Human sperm TMEM95 binds eggs and facilitates membrane fusion
Edited by Mariana Wolfner, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; received May 11, 2022; accepted August 1, 2022
Significance
Membrane fusion of sperm and eggs is pivotal in sexual reproduction. Tmem95 knockout mice produce sperm that can bind to, but do not fuse with, eggs. How TMEM95 facilitates membrane fusion was unknown. We show here that human TMEM95 binds eggs. Our crystal structure of TMEM95 suggests a region where this binding may occur. We develop monoclonal antibodies against TMEM95 that impair sperm-egg fusion but do not block sperm-egg binding. Thus, we propose that there is a receptor-mediated interaction of sperm TMEM95 with eggs, and that this interaction may have a direct role in membrane fusion. Our work suggests avenues for the identification of the TMEM95 egg receptor and the development of infertility treatments and contraceptives for humans.
Abstract
Tmem95 encodes a sperm acrosomal membrane protein, whose knockout has a male-specific sterility phenotype in mice. Tmem95 knockout murine sperm can bind to, but do not fuse with, eggs. How TMEM95 plays a role in membrane fusion of sperm and eggs has remained elusive. Here, we utilize a sperm penetration assay as a model system to investigate the function of human TMEM95. We show that human TMEM95 binds to hamster egg membranes, providing evidence for a TMEM95 receptor on eggs. Using X-ray crystallography, we reveal an evolutionarily conserved, positively charged region of TMEM95 as a putative receptor-binding surface. Amino acid substitutions within this region of TMEM95 ablate egg-binding activity. We identify monoclonal antibodies against TMEM95 that reduce the number of human sperm fused with hamster eggs in sperm penetration assays. Strikingly, these antibodies do not block binding of sperm to eggs. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence for a specific, receptor-mediated interaction of sperm TMEM95 with eggs and suggest that this interaction may have a role in facilitating membrane fusion during fertilization.
Sign up for PNAS alerts.
Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited.
Fertilization is a central event of sexual reproduction, but how sperm and eggs bind to and fuse with one another has been largely undefined. Sperm IZUMO1 (1) and egg JUNO (2) mediate the only known cell-surface interaction between mammalian gametes. Recent reports suggested that TMEM95 (encoding transmembrane protein 95) mutant cattle (3, 4) and Tmem95 mutant mice (5) exhibit impaired male fertility, and their sperm have defects in fusion with eggs; Tmem95 knockout mice show male-specific sterility (6, 7). Tmem95 knockout murine sperm, which have normal expression and localization of IZUMO1, can bind to, but do not fuse with, eggs (6, 7). Tmem95 encodes a sperm acrosomal membrane protein, which relocalizes to the equatorial segment of the sperm head (3, 7) where membrane fusion with the egg takes place (8, 9). These observations shed light on a potential role of TMEM95 in sperm-egg membrane fusion.
Humans also express TMEM95 transcripts (10). In this study, we utilized the sperm penetration assay (11), a clinical laboratory test that evaluates fusion of human sperm with eggs from Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), as a model system. TMEM95 is a type I single-pass transmembrane protein (3, 6, 7). Motivated by a hypothesis that the ectodomain of TMEM95 binds to eggs through a specific, membrane-bound receptor on eggs, we found that a bivalent TMEM95 ectodomain protein binds hamster eggs, providing direct evidence for a TMEM95 receptor on eggs. The 1.5 Å-resolution X-ray crystal structure of TMEM95 we describe here reveals an evolutionarily conserved region of the protein with a positively charged surface. Amino acid substitutions within this region of TMEM95 ablate egg binding. We speculate that this region serves as an egg-receptor binding site for TMEM95.
