single-cell resolution, we illustrate that decreasing m6A abundances activates pErk and pAkt-signaling, regulating pluripotency departure.
Sign up for PNAS alerts.
Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited.
Pluripotency is governed by a TF regulatory network centered on Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog (1–7). The loss of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog is a hallmark of pluripotency exit. Although, conventional mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) culture in serum and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) (8, 9) permits cells to undergo a reversible step toward differentiation, marked by the down-regulation of Nanog (10–12). LIF sustains pluripotency through Jak-Stat and PI3K-pAkt signaling pathways acting in parallel (13). In serum-free conditions, LIF and Wnt activation alongside Mek-pErk inhibition enable the capture of mESCs in a pluripotent ground state (14, 15). This homogeneous population represents the newly formed epiblast of the preimplantation mouse embryo (16).
Pluripotency exit involves a formative conversion related to prestreak epiblast in which competence for both soma and germline induction is acquired (17, 18). This was first shown in a transient cell population termed epiblast-like cells (EpiLCs), induced in FGF2 and activin-supplemented, serum-free medium (19). Currently, a lower activin concentration, endogenous FGF-signaling, and inhibition of Wnt and retinoic acid pathways allows the isolation of formative stem (FS) cells (20). These retain the capacity for both soma and germline induction and can be expanded long-term (20). Finally, prolonged culture in high concentrations of FGF2, activin, and inhibition of Wnt-signaling originally allowed the capture of primed pluripotency. Termed epiblast-derived stem cells (EpiSCs) (21), these are refractory to germ cell lineage induction and show relatedness to primed epiblast of the anterior primitive streak (22, 23).
Recently, N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant messenger RNA (mRNA) modification (24–26), was shown to be pivotal in pluripotent state regulation (27–29). The Mettl3–Mettl14–Wtap writer complex processes adenosine to m6A on mRNA (30, 31). Two demethylases, Alkbh5 and FTO, facilitate methylation erasure (32, 33), suggesting that m6A abundances are reversible and dynamic in nature. Stable m6A depletion by Mettl3 knock-out (KO) rendered ground-state mESCs poorly responsive to differentiation (28, 29). Increased transcript stability of pluripotency TFs like Nanog is thought to prevent pluripotency network disassembly (24, 28, 29, 34). However, immediate m6A depletion by Mettl3 knock-down (KD) was reported to differentiate mESCs grown in Serum/LIF (27, 35) and also EpiSCs (29). These converse effects are attributed to the increased transcript stability of lineage TFs like Otx2 (27). Models suggest that dynamic m6A deposition can create opportune timing for pluripotency or lineage TF mRNAs to become more prevalent over one another and resolve cell fate (24–26, 34, 36). However, questions remain whether TF mRNA stability mechanisms negotiate cell fate alone (24, 25) or ensure efficient transcriptome switching once cell-fate choice is established (24, 25).
Current snapshot, population average approaches offer a wealth of information on m6A modification landscapes. They also provide a comprehensive understanding of biochemical processes underlying epi-transcriptomic regulation (24–26, 34, 36). However, only long-term TF quantification at single-cell resolution enables the precise deconvolution of m6A-dependent cell-fate decisions. To this end, we developed transgenic mESC lines to quantify multiple pluripotency TF protein levels in live cells over many generations (11). Over half-a-million time-resolved data points from more than 8,000 cells reveal that m6A depletion supports pluripotency heterogeneity. Importantly, m6A depletion activates pErk- and pAkt-signaling pathways facilitating both pluripotency maintenance and its departure.
Results
Immediate m6A Depletion Promotes Nanog-State Heterogeneity in mESCs.
To observe immediate m6A depletion effects, we employed short hairpin RNA (shRNA)- or small interfering RNA (siRNA)–mediated knock-down (KD) of Mettl3 and Mettl14 for 10 d. This significantly decreased Mettl3 and Mettl14 protein levels in mESCs (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. 1 A, C, E, and I). Depletion of either Mettl3 or Mettl14 reciprocally down-regulates the other complex partner (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. 1 A, C, E, and I), indicating mutual coregulation at the protein level (27, 29). Mettl3 or Mettl14 KD increased Wtap protein levels as previously shown (29) (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. 1 A, C, E, and I) and reduced m6A abundances on mRNA (29) (Fig. 1B). m6A depletion resulted in a mixture of both domed, rounded, and flat, loosely formed mESC colonies (Fig. 1C). To determine Nanog protein levels over time in individual cells, we employed protein-fusion reporter mESCs (11). The tethering of fluorescent proteins (FPs) to the carboxy termini of TFs shows functional TF protein levels (11, 12). We confirmed no relation between the degree of m6A depletion and Nanog expression (11) (SI Appendix, Fig. 1 G and H). Immediate m6A depletion increases the proportion of Nanog-negative cells (Fig. 1 D and E and SI Appendix, Fig. 1 B, D, and F), although almost all cells remain positive for core pluripotency TFs Oct4 and Sox2 (Fig. 1 F, G, and H and SI Appendix, Fig. 1 J, K, and L). Multispectral protein-level quantification showed that Oct4- and Sox2-positive, Nanog-negative cells were also negative for Klf4 (SI Appendix, Fig. 1M), Esrrb (SI Appendix, Fig. 1N), and Tbx3 (SI Appendix, Fig. 1O). The down-regulation of pluripotency TFs is accompanied by a global increase in pluripotency TF mRNA stability. This is shown by real-time PCR quantification of Nanog and Esrrb transcript abundances after 3 and 6 h of transcription inhibition with Actinomycin D (Fig. 1 I and J) (28). In comparison, no mRNA stability effects were observed for Oct4, which does not retain m6A deposition–mediated regulation (27) (SI Appendix, Fig. 1L). These findings indicate that pluripotency TF down-regulation is disconnected from increased pluripotency TF mRNA stability observed in m6A depleted cells.
Fig. 1.
m6A Depletion Sustains Nanog-Positive and Negative-State Accumulation.
