Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations
- aDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081BT, The Netherlands;
- bDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M1C 1A4;
- cDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000 C, Denmark;
- dDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;
- eSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia;
- fInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom;
- gCenter for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden;
- hHuman Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212;
- iDepartment of Psychology and Education, The Open University, Raanana 4353701, Israel;
- jDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea;
- kCenter for Happiness Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea;
- lFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 92019, New Zealand;
- mSchool of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland;
- nInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom;
- oDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32304;
- pDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany;
- qDepartment of Psychology, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia;
- rDepartment of Psychology, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara 06800, Turkey;
- sEscuela de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, 9170197 Santiago, Chile;
- tDepartment of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 49100-000 Sergipe, Brazil;
- uDepartment of Psychology, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan;
- vInstitute for Educational Research, Belgrade University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
- wSchool of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia;
- xSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903;
- yInstitute of Psychology, Health, and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, United Kingdom;
- zIndian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380015, India;
- aaSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom;
- bbDepartment of Human Biology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138, Wroclaw, Poland;
- ccDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
- ddDepartment of Psychology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 176 71, Athens, Greece;
- eeDepartment of Biology, Trnava University, 918 43 Trnava, Slovakia;
- ffInstitute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia;
- ggTurku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland;
- hhDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland;
- iiFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
- jjDepartment of Interdisciplinary Study of Law, Private Law, and Business Law, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- kkCentre of Behavioural & Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211002, India;
- llFaculty of Philosophy, Belgrade University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Susan T. Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved September 6, 2016 (received for review May 9, 2016)

Significance
Pathogens, and antipathogen behavioral strategies, affect myriad aspects of human behavior. Recent findings suggest that antipathogen strategies relate to political attitudes, with more ideologically conservative individuals reporting more disgust toward pathogen cues, and with higher parasite stress nations being, on average, more conservative. However, no research has yet adjudicated between two theoretical accounts proposed to explain these relationships between pathogens and politics. We find that national parasite stress and individual disgust sensitivity relate more strongly to adherence to traditional norms than they relate to support for barriers between social groups. These results suggest that the relationship between pathogens and politics reflects intragroup motivations more than intergroup motivations.
Abstract
People who are more avoidant of pathogens are more politically conservative, as are nations with greater parasite stress. In the current research, we test two prominent hypotheses that have been proposed as explanations for these relationships. The first, which is an intragroup account, holds that these relationships between pathogens and politics are based on motivations to adhere to local norms, which are sometimes shaped by cultural evolution to have pathogen-neutralizing properties. The second, which is an intergroup account, holds that these same relationships are based on motivations to avoid contact with outgroups, who might pose greater infectious disease threats than ingroup members. Results from a study surveying 11,501 participants across 30 nations are more consistent with the intragroup account than with the intergroup account. National parasite stress relates to traditionalism (an aspect of conservatism especially related to adherence to group norms) but not to social dominance orientation (SDO; an aspect of conservatism especially related to endorsements of intergroup barriers and negativity toward ethnic and racial outgroups). Further, individual differences in pathogen-avoidance motives (i.e., disgust sensitivity) relate more strongly to traditionalism than to SDO within the 30 nations.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: j.m.tybur{at}vu.nl.
Author contributions: J.M.T. and Y.I. designed research; J.M.T., Y.I., L.A., P.B., F.K.B., M.d.B., D.V.B., L.B., I.C., J.A.C., N.S.C., A.C., J.R.C., P.C., V.C.A., D.E.D., A.M.F., D.C.S.F., K.I., I.J., T.J., F.v.L., D.M.G.L., N.P.L., J.C.M., S.M., J.H.P., B.P., M.B.P., D.P., G.P., P.P., M.J.R., L.M.R., B. Sandin, B. Sevi, D.D.S., N.S., S.T., C.W., J.C.Y., and I.Ž. performed research; J.M.T. analyzed data; and J.M.T. and Y.I. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1607398113/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.