We also found that human TMEM95 plays a role in membrane fusion. After generating two monoclonal antibodies that bind to different epitopes of TMEM95, we observed that neither antibody blocks binding of human sperm to hamster eggs, but both could inhibit membrane fusion of sperm with eggs. Taken together, our results provide evidence for a specific, receptor-mediated interaction of human sperm TMEM95 with eggs and inform strategies for the identification of this receptor. We propose that the interaction of TMEM95 with eggs facilitates membrane fusion of human sperm and eggs.
Results
A Bivalent TMEM95 Protein Binds Hamster Eggs.
We hypothesized that the ectodomain of TMEM95 mediates a cell-surface interaction of sperm with eggs. To monitor the interaction between TMEM95 and eggs, we designed and produced TMEM95-Fc, a fusion protein of the ectodomain of human TMEM95 and the fragment crystallizable region of human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). TMEM95-Fc contains two copies of the TMEM95 ectodomain (Fig. 1B) and the Fc confers increased avidity for binding over monomeric TMEM95. Given that human sperm can fuse with eggs from Syrian golden hamsters (11, 12), we incubated the Fc or TMEM95-Fc proteins with hamster eggs, whose surrounding zona pellucida and cumulus cells were removed. Using a fluorescently labeled anti-Fc antibody, we detected binding to the hamster egg surface only with TMEM95-Fc, not Fc alone (Fig. 1 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S1F). We did not observe binding of TMEM95-Fc to murine eggs (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). To confirm that our labeling approach can also detect known protein-protein interactions of sperm with eggs, we next surveyed IZUMO1-Fc on hamster eggs (13), a fusion protein of human sperm IZUMO1 (1) ectodomain with Fc. While IZUMO1-Fc binds eggs, the IZUMO1W148A-Fc variant does not (Fig. 1 C and D). The substitution of W148A ablates the interaction of IZUMO1 with JUNO (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 C–I) (14, 15), the egg receptor of IZUMO1 (2). Our results show that TMEM95 binds egg plasma membranes and suggest the presence of a receptor for TMEM95 on eggs.
Fig. 1.
The Structure of TMEM95 Is Homologous to that of the N Terminus of IZUMO1.
To understand how TMEM95 binds eggs, we determined a crystal structure of the TMEM95 ectodomain to 1.5 Å resolution using multiwavelength anomalous X-ray diffraction (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S2A and Table S1) (16). TMEM95 adopts an elongated rod shape, comprised of an N-terminal α-helical bundle (residues 17 to 110) and a C-terminal β-hairpin region (residues 111 to 135) (Fig. 2C). TMEM95 shows homology to the N terminus of IZUMO1 (14, 15) with a Cα root-mean-square deviation of 7.2 Å and to the N terminus of SPACA6 (17). Unlike IZUMO1 and SPACA6, TMEM95 does not have an immunoglobulin-like domain at the C terminus (Fig. 2D). The helical bundle of TMEM95 has three helices (α1, α3, and α4) and a coil (loop 2) that are arranged in an anti-parallel manner (α1-loop 2 and α3-α4). TMEM95 has three unique disulfide bonds: C35-C45 between α1 and loop 2 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B), and C105-C134 and C109-C128 adjacent to the β-hairpin (Fig. 2 B–D).
Fig. 2.
JUNO does not act as an egg receptor for TMEM95 (6, 7). A conserved N-linked glycan in the β-hairpin of TMEM95 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 E and J) could cause a clash if TMEM95 were to make a contact similar to that of IZUMO1 with JUNO (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 C and D). However, even if this glycan is removed by the treatment with N-glycosidase PNGaseF, TMEM95-Fc binds egg plasma membranes but does not bind JUNO (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 F–I).
A Conserved Surface of TMEM95 Is a Putative Receptor-Binding Site.