The culture of mESCs in serum/LIF (8, 9) allows cells to undertake a reversible step toward differentiation, marked by the down-regulation of Nanog (10–12). To understand precisely how m6A depletion affects this property, we sought to define the dynamics of Nanog-state heterogeneity at single-cell resolution. We created double knock-in, protein-fusion Nanog and Oct4 TF mESCs and measured protein levels continuously over many cell generations. One allele of the endogenous Oct4 gene locus was targeted with a yellow (VENUS) FP (11), and one allele of the Nanog gene locus was targeted with a red (KATUSHKA) FP (Fig. 2A). The FPs are directly fused to the carboxy termini of TF’s and thus present functionally relevant protein levels in mESCs (11, 12) (SI Appendix, Fig. 2 A and B). After m6A depletion for 10 d, effects on NanogKATUSHKA expression were reproduced for imaging (Fig. 2B and SI Appendix, Fig. 2 C–I). The development of clonal colonies from single cells was monitored by microscopy (11, 12). Cells were marked by constitutive expression of infrared FP (iRFP) targeted to the nuclear membrane. Computer-assisted cell tracking and quantification of time-lapse imaging was performed (11, 37). To compensate for cell cycle–dependent fluctuations in protein intensity, a cell cycle–corrected distribution was calculated. Here, only the median of NanogVENUS intensity from the initial first three time points after a cell division was quantified. Using this unbiased approach, we generated protein intensity distributions unaffected by cell-cycle convolution (11) (Fig. 2 C and D).
Fig. 2.
Mother-to-daughter inheritance analysis showed that m6A-depleted, NanogKATUSHKA-negative daughter cells are four times less likely to reacquire NanogKATUSHKA expression (Fig. 2 D and E). Nearly all daughter cells inherit similar Oct4VENUS levels from their mothers (SI Appendix, Fig. 2J). Cell survival or proliferation remain unchanged (38) (SI Appendix, Fig. 2 K and L). Lineage-tracing reveals that m6A-depleted cells inherit the NanogKATUSHKA-negative, Oct4VENUS-positive state for many cell generations (Fig. 2 F and G). While on average, over six generations are required before half of the NanogKATUSHKA-negative cells re-express Nanog, control cells require less than two generations (Fig. 2 F and G). Likewise, m6A-depleted, NanogKATUSHKA-negative, Oct4VENUS-positive cells are supported long-term, with low probability for cell-state departure (Fig. 2E). While either Nanog state accumulates, low-frequency dynamic interchange between these populations (Fig. 2E) suggests differential and opposing regulation downstream of m6A depletion. We examined whether these diverse cell-state dynamics stemmed from the activation of signaling pathways in m6A-depleted cells.
m6A Depletion Activates Mek-pErk Promoting Nanog-Negative State Accumulation.
KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) analysis of m6A sequencing (m6A-seq) data indicated that mRNAs of FGF (fibroblast growth factor), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3-kinase) signaling regulators are m6A modified (SI Appendix, Fig. 3A) (27). m6A-depleted cells over 10 d show increased mRNA levels of Fgf5 and Fgf2 ligands but not Fgf4 (Fig. 3A and SI Appendix, Fig. 3 B and C). This corresponds to elevated Fgf5 mRNA stability (Fig. 3A). Downstream phosphorylation of the FGFR1 receptor upon m6A depletion (Fig. 3B) activates the Mek1/2 and Erk1/2 signaling cascade (39, 40) (Fig. 3 C and D). Multispectral, single-cell, protein-level quantification for Nanog and pErk shows that pErk activation levels are similar in Nanog-positive and -negative, m6A-depleted cell populations (Fig. 3 E and F and SI Appendix, Fig. 3D). pErk activation is therefore not a by-product of the increase in the proportion of Nanog-negative cells. Strikingly, inhibition of MAPK-signaling by PD0325901 reverses the accumulation of the m6A-depleted, NanogVENUS-negative cell fraction and reinstates NanogVENUS expression (Fig. 3 G and H). We recapitulated these effects on the NanogVENUS distribution by adding PD173074, a specific inhibitor of FGF receptors (20) (SI Appendix, Fig. 3E). PD173074 treatment effectively down-regulated pErk (SI Appendix, Fig. 3F). These findings show that NanogVENUS-negative cell-state accumulation is regulated by FGF-dependent Mek-pErk signaling in m6A-depleted cells.
Fig. 3.
m6A Depletion Activates Signaling Regulating Epiblast Cell Identity.
We asked whether pErk activation in m6A-depleted cells promotes the expression of key TFs involved in Nanog down-regulation. Otx2 and Oct6 (also known as Pou3f1) are associated with Nanog depletion in mESCs (17, 41, 42) and the peri-implantation epiblast (43–46). Multispectral, single-cell, TF protein-level quantification shows that m6A depletion for 10 d is accompanied by an increase in Otx2 (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. 4 A and C) and Oct6 (Fig. 4B and SI Appendix, Fig. 4 B and C) expressing cells. Mek-pErk appears central to the up-regulation of these TFs as MAPK inhibition by PD0325901 (Fig. 4C) or the blockade of FGF receptors by PD173074 (SI Appendix, Fig. 4D) depletes Otx2 and Oct6 levels. We asked whether Otx2 and Oct6 regulate the Nanog-negative cell state by knocking-down either one or both TFs simultaneously. Otx2 and Oct6 KD significantly reduced the NanogVENUS-negative cell fraction (Fig. 4 D–F and SI Appendix, Fig. 4E). The increase in Otx2 and Oct6 mRNA and protein levels also appears to be independent of mRNA stability in m6A-depleted cells (Fig. 4 G and H). Instead, pErk activation stimulates the up-regulation of epiblast TFs, promoting Nanog-negative cell-state accumulation.
Fig. 4.
Nanog repression is also a feature of the transient EpiLC state acquisition (19). However, in Serum/LIF conditions, epiblast identity is suppressed by the continued presence of LIF (16, 47). In FGF2-supplemented, serum-free medium used to support mEpiSCs, m6A depletion led to spontaneous differentiation (29). We asked whether decreasing m6A abundances also rendered the recently established FS epiblast cells more amenable to lineage commitment. FS cells are maintained by endogenous FGF activity and low nodal/activin supplementation. These cells are poised to enter mesendodermal differentiation upon increased levels of either signal or canonical Wnt (20). The FS state was induced from 2i/LIF pluripotency conditions for 10 d, followed by m6A depletion for a further 10 d. Marker analysis showed that Oct4 TF protein expression was unaffected, and levels of epiblast TFs Otx2 and Oct6 also remained unaltered (Fig. 4I). However, we observed pErk- and pAkt-signaling activation (Fig. 4J), while Wnt activity remained unchanged in m6A-depleted FS cells (SI Appendix, Fig. 4F). FS cultures could be expanded long-term and profiling of mesendodermal markers showed no significant up-regulation (Fig. 4K and SI Appendix, Fig. 4G). However, upon lineage induction of m6A-depleted cells, a significant enrichment for mesendodermal markers was found as indicated by Mesp1, Mixl1, and brachyury T at the mRNA (Fig. 4K) and protein levels (SI Appendix, Fig. 4H). Together, these observations indicate that m6A depletion activates pErk-signaling, promoting epiblast cell identity in Serum/LIF. Upon lineage induction in m6A-depleted FS cells, pErk and pAkt coactivation appears to increase the propensity for mesendodermal differentiation.
m6A Depletion Coactivates PI3K-pAkt Promoting Nanog Expression in Serum/LIF.