To gain further insights into the TMEM95 interaction with eggs, we analyzed the protein sequences of TMEM95 orthologs and mapped the degree of conservation for each amino acid onto the structure of TMEM95. We found that the area surrounding the N-glycan is variable (Fig. 3A), while the opposite side harbors a conserved (Fig. 3B), positively charged surface (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
To examine whether the conserved, charged surface is critical for binding of TMEM95 to eggs, we produced TMEM95-Fc proteins that carry amino acid substitutions of arginine residues (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A and B). These TMEM95 variants have melting temperatures comparable to that of the wild-type TMEM95-Fc protein (SI Appendix, Fig. S3C). When incubated with hamster eggs, the R70A, R73A, and R70A R73A TMEM95-Fc variants showed drastically reduced egg-binding activities compared to the wild-type (Fig. 3 E–H and SI Appendix, Fig. S3D). Our data suggest that the identified evolutionarily conserved, positively charged surface of TMEM95 may function as a receptor-binding site.
Monoclonal Antibodies Detect TMEM95 in Human Sperm.
To generate reagents to investigate the functions of TMEM95 in human sperm, we immunized mice with the TMEM95 ectodomain (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A–C) and generated hybridoma cell lines that produce TMEM95 ectodomain-specific monoclonal antibodies, 3A01 and 6B08 (SI Appendix, Table S2). We used biolayer interferometry to assess the binding of the antibodies to TMEM95 (Fig. 4A) and found that 3A01 and 6B08 bind TMEM95 via two noncompeting epitopes (Fig. 4B) with association constants of 1.4 nM and 1.3 nM, respectively (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 D and E). The binding of either 3A01 or 6B08 to TMEM95-Fc does not inhibit its binding to the eggs (SI Appendix, Fig. S4G). 3A01 and 6B08 bind similarly to TMEM95-Fc and the R70A and R73A TMEM95-Fc variants (SI Appendix, Fig. S4H). These results suggest that the 3A01 and 6B08 antibodies against TMEM95 do not compete for binding of TMEM95 with its egg receptor.
Fig. 4.
We next performed Western blotting using the TMEM95 antibodies to probe whole cell lysates of human sperm and each could detect a band of ∼20 kDa (SI Appendix, Fig. S4F), the expected molecular weight of TMEM95. To investigate whether TMEM95 is N-linked glycosylated, we treated the human sperm lysate with PNGaseF and observed a shift in size to ∼17.5 kDa (Fig. 4C), consistent with the loss of one glycan. Our results show that TMEM95 is expressed and N-linked glycosylated in human sperm.
Using a similar approach for IZUMO1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 A–C), we generated hybridoma cell lines that produce IZUMO1-specific monoclonal antibodies, 4E04 and 6F02 (Fig. 4D and SI Appendix, Table S2). These antibodies both bind IZUMO1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 F and J) via two noncompeting epitopes (Fig. 4E and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 D and E). Compared to 4E04-bound IZUMO1-Fc, 6F02-bound IZUMO1-Fc blocks binding of IZUMO1-Fc to eggs (SI Appendix, Fig. S5G) and JUNO (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 H and I). These results suggest that 4E04 and 6F02 bind to different epitopes of IZUMO1, and that the 6F02 epitope overlaps with the IZUMO1-binding site for JUNO.
TMEM95 Antibodies Impair Fusion of Human Sperm to Hamster Eggs.
To examine whether human TMEM95 plays a role in membrane fusion, we produced the fragments antigen-binding (Fab) of the TMEM95 and IZUMO1 antibodies and tested these in a sperm penetration assay. These Fab fragments bind antigens at nanomolar affinities (SI Appendix, Figs. S4E and S5E) and may have less steric effects in membrane fusion than their larger IgG counterparts. We inseminated hamster eggs with human sperm preincubated with the TMEM95 antibody Fab, 3A01 (Fig. 5C) or 6B08 (Fig. 5D). We used an untreated group as a negative control (Fig. 5A) and IZUMO1 antibody Fab 6F02-treatment as a positive control (Fig. 5B). Based on the numbers of bound (Fig. 5E) and fused (Fig. 5F) sperm per egg, we found that the TMEM95 antibody Fab fragments do not block binding of sperm to eggs (Fig. 5E).
Fig. 5.
However, the averaged numbers of fused sperm per egg significantly decreased from 9.1 ± 0.7 (mean ± SEM) in the untreated group to 4.1 ± 0.9 (P = 0.0002) and 3.4 ± 0.6 (P < 0.0001) in the TMEM95 Fab 3A01 and 6B08 groups, respectively (Fig. 5F and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 A–D). Similarly, we observed that the TMEM95 antibody IgGs do not block sperm-egg binding (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 E–G), but they decrease the average numbers of fused sperm per egg when compared with a control group treated with preimmune IgG (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 H–L). Therefore, the two noncompeting TMEM95 monoclonal antibodies do not block sperm-egg binding but impair sperm-egg fusion, suggesting that TMEM95 plays a role in sperm-egg membrane fusion.
Discussion
Evidence for a Receptor for TMEM95 on Eggs.
Our results provide strong evidence for the existence of a membrane-bound receptor for sperm TMEM95 on eggs. Although the receptor has yet to be identified, our structural and site-directed mutagenesis studies identify a putative receptor-binding site on TMEM95. This region has a solvent-accessible surface area of ∼1,200 Å2, comparable to protein surfaces that mediate many protein-protein interactions (18, 19). We envision that the TMEM95 receptor is a membrane protein with a negatively charged region on its ectodomain surface. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out potential nonprotein receptor candidates with electrostatic negative properties on the egg surface, such as phospholipids and glycans.
The bivalent TMEM95-Fc protein introduced here may be a useful reagent to facilitate the identification of the egg receptor of TMEM95. As cell-surface interactions between membrane-bound proteins are often transient and dynamic (2, 20), the avidity of a bivalent protein could serve to stabilize the potentially weak interaction of TMEM95 with its receptor. TMEM95-Fc could therefore be used as a bait for the egg receptor, for example, for coimmunoprecipitation of mammalian eggs [e.g., see (21)], or for screening cultured cells expressing an egg cDNA library [e.g., see (2)].
Potential Roles of TMEM95 in Membrane Fusion.
The TMEM95 antibodies used in this study do not ablate binding of TMEM95 to hamster eggs. How would the nonblocking antibodies of TMEM95 inhibit sperm-egg fusion? One possibility is that TMEM95 undergoes structural changes that are important for membrane fusion. Should sperm-egg fusion be accompanied by changes of TMEM95 in protein conformation or oligomeric state, the antibodies raised here against a defined conformation of TMEM95 may trap TMEM95 in a prefusion, monomeric state. Notably, early studies have suggested essential structural changes for IZUMO1 (e.g., rearrangement of disulfides, protein dimerization) during sperm-egg membrane fusion (14, 22, 23).
Alternatively, or in addition, TMEM95 may assemble into a complex with other sperm proteins, such as a membrane fusogen. Antibody binding to TMEM95 could affect these events and explain the inhibitory results. Additionally, these antibodies might create steric hinderance which could interfere with membrane fusion (note, however, that an anti-IZUMO1 IgG, Mab125, does not block sperm-egg fusion, (24)).
Taken together, we conceptualize that sperm-egg membrane fusion involves pairwise cell surface interactions. Sperm IZUMO1 binds egg JUNO, which mediates gamete adhesion, and a receptor-mediated interaction of sperm TMEM95 to the egg takes place; membrane fusion occurs thereafter. We anticipate additional analogous, yet to be identified, interactions between sperm proteins (6, 25–28) and their specific egg receptors (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
In summary, our results suggest that human sperm TMEM95 likely plays a direct role in membrane fusion with eggs. Future work is needed to rule out indirect effects of TMEM95 antibodies that inhibit fusion while not blocking sperm-egg binding. More broadly, our work takes steps toward fully understanding the molecular interactions of the fertilization complex and has implications for the development of infertility treatments and contraceptives.