We asked whether m6A depletion also coactivates pAkt, promoting Nanog expression and pluripotency maintenance in Serum/LIF (13, 48). m6A-depleted cells showed a significant increase in pAkt activation (Fig. 5A) spanning the Nanog protein intensity distribution (Fig. 5B and SI Appendix, Fig. 5A). NanogVENUS-positive cells also displayed a higher pAkt activation, consistent with its role in supporting Nanog expression. PI3K inhibition by LY294002 administration resulted in a transient Akt dephosphorylation (SI Appendix, Fig. 5B) and a significant increase in the proportion of NanogVENUS-negative cells (Fig. 5 C and D). Furthermore, inhibition of pAkt increased pErk-mediated expression of Otx2 and Oct6 (SI Appendix, Fig. 5C). pAkt can also promote pluripotency by facilitating the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin (49), resulting in Wnt pathway activation (15, 50). This is achieved by pAkt-dependent phosphorylation and degradation of the Wnt repressor Gsk3β, as also shown herein (SI Appendix, Fig. 5D). Profiling of other signaling pathways indicates that m6A depletion does not affect signaling activation more broadly (SI Appendix, Fig. 5E). PI3K-pAkt and Mek-pErk regulators (51, 52) implicated in tumorigenicity (53) also remained unchanged (SI Appendix, Fig. 5F). Extended propagation in Serum/LIF reveals that the proportion of m6A-depleted NanogVENUS-negative cells becomes progressively reduced over time, likely due to the increased propensity for pluripotency exit (Fig. 5E). Meanwhile, NanogVENUS-positive cells gradually expand in culture. These results suggest that alongside increased pluripotency TF mRNA stability (Fig. 1 I and J), pAkt activation reinforces Nanog expression in m6A-depleted cells.
Fig. 5.
Stably m6A-Depleted mESCs Activate Mek-pErk Facilitating Pluripotency Exit.
Stable m6A depletion by Mettl3 KO hampers the priming and differentiation competence of mESCs, leading to a “hyper-naïve” pluripotency phenotype. This is attributed to increased pluripotency TF mRNA stability of m6A-decorated transcripts (28, 29) (SI Appendix, Fig. 6 A and B). We profiled Nanog and Oct4 in two KO ESC lines by multispectral, single-cell, protein-level quantification. KO1 and KO2 cell lines differ in the proportions of Oct4-positive, Nanog-negative cells in Serum/LIF (Fig. 6A). KO1 with a greater Oct4-positive, Nanog-negative cell fraction has higher pErk activation compared to the other cell lines. This activation threshold appears to counteract elevated pluripotency TF mRNA stability and pAkt (Fig. 6 A and B). A comparable increase in pluripotency TF mRNA stability and lower pErk activation in KO2 cells results in a reduced proportion of Nanog-negative cells in Serum/LIF (Fig. 6 A and B). Pharmacological inhibition of pErk in 2i/LIF conditions reinstates homogeneous Nanog expression (Fig. 6C) and increases pAkt levels in m6A-depleted cells (Fig. 6D and SI Appendix, Fig. 6C). Induction of differentiation by retinoic acid treatment of wild-type (WT) and KO cells shows that KO1 with higher pErk activation propensity differentiates more efficiently than KO2 (Fig. 6E). This is characterized by a lower proportion of Oct4 and Nanog double-positive cells remaining after 48 h of retinoic acid treatment in KO1 relative to KO2. These findings show that activation of pErk-signaling in stably m6A-depleted cells counteracts the pluripotency exit delay imposed by stable m6A depletion.
Fig. 6.
Discussion
Decreasing m6A abundances is thought to regulate fate decisions in pluripotent cells by elevating the mRNA stabilities of TFs (24, 25, 27–29, 54). Increased stability of pluripotency TF mRNAs reinforces pluripotency (28, 29) while that of lineage regulators facilitates pluripotency departure (27, 35). How cell fate is resolved upon m6A depletion, however, remains poorly understood. We find that pErk- and pAkt-signaling activation in m6A-depleted cells regulates pluripotent state heterogeneity and pluripotency exit propensity (Fig. 6F).
Immediate m6A depletion by Mettl3 KD promotes Nanog-negative cell-state accumulation in Serum/LIF. This effect is disconnected from the increase in Nanog and Esrrb mRNA transcript stabilities. Instead, FGF5 ligand mRNA stability and expression facilitate FGFR1-mediated pErk activation. pErk dependent up-regulation of epiblast TFs Otx2 and Oct6 promotes Nanog down-regulation. This feature is also characteristic of the EpiLC state transition (19), although full acquisition of epiblast identity is repressed in Serum/LIF by LIF supplementation (16, 47). Interestingly, the mRNA stability of Otx2 and Oct6 is not changed by m6A depletion. KD of Otx2 and Oct6 promotes the re-expression of Nanog. FGF-signaling coactivates pAkt, which also facilitates Nanog reup-regulation. pAkt further stimulates Wnt-signaling, supporting pluripotency (15). Inhibition of pAkt increases Oct4VENUS-positive, NanogKATUSHKA-negative cell-state accumulation. Conversely, inhibition of pErk reduces this effect. Live, quantitative, single-cell resolution imaging shows heritable, long-term, Oct4VENUS-positive, NanogKATUSHKA-negative state accumulation in m6A-depleted cells. In parallel, increased Nanog mRNA stability and pAkt activation appear to facilitate the gradual expansion of the NanogKATUSHKA-positive population. Together, our findings indicate that immediate m6A depletion activates differential and opposing pErk- and pAkt-signaling in Serum/LIF, promoting both pluripotency and its departure (Fig. 6F).