Materials and Methods
Additional information is provided in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy of Hamster Eggs.
Sexually mature female Syrian golden hamsters (Japan SLC Inc.) (approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University #28-4-2) were superovulated by peritoneal injection of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin and human coagulating gland (20 units for each; ASKA Pharmaceutical). Cumulus-oocyte complexes were extracted from the oviductal ampulla and treated with 1 mg/mL collagenase to remove the cumulus cells and zona pellucida, which yields zona-free eggs. These zona-free eggs were incubated with 200 nM Fc-fusion proteins in Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium (11) for 1 h and then stained with goat anti-human IgG Fc antibody DyLight 488 (Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1:50 for 1 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The eggs were imaged under a Keyence BZ-X810 microscope.
Protein Crystallization of TMEM95.
Native TMEM95 proteins were crystallized at room temperature in a sitting-drop vapor diffusion system. Three hundred fifty nanoliters of 6.8 mg/mL protein was mixed with 350 nL of a reservoir solution of 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes pH 7.3, 30 mM CaCl2, 2% (wt/vol) PPG-P400, and 22% (wt/vol) PEG 3,350, over 80 μL of reservoir solution. Native crystals were supplemented with 20% (wt/vol) PEG 400 before cryo-cooling in liquid nitrogen. For multiwavelength anomalous diffraction, crystals were grown in 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes pH 7.3, 10 mM CaCl2, 2% (wt/vol) PPG-P400, and 18% (wt/vol) PEG 3,350, and were transferred to a solution supplemented with 500 mM SmCl3 and incubated for ∼5 min. The Sm3+-bound crystals were washed in a SmCl3-free reservoir solution, cryo-protected with 20% PEG 400, and cooled in liquid nitrogen.
Sperm Penetration Assay.
Sperm penetration assays were performed as previously described (11) with minor changes. Briefly, human semen from healthy donors, who had informed consent, was liquefied for 30 min at room temperature. The sperm were purified by discontinuous Percoll gradients (29) and incubated in Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium containing 2.5 μM calcium ionophore for 3 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The sperm were washed in fresh Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium and treated with monoclonal antibodies at 40 μg/mL for 1 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Motile sperm were manually counted in a hemocytometer under an inverted microscope. Zona-free hamster eggs were inseminated in 100 μL medium drops by the antibody-treated sperm at a density of 3 × 106 motile sperm per milliliter for 3 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The eggs were washed in fresh medium, gently flattened by coverslips, and examined under a phase-contrast microscope.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
The coordinate and structure factor of human sperm TMEM95 ectodomain has been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank under PDB ID code 7UX0 (34). The structure is available immediately at https://peterkimlab.stanford.edu (35).
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the P.S.K., M.I., and P.V.L. laboratories, Dr. Jonathan Z. Long, and Dr. Masaru Okabe for discussion, Dr. Mirella Bucci for comments on the manuscript, Gita Abhiraman and the laboratory of Dr. K. Christopher Garcia for protocols of baculovirus protein production, Dr. Daniel Fernandez of the Sarafan ChEM-H Macromolecular Structure Knowledge Center, and Silvia Russi of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) beam line 12-2 for X-ray crystallographic data collection. Use of the SSRL, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE, Office of Biological and Environmental Research and by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant P30GM133894. We are grateful to the late Dr. Stuart Moss of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). This work was supported by a NIH NICHD grant K99HD104924 (S.T.), Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation DRG-2301-17 (S.T.), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science grants JP22K15103 (Y.L.), JP19H05750 (M.I.), and JP21H05033 (M.I.), a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship DGE1752814 and DGE2146752 (W.M.S.), a Pew Biomedical Scholars Award (P.V.L.), the Global Consortium for Reproductive Longevity and Equality at the Buck Institute by the Bia-Echo Foundation (P.V.L.), the Virginia & D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research (P.S.K.), and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub (P.S.K.).