These signaling pathways also appear to be required for the maintenance of the recently defined FS epiblast cells (20). The FS population prominently expresses FGF5, a number of other FGF ligands as well as FGF receptors 1 and 2 (20). FS cells are maintained by the balance of endogenous FGF activation and low nodal/activin-signaling (20). They are poised toward differentiation and respond to increased levels of either signal or of canonical Wnt by entering the mesendodermal lineage. Inhibition of FGF receptors or downstream MEK1/2 promotes the rapid collapse of FS cultures (20). As shown here, m6A depletion in FS cells results in the activation of pErk and pAkt, while Wnt-signaling remains unchanged. Interestingly, unlike mEpiSCs, which undergo spontaneous differentiation upon m6A depletion (29), FS cultures can be maintained in the m6A-depleted state. Upon lineage induction, however, and in line with findings in mEpiSCs (29), m6A depletion promotes a greater propensity for differentiation (Fig. 6F). Higher pAkt- and pErk-signaling activation in m6A-depleted FS cells supports a state more poised toward mesendodermal lineage commitment. While little explored, the precise tuning of m6A levels may facilitate controlled and robust human stem cell lineage differentiation into more mature and functional tissues for therapies (36).
On the contrary, stably m6A-depleted Mettl3 KO ESCs show a reduced capacity for differentiation or “hyper-naive” pluripotency (28, 29). This strengthening of the pluripotency TF network appears to occur due to the prolonged increase in mRNA stability of pluripotency TFs. KO cell lines also show increased albeit different levels of FGF-signaling activation in Serum/LIF. This may reflect differences in the propensity for FGF-signaling prior to m6A depletion. Higher pErk activation in KO cells results in greater Nanog-state heterogeneity, and this effect can be reversed by pErk inhibition. Also, higher pErk activation propensity promotes a greater degree of pluripotency exit upon differentiation. pErk activation therefore counteracts pluripotency exit delay imposed by stable m6A depletion (Fig. 6F). Our findings are relevant for malignant cell differentiation and complement m6A abundance–dependent regulation of pAkt in cancer progression (53). pErk-signaling and pAkt-dependent stimulation of Wnt (49) upon m6A depletion in mEpiSCs may contribute to the dissolution of primed pluripotency (29, 55). Finally, enhanced maintenance of m6A-depleted human pluripotent stem cells (28) could originate from mRNA stability-dependent increases in FGF-signaling. In summary, single-cell resolution approaches illustrate that decreasing m6A abundances regulates pluripotency exit propensity and lineage commitment by activating pErk- and pAkt-signaling pathways. Signaling activation upon m6A depletion can direct pluripotent cell-fate determination independently of TF mRNA transcript stability mechanisms.
Methods
Cell Lines.
mESCs from the R1 parental line (129 substrain) were electroporated with linearized Oct4-Venus-IRES-neo targeting vector and selected with G418 (200 µg/mL, catalog no. G8168-10ML, Invitrogen). Resistant ES clones were confirmed by Southern blotting. Oct4VENUS heterozygous fusion mESCs underwent a second round of electroporation with the Nanog-Katushka-2A-BSD targeting vector and were selected with Blasticidin (5 µg/mL, catalog no. A11139-02, Invitrogen). The NanogVENUS line, the parental R1 ESCs, and the E14TG2a ESCs were kindly obtained from K.A.’s laboratory (BIOTEC, Technische Universitaet Dresden). Professor Howard Y. Chang kindly provided J1 (129 substrain) Mettl3 KO cell lines (KO1 and KO2) and wild-type control cells for this study grown in Serum/LIF as previously published (28).
ESC Electroporation and Southern Blotting.
Electroporation was conducted as previously described (56). Antibiotic-resistant colonies were picked, expanded in 96-well plates, and DNA was extracted by Proteinase K (0315801001, Roche) digestion and NaCl–ethanol precipitation. Genomic DNA was digested overnight with the indicated enzyme(s), separated on 0.8% agarose gels, and blotted to nylon membranes (BNAZF810S, PALL). Probes were labeled with 32P by random priming (11585592001, High Prime Kit, Roche). Hybridization and washes were conducted at 65 °C.
ESC Culture.
mESC lines were maintained in Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)–containing medium and feeder-free conditions as described previously (11). Retinoic acid–induced differentiation was initiated by removal of LIF and addition of 1 μM retinoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, R2625) 24 h after cell seeding for 2 d in FBS-containing ESC medium. For 2i/LIF ground-state conditions, mESCs were cultured on Fibronectin-coated plates or flasks (Nunc) in N2B27-based, FBS-free medium supplemented with MEK inhibitor PD0325901 (1 μM) and GSK3β inhibitor CHIR99021 (3.3 μM). In 2i/LIF, mESCs were passaged by dissociating with TrypLE (Gibco, 12605010). mESCs originally cultured in FBS-containing medium were adapted to 2i/LIF conditions for at least five passages before further experimentation. For inhibitor assays in FBS/LIF (Figs. 3–5), the following concentrations of inhibitors PD0325901 (1 μM), PD173074 (0.8 μM), or LY294002 (5 μM) were used. Thereafter, cells were collected for protein extraction followed by immunoblot analyses for designated protein targets.
FS Cell Culture.
Mouse FS cells were obtained from R1 ESCs in N2B27-based 2i/LIF conditions by culturing in AloXR medium (20) for at least five passages. Briefly, AloXR media contains activin A (3 ng/mL, R&D Systems), XAV939 (2 μM, Selleck), and BMS493 (1 μM, Selleck) in N2B27 basal medium. FS cell clumps were dissociated with Accutase (A1110501, Gibco) and passaged on Fibronectin (Merck Millipore, FC010)–coated plates every 2 to 3 d. Medium was replaced daily. For mesendodermal differentiation, FS cells were dissociated, washed, and seeded on Fibronectin-coated plates in N2B27 basal medium containing 20 ng/mL activin A and 3 μM CHIR99021 (Selleck) for 24 h (20).
Viral Transduction of ESC and FS Lines.
Viral transduction methodology and short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequences obtained from the Broad Institute’s The RNA interference (RNAi) Consortium are described in the SI Appendix.
siRNA Transfection.
siRNA transfection methodology and siRNA sequences used in this study are described in the SI Appendix.
Immunoblot Analyses.