Supporting Information
Appendix 01 (PDF)
- Download
- 6.04 MB
References
1
N. Inoue, M. Ikawa, A. Isotani, M. Okabe, The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs. Nature 434, 234–238 (2005).
2
E. Bianchi, B. Doe, D. Goulding, G. J. Wright, Juno is the egg Izumo receptor and is essential for mammalian fertilization. Nature 508, 483–487 (2014).
3
H. Pausch et al., A nonsense mutation in TMEM95 encoding a nondescript transmembrane protein causes idiopathic male subfertility in cattle. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004044 (2014).
4
S. Zhang et al., Detection of bovine TMEM95 p.Cys161X mutation in 13 Chinese indigenous cattle breeds. Animals (Basel) 9, 444 (2019).
5
N. Inoue, I. Wada, Deletion of the initial methionine codon of the Tmem95 gene causes subfertility, but not complete infertility, in male mice. Biol. Reprod. 106, 378–381 (2022).
6
T. Noda et al., Sperm proteins SOF1, TMEM95, and SPACA6 are required for sperm-oocyte fusion in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 11493–11502 (2020).
7
I. Lamas-Toranzo et al., TMEM95 is a sperm membrane protein essential for mammalian fertilization. eLife 9, e53913 (2020).
8
J. M. Bedford, H. D. Moore, L. E. Franklin, Significance of the equatorial segment of the acrosome of the spermatozoon in eutherian mammals. Exp. Cell Res. 119, 119–126 (1979).
9
R. Yanagimachi, “Mammalian fertilization” in The Physiology of Reproduction, E. Knobil, J. Neill, Eds. (Raven Press, New York, 1994).
10
M. R. Miller et al., Unconventional endocannabinoid signaling governs sperm activation via the sex hormone progesterone. Science 352, 555–559 (2016).
11
World Health Organization, WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen (World Health Organization, Geneva, ed. 5, 2010), pp. xiv, 271.
12
E. Bianchi, G. J. Wright, Cross-species fertilization: The hamster egg receptor, Juno, binds the human sperm ligand, Izumo1. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140101 (2015).
13
N. Inoue, T. Saito, I. Wada, Unveiling a novel function of CD9 in surface compartmentalization of oocytes. Development 147, dev189985 (2020).
14
H. Aydin, A. Sultana, S. Li, A. Thavalingam, J. E. Lee, Molecular architecture of the human sperm IZUMO1 and egg JUNO fertilization complex. Nature 534, 562–565 (2016).
15
U. Ohto et al., Structure of IZUMO1-JUNO reveals sperm-oocyte recognition during mammalian fertilization. Nature 534, 566–569 (2016).
16
S. Tang et al., Human sperm TMEM95 binds eggs and facilitates membrane fusion. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2022). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.10.495573. Accessed 10 June 2022.
17
T. D. R. Vance et al., SPACA6 structure reveals a conserved superfamily of gamete fusion-associated proteins. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2022). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.23.484325. Accessed 23 March 2022.
18
G. Schreiber, A. E. Keating, Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 50–61 (2011).
19
J. Chen, N. Sawyer, L. Regan, Protein-protein interactions: General trends in the relationship between binding affinity and interfacial buried surface area. Protein Sci. 22, 510–515 (2013).
20
S. Tang, P. S. Kim, A high-affinity human PD-1/PD-L2 complex informs avenues for small-molecule immune checkpoint drug discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 24500–24506 (2019).
21
Y. Qu, D. Lu, H. Jiang, X. Chi, H. Zhang, EZH2 is required for mouse oocyte meiotic maturation by interacting with and stabilizing spindle assembly checkpoint protein BubRI. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7659–7672 (2016).
22
N. Inoue, Y. Hagihara, D. Wright, T. Suzuki, I. Wada, Oocyte-triggered dimerization of sperm IZUMO1 promotes sperm-egg fusion in mice. Nat. Commun. 6, 8858 (2015).