Total proteins were extracted by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer containing the protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich, P8340) and phosphatase inhibitor mixtures (Sigma-Aldrich, P5726; P0044). Protein concentration of the lysate was quantified with Bio-Rad Bradford (Bio-Rad, 5000006) assays. Protein samples were denatured and resolved by Bolt Bis-Tris Plus Gels (Invitrogen). Separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes then detected with primary antibodies against Mettl3 (Abcam ab195352), Mettl14 (Sigma-Aldrich, HPA038002), Wtap (Proteintech, 60188–1-Ig), Oct4 (Santa Cruz, sc-8628), Nanog (Abcam ab80892), Oct6 (Merck Millipore, MABN738), Otx2 (R&D systems, AF1979), GSK-3β (Cell Signaling, 9315S), pGSK3β (Ser9) (Cell Signaling, 9323S), β-catenin (Santa Cruz, sc-7199), pβ-catenin(Ser33/37/Thr41) (Cell Signaling, 9561S), Phlpp2 (Abcam, ab71973), Smad1/5/9 (Abcam, ab66737), pSmad1(Ser463/465)/Smad5(Ser463/465)/Smad9 (Ser465/467) (Cell Signaling, 13820S), Ras (Abcam, ab52939), Smad2/3 (Cell Signaling, 8685S), pSmad2(Ser465/467)/Smad3(Ser423/425) (Cell Signaling, 8828S), mTOR (Cell Signaling, 2983S), pmTOR(S2481) (Abcam, ab137133), Eras (Abcam, ab192868), Pten (Cell Signaling, 9559S), PP2A C subunit (Cell Signaling, 2038S), Akt (Cell Signaling, 4691S), pAkt(Ser473) (Cell Signaling, 4060S), pAkt(Thr308) (Cell Signaling, 13038S), c-Raf (Cell Signaling, 9422S), pc-Raf(Ser338) (Cell Signaling, 9427S), Erk1/2 (Cell Signaling, 4348S), pErk1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling, 9101S), Mek1(Abcam, ab32091), Mek2 (Abcam, ab32517), pMek1/2 (Ser217/221) (Cell Signaling, 9154S), Fgfr1 (Abcam, ab10646), pFgfr1(Tyr653/Tyr654) (Merck Millipore, 06–1433), Histone H3 (Abcam, ab85869), and GAPDH (Abcam, ab125247). The following secondary antibodies were used: Donkey anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Abcam, ab6820), donkey anti-rabbit (HRP) (Abcam, ab6802), and donkey anti-Goat (HRP) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-28664). Blots were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Thermo Fisher Scientific 32209 and 34095) and scanned by a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS + system.
Immunoblot Quantification.
The integrated optical density (IOD) of immunoblot bands was measured by Gel-Pro analyzer software (Rockville). Generally, the IOD of target bands was firstly divided by the IOD of corresponding loading-control (for example, GAPDH) bands to normalize the sample loading-dependent variation between different lanes. Then, normalized quantification of target bands from all sample lanes were divided by the normalized value of target bands from the corresponding control sample lane. The resulting ratios were used as relative abundances of target proteins across different samples. The IOD of phosphorylated protein bands were divided by the IOD of their corresponding total-protein bands. The resulting values were used to calculate relative abundance of phosphorylated protein as previously mentioned. Each analysis for relative protein abundance was performed independently for at least three experimental repeats.
Live-Cell Multicolor Flow Cytometry.
mESCs were dissociated with 0.05% trypsin (Gibco, 25300054) or TrypLE. Single-cell suspensions were obtained by resuspension of the cell pallet with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and filtration with a 40-μm cell strainer. All samples were run on a BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer. The blue 488-nm laser and GFP detector was used to analyze the VENUS fluorescence signal. The yellow-green 561-nm laser and PE-Cy5 detector was used to analyze KATUSHKA fluorescence signal. The red 640-nm laser and Alexa Fluro 700 detector was used to analyze iRFP713 fluorescence signal. Background signal from R1 unmodified wild-type mESCs on each channel was used to align each negative gate at 103 signal intensities.
Intracellular Flow Cytometry.
For intracellular flow cytometry analysis, cells were dissociated and then fixed using 1.5% formaldehyde (Santa Cruz, sc-281692) for 10 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were permeabilized by resuspension in 100% methanol overnight at −20 °C. Permeabilized cells were washed twice by staining buffer (PBS with 0.5% BSA and 0.02% NaN3) and then incubated with 10 µL of Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated mouse anti-pAkt (S473) (BD Bioscience, 560343) or 5 µL of mouse IgG1 κ Isotype Control (BD Bioscience, 557714) in 50 µL staining buffer for 60 min at 4 °C. Stained cells were washed five times with staining buffer before running on a BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer.
Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting.
Isolation of NanogVENUS fluorescent cell subpopulations in Scr or shM3 conditions was performed on BD FACS (Fluorescence-activated cell sorting) Aria II cell sorter with a BD FacsDiva software package. In order to obtain enough cells with high purity for immunoblot analysis, we applied two rounds of sorting. The first sorting was carried out on “Yield” mode to get a preliminary enrichment of the target cell population. Preliminarily sorted cells were resorted with “Purity” Mode to attain high purity of the target cell population. The purity (more than 98%) of each sorted population was confirmed immediately after sorting. FACS analyses were performed on at least three independent experiments.
m6A Dot Blot Assay.
Total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL (Invitrogen, 15596026) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polyadenylated mRNA was purified by Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen, 61006). Purified mRNA was used for m6A dot blot with a Bio-Dot Apparatus. In brief, mRNA was denatured and applied to rehydrated Hybond-N+ membrane (GE, RPN203B) within Bio-Dot Apparatus by gentle suction vacuum. The membrane was then cross-linked in an ultraviolet (UV) light crosslinker BLX-E254nm (Vilber, France) for 5 min, followed by baking at 80 °C for 30 min. The blotted membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat milk and incubated with primary rabbit anti-m6 A antibody (Synaptic Systems, 202003) and followed by secondary donkey anti-rabbit (HRP) (Abcam, ab6802). Blots were developed by ECL (Thermo Fisher Scientific 34095) and scanned by Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+ system. The signal density of the dot blot experiment is quantified by Gel-Pro analyzer software (Media Cybernetics) in all experiments. The relative m6A abundance was calculated as the ratio of dot intensities between shM3 and Scr. Methylene blue staining was used as RNA loading control.
qRT-PCR.
qRT-PCR was used to assess the relative abundance of mRNA. Methodology and primers used for qRT-PCR are described in the SI Appendix.
mRNA Half-Life Assay.
Control, Mettl3 KD, or Mettl3 KO cells were seeded in 6 cm dished at 50% confluency for 24 h. Actinomycin D (Sigma-Aldrich, A1410) was added to culture medium at 5 μg/mL for 6 h, 3 h, and 0 h before collection. The total RNA was purified and applied for RT-qPCR analysis to examine mRNA abundance. The degradation rate of RNA was estimated as previously shown (53).
Immunocytochemistry.
To attain feeder-free monolayer mESC culture, cells were grown on circle glass coverslips coated with Recombinant Human E-Cadherin (25 µg/ml −1, Primorigen, S2071-500UG) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 24-well plates for 2 d. ESCs were then rinsed briefly and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Santa Cruz, sc-281692) in PBS at room temperature for 5 min. After permeabilization with PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 (For pErk1/2 and pStat3 staining, cells were permeabilized with ice-cold 100% methanol for 10 min at −20 °C, followed by rinse in 1× PBS for 5 min) and blocking with 5% donkey serum for 30 min, the coverslips were incubated with a primary antibody combination at optimized dilutions overnight at 4 °C. The next day, coverslips were washed with PBS four times and incubated with the secondary antibody combination at room temperature for 1 h. For triple fluorescence staining, three primary antibodies raised in different species were used, followed by compatible secondary antibodies, conjugated with fluorophores: Alexa Fluor 488, 555, or 647. Negative control-staining was done using secondary antibodies only. After secondary antibody incubation, coverslips were washed five times and counterstained with antifade Mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H1200). Images of stained cells were then acquired by wide-field microscopy.
Cells seeded in 8-well µ-Slides (Ibidi, 80826) were used to estimate the correlation between FP-fusion and total-protein levels. Imaging of NanogKATUSHKA and Oct4VENUS FP-fusions in live cells was first done followed by in situ immunostaining of fixed cells. Exposure time used for immune-staining yielded no fluorescence protein detection, ensuring no interference from FP-fusion signal during the imaging of immuno-stained samples. Spatial shifts in image x, y between DAPI images from staining and live-cell imaging of corresponding NanogKATUSHKA or Oct4VENUS signals were realigned by manual correction using Photoshop software.
The following antibodies were used: goat anti-Oct-3/4 (Santa Cruz, sc-8628), rabbit anti-Oct3/4 (Abcam, ab19857), rabbit anti-Nanog (Abcam ab80892), mouse anti-Nanog (BD Pharmingen, 560259), mouse anti-Sox2 (Abcam, ab79351), mouse anti-Esrrb (R&D systems, PPH6705-00), mouse anti-Klf4 (Abcam, ab75486), rabbit anti-Tbx3 (gift from Prof. Hitoshi Niwa), mouse anti-Oct6 (Merck Millipore, MABN738), goat anti-Otx2 (R&D systems, AF1979), rabbit anti-pErk1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling, 9101s), Stat3 (Cell Signaling, 12640S), pStat3(Tyr705) (Cell Signaling, 9145S), and goat anti-T (1/200, R&D, AF2085). Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated donkey anti-mouse (Invitrogen, A-21202), donkey anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, A21206), Alexa Fluor 555–conjugated donkey anti-mouse (Invitrogen, A31570), donkey anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, A31572); Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated donkey anti-mouse (Invitrogen, A31571), donkey anti-mouse (Invitrogen, A-21447) were used as secondary antibodies.
The following filters sets were used: Filter Set 38 HE (Zeiss, 489038–9901-000) for the 488-nm channel, mCherry hardcoated (HC) Filterset (AHF, F36-508) for the 555-nm channel, Cy5 ET Filterset (AHF, F46-006) for the 647-nm channel, and Filter Set 49 (Zeiss, 488049–9901-000) for the DAPI channel.
Immunofluorescence Quantification.
Staining images were firstly background corrected with the BaSiC (57) package for quantitative analyses. Nuclei areas were determined and segmented according to DAPI-staining by a custom-made Fiji script. For pErk1/2-staining analysis, manual segmentation was used to determine cytoplasmic areas for quantification (SI Appendix, Fig. 4L). The intensity of fluorescence signals within segmented areas for individual cells were quantified using the program Fiji. Data processing and visualization of staining quantifications were done with RStudio (R version 3.6) and the ggplot2 package. Cells within a range of 40 to 650 px in nuclear area were analyzed to reduce segmentation artifacts. The original quantified intensities were transformed by Log10 function for final plotting.
Time-Lapse Imaging.
In total, 2,000 ESCs from Scr or shM3 conditions were seeded in one well of 96-well µ-plates (Catalog no. 89626, Ibidi) coated with Recombinant Human E-Cadherin (50 µg/mL −1, Primorigen, S2071-500UG). After seeding, plates were leveled on the microscope stage with 5% CO2 using a self-developed continuous gas delivery lid system and cultured at 37 °C. Imaging was initiated as soon as position grids were established in each well. Imaging was conducted on previously mentioned wide-field microscope (Zeiss), with a pE-4000 CoolLED light engine, Micro-Manager Version 2.0 beta control software, Hamamatsu camera, and a 10× FLUAR objective (Zeiss). Images were acquired on live cells at 10 ms in bright-field and 250 ms for the VENUS channel using a yellow fluorescence protein (YFP) Filter Set (AHF, F46-003), 250 ms for the KATUSHKA channel using an mCherry HC Filter Set (AHF, F36-508), and 50 ms for the nuclear marker iRFP channel using a customized iRFP filter (AHF). Continuous time-lapse imaging of mESCs was conducted for a minimum of 4 d. Channels were imaged continuously at 30-min intervals per position. All experiments were performed over three independent experimental repeats.
Single-Cell Tracking.
Single-cell tracking was performed as previously described (11). Briefly, tracking was done by using “the tracking tool” (TTT) program (37) on a desktop computer with 32 GB of random access memory (RAM), Quad-core central processing unit (CPU), and Windows 64-bit operating systems. Individual cells from a selected colony were identified and tracked through manually evaluating every time point of iRFP channel in a time-lapse movie. All relevant properties and behavior (division, death, and migration) of cells of interest were marked, stored, and displayed in pedigrees. All cell tracking was done manually; only cells with unequivocal identity that could clearly be identified when evaluating the video were used for analysis and all cells with questionable identity were excluded from analyses. “the tracking tool”
Background Correction and Quantification in Time-Lapse Movies.