23
N. Inoue, I. Wada, Monitoring dimeric status of IZUMO1 during the acrosome reaction in living spermatozoon. Cell Cycle 17, 1279–1285 (2018).
24
N. Inoue et al., Molecular dissection of IZUMO1, a sperm protein essential for sperm-egg fusion. Development 140, 3221–3229 (2013).
25
S. Barbaux et al., Sperm SPACA6 protein is required for mammalian sperm-egg adhesion/fusion. Sci. Rep. 10, 5335 (2020).
26
N. Inoue, Y. Hagihara, I. Wada, Evolutionarily conserved sperm factors, DCST1 and DCST2, are required for gamete fusion. eLife 10, e66313 (2021).
27
T. Noda et al., Sperm membrane proteins DCST1 and DCST2 are required for sperm-egg interaction in mice and fish. Commun. Biol. 5, 332 (2022).
28
Y. Fujihara et al., Spermatozoa lacking fertilization influencing membrane protein (FIMP) fail to fuse with oocytes in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 9393–9400 (2020).
29
S. L. Cafe, A. L. Anderson, B. Nixon, In vitro induction and detection of acrosomal exocytosis in human spermatozoa. Bio Protoc. 10, e3689 (2020).
30
H. Ashkenazy et al., ConSurf 2016: An improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W50 (2016).
31
F. Le Naour, E. Rubinstein, C. Jasmin, M. Prenant, C. Boucheix, Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287, 319–321 (2000).
32
K. Miyado et al., Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science 287, 321–324 (2000).
33
K. Kaji et al., The gamete fusion process is defective in eggs of Cd9-deficient mice. Nat. Genet. 24, 279–282 (2000).
34
S. Tang, P. S. Kim, Human Sperm TMEM95 Ectodomain. RCSB Protein Data Bank. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=7UX0. Deposited 4 May 2022.
35
P. S. Kim, Human sperm TMEM95 binds eggs and facilitates membrane fusion. The Peter Kim Lab. https://peterkimlab.stanford.edu/publications. Accessed 12 September 2022.
Information & Authors
Information
Published in
Classifications
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
The coordinate and structure factor of human sperm TMEM95 ectodomain has been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank under PDB ID code 7UX0 (34). The structure is available immediately at https://peterkimlab.stanford.edu (35).
Submission history
Received: May 11, 2022
Accepted: August 1, 2022
Published online: September 26, 2022
Published in issue: October 4, 2022
Keywords
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the P.S.K., M.I., and P.V.L. laboratories, Dr. Jonathan Z. Long, and Dr. Masaru Okabe for discussion, Dr. Mirella Bucci for comments on the manuscript, Gita Abhiraman and the laboratory of Dr. K. Christopher Garcia for protocols of baculovirus protein production, Dr. Daniel Fernandez of the Sarafan ChEM-H Macromolecular Structure Knowledge Center, and Silvia Russi of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) beam line 12-2 for X-ray crystallographic data collection. Use of the SSRL, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE, Office of Biological and Environmental Research and by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant P30GM133894. We are grateful to the late Dr. Stuart Moss of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). This work was supported by a NIH NICHD grant K99HD104924 (S.T.), Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation DRG-2301-17 (S.T.), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science grants JP22K15103 (Y.L.), JP19H05750 (M.I.), and JP21H05033 (M.I.), a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship DGE1752814 and DGE2146752 (W.M.S.), a Pew Biomedical Scholars Award (P.V.L.), the Global Consortium for Reproductive Longevity and Equality at the Buck Institute by the Bia-Echo Foundation (P.V.L.), the Virginia & D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research (P.S.K.), and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub (P.S.K.).
Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citation statements
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite this article
119 (40) e2207805119,
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Cited by
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
DOWNLOAD PDFLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginRecommend to a librarian
Recommend PNAS to a LibrarianPurchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.