Fluorescence image normalization was done as previously described (57). Briefly, after subtracting the estimated time-dependent background and correcting uneven illumination, normalized images were used for fluorescence-intensity quantification of tracked single cells. The software package QTFy (37) was used to semiautomatically quantify the nuclear signal of tracked cells, resulting in normalized intensity time traces. Nuclei were first automatically segmented based on the nucmem-iRFP signal and further corrected manually by referring to multichannel images. Oct4VENUS or NanogKATUSHKA signals were then quantified electronically from nuclear segmentation.
Cell Cycle–Corrected Protein Distribution.
To compensate for cell cycle–dependent fluctuations in signal intensity, cell cycle–corrected values were used for distributions and cell-state transition analyses. To this end, only the initial NanogKATUSHKA or Oct4VENUS intensities were considered (that is, median of first three time points) for each single cell. For heat-tree visualization in Fig. 2H, the absolute Oct4VENUS or NanogKATUSHKA intensities in single-cell trajectories were cell cycle corrected by nuclear volume, as previously shown (11). The resulting intensity concentrations over the entire cell lifetime were shown in heat trees.
Negative Gate in Time-Lapse Movies.
For Nanog expression, an intensity of Log10 1.4 a.u. (arbitrary units) nicely separated the bimodal NanogKATUSHKA intensity distribution in all three Mettl3 KD experiments. For Oct4 expression, the negative gate was set to Log10 1.7 with ∼5% of Oct4VENUS-negative cells being present across all three independent experiments, reflecting FACS analyses. For heat-tree visualization in (Fig. 2H), cells visually negative in time lapse throughout their lifetimes were quantified to determine the electronic negative gate threshold for NanogKATUSHKA and/or Oct4VNEUS intensity concentrations.
KEGG Enrichment Analysis.
Mettl3 and Mettl14 target gene list from the SI Appendix, Table 1 in Wang’s publication (27) were used for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The KEGG enrichment analysis was done by RStudio (R version 3.6) and the cluster-Profiler package (58). Top 30 enriched pathways were shown in a dot plot in SI Appendix, Fig. 3A.
Statistics and Reproducibility.
At least three independent experiments were done for each assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. Two-tailed Student’s t tests assuming unequal variances were performed to assess the statistical significance of differences between groups. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to assess correlation. Statistical significance (P) was assessed by a two-tailed t test of r = 0. Immunoblots shown are the representative images of at least three independent experiments. For box plots, the center line represents the median, the box limits show the upper and lower quartiles, whiskers represent 1.5 times the interquartile range, and outliers are represented as individual data points.
Data Availability
The following is contained in SI Appendix, Figs. 1–6. An immunoreagent list is supplied in SI Appendix, Table 1. Statistics source data for Figs. 1–6 and SI Appendix, Figs. 1–6 is provided in SI Appendix, Table 2. Unprocessed immunoblots and Southern blotting images are provided in SI Appendix, Fig. 7. Detailed methodology for viral transduction of ESC and FS cell lines, siRNA transfections and qRT-PCR are provided in the SI Appendix. Source data for quantitative imaging analyses is provided in Dataset 1. Due to size restrictions, quantitative live-cell imaging raw data pertaining to Fig. 2 C–G and SI Appendix, Fig. 2 J–L are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Acknowledgments
We extend gratitude to Professor Howard Chang (Stanford University) for providing us with Mettl3 KO mESCs for this study and Professor Hitoshi Niwa (Kumamoto University) for the anti-mouse Tbx3 antibody. We kindly thank the Norwegian Helse Sør-Øst funding agency, Project No. 2016053, and the Norwegian Research Council funding agency, Project Number No. 247656, for funding this research.
Supporting Information
Appendix 01 (PDF)
- Download
- 2.75 MB
Dataset_S01 (XLSX)
- Download
- 33.49 MB
References
1
H. Niwa, J. Miyazaki, A. G. Smith, Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat. Genet. 24, 372–376 (2000).
2
Y.-H. Loh et al., The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006).
3
J. Kim, J. Chu, X. Shen, J. Wang, S. H. Orkin, An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 132, 1049–1061 (2008).
4
I. Chambers, S. R. Tomlinson, The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency. Development 136, 2311–2322 (2009).
5
R. Lu et al., Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 462, 358–362 (2009).
6
J. Silva et al., Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722–737 (2009).
7
R. A. Young, Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144, 940–954 (2011).
8
A. G. Smith et al., Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336, 688–690 (1988).
9
R. L. Williams et al., Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 336, 684–687 (1988).
10
I. Chambers et al., Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230–1234 (2007).
11
A. Filipczyk et al., Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1235–1246 (2015).
12
A. Filipczyk et al., Biallelic expression of nanog protein in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 13, 12–13 (2013).
13
H. Niwa, K. Ogawa, D. Shimosato, K. Adachi, A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 460, 118–122 (2009).
14
Q. L. Ying, J. Nichols, I. Chambers, A. Smith, BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115, 281–292 (2003).
15
Q.-L. Ying et al., The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519–523 (2008).
16
T. Boroviak, R. Loos, P. Bertone, A. Smith, J. Nichols, The ability of inner-cell-mass cells to self-renew as embryonic stem cells is acquired following epiblast specification. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 516–528 (2014).
17
T. Kalkan, A. Smith, Mapping the route from naive pluripotency to lineage specification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369, 20130540 (2014).
18
A. Smith, Formative pluripotency: The executive phase in a developmental continuum. Development 144, 365–373 (2017).
19
K. Hayashi, H. Ohta, K. Kurimoto, S. Aramaki, M. Saitou, Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell 146, 519–532 (2011).
20
M. Kinoshita et al., Capture of mouse and human stem cells with features of formative pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 28, 453–471.e8 (2021).
21
I. G. Brons et al., Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191–195 (2007).
22
Y. Kojima et al., The transcriptional and functional properties of mouse epiblast stem cells resemble the anterior primitive streak. Cell Stem Cell 14, 107–120 (2014).
23
A. Tsakiridis et al., Distinct Wnt-driven primitive streak-like populations reflect in vivo lineage precursors. Development 141, 1209–1221 (2014).
24
M. Frye, B. T. Harada, M. Behm, C. He, RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science (80-.) 361, 1346–1349 (2018).
25
I. A. Roundtree, M. E. Evans, T. Pan, C. He, Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell 169, 1187–1200 (2017).
26
B. S. Zhao, I. A. Roundtree, C. He, Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 31–42 (2017).
27
Y. Wang et al., N6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 191–198 (2014).
28
P. J. Batista et al., m(6)A RNA modification controls cell fate transition in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 15, 707–719 (2014).
29
S. Geula et al., Stem cells. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation. Science 347, 1002–1006 (2015).
30
J. Liu et al., A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 93–95 (2014).
31
X.-L. Ping et al., Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 24, 177–189 (2014).
32
G. Jia et al., N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 885–887 (2011).
33
G. Zheng et al., ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell 49, 18–29 (2013).
34
B. S. Zhao, C. He, Fate by RNA methylation: m6A steers stem cell pluripotency. Genome Biol. 16, 43 (2015).
35
J. Wen et al., Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m6A methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol. Cell 69, 1028–1038.e6 (2018).
36
A. Klungland, J. A. Dahl, G. Greggains, P. Fedorcsak, A. Filipczyk, Reversible RNA modifications in meiosis and pluripotency. Nat. Methods 14, 18–22 (2016).
37
O. Hilsenbeck et al., Software tools for single-cell tracking and quantification of cellular and molecular properties. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 703–706 (2016).
38
H. Chen et al., Erk signaling is indispensable for genomic stability and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E5936–E5943 (2015).
39
A. Molotkov, P. Mazot, J. R. Brewer, R. M. Cinalli, P. Soriano, Distinct requirements for FGFR1 and FGFR2 in primitive endoderm development and exit from pluripotency. Dev. Cell 41, 511–526.e4 (2017).
40
M. Kang, V. Garg, A.-K. Hadjantonakis, Lineage establishment and progression within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst requires FGFR1 and FGFR2. Dev. Cell 41, 496–510.e5 (2017).
41
F. Tang et al., Deterministic and stochastic allele specific gene expression in single mouse blastomeres. PLoS One 6, e21208 (2011).
42
M. Iwafuchi-Doi et al., Transcriptional regulatory networks in epiblast cells and during anterior neural plate development as modeled in epiblast stem cells. Development 139, 3926–3937 (2012).
43
D. Acampora, L. G. Di Giovannantonio, A. Simeone, Otx2 is an intrinsic determinant of the embryonic stem cell state and is required for transition to a stable epiblast stem cell condition. Development 140, 43–55 (2013).
44
C. Buecker et al., Reorganization of enhancer patterns in transition from naive to primed pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 14, 838–853 (2014).
45
S.-H. H. Yang et al., Otx2 and Oct4 drive early enhancer activation during embryonic stem cell transition from naive pluripotency. Cell Rep. 7, 1968–1981 (2014).
46
D. Acampora et al., Functional antagonism between OTX2 and NANOG specifies a spectrum of heterogeneous identities in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 9, 1642–1659 (2017).
47
S.-J. Dunn, G. Martello, B. Yordanov, S. Emmott, A. G. Smith, Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency. Science 344, 1156–1160 (2014).
48
S. Ohtsuka, Y. Nakai-Futatsugi, H. Niwa, LIF signal in mouse embryonic stem cells. JAK-STAT 4, e1086520 (2015).
49
S.-N. Hassani, M. Totonchi, H. Gourabi, H. R. Schöler, H. Baharvand, Signaling roadmap modulating naive and primed pluripotency. Stem Cells Dev. 23, 193–208 (2014).
50
D. ten Berge et al., Embryonic stem cells require Wnt proteins to prevent differentiation to epiblast stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1070–1075 (2011).
51
D. Meng, A. R. Frank, J. L. Jewell, mTOR signaling in stem and progenitor cells. Development 145, dev152595 (2018).
52
R. A. Saxton, D. M. Sabatini, mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 168, 960–976 (2017).
53
J. Liu et al., m6A mRNA methylation regulates AKT activity to promote the proliferation and tumorigenicity of endometrial cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1074–1083 (2018).
54
A. Bertero et al., The SMAD2/3 interactome reveals that TGFβ controls m6A mRNA methylation in pluripotency. Nature 555, 256–259 (2018).
55
B. Greber et al., Conserved and divergent roles of FGF signaling in mouse epiblast stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 215–226 (2010).
56
K. Anastassiadis, F. Schnütgen, H. von Melchner, A. F. Stewart, Gene targeting and site-specific recombination in mouse ES cells. Methods Enzymol. 533, 133–155 (2013).
57
T. Peng et al., A BaSiC tool for background and shading correction of optical microscopy images. Nat. Commun. 8, 14836 (2017).
58
G. Yu, L. G. Wang, Y. Han, Q. Y. He, clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).
Data Availability
The following is contained in SI Appendix, Figs. 1–6. An immunoreagent list is supplied in SI Appendix, Table 1. Statistics source data for Figs. 1–6 and SI Appendix, Figs. 1–6 is provided in SI Appendix, Table 2. Unprocessed immunoblots and Southern blotting images are provided in SI Appendix, Fig. 7. Detailed methodology for viral transduction of ESC and FS cell lines, siRNA transfections and qRT-PCR are provided in the SI Appendix. Source data for quantitative imaging analyses is provided in Dataset 1. Due to size restrictions, quantitative live-cell imaging raw data pertaining to Fig. 2 C–G and SI Appendix, Fig. 2 J–L are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Submission history
Received: March 31, 2021
Accepted: November 2, 2021
Published online: December 17, 2021
Published in issue: December 21, 2021
Change history
March 23, 2022: Due to a production error, Figures 4 and 6 appeared incorrectly. These figures have been updated. A typographical error in the article text has also been corrected. Previous version (December 17, 2021)
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We extend gratitude to Professor Howard Chang (Stanford University) for providing us with Mettl3 KO mESCs for this study and Professor Hitoshi Niwa (Kumamoto University) for the anti-mouse Tbx3 antibody. We kindly thank the Norwegian Helse Sør-Øst funding agency, Project No. 2016053, and the Norwegian Research Council funding agency, Project Number No. 247656, for funding this research.
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.